HB 378 — Fugitive Dust Mitigation Amendments
Last action — Governor Signed
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 26, 2026. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Spencer Cox (Republican) on March 25, 2026.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (2 R).
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
113 added · 170 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent changes to Bill HB 378 allow the Division of Air Quality to impose a compliance fee on aggregate operations, starting in 2028, which aims to ensure businesses follow environmental regulations. Additionally, it now requires facilities that manage fugitive dust to display clear informational signs for the public. Some previous provisions regarding written notices and increased inspections for non-compliance have been removed, which suggests a shift towards a more flexible regulatory approach. These updates are important as they balance regulatory oversight with the need to support businesses while still addressing air quality concerns.
HB0378S02Enrolled comparedCopy withH.B. HB0378 {Omitted text} shows text that was in HB0378 but was omitted in HB0378S02 inserted text shows text that was not in HB0378 but was inserted into HB0378S02 DISCLAIMER:
This378 documentFugitive isDust providedMitigation toAmendments assistGENERAL youSESSION inSTATE yourOF comparisonUTAH ofChief theSponsor: two bills.
Sometimes this automated comparison will NOT be completely accurate.
Therefore, you need to read the actual bills.
This automatically generated document could contain inaccuracies caused by:
limitations of the compare program;
bad input data;
or other causes.
Fugitive Dust Mitigation Amendments GENERAL SESSION STATE OF UTAH Chief Sponsor:
3Derrin LONGR. TITLE General Description:
Owens 3 LONG TITLE General Description:
▸ {imposes } allows the Division of Air Quality (division) to impose an aggregate compliance fee up to certain amounts on an aggregate operation;
▸ requires a fugitive dust facility to post informational signage that is clearly visible to the public;andpublic; ▸ {requires the Division of Air Quality (division) to send written notice to a fugitivH dust facility not in compliance with a fugitive dust control plan or other state and federal law;} B ▸ {allows the division to require a fugitive dust facility not in compliance with a fu3itive dust control plan to:
}and 7▸ HB0378makes comparedtechnical with HB0378S02 ● {provide a corrective action report and monitoringconforming data;changes.
and} ● {submit to increased inspections;} ▸ {provides that the division may reduce the frequency of inspections for a fugitive dust facility with a history of compliance;} ▸ {provides that a fugitive dust facility may use on-site wastewater for fugitive dust control if approved by the division and the state engineer;
and} ▸ makes technical and conforming changes.
19-1-10519-1-105, , as last amended by Laws of Utah 2025, Chapter 14 ENACTS:
19-2-13019-2-130, , Utah Code Annotated 1953 19-2a-10819-2a-108, , Utah Code Annotated 1953 REPEALS:
19-2a-10119-2a-101, , as enacted by Laws of Utah 2018, Chapter 120 BeH.B. it enacted by the Legislature of the state of Utah:
378 Enrolled Copy Be it enacted by the Legislature of the state of Utah:
19-1-105.19-1-105 .
- 2 - HB0378 compared with HB0378S02 (d) the Division of Waste Management and Radiation Control, to administer:
(3)(3)(a) (a) A division director shall possess the administrative skills and training necessary to perform the duties of division director.
(5)- A2 division- directorEnrolled shallCopy serveH.B. as the executive secretary to the policymaking board, created in Section 19-1-106, that has rulemaking authority over the division director's division.
378 (5) A division director shall serve as the executive secretary to the policymaking board, created in Section 19-1-106, that has rulemaking authority over the division director's division.
Section 219-2-130 is enacted to read:
19-2-130.19-2-130 .
(a)(a)(i) (a){(i)} "Aggregate" means rock material, including sand, gravel, stone, and other rock {material that is majority nonmetallic minerals} products.
- 3 - HB0378 compared with HB0378S02 (A) metalliferous minerals, as that term is described in Section 59-5-201;
{(2) } {(a) {Beginning on July 1, 2027, there is imposed on an owner or operator of an aggregate operation an annual aggregate compliance fee.} } (d) "Frac sand" means a quartz silica sand that is:
(e)(e)(i) (i) "Mineral salts" means a salt containing a nonmetallic element.
(b){(2)}(2) {The } Beginning on July 1, 2027, and ending on June 30, 2028, the division may impose an annual aggregate compliance fee {is } on an aggregate operation based on annual air pollutant emissions, in an amountamount: {of} :
(i){(a)}(a) for 20 or less tons of annual emissions, not to exceed $750;
(ii){(b)}(b) for between 20 and 79 tons of annual emissions, not to exceed $1,500;
(iii){(c)}(c) for between 79 and 99 tons of annual emissions, not to exceed $3,500;
and (iv){(d)}(d) for 99 or more tons of annual emissions, not to exceed $4,500.
(3)- Beginning3 on- JulyH.B. 1, 2028, the division may impose an annual aggregate compliance fee on an aggregate operation in accordance with Title 63J, Chapter 1, Budgetary Procedures Act.
-378 4Enrolled -Copy HB0378(3) comparedBeginning withon HB0378S02July (3){(4)}1, In2028, accordancethe withdivision Titlemay 63G,impose Chapteran 3,annual Utahaggregate Administrativecompliance Rulemakingfee Act,on thean boardaggregate mayoperation makein rulesaccordance towith implementTitle the63J, feeChapter described1, inBudgetary thisProcedures section.Act.
(4) In accordance with Title 63G, Chapter 3, Utah Administrative Rulemaking Act, the board may make rules to implement the fee described in this section.
Section 319-2a-108 is enacted to read:
Show all 59 changed lines (19 more)
19-2a-108.19-2a-108 .
Fugitive dust facility {requirements } -- {Signage -- Water reuse} Definitions -- Signage requirement.
and {(ii) {is required by the division.} } {(d) } (ii) complies with relevant state and federal law for a fugitive dust facility.
(d)(d)(i) (i) "Fugitive dust facility" means a commercial facility or site:
(A) an aggregate operation that extracts, crushes, screens, grinds, stores, or transports rock material, including sand, gravel, stone, and other rock {material} products;
{(e) {"Fugitive dust logbook" means a written record of a fugitive dust facility's monitoring, inspections, maintenance, and corrective actions, as required by a fugitive dust control plan.} } - 5 - HB0378 compared with HB0378S02 (2) A fugitive dust facility shall post informational signage:
(iii)- a4 business- identificationEnrolled number;andCopy (iv)H.B. the contact information for:
378 (iii) a business identification number;
and (iv) the contact information for:
{(3)Section {A4. fugitive dust facility may not operate without a fugitive dust control plan approved by the division.} } {(4) } {(a) {If the division determines that a fugitive dust facility is not in compliance with a fugitive dust control plan or relevant state and federal law, the division shall:} } {(i) {send a written notice of noncompliance to the fugitive dust facility;
and} } {(ii) {inform the fugitive dust facility that the division may require the fugitive dust facility to:} } {(A) {provide the information described in Subsection (4)(b);
and} } {(B) {submit to inspections by the division of up to three times per week for a six-week period.} } {(b) {The division may require a fugitive dust facility not in compliance with a fugitive dust control plan to submit to the division:} } {(i) {a corrective action report that includes an action the fugitive dust facility takes to comply with a fugitive dust control plan;} } {(ii) {a fugitive dust logbook, for a period of time determined by the division;
and} } {(iii) {any other information required by the division.} } {(c) {The division may modify a fugitive dust facility's inspection schedule to at least one inspection every 18 months, if the fugitive dust facility:} } {(i) {is subject to an annual inspection by the division;
and} } {(ii) {receives no written notice of noncompliance, described in Subsection (4)(a), in a three-year period.} } {(5) {A fugitive dust facility may use wastewater for fugitive dust control if the wastewater:} } {(a) {is generated by the fugitive dust facility on site;
and} } - 6 - HB0378 compared with HB0378S02 {(b) {is approved for use:} } {(i) {by the division in a fugitive dust control plan;
and} } {(ii) {by the state engineer, created in Section 73-2-1, under a water right application, if necessary.} } Section 4.
This Bill Repeals:
Effective date.
2-3-26 2:55 PM - 75 -
Show all 59 changed rows (19 more)
View plain text versions (6)
- Enrolled View text Current pdf
- Comparison to Original Bill View text pdf
- Comparison to Sub #1 View text pdf
- Substitute Substitute #1 pdf
- Substitute Substitute #2 pdf
- Introduced View text pdf
Action History
-
Governor Signed
-
House/ to Governor
-
House/ received enrolled bill from Printing
-
House/ enrolled bill to Printing
-
Enrolled Bill Returned to House or Senate
-
Draft of Enrolled Bill Prepared
-
Bill Received from House for Enrolling
-
House/ signed by Speaker/ sent for enrolling
-
House/ received from Senate
-
Senate/ to House
-
Senate/ signed by President/ returned to House
-
Senate/ passed 3rd reading
-
Senate/ 3rd reading
-
Senate/ 2nd reading
-
Senate/ comm rpt/ placed on Consent Calendar [Senate Business and Labor Committee]
-
Senate Comm - Consent Calendar Recommendation [Senate Business and Labor Committee]
-
Senate Comm - Favorable Recommendation [Senate Business and Labor Committee]
-
Senate/ to standing committee [Senate Business and Labor Committee]
-
Senate/ 1st reading (Introduced)
-
Senate/ received from House
-
House/ to Senate
-
House/ passed 3rd reading
-
House/ 3rd reading
-
LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for HB0378S02
-
LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for HB0378S02
-
House/ 2nd reading
-
House/ comm rpt/ substituted [House Public Utilities and Energy Committee]
-
House Comm - Favorable Recommendation [House Public Utilities and Energy Committee]
-
House Comm - Substitute Recommendation [House Public Utilities and Energy Committee]
-
LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for HB0378S02
-
LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for HB0378S02
-
LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for HB0378S01
-
LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for HB0378S01
-
House/ to standing committee [House Public Utilities and Energy Committee]
-
House/ received fiscal note from Fiscal Analyst
-
LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for HB0378
-
LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for HB0378
-
House/ 1st reading (Introduced)
-
House/ received bill from Legislative Research
-
LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for HB0378
-
LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for HB0378
-
Numbered Bill Publicly Distributed
-
Bill Numbered but not Distributed
Sponsors
- Derrin R. Owens · Cosponsor
- Stephanie Gricius · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 102 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Stephanie Gricius Republican
Co-sponsors (1)
- Derrin R. Owens Republican
Not signed on (102)
102 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 102 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 378?
- HB 378 is sponsored by Derrin R. Owens (Republican) and Stephanie Gricius (Republican).
- What is the current status of HB 378?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 26, 2026. Enacted.
- Where can I track HB 378?
- Track HB 378 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 378
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 378
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →