Oregon 2026 Regular Session Status: Enacted Bipartisan · 20 R · 17 D cosponsors

SB 1585 — Relating to matching grants for cities; and prescribing an effective date.

Last action — Effective date, June 5, 2026.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed House
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 02, 2026. Enacted.

Signed by Governor Tina Kotek (Democratic) on April 07, 2026.

Odds of enactment

High chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 98% · high confidence
  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 40 sponsors

    7 primary, 33 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Bipartisan support

    Sponsored across 2 parties (20 R · 17 D) — cross-party backing.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 5 recorded votes so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Summary

Sets maximum matching fund requirements for state grants to small incorporated cities for <b>certain</b> capital construction and municipal infrastructure<b> and improvements</b>. Takes effect on the 91st day following adjournment sine die.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

340 added · 343 removed

Plain-language change summary

The changes to Bill SB 1585 primarily adjust the requirements for matching grants that small cities can receive for safety improvement projects near schools. Specifically, it now establishes a maximum cash match percentage for incorporated cities with populations up to 20,000, which could help make these grants more accessible to smaller communities. This matters because it allows smaller cities to receive funding for important projects without needing to contribute as much of their own money, ultimately supporting public safety and infrastructure improvements in those areas.

→
Previous
Latest
83rd OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY--2026 Regular Session A-Engrossed Senate Bill 1585 Ordered by the Senate February 17 Including Senate Amendments dated February 17 Sponsored by Senators MANNING JR, ANDERSON, SOLLMAN, MEEK, PROZANSKI, Representative DIEHL;
83rd OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY--2026 Regular Session Enrolled Senate Bill 1585 Sponsored by Senators MANNING JR, ANDERSON, SOLLMAN, MEEK, PATTERSON, PROZANSKI, Representative DIEHL;
Senators BROADMAN, GOLDEN, GORSEK, HAYDEN, NASH, SMITH DB, THATCHER, WEBER, Represen- tatives BOICE, EVANS, FRAGALA, GAMBA, HUDSON, MCINTIRE, MCLAIN, RIEKE SMITH, WISE (Pre- session filed.) SUMMARY The following summary is not prepared by the sponsors of the measure and is not a part of the body thereof subject to consideration by the Legislative Assembly.
Senators BROADMAN, DRAZAN, GOLDEN, GORSEK, HAYDEN, NASH, SMITH DB, THATCHER, WEBER, Representatives BOICE, BUNCH, CATE, EDWARDS, EVANS, FRAGALA, GAMBA, GOMBERG, HARBICK, HELFRICH, HELM, HUDSON, LEVY B, LEWIS, MANNIX, MCINTIRE, MCLAIN, MUNOZ, NELSON, OWENS, RIEKE SMITH, WISE, WRIGHT, YUNKER (Presession filed.) CHAPTER .................................................
It is an editor’s brief statement of the essential features of the measure.
AN ACT Relating to matching grants for cities;
The statement includes a measure digest written in compliance with applicable readability standards.
Digest:
The Act would set a maximum percent required for matching grants made by the state to small cities for capital projects.
(Flesch Readability Score:
64.6).
Sets maximum matching fund requirements for state grants to small incorporated cities for certain capital construction and municipal infrastructure and improvements.
Takes effect on the 91st day following adjournment sine die.
A BILL FOR AN ACT Relating to matching grants for cities;
NOTE:
(C) An incorporated city with a population greater than 7,500 but not greater than 10,000 may be required to provide a cash match of not greater than nine percent of the project’s costs.
Matter in boldfaced type in an amended section is new;
matter [italic and bracketed] is existing law to be omitted.
New sections are in boldfaced type.
LC 133 A-Eng.
SB 1585 (C) An incorporated city with a population greater than 7,500 but not greater than 10,000 may be required to provide a cash match of not greater than nine percent of the project’s costs.
(c) [Notwithstanding subsection (2) of this section, by rule,] The commission may reduce the amount [the] an applicant must provide for a cash match.
Enrolled Senate Bill 1585 (SB 1585-A) Page 1 (c) [Notwithstanding subsection (2) of this section, by rule,] The commission may reduce the amount [the] an applicant must provide for a cash match.
(i) Three percent of the moneys required for a transportation project having a project [2] A-Eng.
(i) Three percent of the moneys required for a transportation project having a project cost of $100,000 or less.
SB 1585 cost of $100,000 or less.
(b) Notwithstanding any other provision of law restricting the use of the grant award moneys, incorporated cities with a population not greater than 20,000 may use grant moneys awarded for capital construction or municipal infrastructure for all phases of a funded project in addition to construction, including, but not limited to, engineering, planning and support.
Enrolled Senate Bill 1585 (SB 1585-A) Page 2 (b) Notwithstanding any other provision of law restricting the use of the grant award moneys, incorporated cities with a population not greater than 20,000 may use grant moneys awarded for capital construction or municipal infrastructure for all phases of a funded project in addition to construction, including, but not limited to, engineering, planning and support.
(b) Notwithstanding any other provision of law restricting the use of the grant award [3] A-Eng.
(b) Notwithstanding any other provision of law restricting the use of the grant award moneys, incorporated cities with a population not greater than 20,000 may use grant moneys awarded for capital construction or municipal infrastructure for all phases of a funded project in addition to construction, including, but not limited to, engineering, planning and support.
SB 1585 moneys, incorporated cities with a population not greater than 20,000 may use grant moneys awarded for capital construction or municipal infrastructure for all phases of a funded project in addition to construction, including, but not limited to, engineering, planning and support.
(2) To qualify for financial assistance under this section, the municipality, corporation, company, entity or individual must demonstrate, and the authority must find, that the levee project substan- tially contributes to the improvement, expansion or repair of the state’s or a municipality’s infrastructure system and is essential for the use or development of farm, industrial or commercial land in Oregon.
Enrolled Senate Bill 1585 (SB 1585-A) Page 3 (2) To qualify for financial assistance under this section, the municipality, corporation, company, entity or individual must demonstrate, and the authority must find, that the levee project substan- tially contributes to the improvement, expansion or repair of the state’s or a municipality’s infrastructure system and is essential for the use or development of farm, industrial or commercial land in Oregon.
(f) Notwithstanding any other provision of law restricting the use of the grant award moneys, municipalities with a population not greater than 20,000 may use grant moneys awarded for capital construction or municipal infrastructure for all phases of a funded [4] A-Eng.
(f) Notwithstanding any other provision of law restricting the use of the grant award moneys, municipalities with a population not greater than 20,000 may use grant moneys awarded for capital construction or municipal infrastructure for all phases of a funded project in addition to construction, including, but not limited to, engineering, planning and support.
SB 1585 project in addition to construction, including, but not limited to, engineering, planning and support.
[(3) Grants from the fund for planning projects are limited to a maximum of $2 million per appli- cant per biennium.] [(4) Grants from the fund for construction or capital improvement projects may not exceed an amount equal to 80 percent of the total cost of the project.] [(5) A grant may not be awarded from the fund unless the applicant pledges matching funds to the project of at least 20 percent of the amount of the grant.] [(6) At least 60 percent of the dollar value of grants awarded from the fund in any biennium shall be used to provide assistance with levee projects to rural or distressed areas as those terms are defined in ORS 285A.010.] SECTION 6.
[(3) Grants from the fund for planning projects are limited to a maximum of $2 million per appli- cant per biennium.] [(4) Grants from the fund for construction or capital improvement projects may not exceed an amount equal to 80 percent of the total cost of the project.] [(5) A grant may not be awarded from the fund unless the applicant pledges matching funds to the project of at least 20 percent of the amount of the grant.] Enrolled Senate Bill 1585 (SB 1585-A) Page 4 [(6) At least 60 percent of the dollar value of grants awarded from the fund in any biennium shall be used to provide assistance with levee projects to rural or distressed areas as those terms are defined in ORS 285A.010.] SECTION 6.
(2) Notwithstanding any other provision of law restricting the use of the grant award moneys, incorporated cities with a population not greater than 20,000 may use grant moneys [5] A-Eng.
(2) Notwithstanding any other provision of law restricting the use of the grant award moneys, incorporated cities with a population not greater than 20,000 may use grant moneys awarded for capital construction or municipal infrastructure for all phases of a funded project in addition to construction, including, but not limited to, engineering, planning and support.
SB 1585 awarded for capital construction or municipal infrastructure for all phases of a funded project in addition to construction, including, but not limited to, engineering, planning and support.
(a) Incorporated cities with a population not greater than 5,000 may be required to pro- vide matching funds in an amount not greater than:
Enrolled Senate Bill 1585 (SB 1585-A) Page 5 (a) Incorporated cities with a population not greater than 5,000 may be required to pro- vide matching funds in an amount not greater than:
[(5)] (6) Grants and the cost of direct services provided under this section must be paid from [6] A-Eng.
[(5)] (6) Grants and the cost of direct services provided under this section must be paid from moneys available in the Water Project Feasibility Fund.
SB 1585 moneys available in the Water Project Feasibility Fund.
(3)(a) A cost match for grants sought by incorporated cities with a population not greater than 20,000 shall be required as follows, based on population according to the most recent federal decennial census:
Enrolled Senate Bill 1585 (SB 1585-A) Page 6 (3)(a) A cost match for grants sought by incorporated cities with a population not greater than 20,000 shall be required as follows, based on population according to the most recent federal decennial census:
(B) Incorporated cities with a population greater than 5,000 but not greater than 7,500 may be required to provide a cost match in an amount not greater than seven percent of the [7] A-Eng.
(B) Incorporated cities with a population greater than 5,000 but not greater than 7,500 may be required to provide a cost match in an amount not greater than seven percent of the amount of the grant sought.
SB 1585 amount of the grant sought.
[8]
Passed by Senate February 19, 2026 Received by Governor:
........................M.,........................................................., 2026 ..................................................................................
Approved:
Obadiah Rutledge, Secretary of Senate ........................M.,........................................................., 2026 ..................................................................................
Rob Wagner, President of Senate ..................................................................................
Show all 43 changed rows (3 more)
Previous
Latest
Tina Kotek, Governor Passed by House March 6, 2026 Filed in Office of Secretary of State:
.................................................................................................................................., 2026 Julie Fahey, Speaker of House ..................................................................................
Tobias Read, Secretary of State Enrolled Senate Bill 1585 (SB 1585-A) Page 7
View plain text versions (4)

Amendments

1 amendment

Click Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.

Action History

  1. Effective date, June 5, 2026.

  2. Chapter 134, 2026 Laws.

  3. Governor signed.

  4. Speaker signed.

  5. President signed.

  6. Rules suspended. Third reading. Carried by Diehl. Passed.

  7. Second reading.

  8. Recommendation: Do pass.

  9. Work Session held.

  10. Referred to Rules by order of Speaker.

  11. Without recommendation as to passage and be referred to Rules.

  12. Work Session held.

  13. Public Hearing held.

  14. Referred to Commerce and Consumer Protection.

  15. First reading. Referred to Speaker's desk.

  16. Third reading. Carried by Manning Jr. Passed.

  17. Second reading.

  18. Recommendation: Do pass with amendments. (Printed A-Eng.)

  19. Work Session held.

  20. Public Hearing held.

  21. Referred to Commerce and General Government.

  22. Introduction and first reading. Referred to President's desk.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

7 sponsors · 33 co-sponsors · 50 not signed on · 8 voted No

Sponsors (7)

Co-sponsors (33)

Not signed on (50)

50 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 50 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 46 Yea · 5 Nay · 9 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 30203
Republican 14306
Unaffiliated 2000
Total 46509
% of votes cast 77%8%0%15%
How each member voted (60)
Member Party Vote
Lamar Wise — Yea
Matt Bunch — Yea
Andrea Valderrama Democrat Not Voting
Annessa Hartman Democrat Not Voting
April Dobson Democrat Yea
Ben Bowman Democrat Yea
Dacia Grayber Democrat Nay
Daniel Nguyen Democrat Yea
David Gomberg Democrat Yea
Emerson Levy Democrat Yea
Farrah Chaichi Democrat Yea
Hai Pham Democrat Yea
Jason Kropf Democrat Yea
John Lively Democrat Yea
Jules Walters Democrat Yea
Julie Fahey Democrat Yea
Ken Helm Democrat Yea
Lesly Muñoz Democrat Yea
Lisa Fragala Democrat Yea
Mari Watanabe Democrat Yea
Mark Gamba Democrat Yea
Nancy Nathanson Democrat Yea
Nathan Sosa Democrat Yea
Pam Marsh Democrat Nay
Paul Evans Democrat Yea
Ricki Ruiz Democrat Not Voting
Rob Nosse Democrat Yea
Sarah McDonald Democrat Yea
Shannon Isadore Democrat Yea
Sue Rieke Smith Democrat Yea
Susan McLain Democrat Yea
Tawna Sanchez Democrat Yea
Thuy Tran Democrat Yea
Tom Andersen Democrat Yea
Travis Nelson Democrat Yea
Willy Chotzen Democrat Yea
Zach Hudson Democrat Yea
Alek Skarlatos Republican Yea
Anna Scharf Republican Yea
Bobby Levy Republican Not Voting
Boomer Wright Republican Not Voting
Court Boice Republican Yea
Cyrus Javadi Republican Not Voting
Darcey Edwards Republican Yea
Darin Harbick Republican Yea
Dwayne Yunker Republican Yea
E. Werner Reschke Republican Nay
Ed Diehl Republican Yea
Emily McIntire Republican Not Voting
Gregory Smith Republican Yea
Jami Cate Republican Yea
Jeffrey Helfrich Republican Yea
Kevin Mannix Republican Yea
Kim Wallan Republican Nay
Lucetta Elmer Republican Yea
Mark Owens Republican Not Voting
Rick Lewis Republican Yea
Shelly Boshart Davis Republican Not Voting
Vikki Breese-Iverson Republican Nay
Virgle Osborne Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Heard and Reported Out

Passed 10 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 4000
Democrat 5000
Unaffiliated 1000
Total 10000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (10)
Member Party Vote
Lamar Wise — Yea
David Gomberg Democrat Yea
Farrah Chaichi Democrat Yea
Jules Walters Democrat Yea
Nathan Sosa Democrat Yea
Willy Chotzen Democrat Yea
E. Werner Reschke Republican Yea
Jami Cate Republican Yea
Kim Wallan Republican Yea
Virgle Osborne Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 25 Yea · 3 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 14301
Republican 11001
Total 25302
% of votes cast 83%10%0%7%
How each member voted (30)
Member Party Vote
Anthony Broadman Democrat Yea
Chris Gorsek Democrat Yea
Courtney Neron Misslin Democrat Yea
Deb Patterson Democrat Yea
Floyd Prozanski Democrat Yea
James Manning Jr. Democrat Yea
Janeen Sollman Democrat Yea
Jeff Golden Democrat Yea
Kate Lieber Democrat Yea
Kathleen Taylor Democrat Yea
Kayse Jama Democrat Yea
Khanh Pham Democrat Nay
Lew Frederick Democrat Not Voting
Lisa Reynolds Democrat Yea
Mark Meek Democrat Yea
Rob Wagner Democrat Yea
Sara Gelser Blouin Democrat Nay
Wlnsvey Campos Democrat Nay
Bruce Starr Republican Yea
Cedric Hayden Republican Yea
Christine Drazan Republican Yea
David Brock Smith Republican Yea
Diane Linthicum Republican Not Voting
Dick Anderson Republican Yea
Fred Girod Republican Yea
Kim Thatcher Republican Yea
Mike McLane Republican Yea
Noah Robinson Republican Yea
Suzanne Weber Republican Yea
Todd Nash Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 1585 do?
Sets maximum matching fund requirements for state grants to small incorporated cities for <b>certain</b> capital construction and municipal infrastructure<b> and improvements</b>. Takes effect on the 91st day following adjournment sine die.
Who sponsors SB 1585?
SB 1585 is sponsored by Jami Cate (Republican), Ken Helm (Democrat), Lesly Muñoz (Democrat), Travis Nelson (Democrat), David Gomberg (Democrat), Darcey Edwards (Republican), Rick Lewis (Republican), Boomer Wright (Republican), Darin Harbick (Republican), Kevin Mannix (Republican), Jeffrey Helfrich (Republican), Dwayne Yunker (Republican), Bobby Levy (Republican), Mark Owens (Republican), Christine Drazan, Deb Patterson (Democrat), Mark Meek (Democrat), Susan McLain (Democrat), Emily McIntire (Republican), Zach Hudson (Democrat), Mark Gamba (Democrat), Lisa Fragala (Democrat), Paul Evans (Democrat), Court Boice (Republican), Suzanne Weber (Republican), Kim Thatcher (Republican), David Brock Smith (Republican), Todd Nash (Republican), Cedric Hayden (Republican), Chris Gorsek (Democrat), Jeff Golden (Democrat), Anthony Broadman (Democrat), Ed Diehl (Republican), Floyd Prozanski (Democrat), Janeen Sollman (Democrat), Dick Anderson (Republican), James Manning Jr. (Democrat), Lamar Wise, and Matt Bunch.
What is the current status of SB 1585?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 02, 2026. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 1585?
Track SB 1585 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 1585

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 1585

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →