Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session Status: Passed House 2 D cosponsors

HB 2172 — Concerning route jurisdiction transfer and abandonment.

Last action — By resolution, returned to House Rules Committee for third reading.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has passed the House. Introduced December 19, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.

Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the Senate.

Prognosis

Advancing 50% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

Moderate

How often bills like it became law.

  • Passed House

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 2 sponsors

    1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (2 D).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 1 recorded vote so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

125 added · 122 removed

Plain-language change summary

The amended version of Bill HB 2172 clarifies the process for transferring certain state highways to local jurisdictions. It removes the requirement for the state department of transportation to enter into an agreement with cities or counties for those highways that are no longer necessary, making the transfer process smoother. This change matters because it simplifies the process for local governments to take over road maintenance, potentially improving local infrastructure management and saving time in getting roads back into usable condition.

→
Previous
Latest
ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 2172 State of Washington 69th Legislature 2026 Regular Session By House Transportation (originally sponsored by Representatives Bernbaum and Reed) READ FIRST TIME 02/09/26.
H-2565.2 HOUSE BILL 2172 State of Washington 69th Legislature 2026 Regular Session By Representatives Bernbaum and Reed Prefiled 12/19/25.
Read first time 01/12/26.
Referred to Committee on Transportation.
((All)) (1) Except as provided under subsection (2) of this section, public highways in this state ((which)) that have been a part of the route of a state highway and have been or may hereafter be no longer necessary as such, if situated outside of the limits of incorporated cities or towns, shall, upon certification thereof by the state department of transportation to the legislative authority of the county in which any portion of the highway is located, become a county road of the county, and if situated within the corporate limits of any city or town shall upon certification thereof by the state department of transportation to the mayor of the city or town in which any portion of the highway is located become a street of the city or town.
((All)) (1) Except as provided under subsection (2) of this section, the state department of transportation may modify the alignment of all public highways in this state ((which)) that have been a part of the route of a state highway and have been or may hereafter be no longer necessary as such, if situated outside of the limits of incorporated cities or towns, shall, upon certification thereof by the state department of transportation to the legislative authority of the county in which any portion of the highway is located, become a county road of the county, and if situated within the corporate limits of any city or town shall upon certification thereof by the state department of transportation to the mayor of the city or town in which any portion of the highway is located become a street of the city or town.
Upon the certification the secretary of transportation shall execute a deed, which shall be duly acknowledged, conveying the abandoned highway or portion thereof to the county or city as the case may be.
Upon the certification the secretary of transportation shall execute a deed, which shall be duly p.
p.
1 HB 2172 acknowledged, conveying the abandoned highway or portion thereof to the county or city as the case may be.
1 ESHB 2172 (2) The department must enter into an agreement with a city or county in which any portion of a state highway, which exceeds two miles in length or includes a bridge, is determined to no longer be necessary under subsection (1) of this section.
(2) Any portion of a state highway determined to no longer be necessary under subsection (1) of this section, which exceeds two miles in length or includes a bridge, shall be considered a route transfer and subject to the provisions of RCW 47.17.001 and 47.01.425.
Such agreement must be entered into before any portion of a state highway can be abandoned to the county or city.
If an agreement cannot be reached, the department must forward to the legislature the proposed abandonment for review and determination, pursuant to RCW 47.17.001.
2 ESHB 2172 (2) A rural highway route should be designated as a state highway if it meets any of the following criteria:
2 HB 2172 (2) A rural highway route should be designated as a state highway if it meets any of the following criteria:
3 ESHB 2172 oriented traffic in urbanized areas)) in a city or United States census designated place.
3 HB 2172 oriented traffic in urbanized areas)) in a city or United States census designated place.
4 ESHB 2172 (iii) The most direct route and the lowest travel time;
4 HB 2172 (iii) The most direct route and the lowest travel time;
(6) The legislature shall, through duly enacted legislation, make a final determination regarding the status of an existing state highway segment that exceeds two miles in length or includes a bridge that has been or is in the process of being decommissioned and the department and the city or county cannot reach agreement on its disposition pursuant to RCW 36.75.090.
(6) If a highway project results in the decommissioning of a portion of an existing state highway, such as due to a change in the highway's alignment, the legislature must make a final determination regarding the status of the existing state highway segment, through duly enacted legislation including, but not limited to:
(a) Authorizing the disposition of the segment via RCW 36.75.090;
(b) Approving the transfer of the segment to the local jurisdiction;
(c) Authorizing the demolition of the segment;
or (d) Retaining the segment as part of the state highway system.
((The)) Subject to the requirements of RCW 36.75.090(2), the department of transportation shall determine what streets, together with bridges thereon and wharves necessary for use for ferriage of motor vehicle traffic in connection with such streets, if any, in any incorporated cities and towns shall form a part of the route of state highways and between the first and ((fifteenth)) 15th days of July of any year the department shall identify by brief description, the streets, together with the bridges thereon and wharves, if any, in such city or town ((which)) that are designated as forming a part of the route of any state highway;
((The)) Subject to the requirements of RCW 47.01.425, the department of transportation shall determine what streets, together with bridges thereon and wharves necessary for use for ferriage of motor vehicle traffic in connection with such streets, if any, in any incorporated cities and towns shall form a part of the route of state highways and between the first and ((fifteenth)) 15th days of July of any year the department shall identify by brief description, the streets, together with the bridges thereon and wharves, if any, in such city or town ((which)) that are designated as forming a part of the route of any state highway;
PROVIDED, That the responsibility for the construction and maintenance of any such street together with its appurtenances may be returned to a city or a town upon certification by the department to the clerk of any city or town that such street, or portion thereof, is no longer required as a part of the state highway system:
PROVIDED, That the responsibility for the construction and maintenance of any such street together with its appurtenances may be returned to a city or a town upon certification p.
PROVIDED FURTHER, That any such certification that a street, or portion thereof, is no longer required as a part of the p.
5 HB 2172 by the department to the clerk of any city or town that such street, or portion thereof, is no longer required as a part of the state highway system:
5 ESHB 2172 state highway system shall be made between the first and ((fifteenth)) 15th of July following the determination by the department that such street or portion thereof is no longer required as a part of the state highway system, but this shall not prevent the department and any city or town from entering into an agreement that a city or town will accept responsibility for such a street or portion thereof at some time other than between the first and ((fifteenth)) 15th of July of any year.
PROVIDED FURTHER, That any such certification that a street, or portion thereof, is no longer required as a part of the state highway system shall be made between the first and ((fifteenth)) 15th of July following the determination by the department that such street or portion thereof is no longer required as a part of the state highway system, but this shall not prevent the department and any city or town from entering into an agreement that a city or town will accept responsibility for such a street or portion thereof at some time other than between the first and ((fifteenth)) 15th of July of any year.
((Whenever)) Subject to the requirements of RCW 36.75.090(2), whenever the general route of any state highway shall be designated and laid out as running to or by way of certain designated points, without specifying the particular route to be followed to or by way of such points, the department shall determine the particular route to be followed by said state highway to or by way of said designated points, and shall be at liberty to select and adopt as a part of such state highway, the whole or any part of any existing public highway previously designated as a county road, primary road, or secondary road or now or hereafter classified as a county road.
((Whenever)) Subject to the requirements of RCW 47.01.425, whenever the general route of any state highway shall be designated and laid out as running to or by way of certain designated points, without specifying the particular route to be followed to or by way of such points, the department shall determine the particular route to be followed by said state highway to or by way of said designated points, and shall be at liberty to select and adopt as a part of such state highway, the whole or any part of any existing public highway previously designated as a county road, primary road, or secondary road or now or hereafter classified as a county road.
6 ESHB 2172
6 HB 2172
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. By resolution, returned to House Rules Committee for third reading.

  2. Executive session scheduled, but no action was taken in the Senate Committee on Transportation at 1:30 PM.

  3. Public hearing in the Senate Committee on Transportation at 2:30 PM.

  4. First reading, referred to Transportation.

  5. Third reading, passed; yeas, 92; nays, 0; absent, 0; excused, 6.

  6. Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.

  7. Floor amendment(s) adopted.

  8. 1st substitute bill substituted (TR 26).

  9. Rules Committee relieved of further consideration. Placed on second reading.

  10. Referred to Rules 2 Review.

  11. TR - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  12. Executive action taken in the House Committee on Transportation at 1:30 PM.

  13. Public hearing in the House Committee on Transportation at 1:00 PM.

  14. First reading, referred to Transportation.

  15. Prefiled for introduction.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 149 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (1)

Not signed on (149)

149 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 149 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 92 Yea · 0 Nay · 6 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 34004
Democrat 58002
Total 92006
% of votes cast 94%0%0%6%
How each member voted (98)
Member Party Vote
Adam Bernbaum Democrat Yea
Adison Richards Democrat Yea
Adrian Cortes Democrat Yea
Alex Ramel Democrat Yea
Alicia Rule Democrat Yea
Amy Walen Democrat Yea
April Berg Democrat Yea
Beth Doglio Democrat Yea
Brandy Donaghy Democrat Yea
Brianna Thomas Democrat Yea
Chipalo Street Democrat Yea
Chris Stearns Democrat Yea
Cindy Ryu Democrat Yea
Clyde Shavers Democrat Yea
Dan Bronoske Democrat Yea
Darya Farivar Democrat Yea
Dave Paul Democrat Yea
David Hackney Democrat Yea
Davina Duerr Democrat Yea
Debra Entenman Democrat Yea
Debra Lekanoff Democrat Yea
Edwin Obras Democrat Yea
Gerry Pollet Democrat Yea
Greg Nance Democrat Yea
Jake Fey Democrat Yea
Jamila Taylor Democrat Yea
Janice Zahn Democrat Yea
Javier Valdez Democrat Yea
Joe Fitzgibbon Democrat Yea
Joe Timmons Democrat Yea
Julia Reed Democrat Yea
Kristine Reeves Democrat Yea
Larry Springer Democrat Yea
Lauren Davis Democrat Yea
Laurie Jinkins Democrat Yea
Lillian Ortiz-Self Democrat Yea
Lisa Callan Democrat Yea
Lisa Parshley Democrat Yea
Liz Berry Democrat Yea
Mari Leavitt Democrat Not Voting
Mary Fosse Democrat Yea
Melanie Morgan Democrat Yea
Mia Gregerson Democrat Yea
Monica Jurado Stonier Democrat Yea
My-Linh Thai Democrat Yea
Natasha Hill Democrat Yea
Nicole Macri Democrat Yea
Osman Salahuddin Democrat Yea
Roger Goodman Democrat Yea
Sharlett Mena Democrat Yea
Sharon Tomiko Santos Democrat Yea
Sharon Wylie Democrat Yea
Shaun Scott Democrat Yea
Shelley Kloba Democrat Yea
Steve Bergquist Democrat Yea
Steve Tharinger Democrat Not Voting
Strom Peterson Democrat Yea
Tarra Simmons Democrat Yea
Timm Ormsby Democrat Yea
Zach Hall Democrat Yea
Alex Ybarra Republican Yea
Andrew Barkis Republican Yea
Andrew Engell Republican Yea
April Connors Republican Yea
Brian Burnett Republican Yea
Carolyn Eslick Republican Not Voting
Chris Corry Republican Not Voting
Cyndy Jacobsen Republican Yea
Dan Griffey Republican Yea
David Stuebe Republican Yea
Deb Manjarrez Republican Yea
Drew Stokesbary Republican Yea
Ed Orcutt Republican Yea
Gloria Mendoza Republican Yea
Hunter Abell Republican Yea
Jenny Graham Republican Yea
Jeremie Dufault Republican Yea
Jim Walsh Republican Yea
Joe Schmick Republican Yea
Joel McEntire Republican Yea
John Ley Republican Yea
Joshua Penner Republican Yea
Kevin Waters Republican Yea
Mark Klicker Republican Yea
Mary Dye Republican Yea
Matt Marshall Republican Yea
Michael Keaton Republican Yea
Mike Steele Republican Yea
Mike Volz Republican Not Voting
Peter Abbarno Republican Yea
Rob Chase Republican Yea
Sam Low Republican Yea
Skyler Rude Republican Yea
Stephanie Barnard Republican Yea
Stephanie McClintock Republican Yea
Suzanne Schmidt Republican Yea
Tom Dent Republican Not Voting
Travis Couture Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HB 2172?
HB 2172 is sponsored by Julia Reed (Democrat) and Adam Bernbaum (Democrat).
What is the current status of HB 2172?
This bill has passed the House. Introduced December 19, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
Where can I track HB 2172?
Track HB 2172 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 2172

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 2172

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →