Nevada 2023 Regular Session Status: Enacted 5 R cosponsors

SB 113 — Revises provisions relating to groundwater management plans. (BDR 48-595)

Last action — Approved by the Governor. Chapter 159.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 08, 2023. Enacted.

Signed by Governor Joe Lombardo (Republican) on June 01, 2023.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 62% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 6 sponsors

    5 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (5 R).

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

263 added · 281 removed

263 line(s) added, 281 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
(Reprinted with amendments adopted on April 18, 2023) FIRST REPRINT S.B.
Senate Bill No.
113 SENATE BILL N O.
113–Senators Goicoechea, Titus, Buck, Hansen, Stone;
113–SENATORS G OICOECHEA , ITUS, BUCK , H ANSEN , STONE ;AND K RASNER (BY REQUEST ) F EBRUARY 8, 2023 ____________ Referred to Committee on Natural Resources SUMMARY—Revises provisions relating to groundwater management plans.
and Krasner (by request) CHAPTER..........
(BDR 48-595) FISCAL NOTE:
EffEffect on the State:
No.
No.
~ EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
Legislative Counsel’s Digest:
LegiUnder existing law, the State Engineer:
Under existing law, the State Engineer:
(NRS 534.110) Existing management area, a petition for the approval of a groundwater management plan may be submitted to the State Engineer by a majority of the holders of permits or certificates to appropriate water in the basin.
(NRS 534.110) Existing law further provides that in a basin that has been designated as a critical management area, a petition for the approval of a groundwater management plan may be submitted to the State Engineer by a majority of the holders of permits or certificates to appropriate water in the basin.
(1) requires the State Engineer to affirm or modify the perennial yield of a basin at the same time he or she designates a basin as a critical management area;
(1) requires the State Engineer to affirm or modify the perennial yield of a basin at authorizes the State Engineer to modify the perennial yield for a criticaland (2) management area based on the best available science.
and (2) authorizes the State Engineer to modify the perennial yield for a critical management area based on the best available science.
Section 1 also requires the State Engineer to review the perennial yield before reviewing the results of a groundwater management plan and modify the perennial yield if there has been a change.
Section 1 also requires the groundwater management plan and modify the perennial yield if there has been a change.
Section 1.5 of this bill provides that a petition for the approval of a groundwater management plan must instead be signed by the holders of permits or certificates to appropriate water in the basin that are on file in the Office of the State Engineer who represent a majority of the total groundwater permitted or permit or certificate with a date of priority before the date on which permits or certificates for withdrawals of groundwater in the basin were equal to the perennial yield of the basin who does not sign the petition may not be required to comply with an approved groundwater management plan.
Section 1.5 of this bill provides that a petition for the approval of a groundwater management plan must instead be signed by the holders of permits or certificates to appropriate water in the basin that are on file in the Office of the State Engineer who represent a majority of the total groundwater permitted or certificated for use in the basin.
Section 1.5 further provides that, if the State Engineer modifies the perennial yield of the basin, the holders of permits or certificates with dates of priority before or after the date on which withdrawals of groundwater in the basin were equal to the previous perennial yield of the basin must be required to comply or allowed to opt out of complying with an approved groundwater management plan, depending on wUnder existing law, the State Engineer is required to restrict withdrawals of groundwater to conform to priority rights under certain circumstances, including if a basin has been designated as a critical management area for at least 10 consecutive years.
Section 1.5 also provides that the holder of a certificates for withdrawals of groundwater in the basin were equal to the perennial - *SB113_R1* – 2 – yield of the basin who does not sign the petition may not be required to comply with an approved groundwater management plan.
(NRS 534.110) Section 1.5 requires the State Engineer to review an approved groundwater management plan that has been in effect for 10 consecutive years to determine whether there has been significant progress towards stabilizing the water level of the basin and, if not, with certain exceptions, to restrict withdrawals of groundwater to conform to priority rights until the water level is stabilized.
Section 1.5 further provides that, if the State Engineer modifies the perennial yield of the basin, the holders of permits or certificates with dates of priority before the previous perennial yield of the basin must be required to comply or allowed to opt out of complying with an approved groundwater management plan, depending on whether the perennial yield is increased or decreased.
Section 2 of this bill makes a conforming change to create an exception for the restriction of withdrawals to allow a domestic well to continue to withdraw - 82nd Session (2023) – 2 – 0.5 acre-feet of water per year if the owner of the domestic well installs or has insSection 3 of this bill requires that, beginning on October 1, 2033, 10 years after the effective date of this bill, the State Engineer must review any groundwater management plan that was approved before October 1, 2023, to determine whether there has been significant progress towards stabilizing the water level of the basin until the water level is stabilized.
Under existing law, the State Engineer is required to restrict withdrawals of groundwater to conform to priority rights under certain circumstances, including if a basin has been designated as a critical management area for at least 10 an approved groundwater management plan that has been in effect for 10er to review consecutive years to determine whether there has been significant progress towards stabilizing the water level of the basin and, if not, with certain exceptions, to restrict withdrawals of groundwater to conform to priority rights until the water level is stabilized.
in accordance with the requirements of this bill EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
Section 2 of this bill makes a conforming change to create an exception for the restriction of withdrawals to allow a domestic well to continue to withdraw installed a water meter to record the withdrawal.he domestic well installs or has Section 3 of this bill requires that, beginning on October 1, 2033, 10 years after the effective date of this bill, the State Engineer must review any groundwater management plan that was approved before October 1, 2023, to determine whether there has been significant progress towards stabilizing the water level of the basin and, if not, to restrict withdrawals in accordance with the requirements of this bill until the water level is stabilized.
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
- *SB113_R1* – 3 – Sec.
Sec.
and [must be] (b) Be accompanied by a groundwater management plan which must set forth the necessary steps for removal of the basin’s designation as a critical management area.
and [must be] - 82nd Session (2023) – 3 – (b) Be accompanied by a groundwater management plan which must set forth the necessary steps for removal of the basin’s designation as a critical management area.
In determining whether to approve a groundwater management plan submitted pursuant to subsection 1, the State Engineer shall consider, without limitation:
In determining whether to approve a groundwater Engineer shall consider, without limitation:tion 1, the State (a) The hydrology of the basin;
(a) The hydrology of the basin;
(b) Posted on the Internet website of the State Engineer for at least 2 consecutive weeks immediately preceding the date of the hearing.
(b) Posted on the Internet website of the State Engineer for at least 2 consecutive weeks immediately preceding the date of the hea4.
4.
An amendment to a groundwater management plan must be proposed and approved in the same manner as an original - *SB113_R1* – 4 – groundwater management plan is proposed and approved pursuant to this section.
An amendment to a groundwater management plan must be proposed and approved in the same manner as an original groundwater management plan is proposed and approved pursuant to this section.
The State Engineer shall not require the holder of a permit or certificate in the basin with a date of priority that is before the date on which permits or certificates for withdrawals of groundwater in the basin were equal to the perennial yield of the basin who does not sign the petition submitted pursuant to subsection 1 to comply with the provisions of a groundwater management plan that is approved pursuant to this section, but the holder of such a permit or certificate may notify the State Engineer in writing that he or she intends to comply with the approved groundwater management plan at any time after the groundwater management plan has been approved.
The State Engineer shall not require the holder of a permit or certificate in the basin with a date of priority that is before the date on which permits or certificates for withdrawals of groundwater in the basin were equal to the perennial yield of the basin who does not sign the petition submitted pursuant to subsection 1 to comply with the provisions of a groundwater management plan that is approved pursuant to this section, but the holder of such a permit or certificate may notify the State - 82nd Session (2023) – 4 – Engineer in writing that he or she intends to comply with the approved groundwater management plan at any time after the groundwater management plan has been approved.
If the State Engineer modifies the perennial yield of a basin pursuant to subsection 2 of section 1 of this act after a groundwater management plan is submitted pursuant to subsection 1, the State Engineer shall, as applicable:
If the State Engineer modifies the perennial yield of a groundwater management plan is submitted pursuant toact after a subsection 1, the State Engineer shall, as applicable:
If the State Engineer determines there has not been significant progress, the State Engineer shall, except as otherwise provided in subsection 9 of NRS 534.110, order:
If the State Engineer determines there has not otherwise provided in subsection 9 of NRS 534.110, order:pt as (a) The groundwater management plan dissolved;
(a) The groundwater management plan dissolved;
- *SB113_R1* – 5 – Sec.
Sec.
(b) Upon his or her own initiation, conduct pumping tests to determine if overpumping is indicated, to determine the specific yield of the aquifers and to determine permeability characteristics.
- 82nd Session (2023) – 5 – determine if overpumping is indicated, to determine the specific yield of the aquifers and to determine permeability characteristics.
It is a condition of each appropriation of groundwater acquired under this chapter that the right of the appropriator relates to a specific quantity of water and that the right must allow for a reasonable lowering of the static water level at the appropriator’s point of diversion.
It is a condition of each appropriation of groundwater acquired under this chapter that the right of the appropriator relates to a specific quantity of water and that the right must allow for a reasonable lowering of the static water level at the appropriator’s water level in a particular area, the State Engineer shall consider the economics of pumping water for the general type of crops growing and may also consider the effect of using water on the economy of the area in general.
In determining a reasonable lowering of the static water level in a particular area, the State Engineer shall consider the economics of pumping water for the general type of crops growing and may also consider the effect of using water on the economy of the area in general.
and (b) Whose reasonably expected rate of diversion is one-half cubic foot per second or more, the State Engineer shall include as a condition of the permit that pumping water pursuant to the permit may be limited or prohibited to prevent any unreasonable adverse effects on an existing domestic well located within 2,500 feet of the well, unless the holder of the - *SB113_R1* – 6 – permit and the owner of the domestic well have agreed to alternative measures that mitigate those adverse effects.
and (b) Whose reasonably expected rate of diversion is one-half cubic foot per second or more, pumping water pursuant to the permit may be limited or prohibitedhat to prevent any unreasonable adverse effects on an existing domestic well located within 2,500 feet of the well, unless the holder of the permit and the owner of the domestic well have agreed to alternative measures that mitigate those adverse effects.
Except as otherwise provided in subsection 7, the State Engineer shall conduct investigations in any basin or portion thereof where it appears that the average annual replenishment to the groundwater supply may not be adequate for the needs of all permittees and all vested-right claimants, and if the findings of the State Engineer so indicate, except as otherwise provided in subsection 9, the State Engineer may order that withdrawals, including, without limitation, withdrawals from domestic wells, be restricted to conform to priority rights [.] until the water level of the basin is stabilized.
Except as otherwise provided in subsection 7, the State Engineer shall conduct investigations in any basin or portion thereof where it appears that the average annual replenishment to the groundwater supply may not be adequate for the needs of all - 82nd Session (2023) – 6 – State Engineer so indicate, except as otherwise provided inngs of the subsection 9, the State Engineer may order that withdrawals, including, without limitation, withdrawals from domestic wells, be restricted to conform to priority rights [.] until the water level of the basin is stabilized.
The designation of a basin as a critical management area pursuant to this subsection may be appealed pursuant to NRS 533.450.
to this subsection may be appealed pursuant to NRS 533.450.
If a basin has been designated as a critical management area for [at least] 10 consecutive years, except as otherwise provided in subsection 9, the State Engineer shall order that withdrawals, including, without limitation, withdrawals from domestic wells, be restricted in that basin to conform to priority rights [,] until the water level of the basin is stabilized, unless a groundwater management plan has been approved for the basin pursuant to NRS 534.037.
If aant basin has been designated as a critical management area for [at least] 10 consecutive years, except as otherwise provided in subsection 9, the State Engineer shall order that withdrawals, including, without limitation, withdrawals from domestic wells, be restricted in that basin to conform to priority rights [,] until the water level of the basin is stabilized, unless a groundwater management plan has been approved for the basin pursuant to NRS 534.037.
Any order or decision of the State Engineer so restricting drilling of such wells may be reviewed by the district court of the county pursuant to NRS 533.450.
Any order or decision of the State Engineer so restricting drilling of such wells may be reviewed by the district court of the county pursuant to NRS9.33.If a court of competent jurisdiction orders the State Engineer to restrict withdrawals to conform to priority rights or if pursuant to subsection 6 or 7 or subsection 8 of NRS 534.037 the State Engineer orders that withdrawals be restricted to conform to priority rights, the State Engineer must limit the restriction of withdrawals from a domestic well to allow a domestic well to continue to withdraw 0.5 acre-feet of water per year, which must be recorded by a water meter.
Show all 47 changed rows (7 more)
Previous
Latest
9.
- 82nd Session (2023) – 7 – Sec.
If a court of competent jurisdiction orders the State Engineer to restrict withdrawals to conform to priority rights or if pursuant to subsection 6 or 7 or subsection 8 of NRS 534.037 the State Engineer orders that withdrawals be restricted to conform to priority rights, the State Engineer must limit the restriction of withdrawals - *SB113_R1* – 7 – from a domestic well to allow a domestic well to continue to withdraw 0.5 acre-feet of water per year, which must be recorded by a water meter.
Sec.
Except as otherwise provided in subsection 2, the to a groundwater management plan approved before October 1,not apply 2023.
Except as otherwise provided in subsection 2, the amendatory provisions of sections 1 and 1.5 of this act do not apply to a groundwater management plan approved before October 1, 2023.
2.
review any groundwater management plan approved beforeer shall October 1, 2023, to determine whether there has been significant progress towards stabilizing the water level of the basin, as determined by the State Engineer.
Beginning on October 1, 2033, the State Engineer shall review any groundwater management plan approved before October 1, 2023, to determine whether there has been significant progress towards stabilizing the water level of the basin, as determined by the State Engineer.
H - *SB113_R1*
~~~~~ 23 - 82nd Session (2023)
View plain text versions (3)

How this bill changes current law

6 changes Share ↗

Compared against the Nevada Revised Statutes as published AI-generated reading aid — verify against the official bill.

The bill revises provisions related to the groundwater management plans, particularly for critical management areas, and establishes new requirements for the State Engineer and petition processes.

  • NRS 534.110

    The State Engineer may designate certain basins as critical management areas; and (2) is required to designate a basin as a critical management area upon receipt of a petition signed by a majority of the holders of certificates or permits to appropriate water in the basin. → the State Engineer shall, in the order designating the critical management area, affirm or modify the perennial yield of the designated basin.

    The bill mandates the State Engineer to affirm or modify the perennial yield when designating a critical management area.

  • NRS 534.037

    a petition for the approval of a groundwater management plan may be submitted to the State Engineer by a majority of the holders of permits or certificates to appropriate water in the basin. → a petition for the approval of a groundwater management plan for the basin may be submitted to the State Engineer. The petition must be signed by the holders of permits or certificates to appropriate water in the basin that are on file in the Office of the State Engineer who represent a majority of the total groundwater permitted or certificated for use in the basin;

    The process for submitting a groundwater management plan petition is revised to require signatures representing a majority of total groundwater permitted or certificated.

  • NRS 534.037

    who does not sign the petition may not be required to comply with an approved groundwater management plan. → The holder of such a permit or certificate may notify the State Engineer in writing that he or she intends to comply with the approved groundwater management plan at any time after the groundwater management plan has been approved.

    Users who do not sign the petition can later opt to comply with the management plan.

  • NRS 534.037

    the State Engineer shall restrict withdrawals of groundwater to conform to priority rights under certain circumstances, including if a basin has been designated as a critical management area for at least 10 consecutive years. → Section 1.5 requires the State Engineer to review an approved groundwater management plan that has been in effect for 10 consecutive years to determine whether there has been significant progress towards stabilizing the water level of the basin and, if not, with certain exceptions, to restrict withdrawals of groundwater to conform to priority rights until the water level is stabilized.

    The bill requires periodic reviews of groundwater management plans and may impose restrictions on withdrawals if progress toward stabilization has not been made.

  • NRS 534.110

    create an exception for the restriction of withdrawals to allow a domestic well to continue to withdraw 0.5 acre-feet of water per year if the owner of the domestic well installs or has installed certain systems.

    Domestic wells are allowed a baseline withdrawal regardless of restrictions imposed due to critical management area designations.

  • NRS 534.037

    If a groundwater management plan approved pursuant to this section has been in effect for 10 consecutive years, the State Engineer shall review the results of the groundwater management plan to determine whether there has been significant progress towards stabilizing the water level of the basin, as determined by the State Engineer. If the State Engineer determines there has not otherwise provided in subsection 9 of NRS 534.110, order: → the State Engineer must review any groundwater management plan that was approved before October 1, 2023, to determine whether there has been significant progress towards stabilizing the water level of the basin.

    The bill establishes a timeline for reviewing older groundwater management plans to ensure ongoing effectiveness.

Amendments

1 amendment

Click Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.

Action History

  1. Approved by the Governor. Chapter 159.

  2. Enrolled and delivered to Governor.

  3. In Senate. To enrollment.

  4. Read third time. Passed. Title approved. (Yeas: 42, Nays: None.) To Senate.

  5. Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.

  6. Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.

  7. Read second time.

  8. From committee: Do pass.

  9. In Assembly. Read first time. Referred to Committee on Natural Resources. To committee.

  10. From printer. To engrossment. Engrossed. First reprint. Read third time. Passed, as amended. Title approved, as amended. (Yeas: 21, Nays: None.) To Assembly.

  11. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. Placed on Second Reading File. Read second time. Amended. (Amend. No. 218.) To printer.

  12. From printer. To committee.

  13. Read first time. Referred to Committee on Natural Resources. To printer.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

5 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 61 not signed on

Sponsors (5)

Co-sponsors (1)

Not signed on (61)

61 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 61 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 113?
SB 113 is sponsored by Titus, Robin L. (Republican), Buck, Carrie Ann (Republican), Hansen, Ira (Republican), Stone, Jeff (Republican), Krasner, Lisa (Republican), and Pete Goicoechea.
What is the current status of SB 113?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 08, 2023. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 113?
Track SB 113 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 113

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 113

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →