South Dakota 2026 Regular Session Status: In Committee 4 R cosponsors

SB 208 — require the award of certain disbursements to prevailing owners and taxpayers in appeals of property classifications or assessments.

Last action — Taxation Tabled , Passed, YEAS 12, NAYS 0 H.J. 11

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced February 02, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.

Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the Senate.

Odds of enactment

Low chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Stalled 26% · moderate confidence
  • In Committee

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 4 sponsors

    4 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (4 R).

  • Mixed recorded votes

    4 passed, 1 failed in recorded votes so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

39 added · 27 removed

Plain-language change summary

The latest version of SB 208 includes changes that adjust how courts handle attorney fees in property assessment appeals. Now, if a property owner or taxpayer loses their appeal, the court must award fees to the winning party in certain cases, whereas previously it had the option to do so. Additionally, if the appeal results in at least a 20% reduction in property assessment, the court is required to award attorney fees to the successful appellant. These changes are important because they may encourage more property owners to contest unfair assessments, knowing that they have better chances of recovering legal costs.

→
Previous
Latest
26.617.18 101st Legislative Session 208 South Dakota Legislature Senate Bill 208 SENATE JUDICIARY ENGROSSED Introduced by:
26.617.19 101st Legislative Session 208 South Dakota Legislature Senate Bill 208 SENATE ENGROSSED Introduced by:
The circuit court may award disbursements, including reasonable attorneys' attorney fees, in an action brought to circuit court pursuant to this chapter by any appellant relative to the classification or amount of assessment of property, if the appellant does not prevail in its the appeal of the property classification or amount of assessment.
The If an aggrieved owner or taxpayer does not prevail in an action relative to the classification or amount of assessment of property, brought to circuit court pursuant to this chapter, the circuit court may must award disbursements, including reasonable attorneys' attorney fees, in an action brought to circuit court pursuant to this chapter by any appellant relative to the assessment of property, if the appellant does not prevail in its appeal of the property assessment to the county.
If an aggrieved owner or taxpayer obtains an assessment resulting in a reduction of the appealed assessment by less than twenty percent, the court may award disbursements and reasonable attorney fees to the owner or taxpayer.
(1) May award disbursements, including reasonable attorney fees, if the appellant does not prevail in its appeal of the reclassification of the property or obtain an assessment.
(1) Must award disbursements, including reasonable attorney fees, to the county, if the appellant aggrieved owner or taxpayer does not prevail in its appeal of the Overstrikes indicate deleted language.
26.617.19 2 208 reclassification of the property or obtain an assessment.
or (2) Must award disbursements, including reasonable attorney fees, to an appellant that prevails in the reclassification of the property or obtains an assessment resulting in a reduction of the appealed assessment by at least twenty percent.
(2) Must award disbursements, including reasonable attorney fees, to an aggrieved owner or taxpayer that prevails in the reclassification of the property or obtains an assessment resulting in a reduction of the appealed assessment by at least twenty percent;
Overstrikes indicate deleted language.
or (3) May award disbursements, including reasonable attorney fees, to an aggrieved owner or taxpayer that obtains an assessment resulting in a reduction of the appealed assessment by less than twenty percent.
26.617.18 2 208 The attorney for the moving party shall file a verified, itemized statement of costs incurred, and legal services rendered, with the motion under this section.
The attorney for the moving party shall file a verified, itemized statement of costs incurred, and legal services rendered, with the motion under this section.
Underscores indicate new language.
Section 3.
That a NEW SECTION be added to chapter 10-11:
Disbursements may not be awarded to an aggrieved owner or taxpayer pursuant to § 10-11-45.1 or 10-11-78 if the incorrect classification or property assessment value was a result of the aggrieved owner or taxpayer hindering the ability of the director of equalization to properly assess the property.
View plain text versions (5)

Action History

  1. Taxation Tabled , Passed, YEAS 12, NAYS 0 H.J. 11

  2. Taxation Do Pass , Passed, YEAS 4, NAYS 8 H.J. 11

  3. Scheduled for hearing

  4. First read in House and referred to House Taxation H.J. 416

  5. Senate Do Pass Amended , Passed, YEAS 34, NAYS 0 S.J. 345

  6. Deferred with pending amendment (Rule 5-17) , Passed, S.J. 313

  7. Senate Motion to amend , Passed, YEAS 19, NAYS 15 S.J. 312 Amendment 208D

  8. Senate Deferred to another day , Passed, S.J. 294

  9. Judiciary Do Pass Amended , Passed, YEAS 6, NAYS 0 S.J. 23

  10. Judiciary Motion to amend , Passed, S.J. 23 Amendment 208C

  11. Scheduled for hearing S.J. 1

  12. Scheduled for hearing S.J. 1

  13. First read in Senate and referred to Senate Judiciary S.J. 161

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

4 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 101 not signed on · 22 voted No

Sponsors (4)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (101)

101 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 101 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Tabled

Passed 12 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 12001
Total 12001
% of votes cast 92%0%0%8%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Aaron Aylward Republican Yea
Curt Massie Republican Yea
John Hughes Republican Yea
Kent Roe Republican Yea
Keri Weems Republican Yea
Mike Weisgram Republican Yea
Peri Pourier Republican Yea
Phil Jensen Republican Yea
Rebecca Reimer Republican Yea
Tim Czmowski Republican Not Voting
Tim Walburg Republican Yea
Tony Randolph Republican Yea
Will Mortenson Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do Pass

Failed 4 Yea · 8 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 4801
Total 4801
% of votes cast 31%62%0%8%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Aaron Aylward Republican Nay
Curt Massie Republican Nay
John Hughes Republican Nay
Kent Roe Republican Nay
Keri Weems Republican Nay
Mike Weisgram Republican Yea
Peri Pourier Republican Nay
Phil Jensen Republican Nay
Rebecca Reimer Republican Nay
Tim Czmowski Republican Not Voting
Tim Walburg Republican Yea
Tony Randolph Republican Yea
Will Mortenson Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do Pass Amended

Passed 34 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 30001
Democratic 3000
Unaffiliated 1000
Total 34001
% of votes cast 97%0%0%3%
How each member voted (35)
Member Party Vote
Otten — Yea
Jamie Smith Democratic Yea
Liz Larson Democratic Yea
Red Dawn Foster Democratic Yea
Amber Hulse Republican Yea
Arch Beal Republican Not Voting
Brandon Wipf Republican Yea
Carl Perry Republican Yea
Casey Crabtree Republican Yea
Chris Karr Republican Yea
Curt Voight Republican Yea
Glen Vilhauer Republican Yea
Greg Blanc Republican Yea
Helene Duhamel Republican Yea
Jim Mehlhaff Republican Yea
John Carley Republican Yea
Joy Hohn Republican Yea
Kevin Jensen Republican Yea
Kyle Schoenfish Republican Yea
Larry Zikmund Republican Yea
Lauren Nelson Republican Yea
Mark Lapka Republican Yea
Michael Rohl Republican Yea
Mykala Voita Republican Yea
Paul Miskimins Republican Yea
Randy Deibert Republican Yea
Sam Marty Republican Yea
Stephanie Sauder Republican Yea
Steve Kolbeck Republican Yea
Sue Peterson Republican Yea
Sydney Davis Republican Yea
Taffy Howard Republican Yea
Tamara Grove Republican Yea
Tim Reed Republican Yea
Tom Pischke Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Motion to amend

Passed 19 Yea · 15 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 161401
Democratic 3000
Unaffiliated 0100
Total 191501
% of votes cast 54%43%0%3%
How each member voted (35)
Member Party Vote
Otten — Nay
Jamie Smith Democratic Yea
Liz Larson Democratic Yea
Red Dawn Foster Democratic Yea
Amber Hulse Republican Yea
Arch Beal Republican Not Voting
Brandon Wipf Republican Yea
Carl Perry Republican Yea
Casey Crabtree Republican Yea
Chris Karr Republican Nay
Curt Voight Republican Nay
Glen Vilhauer Republican Yea
Greg Blanc Republican Nay
Helene Duhamel Republican Yea
Jim Mehlhaff Republican Yea
John Carley Republican Nay
Joy Hohn Republican Nay
Kevin Jensen Republican Nay
Kyle Schoenfish Republican Yea
Larry Zikmund Republican Nay
Lauren Nelson Republican Yea
Mark Lapka Republican Nay
Michael Rohl Republican Yea
Mykala Voita Republican Nay
Paul Miskimins Republican Yea
Randy Deibert Republican Yea
Sam Marty Republican Nay
Stephanie Sauder Republican Yea
Steve Kolbeck Republican Yea
Sue Peterson Republican Nay
Sydney Davis Republican Yea
Taffy Howard Republican Nay
Tamara Grove Republican Nay
Tim Reed Republican Yea
Tom Pischke Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 208?
SB 208 is sponsored by Carl Perry (Republican), Tim Goodwin (Republican), Mary Fitzgerald (Republican), and Amber Hulse (Republican).
What is the current status of SB 208?
This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced February 02, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Where can I track SB 208?
Track SB 208 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 208

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 208

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →