SB 659 — Prohibiting certain restrictions on regulation of accessory dwelling units
Last action — Chapter 241, Acts, Regular Session, 2026
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House of Delegates
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 29, 2026. Enacted.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
3 sponsors
1 primary, 2 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (2 R).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 3 recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
In plain language
This bill prohibits certain restrictions on accessory dwelling units.
The bill prevents local governments from imposing specific limitations on the regulation of accessory dwelling units. This aims to promote the development and use of these units in residential areas.
What this means for you
- Families: For families, this means greater flexibility in housing arrangements, potentially allowing for more affordable living options.
Summary
Prohibiting certain restrictions on regulation of accessory dwelling units
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
1 added · 1 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendment to SB 659 clarifies the definition of "manufactured home" and establishes specific regulations that allow these homes to be used as accessory dwelling units on properties with single-family homes. This change is important because it prevents municipalities from imposing excessive restrictions on the use and design of manufactured homes, ensuring they can be treated similarly to traditional accessory units. By allowing manufactured homes to share utility connections with the main house, the amendment also promotes cost-effective and efficient use of resources for homeowners. Overall, these adjustments aim to increase housing options and flexibility for families in need of additional living space.
SB659 SFASUB RuckerHFA #1Phillips 2-19Fletcher2-26 7835 Senator#1Wilkinson Rucker3909 Delegate movedPhillips moves to amend the billSenate Committee Substitute on page 32, , section 2,§8-40-1, linesline 1826, by beginning a new paragraph after subsection (f) and 19,inserting bythe strikingfollowing outtext:g) all“Manufactured ofhome” subdivisionmeans (3);And,Bya renumberingstructure constructed in compliance with the remainingfederal subdivisions. AdoptedRejectedManufactured Home Construction and Safety Standards, 42 U.S.C.
§5401 et seq., and installed on a permanent foundation;
And, On page 3, section §8-40-2, line 38, by beginning a new paragraph after subdivision (9) and inserting the following text:e) A manufactured home may be used as an accessory dwelling unit by right on a lot or parcel that contains a single family dwelling in any zoning district where accessory dwelling units are permitted.(f) A municipality may not prohibit or unreasonably restrict the use of a manufactured home as an accessory dwelling unit, provided that the manufactured home is installed on a permanent foundation and complies with applicable building, fire, and safety codes and any other requirements in this article.(g) A municipality may not impose design, aesthetic, age of construction, or prior use requirements on a manufactured home used as an accessory dwelling unit that are more restrictive than those imposed on site built accessory dwelling units of comparable size.(h) A manufactured home used as an accessory dwelling unit shall be assessed and taxed as real property.(i) A manufactured home used as an accessory dwelling unit may share water, sewer, and utility connections with the primary single family dwelling.
Separate utility connections or meters may be required only where necessary to protect public health and safety and where such requirements are applied uniformly to all accessory dwelling units. AdoptedRejected
View plain text versions (6)
- sb659 sub hfa phillips 2-26 _1 adopted.htm View text html
- sb659 sfa rucker _1 2-19 adopted.htm View text Current html
- Committee Substitute Enrolled Committee Substitute pdf
- Committee Substitute Engrossed Committee Substitute pdf
- Committee Substitute View text pdf
- Introduced Introduced Version pdf
Action History
-
Filed for introduction
-
To Government Organization
-
Introduced in Senate
-
To Government Organization
-
Committee substitute reported
-
On 1st reading
-
Read 1st time
-
On 2nd reading
-
Read 2nd time
-
Floor amendments adopted (Voice vote)
-
On 3rd reading
-
Read 3rd time
-
Passed Senate (Roll No. 180)
-
Ordered to House
-
House received Senate message
-
Introduced in House
-
To Government Organization
-
To House Government Organization
-
Do pass
-
On 1st reading, Special Calendar
-
Read 1st time
-
On 2nd reading, Special Calendar
-
Read 2nd time
-
Amendment reported by the Clerk
-
Amendment adopted (Voice vote)
-
On 3rd reading, Special Calendar
-
Postponed on 3rd reading, Special Calendar, until 3/3/2026
-
Read 3rd time
-
Passed House (Roll No. 254)
-
Communicated to Senate
-
House Message received
-
Senate concurred in House amendments and passed bill (Roll No. 361)
-
Communicated to House
-
Completed legislative action
-
House received Senate message
-
To Governor 3/9/2026
-
Approved by Governor 3/14/2026
-
Chapter 241, Acts, Regular Session, 2026
Sponsors
- Rucker · Primary
- Zack Maynard · Cosponsor
- Darren Thorne · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 149 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Rucker
Co-sponsors (2)
- Zack Maynard Republican
- Darren Thorne Republican
Not signed on (149)
149 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 149 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 29 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 34 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (34)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| MR PRESIDENT | — | Yea |
| Anitra Hamilton | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Woelfel | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Woelfel | Democrat | Yea |
| Rick Garcia | Democrat | Yea |
| Ben Queen | Republican | Yea |
| Carl Martin | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Phillips | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Rose | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Rose | Republican | Yea |
| Dean Jeffries | Republican | Yea |
| Eric Tarr | Republican | Yea |
| Eric Tarr | Republican | Yea |
| Glenn Jeffries | Republican | Yea |
| Jack Woodrum | Republican | Yea |
| Jack Woodrum | Republican | Yea |
| Jay Taylor | Republican | Yea |
| Jimmy Willis | Republican | Yea |
| Mark R. Maynard | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Oliverio | Republican | Yea |
| Patricia Rucker | Republican | Yea |
| Patricia Rucker | Republican | Yea |
| Robbie Morris | Republican | Yea |
| Rollan A. Roberts | Republican | Yea |
| Rollan A. Roberts | Republican | Yea |
| Rupie Phillips | Republican | Yea |
| Rupie Phillips | Republican | Yea |
| Ryan Weld | Republican | Yea |
| Ryan Weld | Republican | Yea |
| Tom Takubo | Republican | Yea |
| Tom Takubo | Republican | Yea |
| Tom Willis | Republican | Yea |
| Trenton Barnhart | Republican | Yea |
| Trenton Barnhart | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 23 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 27 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 79% | 3% | 0% | 18% |
How each member voted (34)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| MR PRESIDENT | — | Yea |
| Anitra Hamilton | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Woelfel | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Mike Woelfel | Democrat | Yea |
| Rick Garcia | Democrat | Yea |
| Ben Queen | Republican | Yea |
| Carl Martin | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Phillips | Republican | Not Voting |
| Chris Rose | Republican | Not Voting |
| Chris Rose | Republican | Yea |
| Dean Jeffries | Republican | Yea |
| Eric Tarr | Republican | Yea |
| Eric Tarr | Republican | Nay |
| Glenn Jeffries | Republican | Yea |
| Jack Woodrum | Republican | Not Voting |
| Jack Woodrum | Republican | Yea |
| Jay Taylor | Republican | Yea |
| Jimmy Willis | Republican | Yea |
| Mark R. Maynard | Republican | Not Voting |
| Mike Oliverio | Republican | Yea |
| Patricia Rucker | Republican | Yea |
| Patricia Rucker | Republican | Yea |
| Robbie Morris | Republican | Yea |
| Rollan A. Roberts | Republican | Yea |
| Rollan A. Roberts | Republican | Yea |
| Rupie Phillips | Republican | Yea |
| Rupie Phillips | Republican | Yea |
| Ryan Weld | Republican | Yea |
| Ryan Weld | Republican | Yea |
| Tom Takubo | Republican | Not Voting |
| Tom Takubo | Republican | Yea |
| Tom Willis | Republican | Yea |
| Trenton Barnhart | Republican | Yea |
| Trenton Barnhart | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 659 do?
- Prohibiting certain restrictions on regulation of accessory dwelling units
- Who sponsors SB 659?
- SB 659 is sponsored by Rucker, Zack Maynard (Republican), and Darren Thorne (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 659?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 29, 2026. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 659?
- Track SB 659 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 659
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 659
Last checked for changes 6 days ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →