Diligence Claims Water Amendments
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 251 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 251.
You're tracking HB 251
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 251 — Diligence Claims Water Amendments
Last action — Governor Signed
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 14, 2026. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Spencer Cox (Republican) on March 25, 2026.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (2 R).
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
167 added · 177 removedPlain-language change summary
The latest version of Bill HB 251 clarifies the requirements for claiming water rights in Utah. It specifies that claimants must provide detailed information, including measurements of water diversion and maps of where the water is used, to ensure that the claims are legitimate and can be properly evaluated. These changes aim to improve the accuracy and validity of water claims, which is essential for water management and conservation efforts in the state. This matters because it helps prevent disputes over water rights and ensures that the limited water resources are allocated fairly.
HB0251S01Enrolled comparedCopy withH.B. HB0251 {Omitted text} shows text that was in HB0251 but was omitted in HB0251S01 inserted text shows text that was not in HB0251 but was inserted into HB0251S01 DISCLAIMER:
This251 documentDiligence isClaims providedWater toAmendments assistGENERAL youSESSION inSTATE yourOF comparisonUTAH ofChief theSponsor: two bills.
Sometimes this automated comparison will NOT be completely accurate.
Therefore, you need to read the actual bills.
This automatically generated document could contain inaccuracies caused by:
limitations of the compare program;
bad input data;
or other causes.
Diligence Claims Water Amendments GENERAL SESSION STATE OF UTAH Chief Sponsor:
3David LONGP. TITLE General Description:
Hinkins 3 LONG TITLE General Description:
None H Other Special Clauses:
B None 2 Utah Code Sections Affected:
5 HB0251 compared with HB0251S01 AMENDS:
73-5-1373-5-13, , as last amended by Laws of Utah 2020, Chapter 59 Be it enacted by the Legislature of the state of Utah:
73-5-13.73-5-13 .
(1)(1)(a) (a) A claimant to the right to the use of water, including both surface and undergroundH.B. water, whose right is not represented by a certificate of appropriation issued by the state engineer, by an application filed with the state engineer, by a court decree, or by a notice of claim filed [pursuant] according to law, shall submit the claim to the state engineer in accordance with this section.
251 Enrolled Copy underground water, whose right is not represented by a certificate of appropriation issued by the state engineer, by an application filed with the state engineer, by a court decree, or by a notice of claim filed [pursuant] according to law, shall submit the claim to the state engineer in accordance with this section.
(2)(2)(a) (a) The claimant or the claimant's appointed representative shall verify under oath a claim submitted under this section and submit the claim on [forms] a form provided by the state engineer setting forth [any] the information the state engineer requires, including:
(ii) the quantity of water claimed in acre-feet or rate of flow in second-feet, or both, [where][ where] when appropriate;
and - 2 - HB0251 compared with HB0251S01 (ix) the date when the water was first used.
(b) [The] {Subject to Subsection (8), a} A claim described in Subsection (1) shall also include the following information, prepared by a Utah licensed engineer or a Utah licensed land surveyor:
(c) The state engineer may require additional information as necessary to evaluate [any] a claim- described2 in- SubsectionEnrolled (1)Copy including:H.B.
251 claim described in Subsection (1) including:
(3)(3)(a) (a) A claimant, or a claimant's successor in interest, as shown in the records of the state engineer, may file a corrected claim that:
-(4)(a) 3 - HB0251 compared with HB0251S01 (4) (a) When a claimant submits a claim that is acceptably complete under Subsection (2) and deposits money with the state engineer sufficient to pay the expenses of conducting a field investigation and publishing a notice of the claim, the state engineer shall:
(b)- [A3 claim- notH.B. acceptably complete under Subsection (2) shall be returned to the claimant.] The state engineer shall return a claim to the claimant that the state engineer determines is not acceptably complete.
251 Enrolled Copy (b) [A claim not acceptably complete under Subsection (2) shall be returned to the claimant.] The state engineer shall return a claim to the claimant that the state engineer determines is not acceptably complete.
(5)(5)(a) (a) The state engineer shall:
(6)(6)(a) (a) A person who may be damaged by a diversion and use of water as described in a claim submitted [pursuant] according to this section may file an action in [district court] a court with jurisdiction to - 4 - HB0251 compared with HB0251S01 determine the validity of the claim, regardless of whether the state engineer has filed the claim in accordance with Subsection (4)(a).
(d) In an action brought to determine the validity of a claim to the use of water under this section, the claimant has the initial burden of proof as to the validity of the claimed right{right. except as provided in Subsection (8)}.
(e)(e)(i) (i) A person filing an action challenging the validity of a claim to the use of water under- this4 section- shallEnrolled notifyCopy theH.B. state engineer of the pendency of the action in accordance with state engineer rules.
251 under this section shall notify the state engineer of the pendency of the action in accordance with state engineer rules.
(7)(7)(a) (a) In a general adjudication of water rights under Title 73, Chapter 4, Determination of Water Rights, after completion of final summons in accordance with Section 73-4-22, a claimant is prohibited from filing a claim under this section in the general adjudication area, division, or subdivision.
(8)(8)(a) (a) As used in this Subsection (8):
- 5 - HB0251 compared with HB0251S01 (ii) "Livestock" means a domestic animal raised or kept for profit or personal use.
(B) has an annual use {of less than 20 acre-feet } that meets the condition of {water} Subsection (8)(b)(8)(b)(i); (i);
(i){(ii)}- the5 claimant- filesH.B. an acceptably complete claim in accordance with this section{, except that the claimant is not required to provide the information described in Subsection (2)(b)} ;
(ii){(iii)}251 theEnrolled claimantCopy deposits(ii) money with the stateclaimant engineerfiles sufficientan toacceptably paycomplete theclaim expensesin ofaccordance conductingwith athis fieldsection; investigation and publishing a notice of the claim;
(iii){(iv)}(iii) the livestockclaimant wateringdeposits pondmoney iswith inthe supportstate engineer sufficient to pay the expenses of conducting a homesteadfield parcel;investigation and publishing a notice of the claim;
Show all 48 changed lines (8 more)
(iv) the livestock watering pond is in support of a homestead parcel;
(iv){(A)}(A) {the livestock watering pond } existed before the conveyance of the patent for the homestead parcel{.}parcel; ;
(c) The priority date of a claim described in Subsection (8)(b) is the date on which the homestead parcel is first used in support of livestock notwithstanding that the date is before the patent conveying title to the homesteadparcel.homestead parcel.
(d) The rebuttable presumption described in Subsection (8)(b) may be rebutted by a person protesting a claim based on the impairment of a water right held by the person protesting the claim.Aclaim. person may rebut the rebuttable presumption described in Subsection (8)(b) by a preponderance of the evidence.
{(e)A {Theperson state engineer may notrebut consider impairment based on the conditionsrebuttable presumption described in Subsection (8)(d)(8)(b) unlessby the issue is raised in a timelypreponderance protest that identifies which of the protestant'sevidence. existing - 6 - HB0251 compared with HB0251S01 rights the protestant reasonably believes will experience impairment.
A(e) person may rebut the rebuttable presumption described in Subsection (8)(b) by a preponderance of the evidence.} } (f){(e)} If a claimant and a protestant come to a written agreement regarding how the issue of impairment may be mitigated:
Effective date.
2-2-26 1:19 PM - 76 -
Show all 48 changed rows (8 more)
View plain text versions (4)
- Enrolled View text Current pdf
- Comparison to Original Bill View text pdf
- Substitute Substitute #1 pdf
- Introduced View text pdf
Compared against the Utah Code as published AI-generated reading aid — verify against the official bill.
The bill adds provisions for a rebuttable presumption of water use rights related to livestock watering ponds supporting homestead parcels.
-
Utah Code § 73-5-13
(8)(b) There is a rebuttable presumption that a claimant has the right to the use of a livestock watering pond even though the right is not represented by a certificate of appropriation issued by the state engineer, by an application filed with the state engineer, by a court decree, or by a notice of claim filed according to law if: (i) the aggregate of annual use of all livestock watering ponds that support the homestead parcel is less than 20 acre-feet of water; (ii) the claimant files an acceptably complete claim in accordance with this section; (iii) the claimant deposits money with the state engineer sufficient to pay the expenses of conducting a field investigation and publishing a notice of the claim; (iv) the livestock watering pond is in support of a homestead parcel; and (v) the livestock watering pond: (A) existed before the conveyance of the patent for the homestead parcel; and (B) was used as surface water before 1903.
This establishes a presumption of water rights for livestock watering ponds related to homestead parcels, aiding claimants in asserting their rights.
-
Utah Code § 73-5-13
(8)(c) The priority date of a claim described in Subsection (8)(b) is the date on which the homestead parcel is first used in support of livestock notwithstanding that the date is before the patent conveying title to the homestead parcel.
This defines the priority date for claims tied to homestead parcels, which can be before the patent date.
-
Utah Code § 73-5-13
(8)(d) The rebuttable presumption described in Subsection (8)(b) may be rebutted by a person protesting a claim based on the impairment of a water right held by the person protesting the claim. A person may rebut the rebuttable presumption described in Subsection (8)(b) by a preponderance of the evidence.
This allows individuals to contest the presumption of rights established for livestock watering ponds if they can show impairment of their own water rights.
Action History
-
Governor Signed
-
House/ to Governor
-
House/ received enrolled bill from Printing
-
House/ enrolled bill to Printing
-
Enrolled Bill Returned to House or Senate
-
Draft of Enrolled Bill Prepared
-
Bill Received from House for Enrolling
-
House/ signed by Speaker/ sent for enrolling
-
House/ received from Senate
-
Senate/ to House
-
Senate/ signed by President/ returned to House
-
Senate/ passed 3rd reading
-
Senate/ 3rd reading
-
Senate/ passed 2nd reading
-
Senate/ 2nd reading
-
Senate/ placed on 2nd Reading Calendar
-
Senate/ committee report favorable [Senate Natural Resources, Agriculture, and Environment Committee]
-
Senate Comm - Favorable Recommendation [Senate Natural Resources, Agriculture, and Environment Committee]
-
Senate/ to standing committee [Senate Natural Resources, Agriculture, and Environment Committee]
-
Senate/ 1st reading (Introduced)
-
Senate/ received from House
-
House/ to Senate
-
House/ passed 3rd reading
-
House/ 3rd reading
-
LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for HB0251S01
-
LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for HB0251S01
-
House/ 2nd reading
-
House/ comm rpt/ substituted [House Natural Resources, Agriculture, and Environment Committee]
-
House Comm - Favorable Recommendation [House Natural Resources, Agriculture, and Environment Committee]
-
House Comm - Substitute Recommendation [House Natural Resources, Agriculture, and Environment Committee]
-
LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for HB0251S01
-
LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for HB0251S01
-
House/ to standing committee [House Natural Resources, Agriculture, and Environment Committee]
-
House/ 1st reading (Introduced)
-
House/ received fiscal note from Fiscal Analyst
-
House/ received bill from Legislative Research
-
LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for HB0251
-
LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for HB0251
-
LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for HB0251
-
LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for HB0251
-
Numbered Bill Publicly Distributed
-
Bill Numbered but not Distributed
Sponsors
- David P. Hinkins · Cosponsor
- Scott H. Chew · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 102 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Scott H. Chew Republican
Co-sponsors (1)
- David P. Hinkins Republican
Not signed on (102)
102 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 102 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 251?
- HB 251 is sponsored by David P. Hinkins (Republican) and Scott H. Chew (Republican).
- What is the current status of HB 251?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 14, 2026. Enacted.
- Where can I track HB 251?
- Track HB 251 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 251
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 251
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →