Utah 2026 General Session Status: Enacted 2 R cosponsors

SB 226 — Fatal Motor Vehicle Accident Amendments

Last action — Governor Signed

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed House
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 30, 2026. Enacted.

Signed by Governor Spencer Cox (Republican) on March 23, 2026.

Prognosis

Advancing 54% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 2 sponsors

    1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (2 R).

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

105 added · 158 removed

Plain-language change summary

The amended bill SB 226 now specifies that police officers investigating a fatal car accident must consult with a senior officer before deciding not to pursue a chemical test for drugs or alcohol. This change aims to ensure that decisions about testing are made with careful consideration and oversight, ultimately improving accountability in handling serious accidents. Additionally, the amendment clarifies the language regarding consent to chemical tests for individuals involved in such incidents. These updates are important for reinforcing the law's intent to deter impaired driving and enhance public safety.

→
Previous
Latest
SB0226S02 compared with SB0226 {Omitted text} shows text that was in SB0226 but was omitted in SB0226S02 inserted text shows text that was not in SB0226 but was inserted into SB0226S02 DISCLAIMER:
Enrolled Copy S.B.
This document is provided to assist you in your comparison of the two bills.
226 Fatal Motor Vehicle Accident Amendments GENERAL SESSION STATE OF UTAH Chief Sponsor:
Sometimes this automated comparison will NOT be completely accurate.
Ann Millner House Sponsor:
Therefore, you need to read the actual bills.
Steve Eliason 3 LONG TITLE General Description:
This automatically generated document could contain inaccuracies caused by:
This bill addresses requirements for a chemical test of an individual involved in a motor vehicle accident.
limitations of the compare program;
bad input data;
or other causes.
Fatal Motor Vehicle Accident Amendments GENERAL SESSION STATE OF UTAH Chief Sponsor:
Ann Millner House Sponsor:Steve Eliason 3 LONG TITLE General Description:
This bill {directs law enforcement to seek a warrant to administer } addresses requirements for a {drug and alcohol } chemical test {to a driver when the driver is } of an individual involved in a {fatal } motor vehicle accident.
▸ {directs } requires a peace officer investigating a fatal motor vehicle accident to {pursue } review the facts of the accident with a senior officer before declining to seek a warrant for a {drug test for a surviving driver} chemical test;
▸ requires a peace officer investigating a fatal motor vehicle accident to review the facts of the accident with a senior officer before declining to seek a warrant for a chemical test;
and S ▸ makes technical changes.
and ▸ makes technical changes.
B Money Appropriated in this Bill:
Money Appropriated in this Bill:
2 None SB0226 compared with SB0226S02 Other Special Clauses:
None Other Special Clauses:
41-6a-520 , as last amended by Laws of Utah 2023, Chapter 415 Be it enacted by the Legislature of the state of Utah:
41-6a-520, as last amended by Laws of Utah 2023, Chapter 415 Be it enacted by the Legislature of the state of Utah:
41-6a-520.
41-6a-520 .
(1) (a) [A person ] An individual operating a motor vehicle in this state [is considered to have given the person's consent] consents to a chemical test or tests of the [person's ] individual's breath, blood, urine, or oral fluids [for the purpose of determining ] to determine whether the [person ] individual was operating or in actual physical control of a motor vehicle[ while]:
(1)(a) [A person ] An individual operating a motor vehicle in this state [is considered to S.B.
226 Enrolled Copy have given the person's consent] consents to a chemical test or tests of the [person's ] individual's breath, blood, urine, or oral fluids [for the purpose of determining ] to determine whether the [person ] individual was operating or in actual physical control of a motor vehicle[ while]:
or (iii) {[having any{]} the individual had a} measurable controlled substance or metabolite of a controlled substance in the [person's ] individual's body in violation of Section 41-6a-517.
or (iii) having any measurable controlled substance or metabolite of a controlled substance in the [person's ] individual's body in violation of Section 41-6a-517.
[(b) A test or tests authorized under this Subsection (1) must be administered at the direction of a peace officer having grounds to believe that person to have been operating or in actual physical control of a motor vehicle while in violation of any provision under Subsections (1)(a)(i) through (iii).] (b) A peace officer having reasonable suspicion to believe that an individual was operating or was in actual physical control of a motor vehicle in violation of an offense described in Subsections (1)(a) (i) through (iii) shall direct that a test be administered as authorized in Subsection (1).
[(b) A test or tests authorized under this Subsection (1) must be administered at the direction of a peace officer having grounds to believe that person to have been operating or in actual physical control of a motor vehicle while in violation of any provision under Subsections (1)(a)(i) through (iii).] (b) A peace officer having reasonable suspicion to believe that an individual was operating or was in actual physical control of a motor vehicle in violation of an offense described in Subsections (1)(a)(i) through (iii) shall direct that a test be administered as authorized in Subsection (1).
(c) (i) [The ] A peace officer determines which of the tests are administered and how many [of them] tests are administered.
(c)(i) [The ] A peace officer determines which of the tests are administered and how many [of them] tests are administered.
- 2 - SB0226 compared with SB0226S02 [(ii) If a peace officer requests more than one test, refusal by a person to take one or more requested tests, even though the person does submit to any other requested test or tests, is a refusal under this section.] (ii) If a peace officer requests more than one test, refusal by an individual to take one or more requested tests, even if the individual submits to another requested test or tests, is a refusal under this section.
[(ii) If a peace officer requests more than one test, refusal by a person to take one or more requested tests, even though the person does submit to any other requested test or tests, is a refusal under this section.] (ii) If a peace officer requests more than one test, refusal by an individual to take one or more requested tests, even if the individual submits to another requested test or tests, is a refusal under this section.
(d) (i) [A person ] An individual who has been requested under this section to submit to a chemical test or tests of the [person's ] individual's breath, blood, or urine, or oral fluids may not select the test or tests to be administered.
(d)(i) [A person ] An individual who has been requested under this section to submit to a chemical test or tests of the [person's ] individual's breath, blood, or urine, or oral fluids may not select the test or tests to be administered.
(2) (a) A peace officer requesting a test or tests shall warn [a person ] an individual that refusal to submit to the test or tests may result in criminal prosecution, revocation of the [person's ] individual's license to operate a motor vehicle, a [five or 10 year] five-year or 10-year prohibition of driving with [any] a measurable or detectable amount of alcohol in the [person's ] individual's body depending on the [person's prior] individual's driving history, and a [three-year] two-year prohibition of driving without an ignition interlock device if the [person] individual:
(2)(a) A peace officer requesting a test or tests shall warn [a person ] an individual that - 2 - Enrolled Copy S.B.
226 refusal to submit to the test or tests may result in criminal prosecution, revocation of the [person's ] individual's license to operate a motor vehicle, a [five or 10 year] five-year or 10-year prohibition of driving with [any] a measurable or detectable amount of alcohol in the [person's ] individual's body depending on the [person's prior] individual's driving history, and a [three-year] two-year prohibition of driving without an ignition interlock device if the [person] individual:
(b) (i) [Following the warning under Subsection (2)(a), if the person does not immediately request that the chemical test or tests as offered by a peace officer be administered, a ] A peace officer shall, on behalf of the Driver License Division and within 24 hours of the arrest, give notice of the Driver License Division's intention to revoke the [person's ] individual's privilege or license to operate a motor vehicle if, following the warning described in Subsection (2)(a), the individual does not immediately request that a chemical test or tests be administered as offered by a peace officer.
(b)(i) [Following the warning under Subsection (2)(a), if the person does not immediately request that the chemical test or tests as offered by a peace officer be administered, a ] A peace officer shall, on behalf of the Driver License Division and within 24 hours of the arrest, give notice of the Driver License Division's intention to revoke the [person's ] individual's privilege or license to operate a motor vehicle if, following the warning described in Subsection (2)(a), the individual does not immediately request that a chemical test or tests be administered as offered by a peace officer.
- 3 - SB0226 compared with SB0226S02 (ii) When a peace officer gives the notice on behalf of the Driver License Division, the peace officer shall supply to the operator, in a manner specified by the Driver License Division, basic information regarding how to obtain a hearing before the Driver License Division.
(ii) When a peace officer gives the notice on behalf of the Driver License Division, the peace officer shall supply to the operator, in a manner specified by the Driver License Division, basic information regarding how to obtain a hearing before the Driver License Division.
(c) { Ŝ→ {} {[} {[} {]} As a matter of procedure, [the{] ] a {[{]} {A} peace officer shall submit a signed report, within 10 calendar days after the day on which notice is provided under Subsection (2)(b), that:]} (i) { ←Ŝ } { Ŝ→ {} {a }{} ←Ŝ } the peace officer {shall submit a signed report, within 10 calendar days after the day on which notice is provided under Subsection (2)(b), that:} had grounds to believe the arrested {(i)} [{the peace officer had grounds to believe the arrested } person ] individual {[{person } was in violation of {]} individual }[{was in violation of } any] a{[{any} provision under Subsections (1) (a)(i) through (iii);
(c) As a matter of procedure, [the ] a peace officer shall submit a signed report, within 10 calendar days after the day on which notice is provided under Subsection (2)(b), that:
and{]} a} (ii) { provision under Subsections (1)(a)(i) through (iii);
(i) the peace officer had grounds to believe the arrested [person ] individual was in violation of [any] a provision under Subsections (1)(a)(i) through (iii);
and} the {(ii)} [{the } person ] individual {[{person } had refused to submit to a chemical test or tests under Subsection (1).{]} individual } (3) [{had refused to submit to a chemical test or tests under Subsection (1).} Upon the request of the person {(3)} ] If an individual {[{Upon the request of the person } who was tested]} {If an individual } requests so{who was tested} , the results of the test or tests shall be made available to the { requests so}[{, the results of the test or tests shall be made available to the } person] individual{[{person} .{]} individual} (4) (a) {.} The {(4)} {(a)} [{The } person] individual{[{person} to be tested may, at the {]} individual}[{ to be tested may, at the } person's ] individual's {[{person's } own expense, have a physician or a physician assistant of the {]} individual's }[{own expense, have a physician or a physician assistant of the } person's ] individual's {[{person's } own choice administer a chemical test in addition to the test or tests administered at the direction of a peace officer.{]} individual's } (b) {own choice administer } The failure or inability to obtain the additional test does not affect admissibility of the results of the test or tests taken at the direction of a {chemical test in addition to - 4 - SB0226 compared with SB0226S02 } peace officer, or preclude or delay the test or tests {administered } to be taken at the direction of a peace officer.
and (ii) the [person ] individual had refused to submit to a chemical test or tests under Subsection (1).
{(b)} (c) The failure or inability to obtain the additional test {shall be } does not affect admissibility of the results of the test or tests taken at the direction of a peace officer, or preclude or delay the test or tests to be taken at the direction of a peace officer.
(3) [Upon the request of the person ] If an individual who was tested requests so, the results of the test or tests shall be made available to the [person] individual.
{(c)} [{The additional test shall be } subsequent to {the test or tests administered at the direction of a peace officer.
(4)(a) The [person] individual to be tested may, at the [person's ] individual's own expense, have a physician or a physician assistant of the [person's ] individual's own choice administer a chemical test in addition to the test or tests administered at the direction of a peace officer.
{(5)} ] after{[{For the purpose of determining whether to submit to a chemical } the test or tests{, } administered at the {person to be tested} direction of a peace officer.{]} An individual being asked to submit to a chemical test or tests} (5) [{ does not have } For the {right } purpose of determining whether to {consult an attorney } submit to a chemical test or {have an attorney} tests, {physician, or other } the person to be tested] An individual being asked to submit to a chemical test or tests{[{person } does not have the right to consult an attorney or have an attorney, physician, or other {]} individual }[{present } person ] individual {[{as a condition for the taking of any test} present {]} for the purpose of determining whether to submit to a chemical test or tests}[{.} as a condition for the taking of any test {(6)} ] for the purpose of determining whether to submit to a chemical test or tests{Notwithstanding the provisions in this section, a blood test taken under this section is subject to Section 77-23-213} .
- 3 - S.B.
{(7)} {(a) A peace officer investigating a motor vehicle accident resulting in the death of an individual shall seek a search warrant authorizing a chemical test described in Subsection (1)(a) of each driver involved in the accident.} {(b) The search warrant requirement described in Subsection (7)(a) applies to an accident involving one or more of the following:} {(i) a vehicle and a pedestrian;} {(ii) a vehicle and an object;
226 Enrolled Copy (b) The failure or inability to obtain the additional test does not affect admissibility of the results of the test or tests taken at the direction of a peace officer, or preclude or delay the test or tests to be taken at the direction of a peace officer.
or} {(iii) multiple vehicles.} {(c) A peace officer may administer a chemical test described in Subsection (7)(a) if:} {(i) a court issues a search warrant authorizing the chemical test;
(c) The additional test shall be [subsequent to] after the test or tests administered at the direction of a peace officer.
or} {(ii) the individual the peace officer wishes to test gives voluntary consent.} {(d) A peace officer shall ensure a chemical test administered under this Subsection (7):} - 5 - SB0226 compared with SB0226S02 {(i) is a blood test;
(5) [For the purpose of determining whether to submit to a chemical test or tests, the person to be tested] An individual being asked to submit to a chemical test or tests does not have the right to consult an attorney or have an attorney, physician, or other [person ] individual present [as a condition for the taking of any test] for the purpose of determining whether to submit to a chemical test or tests.
and} {(ii) if possible, is administered within 24 hours of an accident described in Subsection (7)(b).} {(e) The implied consent described in Subsection (1) alone does not authorize a chemical test described in Subsection (7)(a).} (6) Notwithstanding the provisions in this section, a blood test taken under this section is subject to Section 77-23-213.
(6) Notwithstanding the provisions in this section, a blood test taken under this section is subject to Section 77-23-213.
Effective date.
3-1-26 7:18 PM - 6 -
- 4 -
View plain text versions (10)

How this bill changes current law

3 changes Share ↗

Compared against the Utah Code as published AI-generated reading aid — verify against the official bill.

This bill requires peace officers to review the facts of a fatal accident with a senior officer before not seeking a chemical test and specifies that they must direct individuals to submit to such tests if reasonable suspicion exists.

  • 41-6a-520

    [A person ] An individual operating a motor vehicle in this state [is considered to have given the person's consent] consents to a chemical test or tests of the [person's ] individual's breath, blood, urine, or oral fluids [for the purpose of determining ] to determine whether the [person ] individual was operating or in actual physical control of a motor vehicle[ while]: → An individual operating a motor vehicle in this state consents to a chemical test or tests of the individual's breath, blood, urine, or oral fluids to determine whether the individual was operating or in actual physical control of a motor vehicle:

    This change clarifies the consent aspect and modifies the structure of the initial statement in the statute.

  • 41-6a-520

    [(b) A test or tests authorized under this Subsection (1) must be administered at the direction of a peace officer having grounds to believe that person to have been operating or in actual physical control of a motor vehicle while in violation of any provision under Subsections (1)(a)(i) through (iii).] → A peace officer having reasonable suspicion to believe that an individual was operating or was in actual physical control of a motor vehicle in violation of an offense described in Subsections (1)(a)(i) through (iii) shall direct that a test be administered as authorized in Subsection (1).

    This change establishes the requirement for peace officers to direct chemical tests based on reasonable suspicion.

  • 41-6a-520

    [(7) If a peace officer investigating a motor vehicle accident resulting in the death of an individual believes there is insufficient probable cause to justify a search warrant authorizing a chemical test described in Subsection (1)(a), the peace officer shall review the facts with a senior officer to confirm that no impairment is suspected and probable cause for a chemical test does not exist.] → If a peace officer investigating a motor vehicle accident resulting in the death of an individual believes there is insufficient probable cause to justify a search warrant authorizing a chemical test described in Subsection (1)(a), the peace officer shall review the facts with a senior officer to confirm that no impairment is suspected and probable cause for a chemical test does not exist.

    This change adds a requirement to review the facts with a senior officer before declining to seek a chemical test after a fatal accident.

Amendments

2 amendments

Click Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.

Action History

  1. Governor Signed

  2. Governor Signed

  3. Senate/ to Governor

  4. Senate/ received enrolled bill from Printing

  5. Senate/ enrolled bill to Printing

  6. Enrolled Bill Returned to House or Senate

  7. Draft of Enrolled Bill Prepared

  8. Bill Received from Senate for Enrolling

  9. Senate/ signed by President/ sent for enrolling

  10. Senate/ received from House

  11. House/ to Senate

  12. House/ signed by Speaker/ returned to Senate

  13. House/ received from Senate

  14. Senate/ to House

  15. Senate/ concurs with House amendment

  16. Senate/ placed on Concurrence Calendar

  17. Senate/ received from House

  18. House/ to Senate

  19. House/ passed 3rd reading

  20. House/ uncircled

  21. House/ circled

  22. House/ 3rd reading

  23. House/ Rules to 3rd Reading Calendar

  24. House/ 3rd Reading Calendar to Rules [House Rules Committee]

  25. House/ 2nd reading

  26. House/ Rules to 3rd Reading Calendar

  27. LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for SB0226S02

  28. LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for SB0226S02

  29. House/ return to Rules due to fiscal impact [House Rules Committee]

  30. House/ comm rpt/ substituted [House Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Committee]

  31. House Comm - Favorable Recommendation [House Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Committee]

  32. House Comm - Substitute Recommendation [House Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Committee]

  33. LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for SB0226S02

  34. LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for SB0226S02

  35. House/ to standing committee [House Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Committee]

  36. House/ 1st reading (Introduced)

  37. House/ received from Senate

  38. Senate/ to House

  39. Senate/ passed 3rd reading

  40. Senate/ uncircled

  41. LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for SB0226S01

  42. LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for SB0226S01

  43. Senate/ circled

  44. Senate/ floor amendment

  45. Senate/ 3rd reading

  46. Senate/ passed 2nd reading

  47. Senate/ substituted

  48. Senate/ uncircled

  49. LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for SB0226S01

  50. LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for SB0226S01

  51. Senate/ circled

  52. Senate/ 2nd reading

  53. Senate/ placed on 2nd Reading Calendar

  54. Senate/ comm rpt/ amended [Senate Transportation, Public Utilities, Energy, and Technology Committee]

  55. Senate Comm - Favorable Recommendation [Senate Transportation, Public Utilities, Energy, and Technology Committee]

  56. Senate Comm - Amendment Recommendation [Senate Transportation, Public Utilities, Energy, and Technology Committee]

  57. Senate/ received fiscal note from Fiscal Analyst

  58. LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for SB0226

  59. LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for SB0226

  60. Senate/ to standing committee [Senate Transportation, Public Utilities, Energy, and Technology Committee]

  61. Senate/ 1st reading (Introduced)

  62. Senate/ received bill from Legislative Research

  63. LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for SB0226

  64. LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for SB0226

  65. Numbered Bill Publicly Distributed

  66. Bill Numbered but not Distributed

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 102 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (1)

Not signed on (102)

102 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 102 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 226?
SB 226 is sponsored by Steve Eliason (Republican) and Ann Millner (Republican).
What is the current status of SB 226?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 30, 2026. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 226?
Track SB 226 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 226

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 226

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →