AB 112 — Removes an exemption from provisions providing certain employees with the right to use sick leave to assist family members. (BDR 53-318)
Last action — Vetoed by the Governor.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2025 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Vetoed by Governor Joe Lombardo (Republican) on June 05, 2025.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
82 added · 92 removed82 line(s) added, 92 removed.
(ReprintedAssembly withBill amendmentsNo. adopted on April 21, 2025) FIRST REPRINT A.B.
112112–Assemblymember ANguyen SSEMBLYCHAPTER.......... B ILLN O.
112–ASSEMBLYMEMBER N GUYEN PREFILED JANUARY 23, 2025 ____________ Referred to Committee on Commerce and Labor SUMMARY—Removes an exemption from provisions providing certain employees with the right to use sick leave to assist family members.
(BDR 53-318) FISCAL NOTE:
Effect on Local Government:
No.
Effect on the State:
No.
~ EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
Existing law requires a private employer that provides employees with sick leave to allow an employee to use accrued sick leave for an absence due to an illness, injury, medical appointment or other authorized medical need of a member of the employee’s immediate family.
Existing law exempts an employer from this requirement if the employee is covered under a valid collective bargaining agreement.
(NRS 608.01975) Section 1 of this bill eliminates the exemption, thereby making the requirement applicable to an employer even if the employee is thecovered obligationunder of an employer to comply with a valid collective bargaining agreement,thatagreement. policy of the employer, employment contract or applicable local, state or federal law that provides the same or a more generous sick leave benefit or paid time off benefit is not diminished by the provisions of section 1.
Section 21 also provides that the obligation of thisan billemployer providesto comply with a collective bargaining agreement, policy of the employer, employment contract or applicable local, state or federal law that provides the amendatorysame or a more generous sick leave benefit is not diminished provisions of section 1 do not apply during the current term of any collectivecollectiveatory bargaining agreement entered into before October 1, collective2025, bargainingbut agreementdo enteredapply intoto on or after October 1, 2025.o any -extension *AB112_R1*or –renewal 2of –such THEan PEOPLEagreement OFand THEto STATEany OFcollective NEVADA,bargaining REPRESENTEDagreement INentered SENATEinto ANDon ASSEMBLY,or DOafter ENACTOctober AS1, FOLLOWS:2025.
EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEMBLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
3.- 83rd Session (2025) – 2 – clearly sets forth an explanation of the provisions of this section.
The Labor Commissioner shall prepare a bulletin which clearly sets forth an explanation of the provisions of this section.
(c) Prohibit, preempt or discourage any contract or other agreement that provides a more generous sick leave benefit or paid tim(d)time Extendoff thebenefit; maximum amount of leave to which an employee is entitled to take pursuant to the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993, 29 U.S.C.
or (d) Extend the maximum amount of leave to which an employee 1993, 29 U.S.C.
ororFamily and Medical Leave Act of (e) Diminish the obligation of an employer to comply with any of the following that provide the same or a more generous sick leave benefit or paid time off benefit:
An employer shall not deny an employee the right to use accrued sick leave in accordance with the provisions of this section or retaliate against an employee for attempting to prosecute a - *AB112_R1* – 3 – violation of this section or for exercising any rights afforded by this section.
Insofar as they conflict with the provisions of such an agreement, the amendatory provisions of this act do not apply during the current term of any collective bargaining agreement - 83rd Session (2025) – 3 – entered into before October 1, 2025, but do apply to any extension or renewal of such an agreement and to any collective bargaining agreement entered into on or after October 1, 2025.
H~~~~~ 25 - *AB112_R1*83rd Session (2025)
View plain text versions (4)
- Enrolled As Enrolled Current pdf
- Reprint 1 View text pdf
- Reprint 2 View text pdf
- Introduced As Introduced pdf
Amendments
2 amendmentsClick Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.
Action History
-
Vetoed by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and delivered to Governor.
-
Senate Amendment No. 583 concurred in. To enrollment.
-
In Assembly.
-
Read third time. Passed, as amended. Title approved. (Yeas: 15, Nays: 6.) To Assembly.
-
Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.
-
Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.
-
Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.
-
From printer. To re-engrossment. Re-engrossed. Second reprint. Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.
-
Read second time. Amended. (Amend. No. 583.) To printer.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended.
-
In Senate. Read first time. Referred to Committee on Commerce and Labor. To committee.
-
From printer. To engrossment. Engrossed. First reprint. To Senate.
-
Read third time. Passed, as amended. Title approved. (Yeas: 29, Nays: 13.) To printer.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. Placed on Second Reading File. Read second time. Amended. (Amend. No. 40.) Dispensed with reprinting.
-
Read first time. To committee.
-
From printer.
-
Prefiled. Referred to Committee on Commerce and Labor. To printer.
Sponsors
- Duy Nguyen · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 66 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Nguyen, Duy Democratic
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (66)
66 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 66 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors AB 112?
- AB 112 is sponsored by Nguyen, Duy (Democratic).
- What is the current status of AB 112?
- This bill died with 2025 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 112?
- Track AB 112 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 112
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 112
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →