AB 10 — Local taxes: authorization: cigarettes and tobacco products.
Last action — Vetoed by Governor.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2015-2016, 2nd Special Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
The Cigarette and Tobacco Products Tax Law imposes a tax on every distributor of cigarettes and tobacco products at specified rates. That law specifies that the taxes imposed by that law are in lieu of all other state, county, municipal, or district taxes on the privilege of distributing cigarettes or tobacco products. The California Constitution prohibits the Legislature from imposing taxes for local purposes, but allows the Legislature to authorize local governments to impose them. This bill would authorize, on and after January 1, 2017, the board of supervisors of a county or city and county to impose a tax on the privilege of distributing cigarettes and tobacco products in the county or city and county, including within an incorporated city within the county, and would make conforming changes. This bill would define "distributing" to mean making a sale of cigarettes or tobacco products in a county or city and county that has not been taxed by a cigarette or tobacco products tax ordinance of that county or city and county. This bill would authorize the board of supervisors of a county or city and county to enter into an agreement with another county or city and county to share any startup and ongoing administrative costs of a tax imposed pursuant to that authorization. This bill also would authorize the board of supervisors of a county or city and county to contract with the State Board of Equalization to perform functions incident to the administration or operation of the cigarette and tobacco products tax ordinance of the county, with reimbursement for costs incurred, and would require the State Board of Equalization to perform those functions pursuant to that contract. This bill also would require the State Board of Equalization to permit the examination of its records with respect to the tax imposed pursuant to the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Tax Law upon request by a county or city and county officer or employee to the extent necessary for the proper administration of that local cigarette and tobacco products tax, and authorizes the State Board of Equalization to require reimbursement. The bill would make knowingly accessing, using, or disclosing that confidential information without authorization a crime, thereby imposing a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Enrolled 03/14/16 - Enrolled Current pdf March 14, 2016
- Amended 03/03/16 - Amended Assembly pdf March 03, 2016
- Introduced 07/16/15 - Introduced pdf July 16, 2015
- AB10 View text html
Action History
-
Vetoed by Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 9:30 a.m.
-
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 23. Noes 14. Page 116.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (March 8).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 3.) (March 7). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Referred to Com. on P.H. & D.S.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 46. Noes 27. Page 179.)
-
Assembly Rule 63 suspended. (Ayes 48. Noes 26. Page 178.)
-
Assembly Rule 69 suspended. (Ayes 48. Noes 26. Page 178.)
-
Read third time and amended. Ordered to third reading. (Page 178.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 4.) (August 25).
-
Referred to Com. on P.H. & D.S.
-
From printer.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Mike McGuire · Cosponsor
- Bloom · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on · 11 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Bloom
Co-sponsors (1)
- McGuire, Mike Democratic
Not signed on (120)
120 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 120 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 21 | 13 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 23 | 14 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 58% | 35% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Galgiani | — | Nay |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Cannella | — | Nay |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Not Voting |
| Huff | — | Not Voting |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Nay |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Not Voting |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Nay |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| De León | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 69% | 23% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Not Voting |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 44 | 21 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 48 | 26 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 61% | 33% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Nay |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Not Voting |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Hadley | — | Nay |
| Holden | — | Not Voting |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Nay |
| Chang | — | Nay |
| Gray | — | Not Voting |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Nay |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Nay |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Not Voting |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Nay |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Achadjian | — | Nay |
| Baker | — | Nay |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Kim | — | Nay |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Nay |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Nay |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Not Voting |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Nay |
| Patterson, Joe | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 43 | 21 | 0 | 5 |
| Democratic | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 46 | 27 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 58% | 34% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Not Voting |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Hadley | — | Nay |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Nay |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Nay |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Nay |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Nay |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Nay |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Not Voting |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| Olsen | — | Not Voting |
| Waldron | — | Not Voting |
| Frazier | — | Not Voting |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Achadjian | — | Nay |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Kim | — | Nay |
| Linder | — | Nay |
| Maienschein | — | Nay |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Nay |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Nay |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Nay |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Not Voting |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Nay |
| Patterson, Joe | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 69% | 31% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Mayes | — | Nay |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Nay |
| Steinorth | — | Nay |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Nay |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 10 do?
- The Cigarette and Tobacco Products Tax Law imposes a tax on every distributor of cigarettes and tobacco products at specified rates. That law specifies that the taxes imposed by that law are in lieu of all other state, county, municipal, or district taxes on the privilege of distributing cigarettes or tobacco products. The California Constitution prohibits the Legislature from imposing taxes for local purposes, but allows the Legislature to authorize local governments to impose them. This bill would authorize, on and after January 1, 2017, the board of supervisors of a county or city and county to impose a tax on the privilege of distributing cigarettes and tobacco products in the county or city and county, including within an incorporated city within the county, and would make conforming changes. This bill would define "distributing" to mean making a sale of cigarettes or tobacco products in a county or city and county that has not been taxed by a cigarette or tobacco products tax ordinance of that county or city and county. This bill would authorize the board of supervisors of a county or city and county to enter into an agreement with another county or city and county to share any startup and ongoing administrative costs of a tax imposed pursuant to that authorization. This bill also would authorize the board of supervisors of a county or city and county to contract with the State Board of Equalization to perform functions incident to the administration or operation of the cigarette and tobacco products tax ordinance of the county, with reimbursement for costs incurred, and would require the State Board of Equalization to perform those functions pursuant to that contract. This bill also would require the State Board of Equalization to permit the examination of its records with respect to the tax imposed pursuant to the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Tax Law upon request by a county or city and county officer or employee to the extent necessary for the proper administration of that local cigarette and tobacco products tax, and authorizes the State Board of Equalization to require reimbursement. The bill would make knowingly accessing, using, or disclosing that confidential information without authorization a crime, thereby imposing a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors AB 10?
- AB 10 is sponsored by McGuire, Mike (Democratic) and Bloom.
- What is the current status of AB 10?
- This bill died with 2015-2016, 2nd Special Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 10?
- Track AB 10 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 10
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 10
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →