Fatal Motor Vehicle Accident Amendments
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 226 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 226.
You're tracking SB 226
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 226 — Fatal Motor Vehicle Accident Amendments
Last action — Governor Signed
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 30, 2026. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Spencer Cox (Republican) on March 23, 2026.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (2 R).
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
105 added · 158 removedPlain-language change summary
The amended bill SB 226 now specifies that police officers investigating a fatal car accident must consult with a senior officer before deciding not to pursue a chemical test for drugs or alcohol. This change aims to ensure that decisions about testing are made with careful consideration and oversight, ultimately improving accountability in handling serious accidents. Additionally, the amendment clarifies the language regarding consent to chemical tests for individuals involved in such incidents. These updates are important for reinforcing the law's intent to deter impaired driving and enhance public safety.
SB0226S02Enrolled comparedCopy withS.B. SB0226 {Omitted text} shows text that was in SB0226 but was omitted in SB0226S02 inserted text shows text that was not in SB0226 but was inserted into SB0226S02 DISCLAIMER:
This226 documentFatal isMotor providedVehicle toAccident assistAmendments youGENERAL inSESSION yourSTATE comparisonOF ofUTAH theChief twoSponsor: bills.
SometimesAnn thisMillner automatedHouse comparisonSponsor: will NOT be completely accurate.
Therefore,Steve youEliason need3 toLONG readTITLE theGeneral actualDescription: bills.
This automaticallybill generatedaddresses documentrequirements couldfor containa inaccuracieschemical causedtest by:of an individual involved in a motor vehicle accident.
limitations of the compare program;
bad input data;
or other causes.
Fatal Motor Vehicle Accident Amendments GENERAL SESSION STATE OF UTAH Chief Sponsor:
Ann Millner House Sponsor:Steve Eliason 3 LONG TITLE General Description:
This bill {directs law enforcement to seek a warrant to administer } addresses requirements for a {drug and alcohol } chemical test {to a driver when the driver is } of an individual involved in a {fatal } motor vehicle accident.
▸ {directs } requires a peace officer investigating a fatal motor vehicle accident to {pursue } review the facts of the accident with a senior officer before declining to seek a warrant for a {drug test for a surviving driver} chemical test;
and S ▸ makes technical changes.
B Money Appropriated in this Bill:
2 None SB0226 compared with SB0226S02 Other Special Clauses:
41-6a-52041-6a-520, , as last amended by Laws of Utah 2023, Chapter 415 Be it enacted by the Legislature of the state of Utah:
41-6a-520.41-6a-520 .
(1)(1)(a) (a) [A person ] An individual operating a motor vehicle in this state [is considered to haveS.B. given the person's consent] consents to a chemical test or tests of the [person's ] individual's breath, blood, urine, or oral fluids [for the purpose of determining ] to determine whether the [person ] individual was operating or in actual physical control of a motor vehicle[ while]:
226 Enrolled Copy have given the person's consent] consents to a chemical test or tests of the [person's ] individual's breath, blood, urine, or oral fluids [for the purpose of determining ] to determine whether the [person ] individual was operating or in actual physical control of a motor vehicle[ while]:
or (iii) {[havinghaving any{]}any the individual had a} measurable controlled substance or metabolite of a controlled substance in the [person's ] individual's body in violation of Section 41-6a-517.
[(b) A test or tests authorized under this Subsection (1) must be administered at the direction of a peace officer having grounds to believe that person to have been operating or in actual physical control of a motor vehicle while in violation of any provision under Subsections (1)(a)(i) through (iii).] (b) A peace officer having reasonable suspicion to believe that an individual was operating or was in actual physical control of a motor vehicle in violation of an offense described in Subsections (1)(a)(1)(a)(i) (i) through (iii) shall direct that a test be administered as authorized in Subsection (1).
(c)(c)(i) (i) [The ] A peace officer determines which of the tests are administered and how many [of them] tests are administered.
- 2 - SB0226 compared with SB0226S02 [(ii) If a peace officer requests more than one test, refusal by a person to take one or more requested tests, even though the person does submit to any other requested test or tests, is a refusal under this section.] (ii) If a peace officer requests more than one test, refusal by an individual to take one or more requested tests, even if the individual submits to another requested test or tests, is a refusal under this section.
(d)(d)(i) (i) [A person ] An individual who has been requested under this section to submit to a chemical test or tests of the [person's ] individual's breath, blood, or urine, or oral fluids may not select the test or tests to be administered.
(2)(2)(a) (a) A peace officer requesting a test or tests shall warn [a person ] an individual that refusal- to2 submit- toEnrolled theCopy testS.B. or tests may result in criminal prosecution, revocation of the [person's ] individual's license to operate a motor vehicle, a [five or 10 year] five-year or 10-year prohibition of driving with [any] a measurable or detectable amount of alcohol in the [person's ] individual's body depending on the [person's prior] individual's driving history, and a [three-year] two-year prohibition of driving without an ignition interlock device if the [person] individual:
226 refusal to submit to the test or tests may result in criminal prosecution, revocation of the [person's ] individual's license to operate a motor vehicle, a [five or 10 year] five-year or 10-year prohibition of driving with [any] a measurable or detectable amount of alcohol in the [person's ] individual's body depending on the [person's prior] individual's driving history, and a [three-year] two-year prohibition of driving without an ignition interlock device if the [person] individual:
(b)(b)(i) (i) [Following the warning under Subsection (2)(a), if the person does not immediately request that the chemical test or tests as offered by a peace officer be administered, a ] A peace officer shall, on behalf of the Driver License Division and within 24 hours of the arrest, give notice of the Driver License Division's intention to revoke the [person's ] individual's privilege or license to operate a motor vehicle if, following the warning described in Subsection (2)(a), the individual does not immediately request that a chemical test or tests be administered as offered by a peace officer.
- 3 - SB0226 compared with SB0226S02 (ii) When a peace officer gives the notice on behalf of the Driver License Division, the peace officer shall supply to the operator, in a manner specified by the Driver License Division, basic information regarding how to obtain a hearing before the Driver License Division.
(c) { Ŝ→ {} {[} {[} {]} As a matter of procedure, [the{][the ] a {[{]} {A} peace officer shall submit a signed report, within 10 calendar days after the day on which notice is provided under Subsection (2)(b), that:]}that: (i) { ←Ŝ } { Ŝ→ {} {a }{} ←Ŝ } the peace officer {shall submit a signed report, within 10 calendar days after the day on which notice is provided under Subsection (2)(b), that:} had grounds to believe the arrested {(i)} [{the peace officer had grounds to believe the arrested } person ] individual {[{person } was in violation of {]} individual }[{was in violation of } any] a{[{any} provision under Subsections (1) (a)(i) through (iii);
and{]}(i) a}the (ii)peace {officer had grounds to believe the arrested [person ] individual was in violation of [any] a provision under Subsections (1)(a)(i) through (iii);
and}and (ii) the {(ii)}[person [{the } person ] individual {[{person } had refused to submit to a chemical test or tests under Subsection (1).{]}(1). individual } (3) [{had refused to submit to a chemical test or tests under Subsection (1).} Upon the request of the person {(3)} ] If an individual {[{Upon the request of the person } who was tested]} {If an individual } requests so{who was tested} , the results of the test or tests shall be made available to the { requests so}[{, the results of the test or tests shall be made available to the } person] individual{[{person} .{]} individual} (4) (a) {.} The {(4)} {(a)} [{The } person] individual{[{person} to be tested may, at the {]} individual}[{ to be tested may, at the } person's ] individual's {[{person's } own expense, have a physician or a physician assistant of the {]} individual's }[{own expense, have a physician or a physician assistant of the } person's ] individual's {[{person's } own choice administer a chemical test in addition to the test or tests administered at the direction of a peace officer.{]} individual's } (b) {own choice administer } The failure or inability to obtain the additional test does not affect admissibility of the results of the test or tests taken at the direction of a {chemical test in addition to - 4 - SB0226 compared with SB0226S02 } peace officer, or preclude or delay the test or tests {administered } to be taken at the direction of a peace officer.
{(b)}(3) (c)[Upon Thethe failurerequest orof inability to obtain the additionalperson test] {shallIf bean }individual doeswho notwas affecttested admissibilityrequests ofso, the results of the test or tests takenshall atbe themade directionavailable of a peace officer, or preclude or delay the test or tests to be taken at the direction[person] ofindividual. a peace officer.
{(c)}(4)(a) [{TheThe additional[person] testindividual shallto be }tested subsequentmay, at the [person's ] individual's own expense, have a physician or a physician assistant of the [person's ] individual's own choice administer a chemical test in addition to {thethe test or tests administered at the direction of a peace officer.
{(5)}- ]3 after{[{For- theS.B. purpose of determining whether to submit to a chemical } the test or tests{, } administered at the {person to be tested} direction of a peace officer.{]} An individual being asked to submit to a chemical test or tests} (5) [{ does not have } For the {right } purpose of determining whether to {consult an attorney } submit to a chemical test or {have an attorney} tests, {physician, or other } the person to be tested] An individual being asked to submit to a chemical test or tests{[{person } does not have the right to consult an attorney or have an attorney, physician, or other {]} individual }[{present } person ] individual {[{as a condition for the taking of any test} present {]} for the purpose of determining whether to submit to a chemical test or tests}[{.} as a condition for the taking of any test {(6)} ] for the purpose of determining whether to submit to a chemical test or tests{Notwithstanding the provisions in this section, a blood test taken under this section is subject to Section 77-23-213} .
{(7)}226 {(a)Enrolled ACopy peace(b) officerThe investigatingfailure aor motorinability vehicleto accidentobtain resulting in the deathadditional of an individual shall seek a search warrant authorizing a chemical test describeddoes innot Subsectionaffect (1)(a)admissibility of eachthe driverresults involvedof in the accident.}test {(b)or Thetests searchtaken warrantat requirementthe describeddirection inof Subsectiona (7)(a)peace appliesofficer, toor anpreclude accident involving one or moredelay of the following:}test {(i)or atests vehicleto andbe ataken pedestrian;}at {(ii)the adirection vehicleof anda anpeace object;officer.
or}(c) {(iii)The multipleadditional vehicles.}test {(c)shall Abe peace[subsequent officerto] mayafter administerthe a chemical test describedor intests Subsectionadministered (7)(a)at if:}the {(i)direction aof court issues a searchpeace warrantofficer. authorizing the chemical test;
or}(5) {(ii)[For the individualpurpose theof peacedetermining officerwhether wishesto submit to a chemical test givesor voluntarytests, consent.}the {(d)person Ato peacebe officertested] shallAn ensureindividual being asked to submit to a chemical test administeredor undertests thisdoes Subsectionnot (7):}have -the 5right -to SB0226consult comparedan withattorney SB0226S02or {(i)have isan attorney, physician, or other [person ] individual present [as a bloodcondition test;for the taking of any test] for the purpose of determining whether to submit to a chemical test or tests.
and} {(ii) if possible, is administered within 24 hours of an accident described in Subsection (7)(b).} {(e) The implied consent described in Subsection (1) alone does not authorize a chemical test described in Subsection (7)(a).} (6) Notwithstanding the provisions in this section, a blood test taken under this section is subject to Section 77-23-213.
Effective date.
3-1-26 7:18 PM - 64 -
View plain text versions (10)
- Enrolled View text Current pdf
- Comparison to Original Bill View text pdf
- Comparison to Sub #1 View text pdf
- Amended Amended 2/5/2026 10:02:845 pdf
- Amended Amended Excerpts 2/5/2026 10:02:845 pdf
- Amended Amended 2/25/2026 11:02:100 pdf
- Amended Amended Excerpts 2/25/2026 11:02:100 pdf
- Substitute Substitute #1 pdf
- Substitute Substitute #2 pdf
- Introduced View text pdf
Compared against the Utah Code as published AI-generated reading aid — verify against the official bill.
This bill requires peace officers to review the facts of a fatal accident with a senior officer before not seeking a chemical test and specifies that they must direct individuals to submit to such tests if reasonable suspicion exists.
-
41-6a-520
[A person ] An individual operating a motor vehicle in this state [is considered to have given the person's consent] consents to a chemical test or tests of the [person's ] individual's breath, blood, urine, or oral fluids [for the purpose of determining ] to determine whether the [person ] individual was operating or in actual physical control of a motor vehicle[ while]:→ An individual operating a motor vehicle in this state consents to a chemical test or tests of the individual's breath, blood, urine, or oral fluids to determine whether the individual was operating or in actual physical control of a motor vehicle:This change clarifies the consent aspect and modifies the structure of the initial statement in the statute.
-
41-6a-520
[(b) A test or tests authorized under this Subsection (1) must be administered at the direction of a peace officer having grounds to believe that person to have been operating or in actual physical control of a motor vehicle while in violation of any provision under Subsections (1)(a)(i) through (iii).]→ A peace officer having reasonable suspicion to believe that an individual was operating or was in actual physical control of a motor vehicle in violation of an offense described in Subsections (1)(a)(i) through (iii) shall direct that a test be administered as authorized in Subsection (1).This change establishes the requirement for peace officers to direct chemical tests based on reasonable suspicion.
-
41-6a-520
[(7) If a peace officer investigating a motor vehicle accident resulting in the death of an individual believes there is insufficient probable cause to justify a search warrant authorizing a chemical test described in Subsection (1)(a), the peace officer shall review the facts with a senior officer to confirm that no impairment is suspected and probable cause for a chemical test does not exist.]→ If a peace officer investigating a motor vehicle accident resulting in the death of an individual believes there is insufficient probable cause to justify a search warrant authorizing a chemical test described in Subsection (1)(a), the peace officer shall review the facts with a senior officer to confirm that no impairment is suspected and probable cause for a chemical test does not exist.This change adds a requirement to review the facts with a senior officer before declining to seek a chemical test after a fatal accident.
Amendments
2 amendmentsClick Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.
Action History
-
Governor Signed
-
Governor Signed
-
Senate/ to Governor
-
Senate/ received enrolled bill from Printing
-
Senate/ enrolled bill to Printing
-
Enrolled Bill Returned to House or Senate
-
Draft of Enrolled Bill Prepared
-
Bill Received from Senate for Enrolling
-
Senate/ signed by President/ sent for enrolling
-
Senate/ received from House
-
House/ to Senate
-
House/ signed by Speaker/ returned to Senate
-
House/ received from Senate
-
Senate/ to House
-
Senate/ concurs with House amendment
-
Senate/ placed on Concurrence Calendar
-
Senate/ received from House
-
House/ to Senate
-
House/ passed 3rd reading
-
House/ uncircled
-
House/ circled
-
House/ 3rd reading
-
House/ Rules to 3rd Reading Calendar
-
House/ 3rd Reading Calendar to Rules [House Rules Committee]
-
House/ 2nd reading
-
House/ Rules to 3rd Reading Calendar
-
LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for SB0226S02
-
LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for SB0226S02
-
House/ return to Rules due to fiscal impact [House Rules Committee]
-
House/ comm rpt/ substituted [House Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Committee]
-
House Comm - Favorable Recommendation [House Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Committee]
-
House Comm - Substitute Recommendation [House Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Committee]
-
LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for SB0226S02
-
LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for SB0226S02
-
House/ to standing committee [House Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Committee]
-
House/ 1st reading (Introduced)
-
House/ received from Senate
-
Senate/ to House
-
Senate/ passed 3rd reading
-
Senate/ uncircled
-
LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for SB0226S01
-
LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for SB0226S01
-
Senate/ circled
-
Senate/ floor amendment
-
Senate/ 3rd reading
-
Senate/ passed 2nd reading
-
Senate/ substituted
-
Senate/ uncircled
-
LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for SB0226S01
-
LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for SB0226S01
-
Senate/ circled
-
Senate/ 2nd reading
-
Senate/ placed on 2nd Reading Calendar
-
Senate/ comm rpt/ amended [Senate Transportation, Public Utilities, Energy, and Technology Committee]
-
Senate Comm - Favorable Recommendation [Senate Transportation, Public Utilities, Energy, and Technology Committee]
-
Senate Comm - Amendment Recommendation [Senate Transportation, Public Utilities, Energy, and Technology Committee]
-
Senate/ received fiscal note from Fiscal Analyst
-
LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for SB0226
-
LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for SB0226
-
Senate/ to standing committee [Senate Transportation, Public Utilities, Energy, and Technology Committee]
-
Senate/ 1st reading (Introduced)
-
Senate/ received bill from Legislative Research
-
LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for SB0226
-
LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for SB0226
-
Numbered Bill Publicly Distributed
-
Bill Numbered but not Distributed
Sponsors
- Steve Eliason · Cosponsor
- Ann Millner · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 102 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Ann Millner Republican
Co-sponsors (1)
- Steve Eliason Republican
Not signed on (102)
102 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 102 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 226?
- SB 226 is sponsored by Steve Eliason (Republican) and Ann Millner (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 226?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 30, 2026. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 226?
- Track SB 226 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 226
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 226
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →