SB 260 — Revises provisions relating to air quality. (BDR 53-961)
Last action — Chapter 499.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 03, 2025. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Joe Lombardo (Republican) on June 10, 2025.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
6 sponsors
4 primary, 2 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (5 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
110 added · 147 removedPlain-language change summary
The bill SB 260 has been updated to require employers to take specific actions to protect employees from poor air quality due to wildfire smoke. It mandates the development of a communication system to alert workers about hazardous air conditions and requires employers to limit outdoor work during high pollution levels. Additionally, employers must provide training related to these new safety measures. This change is significant because it emphasizes employee safety in increasingly common wildfire smoke conditions, potentially reducing health risks for those working outdoors.
EXEMPTSenate (ReprintedBill withNo. amendments adopted on April 21, 2025) FIRST REPRINT S.B.
260260–Senators SFlores, ENATEDoñate; B ILLN O.
260–SENATORSand FLORESScheible ,Joint DOÑATESponsors: ;AND SCHEIBLE M ARCH 3, 2025 ____________ JOINT SPONSORS :
SSEMBLYMEMBERSAssemblymembers MMoore, OOREGonzález; , GONZÁLEZ ;AND D’S ILVA ____________ Referred to Committee on Commerce and Labor SUMMARY—Revises provisions relating to air quality.
(BDRand 53-961)D’Silva FISCALCHAPTER.......... NOTE:
Effect on Local Government:
May have Fiscal Impact.
Effect on the State:
Yes.
CONTAINS UNFUNDED MANDATE (§ 1) (NOTR EQUESTED AFFECTEDLOCALGOVERNMENT) ~ EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
establishingrequiring the Administrator of the Division of Industrial Relations of the Department of Business and Industry to adopt certain regulations prescribing requirements for certain employers relating to the exposure of certain employees to poor air quality from wildfire smoke in the workplace;
Existing law requires certain employers to establish and implement a written safety program that includes the establishment of a training program concerning safety in the workplace.
(NRS 618.383) Section 1 of this bill requires certaingthe employersAdministrator of the Division of Industrial Relations of the Department of Business reduce the exposure of an employee to also:poor air quality from wildfire smoke where the air quality index is:
(1) establish and implement a program to mitigate the exposure of employees who occasionally, frequently or constantly perform critical tasks outdoors to poor air quality from wildfire smoke and to monitor such employees for signs of health effects caused by exposure to poor air quality from wildfire smoke;
and (2) provide training to such employees on the program and the potential hazards of not using personal protection equipment while working outdoors and employer to monitor air quality before and as conditions change during each shifte of an employee who occasionally, frequently or constantly performs critical tasks outdoors.
Section 1 further requires the Administrator of the Division of Industrial Relations of the Department of Business and Industry to establish measures that an employer must take to reduce the exposure of an employee to poor air quality from wildfire smoke where the air quality index is:
- *SB260_R1* – 2 – and (2) 200 or more.
The Administrator is also required to establish by regulation an air quality index level caused by wildfire smoke at which an employer is prohibited from eachallowing employeran employee to establishperform acritical communicationstasks systemoutdoors. that:
(1)Section informs1 anfurther employeeresrequires wheneach theemployer employee is being exposed to certainestablish poora aircommunications quality;system that:
and(1) (2)informs allowsan any employee towhen report to the employeremployee theis presencebeing ofexposed suchto certain poor air qualityquality; and any symptom experienced by the employee that may be caused by such exposure.
Finally,and section(2) 1allows providesany thatsymptom theseexperienced requirementsby dothe notemployee applythat tomay anybe employercaused providerby ofsuch emergencyexposure. services;
orand (4)any hasSection 101 orfurther fewerrequires employees.drivers;the Administrator to adopt regulations:
(3)(1) isconcerning athe THEimplementation PEOPLEof OFsuch THEa STATEcommunication OFsystem; NEVADA, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEMBLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
and (2) that prescribe standards for training that certain employers are required to provide to certain employees.
Additionally, section 1 prohibits the regulations adopted by the Administrator from imposing additional liability on an employer for the purposes of certain policies of insurance.
Finally, section 1 provides that these requirements do commercial truck drivers;
(3) is a provider of emergency services;
or (4) has 10 or fewer employees.
EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEMBLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
ExceptThe asAdministrator otherwiseshall providedestablish inby subsectionregulation: 7, each employer shall:
(a)- Establish83rd andSession implement(2025) a– program2 that– meets(a) theMeasures requirementsthat ofan thisemployer sectionmust totake mitigate the exposure to poormonitor air quality from wildfire smoke of employees who occasionally, frequently or constantly perform critical tasks outdoors and toreduce monitorthe suchexposure employees for signs of healthan effectsemployee caused by exposure to poor air quality from wildfire smoke;smoke where:
and(1) (b)The Provideair toquality eachindex such employee, in a language and format that is understandable150 toor eachmore suchbut employee,less trainingthan on:200;
(1)and (2) The requirementsair ofquality thisindex section;is 200 or more;
(2)and The(b) programAn establishedair pursuantquality index level caused by wildfire smoke at which an employer shall not allow an employee to paragraphperform (a);critical tasks outdoors.
and (3) The potential hazards of not using personal protection equipment while working outdoors and being exposed to poor air quality from wildfire smoke.
TheEach employer shall monitorestablish aira qualitycommunications beforesystem andin asaccordance conditionswith changethe duringrequirements eachadopted shift of an employee who occasionally, frequently or constantly performs critical tasks outdoors by determiningregulation thepursuant Environmentalto Protectionsubsection Agency3 Airthat: Quality Index value from AirNow for the location of the critical tasks being performed by the employee.
If AirNow is not available, the employer may use one of the following sources, as appropriate, for monitoring air quality:
Show all 80 changed lines (40 more)
(a) The United States Forest Service.
(b) The Interagency Wildland Fire Air Quality Response Program.
(c) The Air Quality Management Division of Northern Nevada Public Health.
(d) The Clark County Department of Air Quality Management.
- *SB260_R1* – 3 – (e) The Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Program of the Division.
(f) The Bureau of Air Quality Planning of the Division.
3.
The Administrator shall establish measures that an employer must take to reduce the exposure of an employee to poor air quality from wildfire smoke where:
(a) The air quality index is 150 or more but less than 200;
and (b) The air quality index is 200 or more.
4.
The Administrator shall establish an air quality index level caused by wildfire smoke at which an employer shall not allow an employee to perform critical tasks outdoors.
5.
Each employer shall establish a communications system that:
3.
The Administrator shall adopt regulations that prescribe:
(a) Requirements for the implementation of a communications system established pursuant to subsection 2.
Such regulations may prescribe additional requirements for such a communications sys(b) Standards for an employer to train employees who work outdoors and may be exposed to poor air quality from wildfire smoke.
Such standards must require that the training:
(1) Be provided in a manner that is understandable to the employee;
(2) Describe the requirements imposed on employers pursuant to this section;
and (3) Describe the risks of not using personal protection equipment while working outdoors and being exposed to poor air quality from wildfire smoke.
4.
The Administrator may develop and provide to each employer written guidance for complying with this section and any regulations adopted pursuant thereto.
Such guidance may account for working conditions in rural and remote locations.
- 83rd Session (2025) – 3 – 5.
The regulations adopted pursuant to this section must not impose any additional liability on an employer for the purposes of industrial insurance or insurance for occupational diseases.
The Administrator may:
(a) Develop and provide to each employer written guidance for establishing a program pursuant to this section;
and (b) Adopt any regulations necessary to carry out the provisions of this section.
7.
8.7.
(a) “Constantly”“Outdoors” means thata anwork employeeenvironment iswhere performingan criticalemployee tasksaffected outdoorsby duringthe atelements. least two-thirds of his or her workday.
(b)The “Criticalterm task”does meansnot aninclude activitya thatworktly anenvironment employeethat is requiredenclosed toor performclimate incontrolled. order to carry out a critical job function.
(c)(b) “Frequently”“Provider meansof thatemergency services” means an employeeagency isof performingthe criticalState tasksor outdoorsa duringpolitical atsubdivision leastof one-thirdthe butState lessthat thanprovides two-police, thirdsfire-fighting, ofrescue, hisemergency medical services or herother workday.services related to public safety.
-The *SB260_R1*term –includes, 4without –limitation, (d)any “Occasionally”entity means that anprovides employeesuch isservices performing critical tasks outdoors during ata leaststate 2of percentemergency butor lessdeclaration thanof one-disaster thirdproclaimed ofpursuant histo orNRS her414.070. workday.
(e)(c) “Outdoors”“Wildfire smoke” means smoke caused by a workwildfire environmentwhich wherecontains ana employeecomplex movesmixture toof differentgases workand sitesparticles duringthat theincludes, workwithout daylimitation, andgases, ishazardous exposedair topollutants, thewater elements.vapor and particle pollution.
(f)Sec. “Provider of emergency services” means an agency of the State or a political subdivision of the State that provides police, fire-fighting, rescue, emergency medical services or other services related to public safety.
(g) “Wildfire smoke” means a complex mixture of gases and pollutants, water vapor and particle pollution.ses, hazardous air Sec.
H~~~~~ 25 - *SB260_R1*83rd Session (2025)
Show all 80 changed rows (40 more)
View plain text versions (4)
- Enrolled As Enrolled Current pdf
- Reprint 1 View text pdf
- Reprint 2 View text pdf
- Introduced As Introduced pdf
Amendments
2 amendmentsClick Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.
Action History
-
Chapter 499.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and delivered to Governor.
-
To enrollment.
-
In Senate.
-
Read third time. Passed. Title approved. (Yeas: 32, Nays: 10.) To Senate.
-
From committee: Do pass. Placed on General File. Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.
-
From printer. To re-engrossment. Re-engrossed. Second reprint. To Assembly. In Assembly. Read first time. Referred to Committee on Commerce and Labor. To committee. From committee: Do pass. Placed on Second Reading File. Read second time. Taken from General File. Rereferred to Committee on Ways and Means. To committee.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. Placed on General File. Read third time. Amended. (Amend. No. 913.) Reprinting dispensed with. Read third time. Passed, as amended. Title approved, as amended. (Yeas: 15, Nays: 6.) To printer.
-
From printer. To engrossment. Engrossed. First reprint. To committee.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. Placed on Second Reading File. Read second time. Amended. (Amend. No. 535.) Taken from General File. Re-referred to Committee on Finance. Exemption effective. To printer.
-
Notice of eligibility for exemption.
-
From printer. To committee.
-
Read first time. Referred to Committee on Commerce and Labor. To printer.
Sponsors
- Reuben D'Silva · Cosponsor
- Melanie Scheible · Cosponsor
- Cecelia González · Primary
- Cinthia Zermeño Moore · Primary
- Fabian Doñate · Primary
- Edgar Flores · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →4 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 61 not signed on · 15 voted No
Sponsors (4)
- González, Cecelia Democratic
- Cinthia Zermeño Moore
- Doñate, Fabian Democratic
- Flores, Edgar Democratic
Co-sponsors (2)
- D'Silva, Reuben Democratic
- Scheible, Melanie Democratic
Not signed on (61)
61 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 61 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 27 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 5 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 32 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 76% | 24% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (42)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| OâNeill, PK | — | Nay |
| Anderson, Natha C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Backus, Shea M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Brown-May, Tracy | Democratic | Yea |
| Carter, Max E., II | Democratic | Yea |
| Considine, Venicia | Democratic | Yea |
| D'Silva, Reuben | Democratic | Yea |
| Dalia, Joe | Democratic | Yea |
| Flanagan, Tanya P. | Democratic | Yea |
| González, Cecelia | Democratic | Yea |
| Goulding, Heather | Democratic | Yea |
| Hunt, Linda F. | Democratic | Yea |
| Jackson, Jovan A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Jauregui, Sandra | Democratic | Yea |
| Karris, Venise | Democratic | Yea |
| La Rue Hatch, Selena | Democratic | Yea |
| Marzola, Elaine H. | Democratic | Yea |
| Miller, Brittney M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Monroe-Moreno, Daniele | Democratic | Yea |
| Moore, Cinthia Zermeño | Democratic | Yea |
| Mosca, Erica | Democratic | Yea |
| Nadeem, Hanadi | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Duy | Democratic | Yea |
| Orentlicher, David | Democratic | Yea |
| Roth, Erica P. | Democratic | Yea |
| Torres-Fossett, Selena | Democratic | Yea |
| Watts, Howard | Democratic | Yea |
| Yeager, Steve | Democratic | Yea |
| Cole, Lisa K. | Republican | Nay |
| DeLong, Rich | Republican | Nay |
| Dickman, Jill | Republican | Nay |
| Edgeworth, Rebecca | Republican | Yea |
| Gallant, Danielle | Republican | Nay |
| Gray, Ken | Republican | Nay |
| Gurr, Bert K. | Republican | Nay |
| Hafen, Gregory T., II | Republican | Nay |
| Hansen, Alexis M. | Republican | Nay |
| Hardy, Melissa R.. | Republican | Yea |
| Hibbetts, Brian | Republican | Nay |
| Kasama, Heidi | Republican | Yea |
| Koenig, Gregory S. | Republican | Yea |
| Yurek, Toby | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 2 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 15 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (21)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cannizzaro, Nicole J. | Democratic | Yea |
| Cruz-Crawford, Michelee "Shelly" | Democratic | Yea |
| Daly, Skip | Democratic | Yea |
| Dondero Loop, Marilyn | Democratic | Yea |
| Doñate, Fabian | Democratic | Yea |
| Flores, Edgar | Democratic | Yea |
| Lange, Roberta | Democratic | Yea |
| Neal, Dina | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Rochelle T. | Democratic | Yea |
| Ohrenschall, James | Democratic | Yea |
| Pazina, Julie | Democratic | Yea |
| Scheible, Melanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Taylor, Angela D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Buck, Carrie Ann | Republican | Nay |
| Ellison, John | Republican | Nay |
| Hansen, Ira | Republican | Nay |
| Krasner, Lisa | Republican | Nay |
| Rogich, Lori | Republican | Yea |
| Steinbeck, John C. | Republican | Yea |
| Stone, Jeff | Republican | Nay |
| Titus, Robin L. | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 260?
- SB 260 is sponsored by D'Silva, Reuben (Democratic), Scheible, Melanie (Democratic), González, Cecelia (Democratic), Cinthia Zermeño Moore, Doñate, Fabian (Democratic), and Flores, Edgar (Democratic).
- What is the current status of SB 260?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 03, 2025. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 260?
- Track SB 260 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 260
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 260
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →