SF 93 — Shared custody-amendments.
Last action — S Failed Introduction 19-12-0-0-0
-
1Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced February 10, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee referral and hearing.
Odds of enactment
Low chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
Not enough signal yet to read this bill's trajectory — we surface a likelihood only once there's real movement (stage, sponsorship, committee, or votes) to point to.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Summary
AN ACT relating to domestic relations; amending considerations for determining the child's best interests for custody matters; specifying requirements for shared custody considerations for child custody dispositions; providing definitions; requiring court findings for specified child custody dispositions; making conforming amendments; specifying applicability; and providing for an effective date.
Bill Text
- Introduced View text Current pdf
Action History
-
S Failed Introduction 19-12-0-0-0
-
Bill Number Assigned
-
S Received for Introduction
Sponsors
- Cheri Steinmetz · Cosponsor
- Laura Pearson · Primary
- Lynn Hutchings · Cosponsor
- Brian Boner · Cosponsor
- Robert Wharff · Cosponsor
- Scott Smith · Cosponsor
- Daniel Singh · Cosponsor
- Mike Schmid · Cosponsor
- Darin McCann · Cosponsor
- Ann Lucas · Cosponsor
- Scott Heiner · Cosponsor
- Ocean Andrew · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 11 co-sponsors · 81 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Laura Pearson Republican
Co-sponsors (11)
- Cheri Steinmetz Republican
- Lynn Hutchings Republican
- Brian Boner Republican
- Robert Wharff Republican
- Scott Smith Republican
- Daniel Singh Republican
- Mike Schmid Republican
- Darin McCann Republican
- Ann Lucas Republican
- Scott Heiner Republican
- Ocean Andrew Republican
Not signed on (81)
81 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 81 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SF 93 do?
- AN ACT relating to domestic relations; amending considerations for determining the child's best interests for custody matters; specifying requirements for shared custody considerations for child custody dispositions; providing definitions; requiring court findings for specified child custody dispositions; making conforming amendments; specifying applicability; and providing for an effective date.
- Who sponsors SF 93?
- SF 93 is sponsored by Cheri Steinmetz (Republican), Laura Pearson (Republican), Lynn Hutchings (Republican), Brian Boner (Republican), Robert Wharff (Republican), Scott Smith (Republican), Daniel Singh (Republican), Mike Schmid (Republican), Darin McCann (Republican), Ann Lucas (Republican), Scott Heiner (Republican), and Ocean Andrew (Republican).
- What is the current status of SF 93?
- This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced February 10, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track SF 93?
- Track SF 93 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SF 93
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SF 93
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →