S1819 — Provides that the results of urine tests conducted pursuant to a judicial diversion program shall be private and confidential
Last action — In Assembly Committee
-
1Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced January 14, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee referral and hearing.
Odds of enactment
Low chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Introduced
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 5 recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
In plain language
Urine test results from judicial diversion programs will be kept private and confidential.
This bill ensures that any urine test results obtained through judicial diversion programs remain confidential. It aims to protect the privacy of individuals participating in such programs.
Summary
Provides that the results of urine tests conducted pursuant to a judicial diversion program shall be private and confidential.
Bill Text
- Full text View text Current
Action History
-
REFERRED TO CODES
-
DELIVERED TO ASSEMBLY
-
PASSED SENATE
-
ORDERED TO THIRD READING CAL.1792
-
COMMITTEE DISCHARGED AND COMMITTED TO RULES
-
REPORTED AND COMMITTED TO CODES
-
REFERRED TO ALCOHOLISM AND SUBSTANCE USE DISORDERS
-
RETURNED TO SENATE
-
DIED IN ASSEMBLY
-
REFERRED TO CODES
-
DELIVERED TO ASSEMBLY
-
PASSED SENATE
-
AMENDED ON THIRD READING 1819A
-
ADVANCED TO THIRD READING
-
2ND REPORT CAL.
-
1ST REPORT CAL.1249
-
REPORTED AND COMMITTED TO CODES
-
REFERRED TO ALCOHOLISM AND SUBSTANCE USE DISORDERS
Sponsors
- Nathalia Fernandez · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 218 not signed on · 27 voted No
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (218)
218 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 218 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 36 | 24 | 0 | 3 |
| Total | 36 | 24 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 57% | 38% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (63)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Erik Bottcher | — | Yea |
| Gustavo Rivera | — | Yea |
| Monica Martinez | — | Yea |
| Nathalia Fernandez | — | Yea |
| Pete Harckham | — | Yea |
| Peter Oberacker | — | Yea |
| Robert Rolison | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 33 | 26 | 0 | 4 |
| Total | 33 | 26 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 52% | 41% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (63)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 12 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 92% | 8% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Andrew Gounardes | — | Yea |
| Anthony H. Palumbo | — | Yea |
| Brian Kavanagh | — | Yea |
| Dean Murray | — | Yea |
| Jabari Brisport | — | Yea |
| Jamaal Bailey | — | Yea |
| Jeremy Cooney | — | Yea |
| Julia Salazar | — | Yea |
| Luis R. Sepúlveda | — | Yea |
| Patrick M. Gallivan | — | Nay |
| Roxanne J. Persaud | — | Yea |
| Thomas F. O'Mara | — | Yea |
| Zellnor Myrie | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 14% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gustavo Rivera | — | Yea |
| Monica Martinez | — | Yea |
| Nathalia Fernandez | — | Yea |
| Pete Harckham | — | Yea |
| Peter Oberacker | — | Nay |
| Robert Rolison | — | Yea |
| Sean Ryan | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does S1819 do?
- Provides that the results of urine tests conducted pursuant to a judicial diversion program shall be private and confidential.
- Who sponsors S1819?
- S1819 is sponsored by Nathalia Fernandez.
- What is the current status of S1819?
- This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced January 14, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track S1819?
- Track S1819 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on S1819
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of S1819
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →