HB 1173 — require certain applicants that seek a permit from the Public Utilities Commission of the State of South Dakota to prepare and pay for an environmental impact statement.
Last action — Commerce and Energy Deferred to the 41st legislative day , Passed, YEAS 5, NAYS 3
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced January 28, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the House.
Odds of enactment
Low chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
In Committee
Current position in the legislative process.
-
8 sponsors
8 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (8 R).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 4 recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
67 added · 55 removed67 line(s) added, 55 removed.
26.725.1426.725.15 101st Legislative Session 1173 South Dakota Legislature House Bill 1173 HOUSE COMMERCE AND ENERGY ENGROSSED Introduced by:
Representative Hughes An Act to require an environmental impact statement when certain applicants that seek a permit from the Public Utilities Commission of the State of South Dakota.Dakota to prepare and pay for an environmental impact statement.
The amount must be deposited with the state treasurer and credited to a subfund within the designated revenue regulatory assessment fee fund and may only be disbursed on vouchers approved by the commission for the actual cost of investigating, reviewing, processing, and serving notice of the application.
ExpendituresExcept fromas otherwise agreed to by an applicant, the revenuemaximum fundfee mustchargeable bemay budgetednot inexceed one-quarter of one percent of the generalfirst appropriationone bill.hundred million dollars of estimated construction cost plus one- twentieth of one percent of all additional estimated construction costs of the facility.
Except as otherwise provided in this section or agreed to by an applicant, the maximum fee chargeable may not exceed one-quarter of one percent of the first one hundred million dollars of estimated construction cost plus one-twentieth of one percent of all additional estimated construction costs of the facility.
26.725.1426.725.15 2 1173 If the commission determines that an environmental impact statement should be prepared as provided under chapter 34A-9 is required before taking final action on an application under this chapter, the maximum fee chargeable above may be increased to an amount not to exceed one-half of one percent of the first one hundred million dollars of estimated construction cost plus one-twentieth of one percent of all additional estimated construction costs of the facility.
However, the The provisions of this paragraph do not apply in cases in which if a detailed environment impact study has been completed pursuant to complying with the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 as amended to January 1, 2009, and implementing regulations thereto if such a statement is,is 42available U.S.C.to the commission at least thirty days prior to the time the commission is required to render a decision under § 49-41B-24 or 49-41B-25.
§ 4321 (January 1, 2025), or an environmental impact statement complying with the requirements of chapter 34A-9, has been completed and made available to the commission at least thirty days prior to the time the commission is required to render a decision under § 49-41B-24 or 49-41B-25.
Prior to the issuance of a permitpermit, for a carbon dioxide transmission facility, as defined in § 49-41B-2, the commission shallmay prepare or require the preparation of an environmental impact statement that complies with the provisions of chapter 34A-934A-9. and is made available to the public on the commission website.
InExcept allas otherotherwise cases,provided thein commissionthis maysection, preparean orapplicant requireseeking thea preparationpermit ofunder anthis environmentalchapter impactfor statementa thatcarbon compliesdioxide withtransmission thefacility, provisionsas ofdescribed chapterin 34A-9.§ 49-41B-2.1, shall prepare an environmental impact statement.
SectionIn 3.all other cases, the commission may require an applicant to prepare an environmental impact statement.
The environmental impact statement must:
(1) Be paid for by the applicant;
(2) Include the contents required in subdivisions 34A-9-7(1) to (7), inclusive;
(3) Be submitted to the commission at least thirty days prior to the time the commission is required to render a decision pursuant § 49-41B-24 or 49-41B-25;
and (4) Be published on the commission website.
The commission may not require an environmental impact statement if a detailed environmental impact study complying with the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, 42 U.S.C.
§ 4321 (January 1, 2026), has been completed and made available to the commission at least thirty days prior to the time the commission is required to render a decision under § 49-41B-24 or 49-41B-25.
Overstrikes indicate deleted language.
26.725.15 3 1173 Section 3.
The commission may require the applicant to meet its the burden of proof as to any other criteria, upon a specific finding by the commission of Overstrikesa indicatematerial deletedchange language.in the circumstances regarding those criteria, but the Public Utilities Commission shall commission may not, in any event, prepare or require the preparation of an additional environmental impact statement.
26.725.14 3 1173 a material change in the circumstances regarding those criteria, but the Public Utilities Commission shall commission may not, in any event, prepare or require the preparation of an additional environmental impact statement.
View plain text versions (4)
- Engrossed House Commerce and Energy Engrossed Current pdf February 11, 2026
- Introduced View text pdf January 28, 2026
- 1173A View text pdf
- 1173C View text pdf
Action History
-
Commerce and Energy Deferred to the 41st legislative day , Passed, YEAS 5, NAYS 3
-
Scheduled for hearing
-
First read in Senate and referred to Senate Commerce and Energy S.J. 296
-
House of Representatives Do Pass Amended , Passed, YEAS 44, NAYS 22 H.J. 335
-
Commerce and Energy Do Pass Amended , Passed, YEAS 8, NAYS 4
-
Commerce and Energy Motion to amend , Passed, Amendment 1173C
-
Scheduled for hearing H.J. 1
-
Commerce and Energy Deferred to another day , Passed, YEAS 7, NAYS 6
-
Commerce and Energy Motion to amend , Passed, Amendment 1173A
-
Scheduled for hearing
-
First read in House and referred to House Commerce and Energy H.J. 163
Sponsors
- Kathy Rice · Primary
- Sue Peterson · Primary
- Carl Perry · Primary
- Al Novstrup · Primary
- Lauren Nelson · Primary
- Bobbi Andera · Primary
- John Hughes · Primary
- Joy Hohn · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →8 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 97 not signed on · 29 voted No
Sponsors (8)
- Kathy Rice Republican
- Sue Peterson Republican Voted No
- Carl Perry Republican
- Al Novstrup Republican
- Lauren Nelson Republican
- Bobbi Andera Republican
- John Hughes Republican
- Joy Hohn Republican Voted No
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (97)
97 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 97 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 5 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 56% | 33% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Liz Larson | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Carl Perry | Republican | Yea |
| Casey Crabtree | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Karr | Republican | Nay |
| Jim Mehlhaff | Republican | Yea |
| Joy Hohn | Republican | Nay |
| Randy Deibert | Republican | Yea |
| Steve Kolbeck | Republican | Yea |
| Sue Peterson | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 37 | 22 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 44 | 22 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 63% | 31% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (70)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Kolbeck (Jack) | — | Yea |
| Van Diepen | — | Yea |
| Eric Emery | Democratic | Yea |
| Erik Muckey | Democratic | Yea |
| Erin Healy | Democratic | Yea |
| Kadyn Wittman | Democratic | Yea |
| Nicole Uhre-Balk | Democratic | Yea |
| Aaron Aylward | Republican | Yea |
| Al Novstrup | Republican | Yea |
| Amber Arlint | Republican | Nay |
| Bethany Soye | Republican | Not Voting |
| Bobbi Andera | Republican | Yea |
| Brandei Schaefbauer | Republican | Yea |
| Brian Mulder | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Kassin | Republican | Nay |
| Curt Massie | Republican | Yea |
| David Kull | Republican | Nay |
| Drew Peterson | Republican | Nay |
| Dylan Jordan | Republican | Yea |
| Greg Jamison | Republican | Yea |
| Heather Baxter | Republican | Yea |
| Jana Hunt | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Bathke | Republican | Not Voting |
| Jessica Bahmuller | Republican | Yea |
| Jim Halverson | Republican | Yea |
| John Hughes | Republican | Yea |
| John Shubeck | Republican | Yea |
| John Sjaarda | Republican | Yea |
| Jon Hansen | Republican | Yea |
| Josephine Garcia | Republican | Yea |
| Julie Auch | Republican | Yea |
| Kaley Nolz | Republican | Yea |
| Karla Lems | Republican | Yea |
| Kathy Rice | Republican | Yea |
| Kent Roe | Republican | Nay |
| Keri Weems | Republican | Nay |
| Lana Greenfield | Republican | Yea |
| Leslie Heinemann | Republican | Yea |
| Liz May | Republican | Yea |
| Logan Manhart | Republican | Yea |
| Marty Overweg | Republican | Yea |
| Mary Fitzgerald | Republican | Yea |
| Matt Roby | Republican | Nay |
| Mellissa Heermann | Republican | Nay |
| Mike Derby | Republican | Nay |
| Mike Stevens | Republican | Nay |
| Mike Weisgram | Republican | Nay |
| Nick Fosness | Republican | Nay |
| Peri Pourier | Republican | Not Voting |
| Phil Jensen | Republican | Yea |
| Rebecca Reimer | Republican | Nay |
| Roger DeGroot | Republican | Nay |
| Scott Moore | Republican | Yea |
| Scott Odenbach | Republican | Yea |
| Spencer Gosch | Republican | Yea |
| Steve Duffy | Republican | Nay |
| Taylor Rehfeldt | Republican | Nay |
| Terri Jorgenson | Republican | Yea |
| Tesa Schwans | Republican | Yea |
| Tim Czmowski | Republican | Nay |
| Tim Goodwin | Republican | Nay |
| Tim Reisch | Republican | Nay |
| Tim Walburg | Republican | Yea |
| Tina Mulally | Republican | Not Voting |
| Tony Kayser | Republican | Yea |
| Tony Randolph | Republican | Yea |
| Travis Ismay | Republican | Yea |
| Trish Ladner | Republican | Nay |
| Will Mortenson | Republican | Nay |
| William Shorma | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 7 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 62% | 31% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Nicole Uhre-Balk | Democratic | Yea |
| Aaron Aylward | Republican | Not Voting |
| Drew Peterson | Republican | Nay |
| Jessica Bahmuller | Republican | Yea |
| Kaley Nolz | Republican | Yea |
| Karla Lems | Republican | Yea |
| Lana Greenfield | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Weisgram | Republican | Nay |
| Steve Duffy | Republican | Nay |
| Tesa Schwans | Republican | Yea |
| Tina Mulally | Republican | Yea |
| Tony Kayser | Republican | Yea |
| William Shorma | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 54% | 46% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Nicole Uhre-Balk | Democratic | Yea |
| Aaron Aylward | Republican | Nay |
| Drew Peterson | Republican | Yea |
| Jessica Bahmuller | Republican | Yea |
| Kaley Nolz | Republican | Nay |
| Karla Lems | Republican | Yea |
| Lana Greenfield | Republican | Nay |
| Mike Weisgram | Republican | Yea |
| Steve Duffy | Republican | Yea |
| Tesa Schwans | Republican | Nay |
| Tina Mulally | Republican | Nay |
| Tony Kayser | Republican | Nay |
| William Shorma | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 1173?
- HB 1173 is sponsored by Kathy Rice (Republican), Sue Peterson (Republican), Carl Perry (Republican), Al Novstrup (Republican), Lauren Nelson (Republican), Bobbi Andera (Republican), John Hughes (Republican), and Joy Hohn (Republican).
- What is the current status of HB 1173?
- This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced January 28, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track HB 1173?
- Track HB 1173 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 1173
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 1173
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →