SB 5865 — Concerning garnishment forms.
Last action — By resolution, returned to Senate Rules Committee for third reading.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced December 10, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the House.
Odds of enactment
Moderate chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a moderate chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Passed Senate
Current position in the legislative process.
-
8 sponsors
1 primary, 7 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (6 D · 2 R) — cross-party backing.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 1 recorded vote so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
43 added · 51 removedPlain-language change summary
The latest version of Senate Bill 5865 simplifies the wording around garnishment forms used in Washington. It specifies that the forms should follow a template developed by a designated committee, making it easier for people to understand and use. This change matters because clearer instructions can help those involved in garnishment processes—especially defendants—navigate the system more effectively and ensure compliance with legal requirements.
ENGROSSEDS-3584.1 SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5865 State of Washington 69th Legislature 2026 Regular Session By Senate Law & Justice (originally sponsored by Senators Lovick, Wagoner, Dhingra, and Trudeau)Trudeau READPrefiled FIRST12/10/25. TIME 01/16/26.
Read first time 01/12/26.
Referred to Committee on Law & Justice.
and amending RCW 6.27.340 and 6.27.350;6.27.350.
creating a new section;
and providing an effective date.
1 ESSBSB 5865 state, as of the time of service of the writ of garnishment on the garnishee defendant, the amount due and owing from the garnishee defendant to the defendant, and the defendant's total earnings, allowable deductions, disposable earnings, exempt earnings, deductions for superior liens such as child support, and net earnings withheld under the writ.
The first answer ((may be substantially in the following)) mayshall be substantiallyprovided inusing the same form as the form developed by the Washington pattern forms committee ((form:or a substantially equivalent form((:
2 ESSBSB 5865 On the date the writ of garnishment was issued as indicated by the date appearing on the last page of the writ:
3 ESSBSB 5865 If paid:Wee$ .
4 ESSBSB 5865 PrinName of Person.
5 ESSBSB 5865 DAYS AFTER YOU RECEIVE THESE FORMS, MAIL OR DELIVER THEM AS DIRECTED IN THE WRIT." Nonexempt amount due and owing$ .
)) (3) Within ((twenty)) 20 days of receipt of the second answer form the garnishee shall file a second answer((, either)) in the form as provided in subsection (2) of this section, stating the total amount held subject to the garnishment((, or otherwise containing the information required in subsection (2) of this section and a calculation indicating the total amount due and owing from the garnishee defendant to the defendant, the defendant's total earnings, allowable deductions, disposable earnings, exempt earnings, deductions for superior liens such as child support, and net earnings withheld under the writ))writ)). or otherwise containing the information required in subsection (2) of this section and a calculation indicating the total amount due and owing from the garnishee defendant to the defendant, the defendant's total earnings deductions, disposable earnings, exempt earnings, deductions for superior liens such as child support, and net earnings withheld under the writ.
NEW SECTION.
Sec.
3.
The Washington pattern forms committee must complete the development of the new forms referenced in sections 1 and 2 of this act by December 31, 2026.
NEW SECTION.
Sec.
4.
Sections 1 and 2 of this act take effect May 1, 2027.
6 ESSBSB 5865
View plain text versions (3)
- Bill View text Current pdf
- Substitute Engrossed Substitute Bill pdf
- Substitute Substitute Bill pdf
Action History
-
By resolution, returned to Senate Rules Committee for third reading.
-
Rules Committee relieved of further consideration. Placed on second reading.
-
Referred to Rules 2 Review.
-
CRJ - Majority; do pass.
-
Executive action taken in the House Committee on Civil Rights & Judiciary at 8:00 AM.
-
Public hearing in the House Committee on Civil Rights & Judiciary at 10:30 AM.
-
First reading, referred to Civil Rights & Judiciary.
-
Third reading, passed; yeas, 46; nays, 3; absent, 0; excused, 0.
-
Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.
-
Floor amendment(s) adopted.
-
1st substitute bill substituted (LAW 26).
-
Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.
-
Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.
-
LAW - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
Executive action taken in the Senate Committee on Law & Justice at 10:30 AM.
-
Public hearing in the Senate Committee on Law & Justice at 8:00 AM.
-
First reading, referred to Law & Justice.
-
Prefiled for introduction.
Sponsors
- Yasmin Trudeau · Cosponsor
- Yasmin Trudeau · Cosponsor
- Manka Dhingra · Cosponsor
- Manka Dhingra · Cosponsor
- Keith Wagoner · Cosponsor
- Keith Wagoner · Cosponsor
- John Lovick · Cosponsor
- John Lovick · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 7 co-sponsors · 143 not signed on · 3 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- John Lovick Democrat
Co-sponsors (7)
- Yasmin Trudeau Democrat
- Yasmin Trudeau Democrat
- Manka Dhingra Democrat
- Manka Dhingra Democrat
- Keith Wagoner Republican
- Keith Wagoner Republican
- John Lovick Democrat
Not signed on (143)
143 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 143 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 16 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 46 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 94% | 6% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (49)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Adrian Cortes | Democrat | Yea |
| Annette Cleveland | Democrat | Yea |
| Bob Hasegawa | Democrat | Yea |
| Claire Wilson | Democrat | Yea |
| Claudia Kauffman | Democrat | Yea |
| Deborah Krishnadasan | Democrat | Yea |
| Derek Stanford | Democrat | Yea |
| Drew Hansen | Democrat | Yea |
| Emily Alvarado | Democrat | Yea |
| Jamie Pedersen | Democrat | Yea |
| Javier Valdez | Democrat | Yea |
| Jesse Salomon | Democrat | Yea |
| Jessica Bateman | Democrat | Yea |
| John Lovick | Democrat | Yea |
| June Robinson | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Wellman | Democrat | Yea |
| Liz Lovelett | Democrat | Yea |
| Manka Dhingra | Democrat | Yea |
| Marcus Riccelli | Democrat | Yea |
| Marko Liias | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Chapman | Democrat | Yea |
| Noel Frame | Democrat | Yea |
| Rebecca Saldaña | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Shewmake | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Conway | Democrat | Yea |
| T'wina Nobles | Democrat | Yea |
| Tina Orwall | Democrat | Yea |
| Vandana Slatter | Democrat | Yea |
| Victoria Hunt | Democrat | Yea |
| Yasmin Trudeau | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Gildon | Republican | Yea |
| Curtis King | Republican | Yea |
| Drew MacEwen | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Holy | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Wilson | Republican | Yea |
| Jim McCune | Republican | Yea |
| John Braun | Republican | Nay |
| Judy Warnick | Republican | Yea |
| Keith Goehner | Republican | Yea |
| Keith Wagoner | Republican | Yea |
| Leonard Christian | Republican | Nay |
| Mark Schoesler | Republican | Nay |
| Matt Boehnke | Republican | Yea |
| Nikki Torres | Republican | Yea |
| Paul Harris | Republican | Yea |
| Perry Dozier | Republican | Yea |
| Phil Fortunato | Republican | Yea |
| Ron Muzzall | Republican | Yea |
| Shelly Short | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 5865?
- SB 5865 is sponsored by Yasmin Trudeau (Democrat), Manka Dhingra (Democrat), Keith Wagoner (Republican), and John Lovick (Democrat).
- What is the current status of SB 5865?
- This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced December 10, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
- Where can I track SB 5865?
- Track SB 5865 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 5865
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 5865
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →