SB 167 — Prohibits the importation and sale of household cleaning products for which animal testing was performed. (BDR 52-892)

(ReprintedSenate withBill amendmentsNo. adopted on April 21, 2025) FIRST REPRINT S.B.

167167–Senators SENATEScheible; B ILLN O.

167–SENATORS S CHEIBLE ;AND K RASNER PREFILED FEBRUARY 3, 2025 ____________ Referred to Committee on Commerce and LaborKrasner SUMMARY—ProhibitsCHAPTER.......... the importation and sale of household cleaning products for which animal testing was performed.

(BDR 52-892) FISCAL NOTE:

Effect on Local Government:

Increases or Newly Provides for Term of Imprisonment in County or City Jail or Detention Facility.

Effect on the State:

Yes.

~ EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;

matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.

LegThisLegislative billCounsel’s prohibits,Digest: under certain circumstances, a manufacturer from importing, selling or offering for sale in this State any household cleaning product for which animal testing was performed on or after January 1, 2030.

This bill prohibits, under certain circumstances, a manufacturer from importing, selling or offering for sale in this State any household cleaning product for which animal testing was performed on or after January 1, 2030.

(1) to comply with a requirement, notification or registration of a regulatory agency of a foreign jurisdiction;

(2) because of certain considerations relating to the existence ororeign complypracticality withof acertain federaltesting ormethodologies; state law.

This(3) billfor additionallycertain providesassessments; that theor (4) to prohibition does not apply to:

(1)or a(4) householdto cleaningcomply productwith or ingredient in a householdfederal cleaning product if animal testing was conducted for the household cleaning product or ingredientstate beforelaw. January 1, 2030;

(2)This databill fromadditionally certainprovides animalthat testingthe ofprohibition certaindoes ingredients;not apply to:

or(1) (3) a manufacturerhousehold thatcleaning requestsproduct fromor a supplier but is unable to obtain verification that an ingredient hasin nota beenhousehold subjectcleaning toproduct if animal tesExistingtesting lawwas definesconducted various activities that constitute deceptive trade practices and provides for the impositionhousehold testing of civilcertain andingredients; criminal penalties against persons who engage in deceptive trade practices.

or (3) a manufacturer that requests from a supplier but is unable to obtain verification that an ingredient has not been subject to animal testing.

Existing law defines various activities that constitute deceptive trade practices and provides for the imposition of civil and criminal penalties against persons who engage in deceptive trade practices.

-EXPLANATION *SB167_R1* – 2Matter –in THEbolded PEOPLEitalics OFis THEnew; STATE OF NEVADA, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEMBLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:

matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEMBLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:

- 83rd Session (2025) – 2 – (b) Because no appropriate non-animal testing methods exist or the existing non-animal testing methods cannot be reasonably conducted.

(c) To enable a comprehensive safety assessment for which animal testing is necessary even after the integration and evaluation of all relevant existing data, including, without limitation, data from animal and non-animal testing.

(a) A household cleaning product or ingredient in a household cleaning product if animal testing was conducted for the household cleaning product or ingredient before January 1, 2030, even if the household cleaning product in its final form or ing(b) Data from animal testing of an ingredient thatwas ismanufactured a commodity produced in large quantities and is used as a raw material for end uses outside of cleaning products, so long as the animal testing on theor ingredientafter wasthat notdate. conducted predominately for the purpose of assessing the use of the ingredient in a household cleaning product.

(b) Data from animal testing of an ingredient that is a commodity produced in large quantities and is used as a raw material for end uses outside of cleaning products, so long as the animal testing on the ingredient was not conducted predominately for the purpose of assessing the use of the ingredient in a household cleaning product.

and (2) The supplier is unable to provide such verification due to a4.laThis lacksection ofshall accessnot be construed to theprevent necessarya data.manufacturer or supplier from reviewing, assessing or retaining existing data from animal testing, including, without limitation, data sourced from a consortia or nonprofit organization.

- *SB167_R1* – 3 – 4.

This section shall not be construed to prevent a manufacturer or supplier from reviewing, assessing or retaining existing data from animal testing, including, without limitation, data sourced from a consortia or nonprofit organization.

(b) “Household cleaning product” means any product manufactured from chemicals that is designed to clean or provide - 83rd Session (2025) – 3 – protection to household surfaces or furniture, including, without limitation, task-specific cleaning products, such as spot removers, stain removers, upholstery cleaners, glass cleaners, dish soap and laundry detergent.

The term does not include any products subject to regulation under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, 7 U.S.C.

§§ 136 et seq.seq.ide, Fungicide, and (c) “Ingredient” means any single chemical entity or mixture that is intentionally used as a component in the manufacture of a household cleaning product.

(c) “Ingredient” means any single chemical entity or mixture that is intentionally used as a component in the manufacture of a household cleaning product.

H~~~~~ 25 - *SB167_R1*83rd Session (2025)