Utah 2026 General Session Status: Enacted 2 R cosponsors

HB 62 — Road Jurisdiction Amendments

Last action — Governor Signed

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed House
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced October 16, 2025. Enacted.

Signed by Governor Spencer Cox (Republican) on March 13, 2026.

Odds of enactment

High chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Advancing 54% · moderate confidence

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 2 sponsors

    1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (2 R).

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

118 added · 123 removed

Plain-language change summary

The updated version of Bill HB 62 includes new language that establishes a connection between the Mountain View Corridor in Saratoga Springs and the Cedar Valley Highway in Eagle Mountain. This amendment is important because it sets the stage for the construction of the new highway, and it mandates the state department to update the legislature with the new highway information once it is completed. By formally recognizing these roads, the bill aims to improve traffic flow and connectivity in the region.

→
Previous
Latest
HB0062S02 compared with HB0062 {Omitted text} shows text that was in HB0062 but was omitted in HB0062S02 inserted text shows text that was not in HB0062 but was inserted into HB0062S02 DISCLAIMER:
Enrolled Copy H.B.
This document is provided to assist you in your comparison of the two bills.
62 Road Jurisdiction Amendments GENERAL SESSION STATE OF UTAH Chief Sponsor:
Sometimes this automated comparison will NOT be completely accurate.
Stephanie Gricius Senate Sponsor:
Therefore, you need to read the actual bills.
Wayne A.
This automatically generated document could contain inaccuracies caused by:
limitations of the compare program;
bad input data;
or other causes.
Road Jurisdiction Amendments GENERAL SESSION STATE OF UTAH Chief Sponsor:
Stephanie Gricius Senate Sponsor:Wayne A.
H None B Utah Code Sections Affected:
None Utah Code Sections Affected:
0 AMENDS:
AMENDS:
6 HB0062 compared with HB0062S02 72-4-113 , as last amended by Laws of Utah 2016, Chapter 42 72-4-114 , as last amended by Laws of Utah 2022, Chapter 83 72-4-119 , as last amended by Laws of Utah 2023, Chapter 220 72-4-120 , as last amended by Laws of Utah 2015, Chapter 423 ENACTS:
72-4-113, as last amended by Laws of Utah 2016, Chapter 42 72-4-114, as last amended by Laws of Utah 2022, Chapter 83 72-4-119, as last amended by Laws of Utah 2023, Chapter 220 72-4-120, as last amended by Laws of Utah 2015, Chapter 423 ENACTS:
72-4-105.2 , Utah Code Annotated 1953 Be it enacted by the Legislature of the state of Utah:
72-4-105.2, Utah Code Annotated 1953 Be it enacted by the Legislature of the state of Utah:
Section 1 is enacted to read:
Section 72-4-105.2 is enacted to read:
72-4-105.2.
72-4-105.2 .
Upon completion of the construction of a proposed highway that connects Mountain View Corridor in Saratoga Springs with Cedar Valley Highway in Eagle Mountain, the department shall recommend to the Legislature an amendment to this part to reflect the new highway.
H.B.
62 Enrolled Copy Upon completion of the construction of a proposed highway that connects Mountain View Corridor in Saratoga Springs with Cedar Valley Highway in Eagle Mountain, the department shall recommend to the Legislature an amendment to this part to reflect the new highway.
72-4-113.
72-4-113 .
- 2 - HB0062 compared with HB0062S02 (8) SR-78.
(8) SR-78.
72-4-114.
72-4-114 .
(3) SR-83.
- 2 - Enrolled Copy H.B.
62 (3) SR-83.
beginning again at junction with Route 6 at Moark Junction northerly - 3 - HB0062 compared with HB0062S02 through Springville, Provo, Orem, and American Fork to Route 15 north of Lehi;
beginning again at junction with Route 6 at Moark Junction northerly through Springville, Provo, Orem, and American Fork to Route 15 north of Lehi;
72-4-119.
72-4-119 .
(2) SR-132.
- 3 - H.B.
62 Enrolled Copy (2) SR-132.
72-4-120.
72-4-120 .
- 4 - HB0062 compared with HB0062S02 (2) SR-142.
(2) SR-142.
From Route 32 in Kamas easterly to Mirror Lake and northerly to the Utah-Wyoming state line.
From Route 32 in Kamas easterly to Mirror Lake and northerly to the - 4 - Enrolled Copy H.B.
62 Utah-Wyoming state line.
then southeasterly to South Street;
then southeasterly to 10600 South Street;
Effective date.
1-30-26 3:03 PM - 5 -
- 5 -
⬇ Download PDF
View plain text versions (6)

Action History

  1. Governor Signed

  2. House/ to Governor

  3. House/ received enrolled bill from Printing

  4. House/ enrolled bill to Printing

  5. Enrolled Bill Returned to House or Senate

  6. Draft of Enrolled Bill Prepared

  7. Bill Received from House for Enrolling

  8. House/ signed by Speaker/ sent for enrolling

  9. House/ received from Senate

  10. Senate/ to House

  11. Senate/ signed by President/ returned to House

  12. Senate/ passed 3rd reading

  13. Senate/ 3rd reading

  14. Senate/ 2nd reading

  15. Senate/ comm rpt/ placed on Consent Calendar [Senate Transportation, Public Utilities, Energy, and Technology Committee]

  16. Senate Comm - Consent Calendar Recommendation [Senate Transportation, Public Utilities, Energy, and Technology Committee]

  17. Senate Comm - Favorable Recommendation [Senate Transportation, Public Utilities, Energy, and Technology Committee]

  18. Senate/ to standing committee [Senate Transportation, Public Utilities, Energy, and Technology Committee]

  19. Senate/ 1st reading (Introduced)

  20. Senate/ received from House

  21. House/ to Senate

  22. House/ passed 3rd reading

  23. House/ 3rd reading

  24. House/ 2nd reading

  25. House/ comm rpt/ substituted/ Consent Calendar [House Transportation Committee]

  26. House Comm - Consent Calendar Recommendation [House Transportation Committee]

  27. House Comm - Favorable Recommendation [House Transportation Committee]

  28. House Comm - Substitute Recommendation [House Transportation Committee]

  29. LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for HB0062S02

  30. LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for HB0062S02

  31. LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for HB0062S02

  32. LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for HB0062S02

  33. House/ to standing committee [House Transportation Committee]

  34. LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for HB0062S01

  35. LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for HB0062S01

  36. LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for HB0062S01

  37. LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for HB0062S01

  38. House/ 1st reading (Introduced)

  39. House/ received fiscal note from Fiscal Analyst

  40. House/ received bill from Legislative Research

  41. LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for HB0062

  42. Numbered Bill Publicly Distributed

  43. Bill Numbered but not Distributed

  44. LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for HB0062

  45. LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for HB0062

  46. LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for HB0062

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 102 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (1)

Not signed on (102)

102 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 102 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

transportation
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HB 62?
HB 62 is sponsored by Wayne A. Harper (Republican) and Stephanie Gricius (Republican).
What is the current status of HB 62?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced October 16, 2025. Enacted.
Where can I track HB 62?
Track HB 62 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 62

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of HB 62

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →