HB5757 — CRIM PRO-REVOC PRETRIAL RELEAS
Last action — Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Michael J. Coffey, Jr.
-
1Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been introduced in the House. Introduced April 29, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee referral and hearing.
Odds of enactment
Low chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Introduced
Current position in the legislative process.
-
15 sponsors
1 primary, 14 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (14 R · 1 D) — cross-party backing.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
In plain language
The bill revokes pretrial release for certain defendants upon probable cause of new felony charges.
This bill amends pretrial release conditions for defendants previously granted release. It allows for revocation of that release if new felony charges arise during the pretrial period, following a court hearing.
Summary
Amends the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963. Provides that when a defendant has previously been granted pretrial release for a felony or Class A misdemeanor and has been placed on electronic monitoring as a condition of release, that pretrial release shall be revoked upon a finding of probable cause that the defendant has committed a felony that is alleged to have occurred during the defendant's pretrial release after a hearing on the court's own motion or upon the filing of a verified petition by the State. Provides that pretrial detention shall continue pending resolution of the defendant's charges. Provides that the language that states at each subsequent appearance of the defendant before the court, the judge must find that continued detention is necessary to reasonably ensure the appearance of the defendant for later hearings or to prevent the defendant from being charged with a subsequent felony or Class A misdemeanor does not apply to a defendant whose pretrial release has been revoked pursuant to the new provision.
Bill Text
We don't have the full text on file for this bill yet.
Read HB5757 on the official Illinois source →Action History
-
Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Michael J. Coffey, Jr.
-
Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Kevin Schmidt
-
Referred to Rules Committee
-
First Reading
-
Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Brandun Schweizer
-
Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Regan Deering
-
Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Christopher "C.D." Davidsmeyer
-
Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Michael J. Kelly
-
Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Norine K. Hammond
-
Added Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. John M. Cabello
-
Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Tom Weber
-
Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Jeff Keicher
-
Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Jackie Haas
-
Added Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Patrick Sheehan
-
Added Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Daniel J. Ugaste
-
Added Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Patrick Windhorst
-
Filed with the Clerk by Rep. Tony M. McCombie
Sponsors
- Tony M. McCombie · Primary
- Patrick Windhorst · Cosponsor
- Daniel J. Ugaste · Cosponsor
- Patrick Sheehan · Cosponsor
- John M. Cabello · Cosponsor
- Jackie Haas · Cosponsor
- Jeff Keicher · Cosponsor
- Tom Weber · Cosponsor
- Norine K. Hammond · Cosponsor
- Michael J. Kelly · Cosponsor
- Christopher "C.D." Davidsmeyer · Cosponsor
- Regan Deering · Cosponsor
- Brandun Schweizer · Cosponsor
- Kevin Schmidt · Cosponsor
- Jr. Michael J. Coffey · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 14 co-sponsors · 168 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Tony M. McCombie Republican
Co-sponsors (14)
- Patrick Windhorst Republican
- Daniel J. Ugaste Republican
- Patrick Sheehan Republican
- John M. Cabello Republican
- Jackie Haas Republican
- Jeff Keicher Republican
- Tom Weber Republican
- Norine K. Hammond Republican
- Michael J. Kelly Democrat
- Christopher "C.D." Davidsmeyer Republican
- Regan Deering Republican
- Brandun Schweizer Republican
- Kevin Schmidt Republican
- Michael J. Coffey, Jr. Republican
Not signed on (168)
168 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 168 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB5757 do?
- Amends the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963. Provides that when a defendant has previously been granted pretrial release for a felony or Class A misdemeanor and has been placed on electronic monitoring as a condition of release, that pretrial release shall be revoked upon a finding of probable cause that the defendant has committed a felony that is alleged to have occurred during the defendant's pretrial release after a hearing on the court's own motion or upon the filing of a verified petition by the State. Provides that pretrial detention shall continue pending resolution of the defendant's charges. Provides that the language that states at each subsequent appearance of the defendant before the court, the judge must find that continued detention is necessary to reasonably ensure the appearance of the defendant for later hearings or to prevent the defendant from being charged with a subsequent felony or Class A misdemeanor does not apply to a defendant whose pretrial release has been revoked pursuant to the new provision.
- Who sponsors HB5757 ?
- HB5757 is sponsored by Tony M. McCombie (Republican), Patrick Windhorst (Republican), Daniel J. Ugaste (Republican), Patrick Sheehan (Republican), John M. Cabello (Republican), Jackie Haas (Republican), Jeff Keicher (Republican), Tom Weber (Republican), Norine K. Hammond (Republican), Michael J. Kelly (Democrat), Christopher "C.D." Davidsmeyer (Republican), Regan Deering (Republican), Brandun Schweizer (Republican), Kevin Schmidt (Republican), and Michael J. Coffey, Jr. (Republican).
- What is the current status of HB5757 ?
- This bill has been introduced in the House. Introduced April 29, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track HB5757 ?
- Track HB5757 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB5757
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB5757
Last checked for changes about 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →