S 45 — An act relating to protection from nuisance suits for agricultural activities
Last action — Senate Message: Signed by Governor June 12, 2025
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 04, 2025. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Phil Scott (Republican) on June 13, 2025.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
22 sponsors
22 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (12 R · 10 D) — cross-party backing.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 1 recorded vote so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
151 added · 129 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendment to Bill S.45 establishes that individuals cannot file lawsuits related to nuisance or trespass against agricultural activities unless they first attempt mediation with the operators of those activities. This change emphasizes the importance of resolving disputes amicably and aims to protect the agricultural sector from potential legal challenges, thereby supporting its role in the economy and maintaining essential farmland. This is particularly significant as it helps ensure that agricultural production continues without the threat of frequent litigation, which can impede farming operations.
BILL AS INTRODUCED AND PASSED BY SENATE S.45 Page 1 of 67 S.45 AnIntroduced actby relatingSenators toDouglass, protectionBeck, fromBrennan, nuisanceBrock, suitsChittenden, forClarkson, agriculturalCollamore, activitiesCummings, ItGulick, isHarrison, herebyHart, enactedHeffernan, byLyons, theMajor, GeneralMattos, AssemblyNorris, ofPerchlik, theWatson, StateWeeks, ofWestman, Vermont:White and Williams Referred to Committee on Judiciary Date:
February 4, 2025 Subject:
Court procedure;
agriculture;
nuisance suits;
agricultural activities;
right-to-farm Statement of purpose of bill as introduced:
This bill proposes to amend the protection against nuisance suits for agricultural activities under the Vermont right-to-farm law by providing that an agricultural activity shall not be a nuisance or trespass when the activity complies with generally accepted agricultural practices.
The nuisance and trespass protection for an agricultural activity would not apply whenever a nuisance or trespass violation results from the negligent operation of an agricultural activity or from a violation of the State agricultural water quality requirements.
The bill would also provide that an agricultural activity shall not lose nuisance or trespass protection due to a change of ownership or a cessation of operation of not more than five years;
a change of crops produced;
or a change of a farming method or conversion of a farming practice or agricultural activity to another farming method, practice, BILL AS INTRODUCED AND PASSED BY SENATE S.45 Page 2 of 7 or agricultural activity on a farm.
The act would also provide that a person shall not bring a court action based on a claim of nuisance or trespass arising from an agricultural activity unless the person and the operator of the agricultural activity, at least once, attempt to resolve through mediation the issue or dispute that the person has concerning operation of the agricultural activity.
An act relating to protection from nuisance suits for agricultural activities It is hereby enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Vermont:
and that the encouragement, development, improvement, and BILL AS INTRODUCED AND PASSED BY SENATE S.45 Page 3 of 7 preservation of agriculture will result in a general benefit to the health and welfare of the people of the State.
The General Assembly finds that agricultural activities are potentially subject to lawsuits based on the theory of nuisance, and that these suits encourage and could force the premature removal of the farmlands and other VT LEG #381873 v.1 AS PASSED BY SENATE S.45 Page 2 of 6 farm resources from agricultural use.
BILL AS INTRODUCED AND PASSED BY SENATE S.45 Page 4 of 7 (2)(B) the preparation, tilling, fertilization, planting, protection, irrigation, and harvesting of crops;
§§ 6001; 6001;
§§ 4802. 4802.
VT LEG #381873 v.1 AS PASSED BY SENATE S.45 Page 3 of 6 (2) “Generally accepted agricultural practices” mean:
BILL AS INTRODUCED AND PASSED BY SENATE S.45 Page 5 of 7 (A) it is conducted in conformity with federal, State, and local laws and regulations (including required agricultural practices);
VT LEG #381873 v.1 AS PASSED BY SENATE S.45 Page 4 of 6 (2) The presumption that the agricultural activity does not constitute a nuisance may be rebutted by a showing that the activity has a substantial adverse effect on health, safety, or welfare, or has a noxious and significant interference with the use and enjoyment of the neighboring property No agricultural activity shall be or become a nuisance or trespass when the activity is conducted in accordance with generally accepted agricultural practices.
(c) The nuisance and trespass protection for an agricultural activity provided for under subsection (a) of this section shall not apply whenever a BILL AS INTRODUCED AND PASSED BY SENATE S.45 Page 6 of 7 nuisance or trespass violation results from the negligent operation of an agricultural activity.
VT LEG #381873 v.1 AS PASSED BY SENATE S.45 Page 5 of 6 (1) a change of ownership or a cessation of operation, in whole or in part, of not more than five years;
§§ 5755. 5755.
REQUIRED MEDIATION PRIOR TO SUIT (a) A person shall not bring a court action based on a claim of nuisance or trespass arising from an agricultural activity unless the person and the operator of the agricultural activity, at least once, attempt to resolve through mediation BILL AS INTRODUCED AND PASSED BY SENATE S.45 Page 7 of 7 the issue or dispute that the person has concerning operation of the agricultural activity.
If the parties to the mediation are unable to resolve the relevant issue or dispute through mediation, the parties may agree VT LEG #381873 v.1 AS PASSED BY SENATE S.45 Page 6 of 6 to submit the issue or dispute to binding arbitration pursuant to 12 V.S.A.
VT LEG #381873 v.1
View plain text versions (7)
- As Passed By the Senate (OfficialOpens in a new window) View text pdf
- As Passed By the Senate (UnofficialOpens in a new window) View text pdf
- As Passed by Both House and Senate (OfficialOpens in a new window) View text pdf
- As Passed by Both House and Senate (UnofficialOpens in a new window) View text pdf
- As EnactedOpens in a new window View text pdf
- Act SummaryOpens in a new window View text Current pdf
- Introduced As IntroducedOpens in a new window pdf
Amendments
2 amendments- House Proposal of Amendment (OfficialOpens in a new window) Show changes
- House Proposal of Amendment (UnofficialOpens in a new window) Show changes
Click Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.
Action History
-
Senate Message: Signed by Governor June 12, 2025
-
Signed by Governor on June 12, 2025
-
Delivered to Governor on June 6, 2025
-
Senate Message: Report of Committee of Conference adopted
-
Rules suspended & ordered delivered to Governor forthwith, on motion of Senator Baruth
-
As passed by Senate and House
-
Committee of Conference report adopted
-
Committee of Conference report submitted by Senator Norris for Committee, text
-
Rules suspended & taken up for immediate consideration, on motion of Senator Baruth
-
House message: House adopted Conference Committee report
-
Rules suspended and bill messaged forthwith to the Senate as moved by Rep. McCoy of Poultney
-
Committee of Conference report adopted (Senate bill)
-
Rules suspended and taken up for immediate consideration, pending entry on Notice Calendar, as moved by Rep. McCoy of Poultney
-
House message: House appointed Conference Committee members
-
Speaker appointed Reps. Durfee of Shaftsbury, LaLonde of South Burlington, and Morgan, L. of Milton as members of the Committee of Conference on the part of the House
-
Senate Message: House proposal of amendment not concurred in and Committee of Conference appointed
-
Rules suspended & messaged to House forthwith, on motion of Senator Baruth
-
Committee of Conference appointed: Senators Norris, Plunkett, and Ingalls
-
House proposal of amendment not concurred in; Committee of Conference requested, on motion of Senator Hashim
-
House proposal of amendment; text
-
Rules suspended & taken up for immediate consideration, on motion of Senator Baruth
-
House proposal of amendment
-
Entered on Notice Calendar
-
House message: House passed bill in concurrence with proposal(s) of amendment
-
Rules suspended and bill messaged forthwith to the Senate as moved by Rep. McCoy of Poultney
-
Read third time and passed in concurrence with proposal of amendment
-
Rules suspended and bill placed in all remaining stages of passage as moved by Rep. McCoy of Poultney
-
Third Reading ordered
-
Report of Committee on Agriculture, Food Resiliency, and Forestry agreed to
-
Rep. Durfee of Shaftsbury reported for the Committee on Agriculture, Food Resiliency, and Forestry
-
Read second time
-
Rules suspended and taken up for immediate consideration as moved by Rep. McCoy of Poultney
-
Notice Calendar: Favorable with Amendment
-
Rep. LaLonde of South Burlington moved that the Committee on Judiciary be relieved of the bill and that the same be committed to the Committee on Agriculture, Food Resiliency, and Forestry, which was agreed to
-
Read first time and referred to the Committee on Judiciary
-
Read 3rd time & passed
-
New Business/Third Reading
-
3rd reading ordered on roll call Passed -- Needed 15 of 30 to Pass -- Yeas = 25, Nays = 5
-
Roll Call, Requested by Sen. Collamore
-
Reported favorably by Senator Norris for Committee on Judiciary
-
Read 2nd time
-
Favorable report by Committee on Judiciary
-
Unfinished Business/Second Reading
-
Favorable report by Committee on Judiciary
-
New Business/Second Reading
-
Favorable report by Committee on Judiciary
-
Second Reading
-
Entered on Notice Calendar
-
Read 1st time & referred to Committee on Judiciary
Sponsors
- Terry K Williams · Primary
- Rebecca "Becca" E White · Primary
- Richard A Westman · Primary
- David H Weeks · Primary
- Anne E Watson · Primary
- Andrew J Perchlik · Primary
- Robert W Norris · Primary
- Christopher P Mattos · Primary
- Joseph "Joe" D Major · Primary
- Virginia "Ginny" V Lyons · Primary
- Steven Heffernan · Primary
- Larry Hart · Primary
- Wendy K Harrison · Primary
- Martine Larocque L Gulick · Primary
- Ann E Cummings · Primary
- Brian P Collamore · Primary
- Alison Clarkson · Primary
- Thomas I Chittenden · Primary
- Randy D Brock · Primary
- Patrick "Pat" M Brennan · Primary
- Scott L Beck · Primary
- Samuel A Douglass · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →22 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 168 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (22)
- Terry K Williams Republican
- Rebecca "Becca" E White Democrat
- Richard A Westman Republican
- David H Weeks Republican
- Anne E Watson Democrat/Progressive Voted No
- Andrew J Perchlik Democrat/Progressive
- Robert W Norris Republican
- Christopher P Mattos Republican
- Joseph "Joe" D Major Democrat
- Virginia "Ginny" V Lyons Democrat
- Steven Heffernan Republican
- Larry Hart Republican
- Wendy K Harrison Democrat
- Martine Larocque L Gulick Democrat Voted No
- Ann E Cummings Democrat
- Brian P Collamore Republican
- Alison Clarkson Democrat Voted No
- Thomas I Chittenden Democrat
- Randy D Brock Republican
- Patrick "Pat" M Brennan Republican
- Scott L Beck Republican
- Samuel A Douglass Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (168)
168 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 168 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat/Progressive | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 8 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Progressive/Democrat | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 25 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 83% | 17% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (30)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| White | — | Nay |
| Ram Hinsdale | — | Yea |
| Alison Clarkson | Democrat | Nay |
| Ann E Cummings | Democrat | Yea |
| Joseph "Joe" D Major | Democrat | Yea |
| Martine Larocque L Gulick | Democrat | Nay |
| Nader A Hashim | Democrat | Yea |
| Robert Plunkett | Democrat | Yea |
| Ruth E Hardy | Democrat | Yea |
| Seth Bongartz | Democrat | Yea |
| Thomas I Chittenden | Democrat | Yea |
| Virginia "Ginny" V Lyons | Democrat | Yea |
| Andrew J Perchlik | Democrat/Progressive | Yea |
| Anne E Watson | Democrat/Progressive | Nay |
| Philip E Baruth | Democrat/Progressive | Yea |
| Tanya C Vyhovsky | Progressive/Democrat | Nay |
| Brian P Collamore | Republican | Yea |
| Christopher P Mattos | Republican | Yea |
| David H Weeks | Republican | Yea |
| Jim F Harrison | Republican | Yea |
| Larry Hart | Republican | Yea |
| Patrick "Pat" M Brennan | Republican | Yea |
| Randy D Brock | Republican | Yea |
| Richard A Westman | Republican | Yea |
| Robert W Norris | Republican | Yea |
| Russ H Ingalls | Republican | Yea |
| Samuel A Douglass | Republican | Yea |
| Scott L Beck | Republican | Yea |
| Steven Heffernan | Republican | Yea |
| Terry K Williams | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors S 45?
- S 45 is sponsored by Terry K Williams (Republican), Rebecca "Becca" E White (Democrat), Richard A Westman (Republican), David H Weeks (Republican), Anne E Watson (Democrat/Progressive), Andrew J Perchlik (Democrat/Progressive), Robert W Norris (Republican), Christopher P Mattos (Republican), Joseph "Joe" D Major (Democrat), Virginia "Ginny" V Lyons (Democrat), Steven Heffernan (Republican), Larry Hart (Republican), Wendy K Harrison (Democrat), Martine Larocque L Gulick (Democrat), Ann E Cummings (Democrat), Brian P Collamore (Republican), Alison Clarkson (Democrat), Thomas I Chittenden (Democrat), Randy D Brock (Republican), Patrick "Pat" M Brennan (Republican), Scott L Beck (Republican), and Samuel A Douglass (Republican).
- What is the current status of S 45?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 04, 2025. Enacted.
- Where can I track S 45?
- Track S 45 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on S 45
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of S 45
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →