HB 4126 — Relating to road usage charges; declaring an emergency.
Last action — In committee upon adjournment.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2026 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Requires the Department of Transportation to submit a biennial report to the Legislative Assembly recommending a rate for the per-mile road usage charge that would sustainably raise the revenue necessary to maintain the public highways in this state. Declares an emergency, effective on passage.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
63 added · 27 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendments to House Bill 4126 specify that the Department of Transportation (ODOT) must provide a detailed estimate of vehicle miles driven on Oregon's highways, categorizing them by weight. This change is important because it allows for a more precise understanding of road usage based on vehicle types, which can lead to fairer road usage charges. Additionally, the deadline for ODOT to submit its first report after the bill's passage has been set for January 31, 2027, ensuring timely recommendations for maintaining highway funding. The bill also declares an emergency to expedite its implementation.
83rd OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY--2026 Regular Session HOUSEA-Engrossed AMENDMENTSHouse TOBill HOUSE BILL 4126 ByOrdered COMMITTEEby ONthe TRANSPORTATIONHouse February 18 DeleteIncluding linesHouse 14Amendments anddated 15February of18 theSponsored printedby billRepresentatives andGAMBA, insert:RIEKE SMITH;
“(b)Representatives AnANDERSEN, estimateMUNOZ, ofSenators theFREDERICK, totalGOLDEN, vehicleMEEK, milesNERON drivenMISSLIN, onPHAM theK public(Presession highwaysfiled.) ofSUMMARY thisThe statefollowing basedsummary onis not prepared by the mostsponsors recentlyof availablethe datameasure onand vehicleis milesnot traveled,a setpart forthof separatelythe accordingbody thereof subject to theconsideration followingby weightthe table:Legislative Assembly.
“(A)It Vehiclesis weighingan 10,000editor’s poundsbrief orstatement less.of the essential features of the measure.
“(B)The Vehiclesstatement weighingincludes morea thanmeasure 10,000digest poundswritten andin notcompliance morewith thanapplicable 12,000readability pounds.standards.
“(C)Digest: Vehicles weighing more than 12,000 pounds and not more than 14,000 pounds.
“(D)The VehiclesAct weighingwould morehave thanODOT 14,000biennially poundsrecommend anda notrate morefor thanthe 16,000per-mile pounds.road usage charge that would raise the money needed to keep up the highways in this state.
“(E)(Flesch VehiclesReadability weighingScore: more than 16,000 pounds and not more than 18,000 pounds.
“(F)60.7). Vehicles weighing more than 18,000 pounds and not more than 20,000 pounds.
“(G)Requires Vehiclesthe weighingDepartment moreof thanTransportation 20,000to poundssubmit anda notbiennial morereport thanto 22,000the pounds.Legislative As- sembly recommending a rate for the per-mile road usage charge that would sustainably raise the revenue necessary to maintain the public highways in this state.
“(H)Declares Vehiclesan weighingemergency, moreeffective thanon 22,000passage. pounds and not more than 24,000 pounds.
“(I)A VehiclesBILL weighingFOR moreAN thanACT 24,000Relating poundsto androad notusage morecharges; than 26,000 pounds.
“(J)and Vehiclesdeclaring weighingan moreemergency. than 26,000 pounds.”.
DeleteBe linesIt 24Enacted throughby 26the andPeople insert:of the State of Oregon:
“SECTIONSECTION 3.1.
Section 2 of this 2026 Act is added to and made a part of ORS 319.883 to 319.946.
SECTION 2.
(1) Not later than September 15 of each even-numbered year, the Depart- ment of Transportation shall submit a report, in the manner provided in ORS 192.245, to the interim committees of the Legislative Assembly related to transportation, that recommends a rate for the per-mile road usage charge that would sustainably raise the revenue necessary to maintain the public highways of this state.
(2) The report must include:
(a) The total estimated cost for maintenance and preservation of Oregon’s transportation system, including for local systems;
and (b) An estimate of the total vehicle miles driven on the public highways of this state based on the most recently available data on vehicle miles traveled, set forth separately ac- cording to the following weight table:
(A) Vehicles weighing 10,000 pounds or less.
(B) Vehicles weighing more than 10,000 pounds and not more than 12,000 pounds.
(C) Vehicles weighing more than 12,000 pounds and not more than 14,000 pounds.
(D) Vehicles weighing more than 14,000 pounds and not more than 16,000 pounds.
(E) Vehicles weighing more than 16,000 pounds and not more than 18,000 pounds.
(F) Vehicles weighing more than 18,000 pounds and not more than 20,000 pounds.
(G) Vehicles weighing more than 20,000 pounds and not more than 22,000 pounds.
(H) Vehicles weighing more than 22,000 pounds and not more than 24,000 pounds.
(I) Vehicles weighing more than 24,000 pounds and not more than 26,000 pounds.
NOTE:
Matter in boldfaced type in an amended section is new;
matter [italic and bracketed] is existing law to be omitted.
New sections are in boldfaced type.
LC 110 A-Eng.
HB 4126 (J) Vehicles weighing more than 26,000 pounds.
(3) For purposes of subsection (2)(a) of this section, the department shall establish met- rics by which maintenance and preservation needs are evaluated and reported, including but not limited to:
(a) The desired pavement condition index for each road type;
(b) Striping and painting standards;
(c) Bridge replacement timelines;
and (d) The department’s administrative costs associated with these maintenance and pres- ervation needs.
Show all 44 changed lines (4 more)
SECTION 3.
“SECTIONSECTION 4.
This 2026 Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety, an emergency is declared to exist, and this 2026 Act takes effect on its passage.”.passage.
LC[2] 110/HB 4126-2
Show all 44 changed rows (4 more)
View plain text versions (3)
- Engrossed A-Engrossed Current pdf
- Introduced House Amendments to Introduced pdf
- Introduced View text pdf
Amendments
1 amendmentClick Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.
Action History
-
In committee upon adjournment.
-
Referred to Ways and Means by prior reference.
-
Recommendation: Do pass with amendments, be printed A-Engrossed, and be referred to Ways and Means by prior reference.
-
Work Session held.
-
Public Hearing held.
-
Referred to Transportation with subsequent referral to Ways and Means.
-
First reading. Referred to Speaker's desk.
Sponsors
- Tom Andersen · Cosponsor
- Khanh Pham · Cosponsor
- Courtney Neron Misslin · Cosponsor
- Mark Meek · Cosponsor
- Jeff Golden · Cosponsor
- Lew Frederick · Cosponsor
- Lesly Muñoz · Cosponsor
- Mark Gamba · Primary
- Sue Rieke Smith · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →2 sponsors · 7 co-sponsors · 81 not signed on · 2 voted No
Sponsors (2)
- Mark Gamba Democrat
- Sue Rieke Smith Democrat
Co-sponsors (7)
- Tom Andersen Democrat
- Khanh Pham Democrat
- Courtney Neron Misslin
- Mark Meek Democrat
- Jeff Golden Democrat
- Lew Frederick Democrat
- Lesly Muñoz Democrat
Not signed on (81)
81 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 81 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Mark Gamba | Democrat | Yea |
| Nancy Nathanson | Democrat | Yea |
| Paul Evans | Democrat | Yea |
| Susan McLain | Democrat | Yea |
| Jeffrey Helfrich | Republican | Nay |
| Kevin Mannix | Republican | Yea |
| Shelly Boshart Davis | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 4126 do?
- Requires the Department of Transportation to submit a biennial report to the Legislative Assembly recommending a rate for the per-mile road usage charge that would sustainably raise the revenue necessary to maintain the public highways in this state. Declares an emergency, effective on passage.
- Who sponsors HB 4126?
- HB 4126 is sponsored by Tom Andersen (Democrat), Khanh Pham (Democrat), Courtney Neron Misslin, Mark Meek (Democrat), Jeff Golden (Democrat), Lew Frederick (Democrat), Lesly Muñoz (Democrat), Mark Gamba (Democrat), and Sue Rieke Smith (Democrat).
- What is the current status of HB 4126?
- This bill died with 2026 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 4126?
- Track HB 4126 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 4126
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 4126
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →