AB 1 is sponsored by Wood, Wolk, Williams, Wieckowski, Weber, Waldron, Ting, Thurmond, Santiago, Roth, Rodriguez, Ridley-Thomas, Rendon, Quirk, Pavley, Pan, Olsen, O'Donnell, Nazarian, Mullin, Monning, Mendoza, Medina, McGuire, Mike (Democratic), McCarty, Mayes, Mathis, Maienschein, Low, Liu, Linder, Leyva, Levine, Leno, Lara, Jones-Sawyer, Irwin, Jacqui (Democratic), Hueso, Holden, Hill, Hertzberg, Hernandez, Hancock, Hall, Gordon, Gomez, Glazer, Gipson, Mike A. (Democratic), Gatto, Gallagher, James (Republican), Galgiani, Frazier, Eggman, Dodd, Daly, Dababneh, Cooper, Cooley, Chu, Chiu, Chau, Cannella, Campos, Burke, Brown, Bloom, Block, Bigelow, Beall, Baker, Alejo, Bonilla, Atkins, Mitchell, De León, Salas, Lopez, Jones, Gray, Dahle, Garcia, Robert (Democratic), Calderon, Lisa (Democratic), Bonta, Mia (Democratic), Jackson, Corey A. (Democratic), Gonzalez, Jeff (Republican), Roger Hernández, Mark Stone, and Travis Allen.

Where can I track AB 1?

Track AB 1 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

California 2015-2016, 2nd Special Session Status: Enacted Bipartisan · 8 D · 2 R cosponsors

AB 1 — Developmental services: Medi-Cal: funding.

Last action March 01, 2016 — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 3, Statutes of 2015-16 Second Extraordinary Session.

✓
Introduced
✓
In Committee
✓
Passed Assembly
✓
Passed Senate
✓
To Executive
6
Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced July 02, 2015. Enacted.

Odds of enactment

High chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 82% · high confidence

Enacted

Current position in the legislative process.
89 sponsors

1 primary, 88 co-sponsors signed on.
Bipartisan support

Sponsored across 2 parties (8 D · 2 R) — cross-party backing.
Mixed recorded votes

4 passed, 1 failed in recorded votes so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Summary

The Lanterman Developmental Disabilities Services Act requires the State Department of Developmental Services to contract with regional centers to provide services and supports to individuals with developmental disabilities. Under existing law, regional centers purchase needed services for individuals with developmental disabilities through approved service providers or arrange for those services through other publicly funded agencies. Existing law establishes specified rates and wages to be paid to certain service providers and the rates to be paid for certain developmental services. Existing law requires that rates to be paid to other developmental service providers either be set by the department or negotiated between the regional center and the service provider. Existing law establishes the Medi-Cal program, administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which basic health care services are provided to qualified low-income persons. The Medi-Cal program is, in part, governed and funded by federal Medicaid Program provisions. Existing law requires, except as otherwise provided, Medi-Cal provider payments to be reduced, as specified. This bill would appropriate a specified sum to the State Department of Developmental Services to, commencing July 1, 2016, among other things, increase rates and wages for certain developmental services providers and fund incentive payments for competitive integrated employment opportunities and internships for individuals with developmental disabilities. The bill would require the department to submit a rate study to specified committees of the Legislature on or before March 1, 2019, regarding community-based services for individuals with developmental disabilities. The bill would require each regional center to report specified information to the department regarding increased funding for regional center operations. The bill would, for dates of service on or after August 1, 2016, increase the payment rates for intermediate care facilities and skilled nursing facilities that provide services to developmentally disabled individuals under the Medi-Cal program, as specified. The bill would also prohibit the State Department of Health Care Services from seeking to retroactively implement certain Medi-Cal provider payment reductions and limitations with regards to reimbursements for services provided by skilled nursing facilities that are distinct parts of general acute care hospitals for dates of service on or after June 1, 2011, and on or before September 30, 2013, and from seeking to recoup overpayments, as specified. Existing law requires the department and regional centers to annually collaborate to compile specified data relating to purchase of service authorization, utilization, and expenditure by each regional center. Existing law requires each regional center to annually report to the department regarding the regional center's implementation of these requirements, including whether the data indicates a need to reduce disparities in the purchase of services among consumers in the regional center's catchment area and the regional center's recommendations and plan to promote equity, and reduce disparities, in the purchase of services. Existing law requires the department to consult with specified stakeholders to review the data, develop recommendations to help reduce disparities in purchase of service expenditures, and encourage development and expansion of culturally appropriate services, among other things, and to report the status of its efforts during the 2016â€“17 legislative budget subcommittee hearing process. The bill would also require the department, subject to available funding, to allocate funding to regional centers to assist in implementing specified recommendations and plans, including the recommendations and plans of the regional centers to promote equity, and reduce disparities, in the purchase of services. Existing law requires an entity that receives payments between $250,000 and $500,000 per year from one or more regional centers to obtain either an independent audit or an independent review report of its financial statements, and requires an entity that receives payments that are equal to or more than $500,000 per year to obtain an independent audit. This bill would instead require an entity that receives payments between $500,000 and $2,000,000 from one or more regional centers to obtain an independent review report of its financial statements, and would authorize these entities to apply for, and require the regional center to grant, a 2-year exemption from this requirement if the regional center does not find issues in the independent review report that have an impact on regional center services. The bill would require an entity that receives payments from one or more regional centers that are equal to or more than $2,000,000 to obtain an independent audit and would authorize these entities to apply for, and require the regional center to grant, a 2-year exemption from the audit requirement if the audit resulted in an unmodified opinion, an unmodified opinion with additional communication, or a qualified opinion with issues that are not material. The bill would require a regional center to annually report to the State Department of Developmental Services any exemptions granted pursuant to these provisions.

Bill Text

Chaptered 03/01/16 - Chaptered Current pdf March 01, 2016
Enrolled 02/29/16 - Enrolled pdf February 29, 2016
02/22/16 - Proposed View text pdf February 22, 2016
Amended 09/03/15 - Amended Senate pdf September 03, 2015
Introduced 07/02/15 - Introduced pdf July 02, 2015
AB1 View text html

Action History

March 01, 2016
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 3, Statutes of 2015-16 Second Extraordinary Session.
March 01, 2016
Approved by the Governor.
February 29, 2016
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 5:30 p.m.
February 29, 2016
Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
February 29, 2016
Assembly adopts Conference Committee report. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 162.).
February 29, 2016
Senate adopted Conference Committee report. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 94.)
February 23, 2016
From printer.
February 22, 2016
From Conference Committee: Be adopted. (Ayes 10 (Assembly Members Bonta, Bonilla, Gallagher, Patterson, and Santiago) (Senators Hernandez, Anderson, Leno, Mitchell, and Nielsen)). (Noes 0). To print.
February 08, 2016
Senator Anderson appointed to Conference Committee.
September 24, 2015
Senators Hernandez (Co-Chair), Leno, Mitchell, Nielsen, and vacancy appointed to Conference Committee.
September 23, 2015
Assembly Members Bonta (Co-Chair), Bonilla, Gallagher, Patterson, and Santiago appointed to Conference Committee.
September 10, 2015
Assembly refused to concur in Senate amendments. To Conference Committee. (Ayes 3. Noes 50. Page 96.)
September 10, 2015
Assembly Rule 77 suspended. (Page 95.)
September 09, 2015
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 11 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
September 09, 2015
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 24. Noes 14. Page 73.).
September 04, 2015
Ordered to third reading.
September 04, 2015
(Ayes 26. Noes 13. Page 66.)
September 04, 2015
Withdrawn from committee.
September 03, 2015
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on RLS.
September 03, 2015
Referred to Com. on RLS.
August 31, 2015
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
August 31, 2015
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 50. Noes 28. Page 58.)
August 27, 2015
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
August 27, 2015
Assembly Rule 63 suspended. (Ayes 51. Noes 27. Page 51.)
August 27, 2015
Without reference to committee.
July 06, 2015
From printer.
July 02, 2015
Read first time. To print.

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 88 co-sponsors · 33 not signed on · 9 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Thurmond

Not signed on (33)

33 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 33 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Conference Report AB1 Thurmond, et al. By Beall

February 29, 2016

Passed 40 Yea · 0 Nay

Party	Yea	Nay	Present	Not Voting
Unaffiliated	37	0	0	0
Democratic	3	0	0	0
Total	40	0	0	0
% of votes cast	100%	0%	0%	0%

How each member voted (40)

Member	Party	Vote
Galgiani	—	Yea
Glazer	—	Yea
Hernandez	—	Yea
Hertzberg	—	Yea
Hill	—	Yea
Allen	—	Yea
Cannella	—	Yea
Mitchell	—	Yea
De León	—	Yea
Runner	—	Yea
Bates	—	Yea
Lara	—	Yea
Leno	—	Yea
Liu	—	Yea
Mendoza	—	Yea
Moorlach	—	Yea
Nielsen	—	Yea
Wieckowski	—	Yea
Wolk	—	Yea
Leyva	—	Yea
Monning	—	Yea
Roth	—	Yea
Hueso	—	Yea
Huff	—	Yea
Fuller	—	Yea
Hall	—	Yea
Anderson	—	Yea
Beall	—	Yea
Block	—	Yea
Hancock	—	Yea
Morrell	—	Yea
Pan	—	Yea
Pavley	—	Yea
Vidak	—	Yea
Beth Gaines	—	Yea
Bill Berryhill	—	Yea
Mark Stone	—	Yea
Jackson, Corey A.	Democratic	Yea
McGuire, Mike	Democratic	Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie	Democratic	Yea

Official roll call →

AB 1 THURMOND Conference Report

February 29, 2016

Passed 78 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other

Party	Yea	Nay	Present	Not Voting
Unaffiliated	68	0	0	1
Democratic	4	0	0	0
Republican	6	0	0	0
Total	78	0	0	1
% of votes cast	99%	0%	0%	1%

How each member voted (79)

Member	Party	Vote
Eggman	—	Yea
Chávez	—	Yea
Dababneh	—	Yea
Daly	—	Yea
Frazier	—	Yea
Gonzalez	—	Yea
Chau	—	Yea
Chu	—	Yea
Salas	—	Yea
Harper	—	Yea
Cooper	—	Yea
Linder	—	Yea
Mayes	—	Yea
Nazarian	—	Yea
O'Donnell	—	Yea
Olsen	—	Yea
Rodriguez	—	Yea
Williams	—	Yea
Gatto	—	Yea
Burke	—	Yea
Gordon	—	Yea
Hadley	—	Yea
Gray	—	Yea
Holden	—	Yea
Atkins	—	Yea
Bonilla	—	Yea
Kim	—	Yea
Lopez	—	Yea
Levine	—	Yea
Maienschein	—	Yea
McCarty	—	Yea
Medina	—	Yea
Bigelow	—	Yea
Campos	—	Yea
Chang	—	Yea
Chiu	—	Not Voting
Cooley	—	Yea
Dodd	—	Yea
Melendez	—	Yea
Mullin	—	Yea
Quirk	—	Yea
Steinorth	—	Yea
Thurmond	—	Yea
Wagner	—	Yea
Waldron	—	Yea
Wood	—	Yea
Gomez	—	Yea
Achadjian	—	Yea
Alejo	—	Yea
Baker	—	Yea
Bloom	—	Yea
Brough	—	Yea
Brown	—	Yea
Jones-Sawyer	—	Yea
Low	—	Yea
Mathis	—	Yea
Obernolte	—	Yea
Rendon	—	Yea
Ridley-Thomas	—	Yea
Santiago	—	Yea
Ting	—	Yea
Weber	—	Yea
Wilk	—	Yea
Beth Gaines	—	Yea
Cristina Garcia	—	Yea
Eduardo Garcia	—	Yea
Mark Stone	—	Yea
Roger Hernández	—	Yea
Travis Allen	—	Yea
Bonta, Mia	Democratic	Yea
Calderon, Lisa	Democratic	Yea
Gipson, Mike A.	Democratic	Yea
Irwin, Jacqui	Democratic	Yea
Dahle, Megan	Republican	Yea
Gallagher, James	Republican	Yea
Grove, Shannon	Republican	Yea
Jones, Brian W.	Republican	Yea
Lackey, Tom	Republican	Yea
Patterson, Joe	Republican	Yea

Official roll call →

3rd Reading AB1 Bonta By Hernandez

September 10, 2015

Passed 24 Yea · 14 Nay · 2 Other

Party	Yea	Nay	Present	Not Voting
Unaffiliated	22	13	0	2
Democratic	2	1	0	0
Total	24	14	0	2
% of votes cast	60%	35%	0%	5%

How each member voted (40)

Member	Party	Vote
Cannella	—	Nay
Allen	—	Yea
Mitchell	—	Yea
De León	—	Yea
Hall	—	Yea
Hancock	—	Yea
Runner	—	Nay
Hernandez	—	Yea
Bates	—	Nay
Block	—	Yea
Hueso	—	Yea
Huff	—	Nay
Lara	—	Yea
Leno	—	Yea
Liu	—	Yea
Mendoza	—	Yea
Monning	—	Yea
Moorlach	—	Nay
Morrell	—	Nay
Nielsen	—	Nay
Pan	—	Yea
Pavley	—	Yea
Roth	—	Yea
Vidak	—	Nay
Wolk	—	Yea
Fuller	—	Nay
Galgiani	—	Not Voting
Glazer	—	Yea
Anderson	—	Nay
Beall	—	Yea
Hertzberg	—	Not Voting
Hill	—	Yea
Leyva	—	Yea
Wieckowski	—	Yea
Beth Gaines	—	Nay
Bill Berryhill	—	Nay
Mark Stone	—	Nay
Jackson, Corey A.	Democratic	Yea
McGuire, Mike	Democratic	Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie	Democratic	Nay

Official roll call →

AB 1 BONTA Concurrence in Senate Amendments

September 10, 2015

Failed 3 Yea · 50 Nay · 27 Other

Party	Yea	Nay	Present	Not Voting
Unaffiliated	1	47	0	22
Democratic	1	3	0	0
Republican	1	0	0	5
Total	3	50	0	27
% of votes cast	4%	63%	0%	34%

How each member voted (80)

Member	Party	Vote
Eggman	—	Nay
Daly	—	Nay
Campos	—	Nay
Gonzalez	—	Nay
Jones-Sawyer	—	Nay
Low	—	Nay
Salas	—	Nay
Bonilla	—	Nay
Cooper	—	Nay
Medina	—	Nay
Mullin	—	Nay
O'Donnell	—	Nay
Perea	—	Nay
Rendon	—	Nay
Gray	—	Nay
Gordon	—	Nay
Lopez	—	Nay
Harper	—	Not Voting
Holden	—	Nay
Atkins	—	Nay
Kim	—	Not Voting
Burke	—	Nay
Levine	—	Nay
Linder	—	Not Voting
Chang	—	Not Voting
Chau	—	Nay
Chiu	—	Nay
Chu	—	Nay
Chávez	—	Not Voting
Cooley	—	Nay
Dababneh	—	Nay
Dodd	—	Nay
Maienschein	—	Not Voting
Mayes	—	Not Voting
McCarty	—	Nay
Melendez	—	Not Voting
Obernolte	—	Not Voting
Olsen	—	Not Voting
Quirk	—	Nay
Rodriguez	—	Nay
Steinorth	—	Not Voting
Thurmond	—	Nay
Wagner	—	Not Voting
Waldron	—	Not Voting
Wilk	—	Not Voting
Williams	—	Nay
Frazier	—	Nay
Gatto	—	Nay
Gomez	—	Nay
Hadley	—	Not Voting
Achadjian	—	Not Voting
Alejo	—	Nay
Baker	—	Not Voting
Bigelow	—	Not Voting
Bloom	—	Nay
Brough	—	Not Voting
Brown	—	Nay
Mathis	—	Not Voting
Nazarian	—	Nay
Ridley-Thomas	—	Yea
Santiago	—	Nay
Ting	—	Nay
Weber	—	Nay
Wood	—	Nay
Beth Gaines	—	Not Voting
Cristina Garcia	—	Nay
Eduardo Garcia	—	Nay
Mark Stone	—	Nay
Roger Hernández	—	Nay
Travis Allen	—	Not Voting
Bonta, Mia	Democratic	Yea
Calderon, Lisa	Democratic	Nay
Gipson, Mike A.	Democratic	Nay
Irwin, Jacqui	Democratic	Nay
Dahle, Megan	Republican	Not Voting
Gallagher, James	Republican	Not Voting
Grove, Shannon	Republican	Not Voting
Jones, Brian W.	Republican	Not Voting
Lackey, Tom	Republican	Not Voting
Patterson, Joe	Republican	Yea

Official roll call →

AB 1 BONTA Assembly Third Reading

August 31, 2015

Passed 50 Yea · 28 Nay · 2 Other

Party	Yea	Nay	Present	Not Voting
Unaffiliated	46	23	0	1
Democratic	4	0	0	0
Republican	0	5	0	1
Total	50	28	0	2
% of votes cast	63%	35%	0%	3%

How each member voted (80)

Member	Party	Vote
Eggman	—	Yea
Frazier	—	Yea
Gatto	—	Nay
Gonzalez	—	Yea
Campos	—	Yea
Salas	—	Yea
Bonilla	—	Yea
Jones-Sawyer	—	Yea
Gray	—	Yea
Lopez	—	Yea
McCarty	—	Yea
Medina	—	Yea
Cooley	—	Yea
Cooper	—	Yea
Dababneh	—	Yea
Daly	—	Yea
Dodd	—	Yea
Mullin	—	Yea
O'Donnell	—	Yea
Rendon	—	Yea
Thurmond	—	Yea
Atkins	—	Yea
Burke	—	Yea
Chau	—	Yea
Chiu	—	Yea
Chu	—	Yea
Levine	—	Yea
Rodriguez	—	Yea
Santiago	—	Yea
Weber	—	Yea
Williams	—	Yea
Wood	—	Yea
Chang	—	Nay
Chávez	—	Nay
Harper	—	Nay
Bigelow	—	Nay
Kim	—	Nay
Maienschein	—	Nay
Mayes	—	Nay
Melendez	—	Nay
Olsen	—	Nay
Quirk	—	Yea
Steinorth	—	Nay
Ting	—	Yea
Waldron	—	Nay
Wilk	—	Nay
Gomez	—	Yea
Gordon	—	Yea
Hadley	—	Nay
Achadjian	—	Nay
Alejo	—	Yea
Baker	—	Nay
Bloom	—	Yea
Brough	—	Nay
Brown	—	Yea
Holden	—	Yea
Linder	—	Nay
Low	—	Yea
Mathis	—	Nay
Nazarian	—	Yea
Obernolte	—	Nay
Perea	—	Yea
Ridley-Thomas	—	Not Voting
Wagner	—	Nay
Beth Gaines	—	Nay
Cristina Garcia	—	Yea
Eduardo Garcia	—	Yea
Mark Stone	—	Yea
Roger Hernández	—	Yea
Travis Allen	—	Nay
Bonta, Mia	Democratic	Yea
Calderon, Lisa	Democratic	Yea
Gipson, Mike A.	Democratic	Yea
Irwin, Jacqui	Democratic	Yea
Dahle, Megan	Republican	Nay
Gallagher, James	Republican	Nay
Grove, Shannon	Republican	Not Voting
Jones, Brian W.	Republican	Nay
Lackey, Tom	Republican	Nay
Patterson, Joe	Republican	Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

veterans healthcare labor health-insurance

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 1 do?: The Lanterman Developmental Disabilities Services Act requires the State Department of Developmental Services to contract with regional centers to provide services and supports to individuals with developmental disabilities. Under existing law, regional centers purchase needed services for individuals with developmental disabilities through approved service providers or arrange for those services through other publicly funded agencies. Existing law establishes specified rates and wages to be paid to certain service providers and the rates to be paid for certain developmental services. Existing law requires that rates to be paid to other developmental service providers either be set by the department or negotiated between the regional center and the service provider. Existing law establishes the Medi-Cal program, administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which basic health care services are provided to qualified low-income persons. The Medi-Cal program is, in part, governed and funded by federal Medicaid Program provisions. Existing law requires, except as otherwise provided, Medi-Cal provider payments to be reduced, as specified. This bill would appropriate a specified sum to the State Department of Developmental Services to, commencing July 1, 2016, among other things, increase rates and wages for certain developmental services providers and fund incentive payments for competitive integrated employment opportunities and internships for individuals with developmental disabilities. The bill would require the department to submit a rate study to specified committees of the Legislature on or before March 1, 2019, regarding community-based services for individuals with developmental disabilities. The bill would require each regional center to report specified information to the department regarding increased funding for regional center operations. The bill would, for dates of service on or after August 1, 2016, increase the payment rates for intermediate care facilities and skilled nursing facilities that provide services to developmentally disabled individuals under the Medi-Cal program, as specified. The bill would also prohibit the State Department of Health Care Services from seeking to retroactively implement certain Medi-Cal provider payment reductions and limitations with regards to reimbursements for services provided by skilled nursing facilities that are distinct parts of general acute care hospitals for dates of service on or after June 1, 2011, and on or before September 30, 2013, and from seeking to recoup overpayments, as specified. Existing law requires the department and regional centers to annually collaborate to compile specified data relating to purchase of service authorization, utilization, and expenditure by each regional center. Existing law requires each regional center to annually report to the department regarding the regional center's implementation of these requirements, including whether the data indicates a need to reduce disparities in the purchase of services among consumers in the regional center's catchment area and the regional center's recommendations and plan to promote equity, and reduce disparities, in the purchase of services. Existing law requires the department to consult with specified stakeholders to review the data, develop recommendations to help reduce disparities in purchase of service expenditures, and encourage development and expansion of culturally appropriate services, among other things, and to report the status of its efforts during the 2016â€“17 legislative budget subcommittee hearing process. The bill would also require the department, subject to available funding, to allocate funding to regional centers to assist in implementing specified recommendations and plans, including the recommendations and plans of the regional centers to promote equity, and reduce disparities, in the purchase of services. Existing law requires an entity that receives payments between $250,000 and $500,000 per year from one or more regional centers to obtain either an independent audit or an independent review report of its financial statements, and requires an entity that receives payments that are equal to or more than $500,000 per year to obtain an independent audit. This bill would instead require an entity that receives payments between $500,000 and $2,000,000 from one or more regional centers to obtain an independent review report of its financial statements, and would authorize these entities to apply for, and require the regional center to grant, a 2-year exemption from this requirement if the regional center does not find issues in the independent review report that have an impact on regional center services. The bill would require an entity that receives payments from one or more regional centers that are equal to or more than $2,000,000 to obtain an independent audit and would authorize these entities to apply for, and require the regional center to grant, a 2-year exemption from the audit requirement if the audit resulted in an unmodified opinion, an unmodified opinion with additional communication, or a qualified opinion with issues that are not material. The bill would require a regional center to annually report to the State Department of Developmental Services any exemptions granted pursuant to these provisions.
Who sponsors AB 1?: AB 1 is sponsored by Wood, Wolk, Williams, Wieckowski, Weber, Waldron, Ting, Thurmond, Santiago, Roth, Rodriguez, Ridley-Thomas, Rendon, Quirk, Pavley, Pan, Olsen, O'Donnell, Nazarian, Mullin, Monning, Mendoza, Medina, McGuire, Mike (Democratic), McCarty, Mayes, Mathis, Maienschein, Low, Liu, Linder, Leyva, Levine, Leno, Lara, Jones-Sawyer, Irwin, Jacqui (Democratic), Hueso, Holden, Hill, Hertzberg, Hernandez, Hancock, Hall, Gordon, Gomez, Glazer, Gipson, Mike A. (Democratic), Gatto, Gallagher, James (Republican), Galgiani, Frazier, Eggman, Dodd, Daly, Dababneh, Cooper, Cooley, Chu, Chiu, Chau, Cannella, Campos, Burke, Brown, Bloom, Block, Bigelow, Beall, Baker, Alejo, Bonilla, Atkins, Mitchell, De León, Salas, Lopez, Jones, Gray, Dahle, Garcia, Robert (Democratic), Calderon, Lisa (Democratic), Bonta, Mia (Democratic), Jackson, Corey A. (Democratic), Gonzalez, Jeff (Republican), Roger Hernández, Mark Stone, and Travis Allen.
What is the current status of AB 1?: This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced July 02, 2015. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 1?: Track AB 1 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Keep track of this bill

Add this bill to your alerts and we'll email you when it moves — or keep it on a watchlist and see it in your weekly digest.

Create a free account →

At a glance

Identifier: AB 1
Jurisdiction: California
Session: 2015-2016, 2nd Special Session
Type: Bill, Appropriation
Introduced: July 02, 2015
Status: Enacted
Prime sponsor: Thurmond

Make your voice heard on AB 1

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 1

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →

Odds of enactment

Prognosis

Summary

Bill Text

Action History

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (88)

Not signed on (33)

Votes

Conference Report AB1 Thurmond, et al. By Beall

AB 1 THURMOND Conference Report

3rd Reading AB1 Bonta By Hernandez

AB 1 BONTA Concurrence in Senate Amendments

AB 1 BONTA Assembly Third Reading

Subjects

Frequently asked questions

Make your voice heard on AB 1