Nevada 2023 Regular Session Status: Enacted Bipartisan · 12 D · 1 R cosponsors

AB 193 — Revises provisions relating to custodial interrogations of children. (BDR 5-229)

Last action — Approved by the Governor. Chapter 208.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 20, 2023. Enacted.

Signed by Governor Joe Lombardo (Republican) on June 05, 2023.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 78% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 16 sponsors

    6 primary, 10 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Bipartisan support

    Sponsored across 2 parties (12 D · 1 R) — cross-party backing.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

72 added · 78 removed

72 line(s) added, 78 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
(Reprinted with amendments adopted on April 20, 2023) FIRST REPRINT A.B.
Assembly Bill No.
193 A SSEMBLY B ILL NO .
193–Assemblymen González, D’Silva, Thomas, Anderson, Torres;
193–A SSEMBLYMEN G ONZÁLEZ , D’SILVA , THOMAS , ANDERSON , TORRES ;
Gorelow, La Rue Hatch, Marzola, C.H.
GORELOW , A R UE HATCH , M ARZOLA , C.H.
Miller, Nguyen, Orentlicher, Peters and Taylor Joint Sponsors:
MILLER, NGUYEN , ORENTLICHER , ETERS AND TAYLOR FEBRUARY 20, 2023 ____________ JOINT S PONSORS :
Senators Ohrenschall;
SENATORS O HRENSCHALL ;AND NGUYEN ____________ Referred to Committee on Judiciary SUMMARY—Revises provisions relating to custodial interrogations of children.
Krasner and Nguyen CHAPTER..........
(BDR 14-229) FISCAL NOTE:
Effect on Local Government:
No.
Effect on the State:
No.
~ EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
Legislative Counsel’s Digest:
LegExisting law prescribes certain requirements relating to custodial interrogations.
Existing law prescribes certain requirements relating to custodial interrogations.
(NRS 62C.013, 171.1239) This bill prohibits a peace officer or other person authorized to conduct a custodial interrogation of a child from:
(NRS 62C.013, 171.1239) This bill prohibits a peace officer or other person making certain materially false statements about evidence to a child who is the subject of a custodial interrogation;
(1) knowingly making certain materially false statements about evidence to a child who is the subject of a custodial interrogation;
or (2) making certain express or implied promises of leniency or advantage to a child who is the subject of a custodial interrogation.
or (2) making certain express or implied promises of leniency or advantage to a child who is the subject of a custodial child obtained in violation of this bill is involuntary and inadmissible in anyby a criminal or juvenile proceeding.
This bill additionally creates a presumption that any statement by a child obtained in violation of this bill is involuntary and inadmissible in any criminal or juvenile proceeding.
To overcome this presumption, the State must prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the statement was voluntary, reliable and not induced by a violation of this bill.
To overcome this presumption, the State must reliable and not induced by a violation of this bill.
(1) the peace officer or other person who conducted the custodial interrogation reasonably - *AB193_R1* – 2 – believed that the information sought was necessary to protect life or property from those reasonably necessary to obtain information related to the imminent threat.
(1) the believed that the information sought was necessary to protect life or property from an imminent threat;
and (2) the questions asked by such a person were limited to those reasonably necessary to obtain information related to the imminent threat.
EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
Chapter 171 of NRS is hereby amended by adding thereto a new section to read as follows:
Chapter 62C of NRS is hereby amended by adding thereto a new section to read as follows:
(a) Knowingly make a materially false statement about evidence that is reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response from the child;
- 82nd Session (2023) – 2 – (a) Knowingly make a materially false statement about evidence that is reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response from the child;
The State may overcome the presumption set forth in this subsection by proving by a preponderance of the evidence that the statement was voluntary, reliable and not induced by an act in violation of this section.
The State may overcome the presumption set evidence that the statement was voluntary, reliable and nothe induced by an act in violation of this section.
The term includes:
(1) A person who is certified for criminal proceedings as an adult pursuant to NRS 62B.390 or 62B.400.
(2) A person who is excluded from the jurisdiction of the juvenile court pursuant to NRS 62B.330.
- *AB193_R1* – 3 – Sec.
(c) “Peace officer” has the meaning ascribed to it in NRS 169.125.
Sec.
H - *AB193_R1*
~~~~~ 23 - 82nd Session (2023)
View plain text versions (4)

Amendments

2 amendments

Click Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.

Action History

  1. Approved by the Governor. Chapter 208.

  2. Enrolled and delivered to Governor.

  3. Senate Amendment No. 673 concurred in. To enrollment.

  4. Read third time. Passed, as amended. Title approved, as amended. (Yeas: 15, Nays: 5, Excused: 1.) To Assembly. In Assembly.

  5. From printer. To re-engrossment. Re-engrossed. Second reprint. Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.

  6. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. Placed on Second Reading File. Read second time. Amended. (Amend. No. 673.) To printer.

  7. In Senate. Read first time. Referred to Committee on Judiciary. To committee.

  8. From printer. To engrossment. Engrossed. First reprint. Read third time. Passed, as amended. Title approved, as amended. (Yeas: 26, Nays: 14, Excused: 2.) To Senate.

  9. Read second time. Amended. (Amend. No. 260.) To printer.

  10. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended.

  11. From printer. To committee.

  12. Read first time. Referred to Committee on Judiciary. To printer.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

6 sponsors · 10 co-sponsors · 51 not signed on

Sponsors (6)

Co-sponsors (10)

Not signed on (51)

51 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 51 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors AB 193?
AB 193 is sponsored by González, Cecelia (Democratic), D'Silva, Reuben (Democratic), Clara Thomas, Anderson, Natha C. (Democratic), Torres-Fossett, Selena (Democratic), Ohrenschall, James (Democratic), La Rue Hatch, Selena (Democratic), Marzola, Elaine H. (Democratic), Nguyen, Duy (Democratic), Orentlicher, David (Democratic), Taylor, Angela D. (Democratic), Krasner, Lisa (Republican), Nguyen, Rochelle T. (Democratic), Miller, Brittney M. (Democratic), Peters, Sarah, and Gorelow, Michelle.
What is the current status of AB 193?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 20, 2023. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 193?
Track AB 193 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 193

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 193

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →