revise the process by which courts consider appeals of decisions regarding conditional use requests.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 1292 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 1292.
You're tracking HB 1292
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 1292 — revise the process by which courts consider appeals of decisions regarding conditional use requests.
Last action — Signed by the Governor on March 23, 2018 H.J. 796
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 01, 2018. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
6 sponsors
6 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 R).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 4 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
We don't have the full text on file for this bill yet.
Read HB 1292 on the official South Dakota source →Action History
-
Signed by the Governor on March 23, 2018 H.J. 796
-
Delivered to the Governor on March 08, 2018 H.J. 747
-
Signed by the President S.J. 749
-
Signed by the Speaker H.J. 689
-
Senate Do Pass, Passed, YEAS 22, NAYS 13. S.J. 675
-
Judiciary Do Pass, Passed, YEAS 4, NAYS 3. S.J. 628
-
Scheduled for hearing
-
First read in Senate and referred to Senate Judiciary S.J. 527
-
House of Representatives Do Pass, Passed, YEAS 44, NAYS 20. H.J. 493
-
Placed on consent, Passed
-
Judiciary Do Pass, Passed, YEAS 13, NAYS 0. H.J. 453
-
Scheduled for hearing
-
First read in House and referred to House Judiciary H.J. 286
Sponsors
- Kettwig · Primary
- Tim Reed · Primary
- Johns · Primary
- Rusch · Primary
- Lust · Primary
- Cammack · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →6 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 99 not signed on · 7 voted No
Sponsors (6)
- Kettwig
- Tim Reed Republican
- Johns
- Rusch
- Lust
- Cammack
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (99)
99 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 99 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 18 | 11 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 21 | 13 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 62% | 38% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (34)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bolin | — | Nay |
| Cronin | — | Nay |
| Maher | — | Yea |
| Kennedy | — | Nay |
| Rusch | — | Yea |
| Cammack | — | Yea |
| Curd | — | Yea |
| Frerichs | — | Yea |
| Haverly | — | Yea |
| Jensen (Phil) | — | Nay |
| Killer | — | Nay |
| Klumb | — | Yea |
| Langer | — | Yea |
| Russell | — | Nay |
| Solano | — | Yea |
| Sutton (Billie) | — | Nay |
| Wiik | — | Yea |
| Ewing | — | Yea |
| Heinert | — | Nay |
| Monroe | — | Nay |
| Nesiba | — | Nay |
| Partridge | — | Yea |
| Peters | — | Yea |
| Soholt | — | Yea |
| Stalzer | — | Yea |
| Tapio | — | Nay |
| Tidemann | — | Yea |
| White | — | Yea |
| Youngberg | — | Yea |
| Al Novstrup | Republican | Yea |
| Ernie Otten | Republican | Nay |
| Jack Kolbeck | Republican | Yea |
| Lana Greenfield | Republican | Yea |
| Lauren Nelson | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 57% | 43% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Kennedy | — | Nay |
| Rusch | — | Yea |
| Langer | — | Yea |
| Netherton | — | Yea |
| Russell | — | Nay |
| Lana Greenfield | Republican | Yea |
| Lauren Nelson | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 33 | 15 | 0 | 3 |
| Republican | 9 | 5 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 43 | 20 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 63% | 29% | 0% | 7% |
How each member voted (68)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bartels | — | Yea |
| Bartling | — | Nay |
| Conzet | — | Yea |
| Glanzer | — | Yea |
| Frye-Mueller | — | Nay |
| Johns | — | Yea |
| Livermont | — | Nay |
| Lust | — | Yea |
| McCleerey | — | Not Voting |
| Lesmeister | — | Nay |
| Rozum | — | Yea |
| Ahlers | — | Nay |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Bordeaux | — | Nay |
| Campbell | — | Nay |
| Dennert | — | Yea |
| DiSanto | — | Nay |
| Haugaard | — | Yea |
| Hunhoff | — | Yea |
| Jensen (Kevin) | — | Nay |
| Peterson (Kent) | — | Yea |
| Peterson (Sue) | — | Nay |
| Soli | — | Not Voting |
| Steinhauer | — | Yea |
| Tulson | — | Yea |
| Barthel | — | Yea |
| Brunner | — | Yea |
| Carson | — | Yea |
| Chase | — | Yea |
| Clark | — | Yea |
| Diedrich | — | Not Voting |
| Duvall | — | Yea |
| Hawley | — | Yea |
| Holmes | — | Yea |
| Johnson | — | Yea |
| Kaiser | — | Yea |
| Kettwig | — | Yea |
| Lake | — | Yea |
| Latterell | — | Nay |
| Mills | — | Nay |
| Qualm | — | Yea |
| Rasmussen | — | Nay |
| Rhoden | — | Yea |
| Ring | — | Nay |
| Rounds | — | Yea |
| Turbiville | — | Yea |
| Willadsen | — | Yea |
| Mickelson | — | Yea |
| Wiese | — | Yea |
| Wismer | — | Nay |
| York | — | Yea |
| Jamie Smith | Democratic | Yea |
| Arch Beal | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Karr | Republican | Yea |
| Ernie Otten | Republican | Yea |
| Greg Jamison | Republican | Yea |
| Kyle Schoenfish | Republican | Yea |
| Lana Greenfield | Republican | Nay |
| Larry Zikmund | Republican | Not Voting |
| Leslie Heinemann | Republican | Yea |
| Liz May | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Stevens | Republican | Yea |
| Sam Marty | Republican | Nay |
| Spencer Gosch | Republican | Not Voting |
| Taffy Howard | Republican | Nay |
| Tim Goodwin | Republican | Nay |
| Tim Reed | Republican | Yea |
| Tom Pischke | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Barthel | — | Yea |
| Kaiser | — | Yea |
| Lust | — | Yea |
| Rozum | — | Yea |
| Bordeaux | — | Yea |
| Jensen (Kevin) | — | Yea |
| Peterson (Kent) | — | Yea |
| Diedrich | — | Yea |
| Johns | — | Yea |
| Turbiville | — | Yea |
| Wismer | — | Yea |
| Mike Stevens | Republican | Yea |
| Tim Reed | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 1292?
- HB 1292 is sponsored by Kettwig, Tim Reed (Republican), Johns, Rusch, Lust, and Cammack.
- What is the current status of HB 1292?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 01, 2018. Enacted.
- Where can I track HB 1292?
- Track HB 1292 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 1292
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 1292
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →