Revises provisions relating to deceptive trade practices. (BDR 52-773)
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 373 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 373.
You're tracking AB 373
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 373 — Revises provisions relating to deceptive trade practices. (BDR 52-773)
Last action — Approved by the Governor. Chapter 205.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 22, 2023. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Joe Lombardo (Republican) on June 05, 2023.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
4 sponsors
2 primary, 2 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (3 D).
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
198 added · 238 removed198 line(s) added, 238 removed.
(ReprintedAssembly withBill amendmentsNo. adopted on April 20, 2023) FIRST REPRINT A.B.
373373–Assemblymen AGorelow, SSEMBLYNguyen; B ILLN O.
373–ASSEMBLYMENAnderson Gand ORELOWTaylor ,CHAPTER.......... NGUYEN ;
ANDERSON AND TAYLOR M ARCH 22, 2023 ____________ Referred to Committee on Judiciary SUMMARY—Revises provisions relating to deceptive trade practices.
(BDR 52-773) FISCAL NOTE:
Effect on Local Government:
Increases or Newly Provides for Term of Imprisonment in County or City Jail or Detention Facility.
Effect on the State:
Yes.
~ EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
Existing law defines activities that constitute deceptive trade practices and provides for the imposition of civil and criminal penalties against persons whodwho engage in deceptive trade practices.
Existing law authorizes a court or the Director of the Department of Business and Industry or his or her designee, in certain actions and proceedings relating to the enforcement of the provisions prohibiting deceptive trade practices, to impose an additional maximum civil penalty of $12,500 for each violation if the court or tradethe practiceDirector directedor towardhis anor elderlyher persondesignee orfinds that a person withhas engaged in a disability.deceptive minor person.
(NRS 598.0973)598.0973, Section598.09735) Sections 1.5 and 1.7 of this billbillity increasesor a increase the additional maximum civil penalty to $25,000$15,000 if the deceptive trade practice was directed toward a person with a disability and $25,000 if directed toward an elderly person or a minor person.
- *AB373_R1* – 2 – Existing law authorizes the Commissioner of Consumer Affairs, the Director of the Department of Business and Industry, the district attorney of any county in this State or the Attorney General to recover a civil penalty not to exceed $5,000 if the 598.0999)court Sectionfinds 2that ofa thisperson billhas increaseswillfully theengaged maximumin civila penaltydeceptive fortrade suchpractice. a(NRS willful violation to $15,000.
(NRS willful violation to $15,000.ill increases the maximum civil penalty for such a Existing law requires an indictment for the offense of engaging in certain trade practices punishable as a felony to be found, or an information or complaint to be filed, within 4 years after the commission of the offense.
(NRS 171.085) Section 3 of this bill imposes that requirement for all offenses involving the commission of any deceptive trade practice that is punishable as a felony.
- 82nd Session (2023) – 2 – EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
The Attorney General is not required to obtain leave of the court before institutingins3.tutIf criminalthe proceedingsAttorney pursuantGeneral has reason to thisbelieve subsection.that a person has engaged or is engaging in a deceptive trade practice, the Attorney General may bring an action in the name of the State of Nevada against that person to obtain a temporary restraining order, a preliminary or permanent injunction, or other appropriate relief [.] , including, without limitation, the recovery of a civil penalty, disgorgement, restitution or the recovery of damages:
3.
If the Attorney General has reason to believe that a person has engaged or is engaging in a deceptive trade practice, the Attorney General may bring an action in the name of the State of Nevada against that person to obtain a temporary restraining order, a preliminary or permanent injunction, or other appropriate relief [.] , including, without limitation, the recovery of a civil penalty, disgorgement, restitution or the recovery of damages:
- *AB373_R1* – 3 – 4.
The subpoena must be served upon the person in the manner required for service of process in this State or by certified mail with return receipt requested.
An employee of the Attorney General may return personally serve the subpoena.
Sec.- 82nd Session (2023) – 3 – 598.0973 1.
1.5.Except as otherwise provided in NRS 598.0974,ws:
in any action or proceeding brought pursuant to NRS 598.0973598.0903 isto hereby598.0999, amendedinclusive, if the court or the Director or his or her designee finds that a person has engaged in a deceptive trade practice directed toward an elderly person or a person with a disability, the court or the Director or his or her designee may, in addition to readany asother follows:civil or criminal penalty, impose a civil penalty of :
598.0973(a) 1.For a deceptive trade practice directed toward a person with a disability, not more than [$12,500] $15,000 for each violation.
Except as otherwise provided in NRS 598.0974, in any action or proceeding brought pursuant to NRS 598.0903 to 598.0999, inclusive, if the court or the Director or his or her designee finds that a person has engaged in a deceptive trade practice directed toward an elderly person or a person with a disability, the court or the Director or his or her designee may, in addition to any other civil or criminal penalty, impose a civil penalty of :
(a) For a deceptive trade practice directed toward a person with a disability, not more than $12,500 for each violation.
(a)the Theelderly conductperson ofor the person waswith ina disregarddisability;rd of the rights of the(b) The person knew or should have known that his or her conduct was directed toward an elderly person or a person with a disability;
(b) The person knew or should have known that his or her conduct was directed toward an elderly person or a person with a disability;
(2) The loss of the primary residence of the elderly person or person (3) The loss of the principal employment or source of income of the elderly person or person with a disability;
(3)(4) The loss of themoney principalreceived employmentfrom ora sourcepension, ofretirement incomeplan of the elderly person or persongovernmental withprogram; a disability;
- *AB373_R1* – 4 – (4) The loss of money received from a pension, retirement plan or governmental program;
or - 82nd Session (2023) – 4 – (7) Any other interference with the economic well-being of the elderly person or person with a disability, including the encumbrance of his or her primary residence or principal source of income;
or (f) Any other factors that the court or the Director or his or her designee deems to be appropriate.
court or the Director or his or her Sec.
1.7.
Show all 71 changed lines (31 more)
NRS 598.09735 is hereby amended to read as follows:
598.09735 1.
Except as otherwise provided in NRS 598.0974, in any action or proceeding brought pursuant to NRS 598.0903 to 598.0999, inclusive, if the court or the Director or his or her designee finds that a person has engaged in a deceptive trade practice directed toward a minor person, the court or the Director or his or her designee may, in addition to any other civil or criminal penalty, impose a civil penalty of not more than [$12,500] $25,000 for each violation.
NRSIn 598.0999determining iswhether herebyto amendedimpose a civil penalty pursuant to readsubsection as1, follows:the court or the Director or his or her designee shall consider whether:
598.0999(a) 1.The conduct of the person was in disregard of the rights of the minor person;
Except(b) asThe otherwise provided in NRS 598.0974, a person whoknew violates a court order or injunctionshould issuedhave pursuantknown tothat thehis provisions of NRS 598.0903 to 598.0999, inclusive, upon a complaint brought by the Commissioner, the Director, the district attorney of any county of this State or theher Attorneyconduct Generalwas shalldirected forfeittoward and pay to the State General Fund a civilminor penaltyperson; of not more than $10,000 for each violation.
(c) The minor person was more vulnerable to the conduct of the person because of the age of the minor person;
(d) The conduct of the person caused the minor person to suffer actual and substantial physical, emotional or economic damage;
(e) (1) Mental or emotional anguish;
the minor person to suffer:
(2) The loss of money or financial support received from any source;
(3) The loss of property that had been set aside for education or for personal or family care and maintenance;
(4) The loss of assets which are essential to the health and welfare of the minor person;
or (5) Any other interference with the economic well-being of the minor person;
or (f) Any other factors that the court or the Director or his or her designee deems to be appropriate.
3.
As used in this section, “minor person” means a person who is 17 years of age or younger.
- 82nd Session (2023) – 5 – 598.0999 1.
Except as otherwise provided in NRS 598.0974,ws:
a person who violates a court order or injunction issued pursuant to the provisions of NRS 598.0903 to 598.0999, inclusive, upon a complaint brought by the Commissioner, the Director, the district attorney of any county of this State or the Attorney General shall forfeit and pay to the State General Fund a civil penalty of not more than $10,000 for each violation.
Except as otherwise provided in NRS 598.0974, in any action brought pursuant to the provisions of NRS 598.0903 to 598.0999, inclusive, if the court finds that a person has willfully engaged in a deceptive trade practice, the Commissioner, the Director, the district attorney of any county in this State or the Attorney General bringing the action may recover a civil penalty not to exceed [$5,000] $15,000 for each violation.
(c) For an offense involving a loss of property or services valued at $25,000 or more but less than $100,000, is guilty of a category B - *AB373_R1* – 5 – felony and shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for a minimum term of not less than 1 year and a maximum term of not for more than 10 years, and by a fine of not more than $10,000.
- The82nd courtSession may(2023) require– the6 natural– person, firm, or officer or managing agent of the corporation or association to pay to thether aggrieved party damages on all profits derived from the knowing and willful engagement in a deceptive trade practice and treble damages on all damages suffered by reason of the deceptive trade practice.
(a) The suspension of the person’s privilege to conduct business withinwit(b) thisIf State;the defendant is a corporation, dissolution of the corporation.
or (b) If the defendant is a corporation, dissolution of the corporation.
appropriate Therelief.nt court may grant or deny the relief sought or may order other appropriate6. relief.
- *AB373_R1* – 6 – 6.
- 82nd Session (2023) – 7 – (c) “Value” means the fair market value of the property or services at the time the deceptive trade practice occurred.
171.085 Except as otherwise provided in NRS 171.080 to 171.084, inclusive, and 171.095, an indictment for:for:71.080 to 1.
1.
H~~~~~ 23 - *AB373_R1*82nd Session (2023)
Show all 71 changed rows (31 more)
View plain text versions (4)
- Enrolled As Enrolled Current pdf
- Reprint 1 View text pdf
- Reprint 2 View text pdf
- Introduced As Introduced pdf
Compared against the Nevada Revised Statutes as published AI-generated reading aid — verify against the official bill.
The bill clarifies the powers of the Attorney General regarding deceptive trade practices and increases civil penalties associated with such practices, while also revising the statute of limitations for prosecuting related offenses.
-
NRS 598.0963
including, without limitation, the recovery of a civil penalty, disgorgement, restitution or the recovery of damages.→ including, without limitation, the recovery of a civil penalty, disgorgement, restitution or the recovery of damages: (a) As parens patriae of the persons residing in this State, with respect to damages sustained directly or indirectly by such persons, or, alternatively, if the court finds in its discretion that the interests of justice so require, as a representative of a class or classes consisting of persons residing in this State who have been damaged directly or indirectly; or (b) As parens patriae, with respect to direct or indirect damages to the general economy of the State of Nevada or any agency or political subdivision thereof.Expands the Attorney General's authority to seek recovery for damages on behalf of both individuals and the general economy.
-
NRS 598.0973
$12,500→ $15,000Increases the maximum civil penalty for deceptive trade practices directed toward persons with disabilities.
-
NRS 598.0973
[$12,500]→ $25,000Increases the maximum civil penalty for deceptive trade practices directed toward elderly persons.
-
NRS 171.085
a limitation of the time within which a prosecution for the sexual assault must be commenced.→ the requirement for an indictment for the offense of engaging in certain trade practices punishable as a felony to be found, or an information or complaint to be filed, within 4 years after the commission of the offense.Revises the statute of limitations for prosecuting deceptive trade practices punishable as felonies.
-
NRS 598.09735
$12,500→ $25,000Increases the maximum civil penalty for deceptive trade practices directed toward minors.
-
NRS 598.0999
$5,000→ $15,000Increases the maximum civil penalty for willful deceptive trade practices.
Amendments
2 amendmentsClick Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.
Action History
-
Approved by the Governor. Chapter 205.
-
Enrolled and delivered to Governor.
-
Senate Amendment No. 606 concurred in. To enrollment.
-
From printer. To re-engrossment. Re-engrossed. Second reprint. Read third time. Passed, as amended. Title approved. (Yeas: 20, Nays: None, Excused: 1.) To Assembly. In Assembly.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. Placed on Second Reading File. Read second time. Amended. (Amend. No. 606.) To printer.
-
In Senate. Read first time. Referred to Committee on Judiciary. To committee.
-
From printer. To engrossment. Engrossed. First reprint. Read third time. Passed, as amended. Title approved, as amended. (Yeas: 40, Nays: None, Excused: 2.) To Senate.
-
Read second time. Amended. (Amend. No. 263.) To printer.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended.
-
From printer. To committee.
-
Read first time. Referred to Committee on Judiciary. To printer.
Sponsors
- Duy Nguyen · Primary
- Natha C. Anderson · Cosponsor
- Angela D. Taylor · Cosponsor
- Michelle Gorelow · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →2 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 63 not signed on
Sponsors (2)
- Nguyen, Duy Democratic
- Gorelow, Michelle
Co-sponsors (2)
- Anderson, Natha C. Democratic
- Taylor, Angela D. Democratic
Not signed on (63)
63 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 63 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors AB 373?
- AB 373 is sponsored by Nguyen, Duy (Democratic), Anderson, Natha C. (Democratic), Taylor, Angela D. (Democratic), and Gorelow, Michelle.
- What is the current status of AB 373?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 22, 2023. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 373?
- Track AB 373 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 373
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 373
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →