HB 93 — The people's right to judicial transparency.
Last action — H Failed Introduction 34-28-0-0-0
-
1Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been introduced in the House. Introduced February 04, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee referral and hearing.
Odds of enactment
Low chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
Not enough signal yet to read this bill's trajectory — we surface a likelihood only once there's real movement (stage, sponsorship, committee, or votes) to point to.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Summary
AN ACT relating to courts; requiring court records and audio recordings to be publicly available online at no cost; specifying exceptions; providing definitions; making conforming amendments; authorizing and requiring rulemaking; providing an appropriation; and providing for effective dates.
Bill Text
- Introduced View text Current pdf
Action History
-
H Failed Introduction 34-28-0-0-0
-
H Received for Introduction
-
Bill Number Assigned
Sponsors
- Nina Webber · Cosponsor
- Joe Webb · Cosponsor
- Tomi Strock · Cosponsor
- Scott Smith · Cosponsor
- Daniel Singh · Cosponsor
- Pepper Ottman · Cosponsor
- Darin McCann · Cosponsor
- Ann Lucas · Primary
- Steve Johnson · Cosponsor
- Paul Hoeft · Cosponsor
- Marlene Brady · Cosponsor
- John Bear · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 11 co-sponsors · 81 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Ann Lucas Republican
Co-sponsors (11)
- Nina Webber Republican
- Joe Webb Republican
- Tomi Strock Republican
- Scott Smith Republican
- Daniel Singh Republican
- Pepper Ottman Republican
- Darin McCann Republican
- Steve Johnson Republican
- Paul Hoeft Republican
- Marlene Brady Republican
- John Bear Republican
Not signed on (81)
81 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 81 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 93 do?
- AN ACT relating to courts; requiring court records and audio recordings to be publicly available online at no cost; specifying exceptions; providing definitions; making conforming amendments; authorizing and requiring rulemaking; providing an appropriation; and providing for effective dates.
- Who sponsors HB 93?
- HB 93 is sponsored by Nina Webber (Republican), Joe Webb (Republican), Tomi Strock (Republican), Scott Smith (Republican), Daniel Singh (Republican), Pepper Ottman (Republican), Darin McCann (Republican), Ann Lucas (Republican), Steve Johnson (Republican), Paul Hoeft (Republican), Marlene Brady (Republican), and John Bear (Republican).
- What is the current status of HB 93?
- This bill has been introduced in the House. Introduced February 04, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track HB 93?
- Track HB 93 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 93
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 93
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →