Nevada 2025 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate 11 D cosponsors

SCR 2 — Recognizes the “Fruit Loop” as a historical LGBTQ+ landmark in Clark County, Nevada. (BDR R-588)

Last action — Enrolled and delivered to Secretary of State. File No. 25.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2025 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

55 added · 65 removed

55 line(s) added, 65 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
(Reprinted with amendments adopted on April 16, 2025) FIRST REPRINT S.C.R.
Senate Concurrent Resolution No.
2 S ENATE C ONCURRENT RESOLUTION N O.
2–Senators Doñate, Scheible, Ohrenschall, Flores;
2–SENATORS DOÑATE , SCHEIBLE , OHRENSCHALL , LORES ;
Daly and Nguyen Joint Sponsors:
DALY AND NGUYEN FEBRUARY 20, 2025 ____________ JOINT S PONSORS :
Assemblymembers González, Watts;
ASSEMBLYMEMBERS G ONZÁLEZ AND W ATTS ____________ Referred to Committee on Government Affairs SUMMARY—Recognizes the “Fruit Loop” as a historical LGBTQ+ landmark in Clark County, Nevada.
Considine, D’Silva and Nguyen FILE NUMBER..........
(BDR R-588) ~ EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
W HEREAS , The State of Nevada consists of various diverse communities, including, without limitation, the LGBTQ+ community, which have made significant cultural, civic, economic and political contributions to the State;
W HEREAS , The State of Nevada consists of various diverse communities, including, without limitation,the LGBTQ+ community, which have made significant cultural, civic, economic and political contributions to the State;
and W HEREAS , The Fruit Loop has provided a safe space for the LGBTQ+ community for self-expression, socialization and advocacy and has contributed to the diverse social, cultural and economic vitality of Las Vegas, Nevada, by fostering inclusivity, acceptance, understanding and respect;
and W HEREAS , The Fruit Loop has provided a safe space for the LGBTQ+ community for self-expression, socializationand advocacy and has contributed to the diverse social, cultural and economic vitality of Las Vegas, Nevada, by fostering inclusivity, acceptance, understanding and respect;
now, therefore, be it - *SCR2_R1* – 2 – R ESOLVED BY THE SENATE OF THE S TATE OF N EVADA , THE A SSEMBLY C ONCURRING , That the members of the 83rd Session of the Nevada Legislature hereby recognize the Fruit Loop as a historical LGBTQ+ landmark;
now, therefore, be it RESOLVED BY THE SENATE OF THE STATE OF N EVADA , THE A SSEMBLY CONCURRING , That the members of the 83rd Session of the Nevada Legislature hereby recognize the Fruit Loop as a historical LGBTQ+ landmark;
and be it further R ESOLVED , That the recognition of the Fruit Loop as a historical LGBTQ+ landmark will encourage continued support for the preservation of its legacy and the promotion of LGBTQ+ history in Nevada;
and be it further RESOLVED , That the recognition of the Fruit Loop as a historical LGBTQ+ landmark will encourage continued support for the preservation of its legacy and the promotion of LGBTQ+ history in Nevada;
and be it further R ESOLVED , That the members of the 83rd Session of the Nevada Legislature hereby urge the Director of the Department of Transportation to install directional signs to direct tourists and members of the public to the location of the Fruit Loop;
and be it further RESOLVED , That the members of the 83rd Session of the Nevada Legislature hereby urge the Director of the Department of Transportation to install directional signs to direct tourists and members of the public to the location of the Fruit Loop;
and be it further R ESOLVED , That the members of the 83rd Session of the Nevada Legislature hereby urge the Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority and the Division of Tourism of the Department of Tourism and Cultural Affairs to produce materials concerning the cultural and historical significance of the Fruit Loop for the inclusion on maps and other marketing materials;
and be it further - 83rd Session (2025) – 2 – R ESOLVED , That the members of the 83rd Session of the Nevada Legislature hereby urge the Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority and the Division of Tourism of the Department of Tourism and Cultural Affairs to produce materials concerning the cultural and historical significance of the Fruit Loop for the inclusion on maps and other marketing materials;
and be it further R ESOLVED , That the Secretary of the Senate transmit a copy of this resolution to the Board of County Commissioners of Clark County, Nevada, the Las Vegas City Council, the Director of the Department of Transportation, the Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority, the Division of Tourism of the Department of Tourism and Cultural Affairs and the LGBTQ+ Center of Southern Nevada;
and be it further R ESOLVED , That the Secretary of the Senate transmit a copy of this resolution to the Board of County Commissioners of Clark County, Nevada, the Las Vegas City Council, the Director of the Department of Transportation, the Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority, the Division of Tourism of the Department of Nevada;
and be it further R ESOLVED , That this resolution becomes effective upon adoption.
and be it furtherirs and the LGBTQ+ Center of Southern R ESOLVED , That this resolution becomes effective upon adoption.
H - *SCR2_R1*
~~~~~ 25 - 83rd Session (2025)
⬇ Download PDF
View plain text versions (4)

Amendments

2 amendments

Click Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.

Action History

  1. Enrolled and delivered to Secretary of State. File No. 25.

  2. Assembly Amendment No. 571 concurred in. To enrollment.

  3. Resolution read and adopted, as amended. To Senate. In Senate.

  4. Taken from Resolution File. Placed on Resolution File for next legislative day.

  5. Taken from Resolution File. Placed on Resolution File for next legislative day.

  6. Taken from Resolution File. Placed on Resolution File for next legislative day.

  7. Taken from Resolution File. Placed on Resolution File for next legislative day.

  8. From printer. To reengrossment. Reengrossed. Second reprint. Taken from Resolution File. Placed on Resolution File for next legislative day.

  9. Resolution read. Amended. (Amend. No. 571.) To printer.

  10. From committee: Amend, and be adopted as amended.

  11. In Assembly. Resolution read. Referred to Committee on Government Affairs. To committee.

  12. From printer. To engrossment. Engrossed. First reprint. Resolution read and adopted. Preamble adopted. To Assembly.

  13. From committee: Amend, and be adopted as amended. Placed on Resolution File. Resolution read. Amended. (Amend. No. 518.) To printer.

  14. From printer. To committee.

  15. Resolution read. Referred to Committee on Government Affairs. To printer.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

6 sponsors · 5 co-sponsors · 56 not signed on

Sponsors (6)

Co-sponsors (5)

Not signed on (56)

56 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 56 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

civil-rights
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SCR 2?
SCR 2 is sponsored by Nguyen, Duy (Democratic), D'Silva, Reuben (Democratic), Considine, Venicia (Democratic), Nguyen, Rochelle T. (Democratic), Daly, Skip (Democratic), Watts, Howard (Democratic), González, Cecelia (Democratic), Flores, Edgar (Democratic), Ohrenschall, James (Democratic), Scheible, Melanie (Democratic), and Doñate, Fabian (Democratic).
What is the current status of SCR 2?
This bill died with 2025 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SCR 2?
Track SCR 2 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SCR 2

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SCR 2

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →