Revises provisions relating to certain orders for protection against domestic violence. (BDR 3-885)
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 309 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 309.
You're tracking AB 309
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 309 — Revises provisions relating to certain orders for protection against domestic violence. (BDR 3-885)
Last action — Approved by the Governor. Chapter 136.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 27, 2025. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Joe Lombardo (Republican) on May 30, 2025.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
9 sponsors
2 primary, 7 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (7 R · 2 D) — cross-party backing.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
128 added · 144 removed128 line(s) added, 144 removed.
(ReprintedAssembly withBill amendmentsNo. adopted on April 21, 2025) FIRST REPRINT A.B.
309309–Assemblymembers AHardy, SSEMBLYHibbetts; BILL NO .
309–ASSEMBLYMEMBERSGoulding, HARDYHafen, ,Koenig, IBBETTSTorres-Fossett ;and Yurek Joint Sponsors:
GSenators OULDINGBuck ,and AFENSteinbeck ,CHAPTER.......... KOENIG , ORRES -FOSSETT AND Y UREK FEBRUARY 27, 2025 ____________ JOINT SPONSORS :
ENATORS B UCK AND STEINBECK ____________ Referred to Committee on Judiciary SUMMARY—Revises provisions relating to certain orders for protection against domestic violence.
(BDR 3-885) FISCAL NOTE:
Effect on Local Government:
No.
Effect on the State:
No.
~ EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
and (2) provides that an extended order for protection against domestic violence may only beexisting grantedlaw, afterif noticea tocourt thegrants adversea partytemporary andorder afor hearingprotection onagainst domesticder violence against an alleged perpetrator of domestic violence who is in custody at the application.time the court grants the order:
Under existing law, if a court grants a temporary order for protection against domestic the time the court grants the order:
and (2) if such an order is received by the facility holding the alleged perpetrator while the alleged perpetrator is still in custody, the order must be served upon the alleged perpetrator beforebefoSection the1 of this bill requires that certain temporary orders for protection against domestic violence served upon an alleged perpetrator who is releasedin fromcustody advise the facility.person that if the person is still in custody on the date of the hearing on the application for an extended order for protection against domestic violence, the person may contest the application by filing a written response with the court which consists solely of a statement indicating whether the person contests the issuance of an extended order.
(NRS 33.020) Section 1 ofalso this bill requires that certainsuch temporary orders fornotify protectionthe againstthe domestictemporary violenceorder servedand uponthe anperson alleged perpetrator who is still in custody on the date of the hearing on in the application for an extended order for protection against domestic violence, the on person may contest the application by filing a written response with the court whichmay: consists solely of a statement indicating whether the person contests the issuance of an extended order.
Section 1 also requires that such temporary orders notify the person that if the person does not file a written response within the time specified in the temporary order and the person is still in custody on the date of the hearing on - *AB309_R1* – 2 – the application for an extended order for protection against domestic violence, the court may:
EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
- 83rd Session (2025) – 2 – (c) Prohibit the adverse party from entering the residence, school or place of employment of the applicant or minor child and order the adverse party to stay away from any specified place frequented regularly by them;
(d)temporary Ifcustody itof hasthe jurisdictionminor underchild chapterto 125Athe ofapplicant;S, NRS, grant temporary(e) custodyEnjoin the adverse party from physically injuring, threatening to injure or taking possession of any animal that is owned or kept by the applicant or minor childchild, toeither thedirectly applicant;or through an agent;
(e) Enjoin the adverse party from physically injuring, threatening to injure or taking possession of any animal that is owned or kept by the applicant or minor child, either directly or through an agent;
(2) Pay rent or make payments on a mortgage on the applicant’sapplica(3) placePay for the support of residence;the applicant or minor child, including, without limitation, support of a minor child for whom a guardian has been appointed pursuant to chapter 159A of NRS or a minor child who has been placed in protective custody pursuant to chapter 432B of NRS, if the adverse party is found to have a duty to support the applicant or minor child;
(3) Pay for the support of the applicant or minor child, including, without limitation, support of a minor child for whom a guardian has been appointed pursuant to chapter 159A of NRS or a - *AB309_R1* – 3 – minor child who has been placed in protective custody pursuant to chapter 432B of NRS, if the adverse party is found to have a duty to support the applicant or minor child;
The appeal may be taken without- bond,83rd butSession its(2025) taking– does3 not– stay the effect or enforcement of the order.
but its taking does not stay the effect or enforcement 4.
(I) A concentration of alcohol of 0.08 or more in the person’s blood or breath;
orn of alcohol of 0.08 or more in the (II) An amount of a prohibited substance in the person’s blood or urine, as applicable, that is equal to or greater than the amount set forth in subsection 3 or 4 of NRS 484C.110.
(1) Be filed with the court not later than 14 calendar days after the date on which the incarcerated adverse party receives - *AB309_R1* – 4 – service of the temporary order for protection at the facility where the incarcerated adverse party is in custody;
at the facility where (2) Consist solely of a statement indicating whether the incarcerated adverse party contests the issuance of an extended order;(3)order; Be filed with the court in accordance with the procedures established by the facility where the incarcerated adverse party is in custody.
(b)and Notify(3) theBe incarceratedfiled adversewith party that if the incarceratedcourt adversein partyaccordance doeswith not file the writtenprocedures responseestablished describedby in paragraph (a) within 14 calendar days after the datefacility onwhere which the incarcerated adverse party receivesis servicein ofcustody. the temporary order for protection, the court may:
(b) Notify the incarcerated adverse party that if the incarcerated adverse party does not file the written response - 83rd Session (2025) – 4 – on which the incarcerated adverse party receives service of thete temporary order for protection, the court may:
H~~~~~ 25 - *AB309_R1*83rd Session (2025)
View plain text versions (3)
- Enrolled As Enrolled Current pdf
- Reprint 1 View text pdf
- Introduced As Introduced pdf
Compared against the Nevada Revised Statutes as published AI-generated reading aid — verify against the official bill.
The bill amends existing law to require additional information to be included in temporary orders for protection against domestic violence when the alleged perpetrator is in custody.
-
NRS 33.030
if the person is still in custody on the date of the hearing on the application for an extended order for protection against domestic violence, the person may contest the application by filing a written response with the court which consists solely of a statement indicating whether the person contests the issuance of an extended order.
Adds requirements for temporary orders to inform incarcerated individuals about contesting extended orders.
-
NRS 33.030
if the temporary order is served upon the incarcerated person and the person is still in custody on the date of the hearing on the application for an extended order for protection against domestic violence, the court may: (1) hold the hearing in the absence of the incarcerated person; and (2) grant the extended order without further input from the incarcerated person.
Specifies conditions under which hearings can be held without the incarcerated person's presence.
Amendments
1 amendmentClick Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.
Action History
-
Approved by the Governor. Chapter 136.
-
Enrolled and delivered to Governor.
-
In Assembly. To enrollment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Title approved. (Yeas: 21, Nays: None.) To Assembly.
-
Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.
-
Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.
-
Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.
-
Read second time.
-
From committee: Do pass.
-
Read first time. Referred to Committee on Judiciary. To committee.
-
In Senate.
-
From printer. To engrossment. Engrossed. First reprint. To Senate.
-
Read third time. Passed, as amended. Title approved. (Yeas: 42, Nays: None.) To printer.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. Placed on Second Reading File. Read second time. Amended. (Amend. No. 401.) Dispensed with reprinting.
-
From printer. To committee.
-
Read first time. Referred to Committee on Judiciary. To printer.
Sponsors
- John C. Steinbeck · Cosponsor
- Carrie Ann Buck · Cosponsor
- Selena Torres-Fossett · Cosponsor
- Gregory S. Koenig · Cosponsor
- Hafen, Gregory T., II · Cosponsor
- Heather Goulding · Cosponsor
- Brian Hibbetts · Primary
- Melissa R.. Hardy · Primary
- Toby Yurek · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →2 sponsors · 7 co-sponsors · 58 not signed on
Sponsors (2)
- Hibbetts, Brian Republican
- Hardy, Melissa R.. Republican
Co-sponsors (7)
- Steinbeck, John C. Republican
- Buck, Carrie Ann Republican
- Torres-Fossett, Selena Democratic
- Koenig, Gregory S. Republican
- Hafen, Gregory T., II Republican
- Goulding, Heather Democratic
- Yurek, Toby Republican
Not signed on (58)
58 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 58 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors AB 309?
- AB 309 is sponsored by Steinbeck, John C. (Republican), Buck, Carrie Ann (Republican), Torres-Fossett, Selena (Democratic), Koenig, Gregory S. (Republican), Hafen, Gregory T., II (Republican), Goulding, Heather (Democratic), Hibbetts, Brian (Republican), Hardy, Melissa R.. (Republican), and Yurek, Toby (Republican).
- What is the current status of AB 309?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 27, 2025. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 309?
- Track AB 309 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 309
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 309
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →