Pennsylvania 2025-2026 Regular Session Status: In Committee 11 D cosponsors

HB 2595 — An Act amending the act of November 30, 2004 (P.L.1672, No.213), known as the Alternative Energy Portfolio Standards Act, providing for interconnection reviews.

Last action — Re-committed to Rules

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced June 03, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.

Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the House.

Odds of enactment

Low chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Advancing 46% · moderate confidence
  • In Committee

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 11 sponsors

    1 primary, 10 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (11 D).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 2 recorded votes so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

In plain language

The bill amends energy standards to include interconnection reviews.

This bill updates the Alternative Energy Portfolio Standards Act to provide for interconnection reviews. These reviews assess how new energy systems connect to the existing grid.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

47 added · 23 removed

Plain-language change summary

The bill HB 2595 was amended to extend the deadlines for electric distribution companies to provide results of interconnection studies to customers. Specifically, the time given for feasibility studies increased from 15 to 90 days, while the timelines for impact and facilities studies were also moved from 60 to 90 days. This change is significant as it allows more time for companies to conduct thorough studies, potentially improving the quality and reliability of their results, which can affect the planning and development of energy projects.

→
Previous
Latest
PRINTER'S NO.
PRIOR PRINTER'S NO.
3507 THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA HOUSE BILL Session of No.
3507 PRINTER'S NO.
2595 2026 INTRODUCED BY INGLIS, FIEDLER, DOUGHERTY, KHAN AND HOHENSTEIN, JUNE 2, 2026 REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON ENERGY, JUNE 3, 2026 AN ACT Ameentitled "An act providing for the sale of electric energy generated from renewable and environmentally beneficial sources, for the acquisition of electric energy generated from renewable and environmentally beneficial sources by electric distribution and supply companies and for the powers and duties of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission," providing for interconnection reviews.
3631 THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA HOUSE BILL Session of No.
2595 2026 INTRODUCED BY INGLIS, FIEDLER, DOUGHERTY, KHAN, HOHENSTEIN, SANCHEZ, NEILSON, WAXMAN, FLEMING AND STEELE, JUNE 2, 2026 AS REPORTED FROM COMMITTEE ON ENERGY, HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, AS AMENDED, JUNE 17, 2026 AN ACT Amending the act of November 30, 2004 (P.L.1672, No.213), entitled "An act providing for the sale of electric energy generated from renewable and environmentally beneficial sources, for the acquisition of electric energy generated from renewable and environmentally beneficial sources by electric distribution and supply companies and for the powers and duties of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission," providing for interconnection reviews.
(1) no later than 15 days after both parties sign an interconnection feasibility study agreement;
(1) no later than 15 90 days after both parties sign an <-- interconnection feasibility study agreement;
or (2) no later than 60 days after both parties sign an interconnection impact study agreement or an interconnection facilities study agreement.
or (2) no later than 60 90 days after both parties sign an <-- interconnection impact study agreement or an interconnection facilities study agreement.
(c) Applicability.--This section shall apply to an interconnection application submitted on or after the effective date of this subsection.
(C) AGREEMENT.--UPON COMPLETION OF AN INTERCONNECTION STUDY, <-- AN ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION COMPANY SHALL ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH THE INTERCONNECTION CUSTOMER TO COMPLETE ANY DISTRIBUTION UPGRADES NECESSARY FOR INTERCONNECTION AS DETERMINED IN THE INTERCONNECTION STUDY, INCLUDING A TIMELINE FOR COMPLETION AND COST ESTIMATES SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE COMMISSION.
(D) DISPUTE RESOLUTION.-- (1) IF THE ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION COMPANY FAILS TO COMPLETE THE DISTRIBUTION UPGRADES IN A TIMELY MANNER AND REASONABLY WITHIN THE COST ESTIMATES PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE AGREEMENT UNDER SUBSECTION (C), THE INTERCONNECTION CUSTOMER MAY PURSUE RESOLUTION THROUGH THE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCESS UNDER 52 PA.
CODE § 75.51 (RELATING TO DISPUTES).
(2) A VIOLATION UNDER THIS SUBSECTION SHALL BE SUBJECT TO ENFORCEMENT BY THE COMMISSION UNDER 66 PA.C.S.
CH.
33 (RELATING TO VIOLATIONS AND PENALTIES).
(c) (E) Applicability.--This section shall apply to an <-- 20260HB2595PN3631 - 2 - interconnection application submitted on or after the effective date of this subsection.
(F) DEFINITION.--AS USED IN THIS SECTION, THE TERM <-- "DISTRIBUTION UPGRADE" MEANS A REQUIRED ADDITION OR MODIFICATION TO THE ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION COMPANY'S ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AT OR BEYOND THE POINT OF INTERCONNECTION.
THE TERM DOES NOT INCLUDE INTERCONNECTION FACILITIES.
20260HB2595PN3507 - 2 -
20260HB2595PN3631 - 3 -
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Re-committed to Rules

  2. First consideration

  3. Reported as amended

  4. Referred to Energy

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 10 co-sponsors · 242 not signed on · 5 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (10)

Not signed on (242)

242 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 242 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 26 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 14000
Republican 12000
Total 26000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (26)
Member Party Vote
Amen Brown Democratic Yea
Arvind Venkat Democratic Yea
Chris Pielli Democratic Yea
Elizabeth Fiedler Democratic Yea
Heather Boyd Democratic Yea
Jacklyn Rusnock Democratic Yea
Joe McAndrew Democratic Yea
John C. Inglis III Democratic Yea
Jose Giral Democratic Yea
Kyle Donahue Democratic Yea
Mandy Steele Democratic Yea
Melissa Cerrato Democratic Yea
Nathan Davidson Democratic Yea
Paul Friel Democratic Yea
Bud Cook Republican Yea
Craig Williams Republican Yea
Dallas Kephart Republican Yea
Eric R. Nelson Republican Yea
Jamie Barton Republican Yea
Joe Hamm Republican Yea
Joshua D. Kail Republican Yea
Kathy L. Rapp Republican Yea
Martin T. Causer Republican Yea
Mike Armanini Republican Yea
Natalie Mihalek Republican Yea
Perry A. Stambaugh Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 21 Yea · 5 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 14000
Republican 7500
Total 21500
% of votes cast 81%19%0%0%
How each member voted (26)
Member Party Vote
Amen Brown Democratic Yea
Arvind Venkat Democratic Yea
Chris Pielli Democratic Yea
Elizabeth Fiedler Democratic Yea
Heather Boyd Democratic Yea
Jacklyn Rusnock Democratic Yea
Joe McAndrew Democratic Yea
John C. Inglis III Democratic Yea
Jose Giral Democratic Yea
Kyle Donahue Democratic Yea
Mandy Steele Democratic Yea
Melissa Cerrato Democratic Yea
Nathan Davidson Democratic Yea
Paul Friel Democratic Yea
Bud Cook Republican Yea
Craig Williams Republican Nay
Dallas Kephart Republican Nay
Eric R. Nelson Republican Nay
Jamie Barton Republican Yea
Joe Hamm Republican Nay
Joshua D. Kail Republican Yea
Kathy L. Rapp Republican Yea
Martin T. Causer Republican Yea
Mike Armanini Republican Yea
Natalie Mihalek Republican Yea
Perry A. Stambaugh Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HB 2595?
HB 2595 is sponsored by John C. Inglis III (Democratic), Elizabeth Fiedler (Democratic), Sean Dougherty (Democratic), Tarik Khan (Democratic), Joseph C. Hohenstein (Democratic), Benjamin V. Sanchez (Democratic), Ed Neilson (Democratic), Ben Waxman (Democratic), Justin C. Fleming (Democratic), Mandy Steele (Democratic), and Heather Boyd (Democratic).
What is the current status of HB 2595?
This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced June 03, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Where can I track HB 2595?
Track HB 2595 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 2595

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 2595

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →