South Dakota · South Dakota Legislature
revise the process by which courts consider appeals of decisions regarding conditional use requests.
Passed
44 Yea
·
20 Nay
·
6 Other
·
By party
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 33 | 15 | 0 | 3 |
| Republican | 9 | 5 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
How each member voted (68)
- Bartels Yes
- Bartling No
- Conzet Yes
- Glanzer Yes
- Frye-Mueller No
- Johns Yes
- Livermont No
- Lust Yes
- McCleerey Excused
- Lesmeister No
- Rozum Yes
- Ahlers No
- Anderson Yes
- Bordeaux No
- Campbell No
- Dennert Yes
- DiSanto No
- Haugaard Yes
- Hunhoff Yes
- Jensen (Kevin) No
- Peterson (Kent) Yes
- Peterson (Sue) No
- Soli Excused
- Steinhauer Yes
- Tulson Yes
- Barthel Yes
- Brunner Yes
- Carson Yes
- Chase Yes
- Clark Yes
- Diedrich Excused
- Duvall Yes
- Hawley Yes
- Holmes Yes
- Johnson Yes
- Kaiser Yes
- Kettwig Yes
- Lake Yes
- Latterell No
- Mills No
- Qualm Yes
- Rasmussen No
- Rhoden Yes
- Ring No
- Rounds Yes
- Turbiville Yes
- Willadsen Yes
- Mickelson Yes
- Wiese Yes
- Wismer No
- York Yes
- Jamie Smith Democratic Yes
- Arch Beal Republican Yes
- Chris Karr Republican Yes
- Ernie Otten Republican Yes
- Greg Jamison Republican Yes
- Kyle Schoenfish Republican Yes
- Lana Greenfield Republican No
- Larry Zikmund Republican Excused
- Leslie Heinemann Republican Yes
- Liz May Republican Yes
- Mike Stevens Republican Yes
- Sam Marty Republican No
- Spencer Gosch Republican Excused
- Taffy Howard Republican No
- Tim Goodwin Republican No
- Tim Reed Republican Yes
- Tom Pischke Republican No