SB 232 — impose a one-year moratorium on the construction or expansion of hyperscale data centers.
Last action — State Affairs Tabled , Passed, YEAS 5, NAYS 3 S.J. 27
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced February 04, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the Senate.
Odds of enactment
Low chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
In Committee
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
2 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (2 R).
-
Mixed recorded votes
1 passed, 1 failed in recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
6 added · 14 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendment to Bill SB 232 extends the current moratorium on certain types of data centers until June 30, 2027. It clarifies the definition of a "hyperscale data center" to focus specifically on those with a peak electrical demand of fifty megawatts or more. Additionally, it removes previous provisions that allowed exemptions for some data centers that had received approvals before July 1, 2026. This change matters as it tightens regulations on large data centers to ensure that their environmental and infrastructural impacts are carefully managed.
232A26.970.13 101st Legislative Session 232 South Dakota Legislature Senate Bill 232 AMENDMENT 232A FOR THE INTRODUCED BILL Introduced by:
The moratorium does not apply to any hyperscale data center that obtained all final government approval and required permits, and executed all utility interconnection agreements, before July 1, 2026.
(1) For for the storage, management, dissemination, and processing of electronic data and information;
and,and which(2) hasHaving twoa orpeak moreelectrical demand of thefifty following:megawatts or greater.
(1) A size exceeding two hundred fifty thousand square feet;
(2) Having a A peak electrical demand of fifty megawatts or greater;
(3) An artificial intelligence model training or large-scale machine learning purpose;
or (4) A co-location configuration with undisclosed end-users.
Action History
-
State Affairs Tabled , Passed, YEAS 5, NAYS 3 S.J. 27
-
State Affairs Do Pass Amended , Passed, YEAS 3, NAYS 5 S.J. 27
-
State Affairs Motion to amend , Passed, S.J. 27 Amendment 232A
-
Scheduled for hearing S.J. 1
-
Scheduled for hearing
-
Referred to Senate State Affairs S.J. 199
-
First Reading Senate S.J. 180
Sponsors
- Phil Jensen · Primary
- Taffy Howard · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →2 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 103 not signed on · 8 voted No
Sponsors (2)
- Phil Jensen Republican
- Taffy Howard Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (103)
103 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 103 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 56% | 33% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Liz Larson | Democratic | Yea |
| Carl Perry | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Karr | Republican | Nay |
| Curt Voight | Republican | Not Voting |
| Jim Mehlhaff | Republican | Yea |
| Kevin Jensen | Republican | Nay |
| Randy Deibert | Republican | Yea |
| Steve Kolbeck | Republican | Yea |
| Tom Pischke | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 3 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 3 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 33% | 56% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Liz Larson | Democratic | Nay |
| Carl Perry | Republican | Nay |
| Chris Karr | Republican | Yea |
| Curt Voight | Republican | Not Voting |
| Jim Mehlhaff | Republican | Nay |
| Kevin Jensen | Republican | Yea |
| Randy Deibert | Republican | Nay |
| Steve Kolbeck | Republican | Nay |
| Tom Pischke | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 232?
- SB 232 is sponsored by Phil Jensen (Republican) and Taffy Howard (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 232?
- This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced February 04, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track SB 232?
- Track SB 232 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 232
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 232
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →