Concerning route jurisdiction transfer and abandonment.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 2172 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 2172.
You're tracking HB 2172
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 2172 — Concerning route jurisdiction transfer and abandonment.
Last action — By resolution, returned to House Rules Committee for third reading.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has passed the House. Introduced December 19, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the Senate.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
ModerateHow often bills like it became law.
-
Passed House
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (2 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 1 recorded vote so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
125 added · 122 removedPlain-language change summary
The amended version of Bill HB 2172 clarifies the process for transferring certain state highways to local jurisdictions. It removes the requirement for the state department of transportation to enter into an agreement with cities or counties for those highways that are no longer necessary, making the transfer process smoother. This change matters because it simplifies the process for local governments to take over road maintenance, potentially improving local infrastructure management and saving time in getting roads back into usable condition.
ENGROSSEDH-2565.2 SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 2172 State of Washington 69th Legislature 2026 Regular Session By House Transportation (originally sponsored by Representatives Bernbaum and Reed)Reed READPrefiled FIRST12/19/25. TIME 02/09/26.
Read first time 01/12/26.
Referred to Committee on Transportation.
((All)) (1) Except as provided under subsection (2) of this section, the state department of transportation may modify the alignment of all public highways in this state ((which)) that have been a part of the route of a state highway and have been or may hereafter be no longer necessary as such, if situated outside of the limits of incorporated cities or towns, shall, upon certification thereof by the state department of transportation to the legislative authority of the county in which any portion of the highway is located, become a county road of the county, and if situated within the corporate limits of any city or town shall upon certification thereof by the state department of transportation to the mayor of the city or town in which any portion of the highway is located become a street of the city or town.
Upon the certification the secretary of transportation shall execute a deed, which shall be duly acknowledged,p. conveying the abandoned highway or portion thereof to the county or city as the case may be.
p.1 HB 2172 acknowledged, conveying the abandoned highway or portion thereof to the county or city as the case may be.
1 ESHB 2172 (2) TheAny departmentportion mustof entera intostate anhighway agreementdetermined withto ano citylonger orbe countynecessary inunder whichsubsection any(1) portion of athis statesection, highway, which exceeds two miles in length or includes a bridge, isshall determinedbe toconsidered noa longerroute betransfer necessaryand undersubject subsectionto (1)the provisions of thisRCW section.47.17.001 and 47.01.425.
Such agreement must be entered into before any portion of a state highway can be abandoned to the county or city.
If an agreement cannot be reached, the department must forward to the legislature the proposed abandonment for review and determination, pursuant to RCW 47.17.001.
2 ESHBHB 2172 (2) A rural highway route should be designated as a state highway if it meets any of the following criteria:
3 ESHBHB 2172 oriented traffic in urbanized areas)) in a city or United States census designated place.
4 ESHBHB 2172 (iii) The most direct route and the lowest travel time;
(6) TheIf legislaturea shall,highway throughproject dulyresults enactedin legislation,the makedecommissioning of a finalportion determination regarding the status of an existing state highwayhighway, segmentsuch thatas exceedsdue twoto milesa change in lengththe orhighway's includesalignment, athe bridgelegislature thatmust hasmake beena orfinal isdetermination inregarding the processstatus of being decommissioned and the departmentexisting andstate thehighway citysegment, orthrough countyduly cannotenacted reachlegislation agreementincluding, onbut itsnot dispositionlimited pursuantto: to RCW 36.75.090.
(a) Authorizing the disposition of the segment via RCW 36.75.090;
(b) Approving the transfer of the segment to the local jurisdiction;
(c) Authorizing the demolition of the segment;
or (d) Retaining the segment as part of the state highway system.
((The)) Subject to the requirements of RCW 36.75.090(2),47.01.425, the department of transportation shall determine what streets, together with bridges thereon and wharves necessary for use for ferriage of motor vehicle traffic in connection with such streets, if any, in any incorporated cities and towns shall form a part of the route of state highways and between the first and ((fifteenth)) 15th days of July of any year the department shall identify by brief description, the streets, together with the bridges thereon and wharves, if any, in such city or town ((which)) that are designated as forming a part of the route of any state highway;
PROVIDED, That the responsibility for the construction and maintenance of any such street together with its appurtenances may be returned to a city or a town upon certification byp. the department to the clerk of any city or town that such street, or portion thereof, is no longer required as a part of the state highway system:
PROVIDED5 FURTHER,HB That2172 by the department to the clerk of any suchcity certificationor town that asuch street, or portion thereof, is no longer required as a part of the p.state highway system:
5PROVIDED ESHBFURTHER, 2172That any such certification that a street, or portion thereof, is no longer required as a part of the state highway system shall be made between the first and ((fifteenth)) 15th of July following the determination by the department that such street or portion thereof is no longer required as a part of the state highway system, but this shall not prevent the department and any city or town from entering into an agreement that a city or town will accept responsibility for such a street or portion thereof at some time other than between the first and ((fifteenth)) 15th of July of any year.
((Whenever)) Subject to the requirements of RCW 36.75.090(2),47.01.425, whenever the general route of any state highway shall be designated and laid out as running to or by way of certain designated points, without specifying the particular route to be followed to or by way of such points, the department shall determine the particular route to be followed by said state highway to or by way of said designated points, and shall be at liberty to select and adopt as a part of such state highway, the whole or any part of any existing public highway previously designated as a county road, primary road, or secondary road or now or hereafter classified as a county road.
6 ESHBHB 2172
View plain text versions (3)
- Bill View text Current pdf
- Substitute Engrossed Substitute Bill pdf
- Substitute Substitute Bill pdf
Action History
-
By resolution, returned to House Rules Committee for third reading.
-
Executive session scheduled, but no action was taken in the Senate Committee on Transportation at 1:30 PM.
-
Public hearing in the Senate Committee on Transportation at 2:30 PM.
-
First reading, referred to Transportation.
-
Third reading, passed; yeas, 92; nays, 0; absent, 0; excused, 6.
-
Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.
-
Floor amendment(s) adopted.
-
1st substitute bill substituted (TR 26).
-
Rules Committee relieved of further consideration. Placed on second reading.
-
Referred to Rules 2 Review.
-
TR - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
Executive action taken in the House Committee on Transportation at 1:30 PM.
-
Public hearing in the House Committee on Transportation at 1:00 PM.
-
First reading, referred to Transportation.
-
Prefiled for introduction.
Sponsors
- Julia Reed · Cosponsor
- Adam Bernbaum · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 149 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Adam Bernbaum Democrat
Co-sponsors (1)
- Julia Reed Democrat
Not signed on (149)
149 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 149 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 34 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Democrat | 58 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 92 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 94% | 0% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (98)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Adam Bernbaum | Democrat | Yea |
| Adison Richards | Democrat | Yea |
| Adrian Cortes | Democrat | Yea |
| Alex Ramel | Democrat | Yea |
| Alicia Rule | Democrat | Yea |
| Amy Walen | Democrat | Yea |
| April Berg | Democrat | Yea |
| Beth Doglio | Democrat | Yea |
| Brandy Donaghy | Democrat | Yea |
| Brianna Thomas | Democrat | Yea |
| Chipalo Street | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Stearns | Democrat | Yea |
| Cindy Ryu | Democrat | Yea |
| Clyde Shavers | Democrat | Yea |
| Dan Bronoske | Democrat | Yea |
| Darya Farivar | Democrat | Yea |
| Dave Paul | Democrat | Yea |
| David Hackney | Democrat | Yea |
| Davina Duerr | Democrat | Yea |
| Debra Entenman | Democrat | Yea |
| Debra Lekanoff | Democrat | Yea |
| Edwin Obras | Democrat | Yea |
| Gerry Pollet | Democrat | Yea |
| Greg Nance | Democrat | Yea |
| Jake Fey | Democrat | Yea |
| Jamila Taylor | Democrat | Yea |
| Janice Zahn | Democrat | Yea |
| Javier Valdez | Democrat | Yea |
| Joe Fitzgibbon | Democrat | Yea |
| Joe Timmons | Democrat | Yea |
| Julia Reed | Democrat | Yea |
| Kristine Reeves | Democrat | Yea |
| Larry Springer | Democrat | Yea |
| Lauren Davis | Democrat | Yea |
| Laurie Jinkins | Democrat | Yea |
| Lillian Ortiz-Self | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Callan | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Parshley | Democrat | Yea |
| Liz Berry | Democrat | Yea |
| Mari Leavitt | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Mary Fosse | Democrat | Yea |
| Melanie Morgan | Democrat | Yea |
| Mia Gregerson | Democrat | Yea |
| Monica Jurado Stonier | Democrat | Yea |
| My-Linh Thai | Democrat | Yea |
| Natasha Hill | Democrat | Yea |
| Nicole Macri | Democrat | Yea |
| Osman Salahuddin | Democrat | Yea |
| Roger Goodman | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharlett Mena | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Tomiko Santos | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Wylie | Democrat | Yea |
| Shaun Scott | Democrat | Yea |
| Shelley Kloba | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Bergquist | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Tharinger | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Strom Peterson | Democrat | Yea |
| Tarra Simmons | Democrat | Yea |
| Timm Ormsby | Democrat | Yea |
| Zach Hall | Democrat | Yea |
| Alex Ybarra | Republican | Yea |
| Andrew Barkis | Republican | Yea |
| Andrew Engell | Republican | Yea |
| April Connors | Republican | Yea |
| Brian Burnett | Republican | Yea |
| Carolyn Eslick | Republican | Not Voting |
| Chris Corry | Republican | Not Voting |
| Cyndy Jacobsen | Republican | Yea |
| Dan Griffey | Republican | Yea |
| David Stuebe | Republican | Yea |
| Deb Manjarrez | Republican | Yea |
| Drew Stokesbary | Republican | Yea |
| Ed Orcutt | Republican | Yea |
| Gloria Mendoza | Republican | Yea |
| Hunter Abell | Republican | Yea |
| Jenny Graham | Republican | Yea |
| Jeremie Dufault | Republican | Yea |
| Jim Walsh | Republican | Yea |
| Joe Schmick | Republican | Yea |
| Joel McEntire | Republican | Yea |
| John Ley | Republican | Yea |
| Joshua Penner | Republican | Yea |
| Kevin Waters | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Klicker | Republican | Yea |
| Mary Dye | Republican | Yea |
| Matt Marshall | Republican | Yea |
| Michael Keaton | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Steele | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Volz | Republican | Not Voting |
| Peter Abbarno | Republican | Yea |
| Rob Chase | Republican | Yea |
| Sam Low | Republican | Yea |
| Skyler Rude | Republican | Yea |
| Stephanie Barnard | Republican | Yea |
| Stephanie McClintock | Republican | Yea |
| Suzanne Schmidt | Republican | Yea |
| Tom Dent | Republican | Not Voting |
| Travis Couture | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 2172?
- HB 2172 is sponsored by Julia Reed (Democrat) and Adam Bernbaum (Democrat).
- What is the current status of HB 2172?
- This bill has passed the House. Introduced December 19, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
- Where can I track HB 2172?
- Track HB 2172 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 2172
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 2172
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →