North Dakota 69th Legislative Assembly (2025-26) Status: Enacted 3 R cosponsors

SB 2382 — AN ACT to create and enact a new chapter to title 28 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to vexatious litigation; and to declare an emergency.

Last action — Filed with Secretary Of State 03/31

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed House
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 27, 2025. Enacted.

Signed by Governor Kelly Armstrong (Republican) on March 31, 2025.

Odds of enactment

High chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 76% · moderate confidence
  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 3 sponsors

    1 primary, 2 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (3 R).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 3 recorded votes so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Summary

Relating to vexatious litigation; and to declare an emergency.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

79 added · 146 removed

Plain-language change summary

The most recent version of Senate Bill 2382 has clarified its focus on "vexatious litigation," which refers to legal actions that are primarily intended to annoy or harm another party rather than to resolve legitimate disputes. It now outlines specific definitions of "vexatious conduct" and what constitutes a "vexatious litigant," ensuring a clearer understanding of this inappropriate behavior in court. Additionally, by dropping the mention of penalties, the bill may emphasize a more educational or regulatory approach to handling vexatious cases, rather than a punitive one. This could help streamline court processes and protect individuals from abusive legal practices.

→
Previous
Latest
25.0666.02000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly of North Dakota FIRST ENGROSSMENT ENGROSSED SENATE BILL NO.
Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly of North Dakota In Regular Session Commencing Tuesday, January 7, 2025 SENATE BILL NO.
2382 Introduced by Senators Sickler, Hogue Representative Lefor A BILL for an Act to create and enact a new chapter to title 28 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to vexatious litigation;
2382 (Senators Sickler, Hogue) (Representative Lefor) AN ACT to create and enact a new chapter to title 28 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to vexatious litigation;
and to provide a penalty.
and to declare an emergency.
Page No.
a.
1 25.0666.02000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly a.
or d.
or S.
B.
NO.
2382 - PAGE 2 d.
Procedure - Vexatious litigant.
Burden of proof - Entry of order restricting vexatious litigation.
A presiding judge may designate a vexatious litigant upon motion by the court or at the request of a party.
If the court finds by a preponderance of the evidence an individual is a vexatious litigant, the court shall enter a prefiling order restricting the vexatious litigant from filing new litigation or filing documents within existing litigation without prior approval of the court.
If the presiding judge finds there is a basis to conclude an individual is a vexatious litigant and determines a prefiling order should be issued, the presiding judge shall issue a proposed prefiling order and proposed findings in support of the order.
A prefiling order must:
3.
An individual determined by the presiding judge to be a vexatious litigant has fourteen days to file a written response to the proposed order.
4.
If a response is filed, the presiding judge may grant a hearing on the proposed order.
If no response is filed within fourteen days, or if the presiding judge concludes, following a response or any subsequent hearings, and there is a basis for issuing the order, the presiding judge may issue the prefiling order.
Prefiling order - Contents - Penalty.
1.
The prefiling order may:
Prohibit the vexatious litigant from filing any new litigation or any new documents in existing litigation in this state without first obtaining leave of a judge of the court where the litigation is proposed to be filed.
Impose all costs of the vexatious litigation against the filing party;
Page No.
and b.
2 25.0666.02000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly b.
Award the opposing party reasonable attorney fees and costs associated with responding to the vexatious litigant, including the cost of seeking the prefiling order.
Require the vexatious litigant to furnish security to assure payment of the moving party's reasonable expenses, costs, and attorney fees incurred in a pending action.
c.
Require the vexatious litigant to take any other action reasonably necessary.
2.
A prefiling order must contain an exception to allow the subject of the order to file an application seeking leave to file.
3.
Failure to comply with the terms of a prefiling order may be punished as a contempt of court.
4.
If a vexatious litigant subject to a prefiling order files any new litigation without first obtaining the leave of the court, the court may summarily dismiss the action without notice.
Procedure - New litigation and subsequent filings.
1.
A vexatious litigant shall file an application for leave to file using the form approved by the state court administrator before filing new litigation or documents into existing litigation.
2.
A court may permit the filing of new litigation or documentation into existing litigation only if it appears the litigation or document has merit and has not been filed for the purpose of harassment or delay.
3.
If the court issues an order granting leave to file a new litigation or a document into existing litigation, a party's time to answer or respond will begin to run when the party is served with the order of the court and a copy of the new litigation or document.
4.
Show all 93 changed rows (53 more)
Previous
Latest
The clerk may not file any litigation presented by the vexatious litigant subject to a prefiling order unless the vexatious litigant first obtains an order permitting the filing.
If the clerk mistakenly files the litigation without the order, any party may file a notice stating the plaintiff or complaining party in a disciplinary proceeding is a vexatious litigant subject to a prefiling order.
The filing of the notice automatically stays the litigation.
The litigation must be dismissed or denied unless the plaintiff or complainant, within ten days of the filing of the notice, obtains an order permitting the litigation to proceed.
If a party is served with a new litigation but the action is not filed with the clerk, the party served is not required to respond to the new litigation unless the Page No.
3 25.0666.02000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly vexatious litigant obtains an order allowing the litigation to be filed and files and serves the new litigation.
5.
Upon receiving an application for leave to file, or upon notice from any party named in the litigation, the court shall rule on the application before ruling on the merits of any proposed filing.
6.
The court may award reasonable attorney's fees and costs to the party filing the notice under subsection 4.
7.
An order granting leave to file is not required for an application for indigent defense services.
Appeals.
1.
A prefiling order entered by a presiding judge designating an individual as a vexatious litigant may be appealed to the supreme court under section 28-27-02 and rule 4 of the North Dakota Rules of Appellate Procedure.
2.
A prefiling order entered by the supreme court is not appealable.
3.
An order denying the application for leave to file by a vexatious litigant is not appealable.
Supreme court order.
1.
The supreme court may, by motion of the court or of any party to an appeal, enter a prefiling order prohibiting a vexatious litigant from filing any new litigation in the courts of this state as a self-represented party without first obtaining leave of a judge of the court where the litigation is proposed to be filed.
2.
If the supreme court finds there is a basis to conclude an individual is a vexatious litigant and determines a prefiling order should be issued, the supreme court shall issue a proposed prefling order and proposed findings in support of the order.
3.
An individual determined by the supreme court to be a vexatious litigant has fourteen days to file a written response to the proposed order.
4.
If a response is filed, the supreme court may grant a hearing on the proposed order.
If no response is filed within fourteen days, or if the supreme court concludes, following a response or any subsequent hearing there is a basis for issuing the order, the supreme court may issue the prefiling order.
Page No.
4 25.0666.02000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly Electronic filing.
A self-represented party who has been declared a vexatious litigant may not file documents electronically and may not be provided a user identification and password to access the state court electronic filing system.
A self-represented vexatious litigant shall file all documents in paper format in compliance with all other rules of the court.
Effect of prefiling order.
Prefiling orders in effect under supreme court rule before August 1, 2025, remain in effect.
A prefiling order entered under this chapter supersedes any other order limiting or enjoining an individual's ability to file or serve papers or pleadings in any North Dakota state court litigation.
Rules - Authority.
Page No.
The supreme court shall adopt rules to implement this chapter.
5 25.0666.02000
SECTION 2.
EMERGENCY.
This Act is declared to be an emergency measure.
S.
B.
NO.
2382 - PAGE 3 ____________________________ ____________________________ President of the Senate Speaker of the House ____________________________ ____________________________ Secretary of the Senate Chief Clerk of the House This certifies that the within bill originated in the Senate of the Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly of North Dakota and is known on the records of that body as Senate Bill No.
2382 and that two-thirds of the members-elect of the Senate voted in favor of said law.
Vote:
Yeas 42 Nays 2 Absent 3 ____________________________ ____________________________ President of the Senate Secretary of the Senate This certifies that two-thirds of the members-elect of the House of Representatives voted in favor of said law.
Vote:
Yeas 72 Nays 21 Absent 1 ____________________________ ____________________________ Speaker of the House Chief Clerk of the House Received by the Governor at ________M.
on _____________________________________, 2025.
Approved at ________M.
on __________________________________________________, 2025.
____________________________ Governor Filed in this office this ___________day of _______________________________________, 2025, at ________ o’clock ________M.
____________________________ Secretary of State
View plain text versions (4)

Action History

  1. Filed with Secretary Of State 03/31

  2. Signed by Governor 03/28

  3. Sent to Governor

  4. Signed by President

  5. Signed by Speaker

  6. Second reading, passed, yeas 42 nays 2, Emergency clause carried

  7. Concurred

  8. Returned to Senate (12)

  9. Emergency clause carried

  10. Second reading, passed as amended, yeas 72 nays 21

  11. Amendment adopted, placed on calendar

  12. Reported back amended, do pass, amendment placed on calendar 7 6 1

  13. Committee Hearing 02:46

  14. Committee Hearing 10:00

  15. Introduced, first reading, referred Judiciary Committee

  16. Received from Senate

  17. Second reading, passed, yeas 45 nays 0

  18. Amendment adopted, placed on calendar

  19. Reported back amended, do pass, amendment placed on calendar 6 0 1

  20. Committee Hearing 10:00

  21. Introduced, first reading, referred Judiciary Committee

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 145 not signed on · 23 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (2)

Not signed on (145)

145 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 145 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 42 Yea · 2 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 37203
Democratic 5000
Total 42203
% of votes cast 89%4%0%6%
How each member voted (47)
Member Party Vote
Boschee, Josh Democratic Yea
Braunberger, Ryan Democratic Yea
Hogan, Kathy Democratic Yea
Marcellais, Richard Democratic Yea
Mathern, Tim Democratic Yea
Axtman, Michelle Republican Yea
Barta, Jeff Republican Yea
Beard, Todd Republican Yea
Bekkedahl, Brad Republican Not Voting
Boehm, Keith Republican Yea
Burckhard, Randy A. Republican Yea
Castaneda, Jose L. Republican Yea
Cleary, Sean Republican Yea
Clemens, David A. Republican Yea
Conley, Cole Republican Yea
Cory, Claire Republican Yea
Davison, Kyle Republican Yea
Dever, Dick Republican Yea
Dwyer, Michael Republican Not Voting
Enget, Mark Republican Yea
Erbele, Robert Republican Yea
Gerhardt, Justin Republican Yea
Hogue, David Republican Yea
Kessel, Greg Republican Yea
Klein, Jerry Republican Yea
Larson, Diane Republican Yea
Lee, Judy Republican Yea
Lemm, Randy D. Republican Yea
Luick, Larry Republican Yea
Magrum, Jeffery J. Republican Nay
Meyer, Scott Republican Yea
Myrdal, Janne Republican Yea
Patten, Dale Republican Yea
Paulson, Bob Republican Yea
Powers, Michelle Republican Yea
Roers, Kristin Republican Yea
Rummel, Dean Republican Yea
Schaible, Donald Republican Yea
Sickler, Jonathan Republican Yea
Sorvaag, Ronald Republican Yea
Thomas, Paul J. Republican Yea
Walen, Chuck Republican Yea
Wanzek, Terry M. Republican Yea
Weber, Mark F. Republican Yea
Weston, Kent Republican Not Voting
Wobbema, Mike Republican Yea
van Oosting, Desiree Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 72 Yea · 21 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 572101
Unaffiliated 5000
Democratic 10000
Total 722101
% of votes cast 77%22%0%1%
How each member voted (94)
Member Party Vote
Cynthia Schreiber-Beck — Yea
Emily O'Brien — Yea
Jared C. Hagert — Yea
Liz Conmy — Yea
Mike Beltz — Yea
Brown, Collette Democratic Yea
Davis, Jayme Democratic Yea
Dobervich, Gretchen Democratic Yea
Finley-DeVille, Lisa Democratic Yea
Foss, Austin Democratic Yea
Hager, LaurieBeth Democratic Yea
Hanson, Karla Rose Democratic Yea
Ista, Zachary Democratic Yea
Mitskog, Alisa Democratic Yea
Schneider, Mary Democratic Yea
Anderson, Bert Republican Yea
Anderson, Dick Republican Yea
Anderson, Karen A. Republican Yea
Bahl, Landon Republican Yea
Berg, Mike Republican Yea
Bolinske, Macy Republican Yea
Bosch, Glenn Republican Yea
Brandenburg, Mike Republican Yea
Brown, TJ Republican Nay
Christianson, Nels Republican Nay
Dockter, Jason Republican Yea
Dressler, Ty Republican Nay
Fegley, Clayton Republican Yea
Fisher, Jay Republican Yea
Frelich, Kathy Republican Yea
Grindberg, Karen Republican Yea
Grueneich, Jim Republican Yea
Hatlestad, Patrick R. Republican Yea
Hauck, Dori Republican Nay
Headland, Craig Republican Yea
Heilman, Matthew Republican Nay
Heinert, Pat D. Republican Yea
Henderson, Donna Republican Nay
Hendrix, Jared Republican Nay
Holle, Dawson Republican Nay
Hoverson, Jeff Republican Nay
Johnson, Jorin Republican Yea
Johnston, Daniel Republican Nay
Jonas, Jim Republican Yea
Karls, Karen Republican Yea
Kasper, Jim Republican Yea
Kempenich, Keith Republican Yea
Kiefert, Dwight Republican Not Voting
Klemin, Lawrence R. Republican Yea
Koppelman, Ben Republican Yea
Lefor, Mike Republican Yea
Longmuir, Donald W. Republican Yea
Louser, Scott Republican Yea
Maki, Roger A. Republican Nay
Marschall, Andrew Republican Yea
Martinson, Bob Republican Yea
McLeod, Carrie Republican Yea
Meier, Lisa Republican Yea
Monson, David Republican Yea
Morton, Desiree Republican Nay
Motschenbacher, Mike Republican Yea
Murphy, Eric J. Republican Yea
Nathe, Mike Republican Yea
Nehring, Dennis Republican Nay
Nelson, Jon O. Republican Yea
Novak, Anna S. Republican Yea
Olson, Jeremy Republican Yea
Olson, Jeremy Republican Nay
Osowski, Doug Republican Nay
Ostlie, Mitch Republican Yea
Porter, Todd Republican Yea
Pyle, Brandy L. Republican Yea
Richter, David Republican Yea
Rios, Nico Republican Nay
Rohr, Karen M. Republican Yea
Ruby, Dan Republican Yea
Ruby, Matthew Republican Yea
Sanford, Mark Republican Yea
Satrom, Bernie Republican Yea
Schatz, Mike Republican Nay
Schauer, Austen Republican Yea
Steiner, Vicky Republican Yea
Stemen, Gregory Republican Yea
Swiontek, Steve Republican Yea
Toman, Nathan Republican Yea
Tveit, Bill Republican Nay
VanWinkle, Lori Republican Nay
Vetter, Steve Republican Yea
Vigesaa, Don Republican Nay
Vollmer, Daniel R. Republican Yea
Wagner, Scott Republican Yea
Warrey, Jonathan Republican Yea
Weisz, Robin Republican Yea
Wolff, Christina Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 45 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 41001
Democratic 4001
Total 45002
% of votes cast 96%0%0%4%
How each member voted (47)
Member Party Vote
Boschee, Josh Democratic Yea
Braunberger, Ryan Democratic Yea
Hogan, Kathy Democratic Yea
Marcellais, Richard Democratic Not Voting
Mathern, Tim Democratic Yea
Axtman, Michelle Republican Yea
Barta, Jeff Republican Yea
Beard, Todd Republican Yea
Bekkedahl, Brad Republican Yea
Boehm, Keith Republican Yea
Burckhard, Randy A. Republican Yea
Castaneda, Jose L. Republican Yea
Cleary, Sean Republican Yea
Clemens, David A. Republican Yea
Conley, Cole Republican Yea
Cory, Claire Republican Yea
Davison, Kyle Republican Yea
Dever, Dick Republican Yea
Dwyer, Michael Republican Yea
Enget, Mark Republican Yea
Erbele, Robert Republican Yea
Gerhardt, Justin Republican Yea
Hogue, David Republican Yea
Kessel, Greg Republican Yea
Klein, Jerry Republican Yea
Larson, Diane Republican Yea
Lee, Judy Republican Yea
Lemm, Randy D. Republican Yea
Luick, Larry Republican Yea
Magrum, Jeffery J. Republican Yea
Meyer, Scott Republican Yea
Myrdal, Janne Republican Yea
Patten, Dale Republican Yea
Paulson, Bob Republican Yea
Powers, Michelle Republican Yea
Roers, Kristin Republican Yea
Rummel, Dean Republican Yea
Schaible, Donald Republican Yea
Sickler, Jonathan Republican Yea
Sorvaag, Ronald Republican Yea
Thomas, Paul J. Republican Yea
Walen, Chuck Republican Yea
Wanzek, Terry M. Republican Yea
Weber, Mark F. Republican Yea
Weston, Kent Republican Yea
Wobbema, Mike Republican Not Voting
van Oosting, Desiree Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 2382 do?
Relating to vexatious litigation; and to declare an emergency.
Who sponsors SB 2382?
SB 2382 is sponsored by Lefor, Mike (Republican), Hogue, David (Republican), and Sickler, Jonathan (Republican).
What is the current status of SB 2382?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 27, 2025. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 2382?
Track SB 2382 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 2382

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 2382

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →