AB 320 — Revises provisions related to the administration of justice. (BDR 1-810)
Last action — Vetoed by the Governor.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2025 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Vetoed by Governor Joe Lombardo (Republican) on June 10, 2025.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
89 added · 97 removed89 line(s) added, 97 removed.
EXEMPTAssembly (ReprintedBill withNo. amendments adopted on April 17, 2025) FIRST REPRINT A.B.
320320–Assemblymembers AJackson; SSEMBLY B ILLN O.
320–ASSEMBLYMEMBERSand JACKSOND’Silva ;ANDCHAPTER.......... D’S ILVA FEBRUARY 27, 2025 ____________ Referred to Committee on Judiciary SUMMARY—Revises provisions related to the administration of justice.
(BDR 1-810) FISCAL NOTE:
Effect on Local Government:
No.
Effect on the State:
Yes.
~ EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
(1) makes certain legislative declarations recognizing the importance of access to the courts ofin thismaintaining Stateorder and thedecorum interestin of the Legislaturecourtroom; urges the courts not to create policies, rules or administrative orders that unduly restrict access to justice based on the attire of the parties.
Sectionand 1.7(2) ofprovides thisthatf billthe prohibitsLegislature aurges courtthe fromcourts imposingnot ato penaltycreate onpolicies, arules defendantor whoadministrative isorders deniedthat unduly restrict access to ajustice courtroombased solelyon because of the attire of the defendant.parties.
Section 1.7 of this bill prohibits a court from imposing a penalty on a defendant who is denied access to a courtroom solely because the defendant is not wearing formal or proSection 5 of this bill authorizes the Division of Parole and Probation of the Department of Public Safety to establish a pilot program to identify and develop employment opportunities for and provide training on employment readiness toelopto parolees and probationers.
-EXPLANATION *AB320_R1* – 2Matter –in THEbolded PEOPLEitalics OFis THEnew; STATE OF NEVADA, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEMBLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEMBLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
- 83rd Session (2025) – 2 – Sec.
A court may not impose a penalty on a defendant who is denied access to a courtroom solely because of the attiredefendant ofis thenot defendant.wearing formal or professional attire.
As used in this section,section: “penalty” includes, without limitation:
(a)limitation, Asuits, finetrousers, orslacks, fee;long pants, dress shirts, long-t sleeved shirts, suit jackets, blazers, ties, dresses, skirts, pantsuits, dress shoes and closed-toed shoes.
(b) Entering“Penalty” uponincludes, thewithout minuteslimitation: that a person failed to appear when lawfully required in court;
or(1) (c)A Thefine issuanceor offee; a warrant for arrest.
Sec.(2) Entering upon the minutes that a person failed to appear when lawfully required in court;
2.or (3) The issuance of a warrant for arrest.
Secs.
2-4.
3.
(Deleted by amendment.) Sec.
4.
(Deleted by amendment.) Sec.
The Division may, by regulation, establish a pilot program to identify and develop employment opportunities for and provide tra2.inIntraining establishingon theemployment pilotreadiness program,to theparolees Divisionand mayers.probationers.
collaborate2. with nonprofit organizations in the community that provide services to parolees and probationers.
In establishing the pilot program, the Division may collaborate with nonprofit organizations in the community that provide services to parolees and probationers.
3.the Department of Public Safety.ision of Parole and Probation of 4.
“Division” means the Division of Parole and Probation of the Department of Public Safety.
4.
- *AB320_R1* – 3 – 5.
8.- 83rd Session (2025) – 3 – NRS 179D.097.al offense” has the meaning ascribed to it in 9.
“Sexual“Standards” offense” has the meaning ascribed to it in NRS9.79“Standards” means the objective standards for granting or revoking parole or probation which are adopted by the Board or the Chief.
(a) Upon passage and approval for purposesthe purpose of adopting any regulations or performing any other preparatory administrative tasks that are necessary to carry out the provisions of this act;
Show all 41 changed lines (1 more)
H~~~~~ 25 - *AB320_R1*83rd Session (2025)
Show all 41 changed rows (1 more)
View plain text versions (4)
- Enrolled As Enrolled Current pdf
- Reprint 1 View text pdf
- Reprint 2 View text pdf
- Introduced As Introduced pdf
Compared against the Nevada Revised Statutes as published AI-generated reading aid — verify against the official bill.
The bill adds provisions for a pilot program to assist parolees and probationers with employment opportunities and training, and modifies the definitions section of NRS 213.107 to reference this new program.
-
NRS 213.107
and section 5 of this act
The definition section is expanded to include reference to a new pilot program established for parolees and probationers.
Amendments
2 amendmentsClick Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.
Action History
-
Vetoed by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and delivered to Governor.
-
Read third time. Passed, as amended. Title approved. (Yeas: 14, Nays: 7.) To Assembly. In Assembly. Senate Amendment No. 953 concurred in. To enrollment.
-
Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. Placed on Second Reading File. Read second time. Amended. (Amend. No. 953.) To printer. From printer. To re-engrossment. Re-engrossed. Second reprint.
-
From committee: Do pass, as amended. Placed on General File. Read third time. Passed, as amended. Title approved, as amended. (Yeas: 41, Nays: None, Excused: 1.) To Senate. In Senate. Read first time. Referred to Committee on Judiciary. To committee.
-
From printer. To engrossment. Engrossed. First reprint. To committee.
-
Read second time. Amended. (Amend. No. 205.) Taken from General File. Rereferred to Committee on Ways and Means. Exemption effective. To printer.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended.
-
Notice of eligibility for exemption.
-
From printer. To committee.
-
Read first time. Referred to Committee on Judiciary. To printer.
Sponsors
- Reuben D'Silva · Cosponsor
- Jovan A. Jackson · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 65 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Jackson, Jovan A. Democratic
Co-sponsors (1)
- D'Silva, Reuben Democratic
Not signed on (65)
65 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 65 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors AB 320?
- AB 320 is sponsored by D'Silva, Reuben (Democratic) and Jackson, Jovan A. (Democratic).
- What is the current status of AB 320?
- This bill died with 2025 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 320?
- Track AB 320 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 320
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 320
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →