SB 61 — ban hemp-derived intoxicants not for medical purposes.
Last action — Placed on calendar pursuant to JR 6F-6 , Passed, YEAS 14, NAYS 19 S.J. 82
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced January 13, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the Senate.
Odds of enactment
Low chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
In Committee
Current position in the legislative process.
-
9 sponsors
9 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (9 R).
-
Mixed recorded votes
1 passed, 1 failed in recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
12 added · 10 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendment to Bill SB 61 clarifies that the specified limit of 0.4 milligrams applies specifically to tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) isomers, analogs, or derivatives rather than just any substances per container. This change is important because it provides a more precise definition of what is regulated, which can help avoid confusion for producers and consumers regarding cannabis products. Additionally, the section emphasizing that these regulations do not apply to medical cannabis remains unchanged, ensuring that patients continue to have access to necessary medical treatments.
26.326.1126.326.12 101st Legislative Session 61 South Dakota Legislature Senate Bill 61 SENATE HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES ENGROSSED Introduced by:
B E IT ENACTED BY THE LLEGISLATURE EGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF SOUTH D AKOTA :
or (c) Are in amounts greater than 0.4 milligrams combined total of any tetrahydrocannabinol isomer, analog, or derivative, per container.
26.326.1126.326.12 2 61 38-35-1.
26.326.1126.326.12 3 61 (c) Tetrahydrocannabinol acetate, also known as THC-O-acetate or THC-O;
26.326.1126.326.12 4 61 total delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol content derived from the sum of the THC and THCA content and reported on a dry weight basis;
View plain text versions (3)
- Engrossed Senate Health and Human Services Engrossed Current pdf January 21, 2026
- Introduced View text pdf January 07, 2026
- 61A View text pdf
Action History
-
Placed on calendar pursuant to JR 6F-6 , Passed, YEAS 14, NAYS 19 S.J. 82
-
Health and Human Services Report out of committee without recommendation as amended , Passed, YEAS 7, NAYS 0 S.J. 4
-
Health and Human Services Motion to amend , Passed, S.J. 3 Amendment 61A
-
Scheduled for hearing S.J. 1
-
First read in Senate and referred to Senate Health and Human Services S.J. 13
Sponsors
- Brandei Schaefbauer · Primary
- Carl Perry · Primary
- Lauren Nelson · Primary
- Tony Kayser · Primary
- Jana Hunt · Primary
- Josephine Garcia · Primary
- Mary Fitzgerald · Primary
- Bobbi Andera · Primary
- John Carley · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →9 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 96 not signed on · 18 voted No
Sponsors (9)
- Brandei Schaefbauer Republican
- Carl Perry Republican
- Lauren Nelson Republican
- Tony Kayser Republican
- Jana Hunt Republican
- Josephine Garcia Republican
- Mary Fitzgerald Republican
- Bobbi Andera Republican
- John Carley Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (96)
96 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 96 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 14 | 16 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 14 | 19 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 40% | 54% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (35)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Otten | — | Nay |
| Jamie Smith | Democratic | Nay |
| Liz Larson | Democratic | Nay |
| Red Dawn Foster | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Amber Hulse | Republican | Nay |
| Arch Beal | Republican | Not Voting |
| Brandon Wipf | Republican | Nay |
| Carl Perry | Republican | Yea |
| Casey Crabtree | Republican | Nay |
| Chris Karr | Republican | Nay |
| Curt Voight | Republican | Yea |
| Glen Vilhauer | Republican | Nay |
| Greg Blanc | Republican | Yea |
| Helene Duhamel | Republican | Yea |
| Jim Mehlhaff | Republican | Nay |
| John Carley | Republican | Yea |
| Joy Hohn | Republican | Yea |
| Kevin Jensen | Republican | Yea |
| Kyle Schoenfish | Republican | Nay |
| Larry Zikmund | Republican | Nay |
| Lauren Nelson | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Lapka | Republican | Yea |
| Michael Rohl | Republican | Nay |
| Mykala Voita | Republican | Yea |
| Paul Miskimins | Republican | Nay |
| Randy Deibert | Republican | Nay |
| Sam Marty | Republican | Yea |
| Stephanie Sauder | Republican | Nay |
| Steve Kolbeck | Republican | Nay |
| Sue Peterson | Republican | Yea |
| Sydney Davis | Republican | Nay |
| Taffy Howard | Republican | Yea |
| Tamara Grove | Republican | Yea |
| Tim Reed | Republican | Nay |
| Tom Pischke | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Jamie Smith | Democratic | Yea |
| Carl Perry | Republican | Yea |
| Curt Voight | Republican | Yea |
| Kevin Jensen | Republican | Yea |
| Sydney Davis | Republican | Yea |
| Tamara Grove | Republican | Yea |
| Tim Reed | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 61?
- SB 61 is sponsored by Brandei Schaefbauer (Republican), Carl Perry (Republican), Lauren Nelson (Republican), Tony Kayser (Republican), Jana Hunt (Republican), Josephine Garcia (Republican), Mary Fitzgerald (Republican), Bobbi Andera (Republican), and John Carley (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 61?
- This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced January 13, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track SB 61?
- Track SB 61 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 61
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 61
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →