North Dakota 69th Legislative Assembly (2025-26) Status: Enacted Bipartisan · 6 R · 4 D cosponsors

HB 1564 — AN ACT to amend and reenact sections 27-19.1-01 and 27-19.1-02, subsection 1 of section 27-19.1-03, subsection 1 of section 27-19.1-04, and sections 27-19.1-05 and 27-19.1-06 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to Indian child welfare.

Last action — Filed with Secretary Of State 04/11

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed House
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 20, 2025. Enacted.

Signed by Governor Kelly Armstrong (Republican) on April 11, 2025.

Odds of enactment

High chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 98% · high confidence

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 10 sponsors

    1 primary, 9 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Bipartisan support

    Sponsored across 2 parties (6 R · 4 D) — cross-party backing.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 3 recorded votes so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Summary

Relating to Indian child welfare.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

407 added · 447 removed

Plain-language change summary

The latest version of House Bill 1564 includes amendments to key sections regarding Indian child welfare in North Dakota. Notably, the definition of "active efforts" has been elaborated, emphasizing the importance of thorough and timely support aimed at maintaining or reuniting Indian children with their families. These efforts must consider the cultural context of the child's tribe and involve collaboration with family and community members. This change is significant because it aims to strengthen the focus on family reunification and culturally appropriate practices, which can lead to better outcomes for Indian children in the welfare system.

→
Previous
Latest
25.1211.01000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly HOUSE BILL NO.
Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly of North Dakota In Regular Session Commencing Tuesday, January 7, 2025 HOUSE BILL NO.
1564 of North Dakota Introduced by Representatives Davis, Beltz, Brown, Finley-DeVille, Holle Senators Cleary, Cory, Hogan, Lee, Weston A BILL for an Act to amend and reenact sections 27-19.1-01 and 27-19.1-02, subsection 1 of section 27-19.1-03, subsection 1 of section 27-19.1-04, and sections 27-19.1-05 and 27-19.1-06 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to Indian child welfare.
1564 (Representatives Davis, Beltz, Brown, Finley-DeVille, Holle) (Senators Cleary, Cory, Hogan, Lee, Weston) AN ACT to amend and reenact sections 27-19.1-01 and 27-19.1-02, subsection 1 of section 27-19.1-03, subsection 1 of section 27-19.1-04, and sections 27-19.1-05 and 27-19.1-06 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to Indian child welfare.
Page No.
(2) Identifying appropriate services and helping a parent or Indian custodian to overcome barriers, including actively assisting a parent or Indian custodian in obtaining such services.
1 25.1211.01000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly (2) Identifying appropriate services and helping a parent or Indian custodian to overcome barriers, including actively assisting a parent or Indian custodian in obtaining such services.
(7) Supporting regular visits with a parent or Indian custodian in the most natural setting possible as well as trial home visits of the Indian child during any period of removal, consistent with the need to ensure the health, safety, and welfare of the Indian child.
H.
B.
NO.
1564 - PAGE 2 (7) Supporting regular visits with a parent or Indian custodian in the most natural setting possible as well as trial home visits of the Indian child during any period of removal, consistent with the need to ensure the health, safety, and welfare of the Indian child.
Page No.
c.
2 25.1211.01000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly c.
The term does not include an adoptive placement, a preadoptive placement, andan emergency change in placement under section 27-20.3-06, or holding an Indian child in custody.
The term does not include an adoptive placement, a preadoptive placement, andan emergency change in placement under section 27-20.3-06, or holding an Indian child in custodya placement pursuant to a criminal or delinquency proceeding.
i.
H.
"Indian custodian" means any Indian individual who has legal custody of an Indian child under tribal law or custom or under state law or to whom temporary Page No.
B.
3 25.1211.01000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly physical care, custody, and control has been transferred by the parent of the Indian child.
NO.
1564 - PAGE 3 i.
"Indian custodian" means any Indian individual who has legal custody of an Indian child under tribal law or custom or under state law or to whom temporary physical care, custody, and control has been transferred by the parent of the Indian child.
Active efforts must utilize the available resources of the Indian child's extended Page No.
Active efforts must utilize the available resources of the Indian child's extended family, tribe, tribal and other relevant social service agencies, and individual Indian caregivers.
4 25.1211.01000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly family, tribe, tribal and other relevant social service agencies, and individual Indian caregivers.
As soon as the threat has been removed and the Indian child is no longer at risk, the state should terminate the removal, by returning the Indian child to the parent or Indian custodian while offering a solution to mitigate the situation that gave rise to the need for emergency removal and placement.If a court order authorizes the emergency removal of the Indian child from the parent or Indian custodian of the child under this section, the order must be accompanied by a declaration that includes:
As soon as the threat has been removed and the Indian child is no longer at risk, the state should terminate the removal, by returning the Indian child to the parent or Indian custodian while offering a solution to mitigate the situation that gave rise to the need for emergency removal and placement.
a.
The name, tribal affiliation, and address of the Indian child, each parent of the Indian child, and the Indian custodian of the child, as applicable;
and b.
A detailed account of the circumstances that led the agency responsible for emergency removal of the child to take that action.
In considering whether to involuntarily place an Indian child in foster care or to terminate the parental rights of the parent of an Indian child, the court shall require that a qualified expert witness must be qualified to testify regarding whether the Indian child's continued custody by the parent or Indian custodian is likely to result in serious emotional or physical damage to the Indian child and should be qualified to testify as Page No.
In considering whether to involuntarily place an Indian child in foster care or to terminate the parental rights of the parent of an Indian child, the court shall require that a qualified expert H.
5 25.1211.01000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly to the prevailing social and cultural standards of the Indian child's tribe.
B.
NO.
1564 - PAGE 4 witness must be qualified to testify regarding whether the Indian child's continued custody by the parent or Indian custodian is likely to result in serious emotional or physical damage to the Indian child and should be qualified to testify as to the prevailing social and cultural standards of the Indian child's tribe.
If one or more parties have been found to be in default under the North Dakota Rules of Civil Procedure, the court may accept a declaration or affidavit from a qualified expert witness without a stipulation in writing from the defaulted parties.
If one or more parties have been found to be in default under the North Dakota Rules of Juvenile Procedure, the court may accept a declaration or affidavit from a qualified expert witness without a stipulation in writing from the defaulted parties.
If a court order authorizes the emergency removal of the Indian child from the parent or Indian custodian of the child under state law, the order must be accompanied by a declaration from the child welfare agency that includes:
a.
The name, tribal affiliation, and address of the Indian child, each parent of the Indian child, and the Indian custodian of the child, as applicable;
and b.
A detailed account of the circumstances that led the agency responsible for emergency removal of the child to take action.
7.
7.
7.8.
Page No.
9.
6 25.1211.01000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly 8.
and (2) A voluntary proceeding that could prohibit the parent or Indian custodian from regaining custody of the Indian child upon demand;
and H.
B.
NO.
Show all 89 changed rows (49 more)
Previous
Latest
1564 - PAGE 5 (2) A voluntary proceeding that could prohibit the parent or Indian custodian from regaining custody of the Indian child upon demand;
the relationship between the Page No.
the relationship between the Indian child and the Indian child's parent;
7 25.1211.01000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly Indian child and the Indian child's parent;
In an Indian child custody proceeding under this chapter involving an Indian child who is not residing or domiciled within the reservation of the Indian child's tribe, the court assigned to exercise jurisdiction under this chapter, upon the petition of the Indian child's parent, Indian custodian, or tribe, shall transfer the proceeding to the jurisdiction of the tribe unless eitherany of the following appliesapply:
In an Indian child custody proceeding under this chapter involving an Indian child who is not residing or domiciled within the reservation of the Indian child's tribe, the court assigned to exercise jurisdiction under this chapter, upon the petition of the Indian child's parent, Indian custodian, or tribe, shall transfer the proceeding to the jurisdiction of the tribe unless either of the following applies:
5.
5.6.
b.c.
H.
B.
NO.
1564 - PAGE 6 b.
c.d.
c.
The court may determine good cause exists to deny the transfer only if the person opposing the transfer shows by clear and convincing evidence the evidence or testimony necessary to decide the case cannot be presented in tribal court without undue hardship to the parties or the witnesses Page No.
The court may determine good cause exists to deny the transfer only if the person opposing the transfer shows by clear and convincing evidence the evidence or testimony necessary to decide the case cannot be presented in tribal court without undue hardship to the parties or the witnesses and that the tribal court is unable to mitigate the hardship by making arrangements to receive the evidence or testimony by use of telephone or live audiovisual means, by hearing the evidence or testimony at a location that is convenient to the parties and witnesses, or by use of other means permissible under the tribal court's rules of evidence.
8 25.1211.01000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly and that the tribal court is unable to mitigate the hardship by making arrangements to receive the evidence or testimony by use of telephone or live audiovisual means, by hearing the evidence or testimony at a location that is convenient to the parties and witnesses, or by use of other means permissible under the tribal court's rules of evidence.
6.7.
6.
7.
7.8.
Page No.
1.
9 25.1211.01000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly 1.
SECTION 5.
H.
B.
NO.
1564 - PAGE 7 SECTION 5.
An Indian child who is accepted for a foster care or nonfoster care placement or a preadoptive placement must be placed in the least restrictive setting that most Page No.
An Indian child who is accepted for a foster care or nonfoster care placement or a preadoptive placement must be placed in the least restrictive setting that most approximates a family that meets the Indian child's special needs, if any, and which is within reasonable proximity to the Indian child's home, taking into account those special needs.
10 25.1211.01000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly approximates a family that meets the Indian child's special needs, if any, and which is within reasonable proximity to the Indian child's home, taking into account those special needs.
5.
H.
The standards to be applied in meeting the placement preference requirements of this subsection must be the prevailing social and cultural standards of the Indian Page No.
B.
11 25.1211.01000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly community in which the Indian child's parent, Indian custodian, or extended family members reside or with which the Indian child's parent, Indian custodian, or extended family members maintain social and cultural ties.
NO.
1564 - PAGE 8 5.
The standards to be applied in meeting the placement preference requirements of this subsection must be the prevailing social and cultural standards of the Indian community in which the Indian child's parent, Indian custodian, or extended family members reside or with which the Indian child's parent, Indian custodian, or extended family members maintain social and cultural ties.
Page No.
d.
12 25.1211.01000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly d.
27-19.1-06.
H.
B.
NO.
1564 - PAGE 9 27-19.1-06.
The state court entering a final adoption decree or order in any voluntary or involuntary Indian child adoptive placement must furnish a copy of the decree or order within thirty days to the Bureau of Indian Affairs, Chief, Division of Human Services, 1849 C Street NW, Mail Stop 3645 MIB, Washington, DC 20240as prescribed by the Bureau of Indian Affairs, along with the following information, in an envelope marked "Confidential":
The state court entering a final adoption decree or order in any voluntary or involuntary Indian child adoptive placement must furnish a copy of the decree or order within thirty days to the Bureau of Indian Affairs, Chief, Division of Human Services, 1849 C Street NW, Mail Stop MIB, Washington, DC 20240as prescribed by the Bureau of Indian Affairs, along with the following information, in an envelope marked "Confidential":
and Page No.
and f.
13 25.1211.01000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly f.
Page No.
H.
14 25.1211.01000
B.
NO.
1564 - PAGE 10 ____________________________ ____________________________ Speaker of the House President of the Senate ____________________________ ____________________________ Chief Clerk of the House Secretary of the Senate This certifies that the within bill originated in the House of Representatives of the Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly of North Dakota and is known on the records of that body as House Bill No.
1564.
House Vote:
Yeas 91 Nays 0 Absent 3 Senate Vote:
Yeas 47 Nays 0 Absent 0 ____________________________ Chief Clerk of the House Received by the Governor at ________M.
on _____________________________________, 2025.
Approved at ________M.
on __________________________________________________, 2025.
____________________________ Governor Filed in this office this ___________day of _______________________________________, 2025, at ________ o’clock ________M.
____________________________ Secretary of State
⬇ Download PDF
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Filed with Secretary Of State 04/11

  2. Signed by Governor 04/10

  3. Sent to Governor

  4. Signed by Speaker

  5. Signed by President

  6. Second reading, passed, yeas 91 nays 0

  7. Concurred

  8. Returned to House (12)

  9. Second reading, passed as amended, yeas 47 nays 0

  10. Amendment adopted, placed on calendar

  11. Reported back amended, do pass, amendment placed on calendar 5 0 1

  12. Committee Hearing 10:45

  13. Introduced, first reading, referred Human Services Committee

  14. Received from House

  15. Second reading, passed, yeas 90 nays 1

  16. Reported back, do pass, place on calendar 13 0 0

  17. Committee Hearing 09:30

  18. Introduced, first reading, referred Human Services Committee

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 9 co-sponsors · 138 not signed on · 1 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (9)

Not signed on (138)

138 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 138 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Motion for Final Passage on HB 1564

Passed 91 Yea · 0 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 81002
Democratic 10001
Total 91003
% of votes cast 97%0%0%3%
How each member voted (94)
Member Party Vote
Brown, Collette Democratic Yea
Conmy, Liz Democratic Yea
Davis, Jayme Democratic Yea
Dobervich, Gretchen Democratic Yea
Finley-DeVille, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Foss, Austin Democratic Yea
Hager, LaurieBeth Democratic Yea
Hanson, Karla Rose Democratic Yea
Ista, Zachary Democratic Yea
Mitskog, Alisa Democratic Yea
Schneider, Mary Democratic Yea
Anderson, Bert Republican Yea
Anderson, Dick Republican Yea
Anderson, Karen A. Republican Yea
Bahl, Landon Republican Not Voting
Beltz, Mike Republican Yea
Berg, Mike Republican Yea
Bolinske, Macy Republican Yea
Bosch, Glenn Republican Yea
Brandenburg, Mike Republican Yea
Brown, TJ Republican Yea
Christianson, Nels Republican Yea
Dockter, Jason Republican Yea
Dressler, Ty Republican Yea
Fegley, Clayton Republican Yea
Fisher, Jay Republican Yea
Frelich, Kathy Republican Yea
Grindberg, Karen Republican Yea
Grueneich, Jim Republican Yea
Hagert, Jared C. Republican Yea
Hatlestad, Patrick R. Republican Yea
Hauck, Dori Republican Yea
Headland, Craig Republican Yea
Heilman, Matthew Republican Yea
Heinert, Pat D. Republican Yea
Henderson, Donna Republican Yea
Hendrix, Jared Republican Yea
Holle, Dawson Republican Yea
Hoverson, Jeff Republican Yea
Johnson, Jorin Republican Yea
Johnston, Daniel Republican Yea
Jonas, Jim Republican Yea
Karls, Karen Republican Yea
Kasper, Jim Republican Yea
Kempenich, Keith Republican Not Voting
Kiefert, Dwight Republican Yea
Klemin, Lawrence R. Republican Yea
Koppelman, Ben Republican Yea
Lefor, Mike Republican Yea
Longmuir, Donald W. Republican Yea
Louser, Scott Republican Yea
Maki, Roger A. Republican Yea
Marschall, Andrew Republican Yea
Martinson, Bob Republican Yea
McLeod, Carrie Republican Yea
Meier, Lisa Republican Yea
Monson, David Republican Yea
Morton, Desiree Republican Yea
Motschenbacher, Mike Republican Yea
Murphy, Eric J. Republican Yea
Nathe, Mike Republican Yea
Nehring, Dennis Republican Yea
Nelson, Jon O. Republican Yea
Novak, Anna S. Republican Yea
O'Brien, Emily Republican Yea
Olson, Jeremy Republican Yea
Olson, Jeremy Republican Yea
Osowski, Doug Republican Yea
Ostlie, Mitch Republican Yea
Porter, Todd Republican Yea
Pyle, Brandy L. Republican Yea
Richter, David Republican Yea
Rios, Nico Republican Yea
Rohr, Karen M. Republican Yea
Ruby, Dan Republican Yea
Ruby, Matthew Republican Yea
Sanford, Mark Republican Yea
Satrom, Bernie Republican Yea
Schatz, Mike Republican Yea
Schauer, Austen Republican Yea
Schreiber-Beck, Cynthia Republican Yea
Steiner, Vicky Republican Yea
Stemen, Gregory Republican Yea
Swiontek, Steve Republican Yea
Toman, Nathan Republican Yea
Tveit, Bill Republican Yea
VanWinkle, Lori Republican Yea
Vetter, Steve Republican Yea
Vigesaa, Don Republican Yea
Vollmer, Daniel R. Republican Yea
Wagner, Scott Republican Yea
Warrey, Jonathan Republican Yea
Weisz, Robin Republican Yea
Wolff, Christina Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Motion for Final Passage on HB 1564

Passed 47 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 42000
Democratic 5000
Total 47000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (47)
Member Party Vote
Boschee, Josh Democratic Yea
Braunberger, Ryan Democratic Yea
Hogan, Kathy Democratic Yea
Marcellais, Richard Democratic Yea
Mathern, Tim Democratic Yea
Axtman, Michelle Republican Yea
Barta, Jeff Republican Yea
Beard, Todd Republican Yea
Bekkedahl, Brad Republican Yea
Boehm, Keith Republican Yea
Burckhard, Randy A. Republican Yea
Castaneda, Jose L. Republican Yea
Cleary, Sean Republican Yea
Clemens, David A. Republican Yea
Conley, Cole Republican Yea
Cory, Claire Republican Yea
Davison, Kyle Republican Yea
Dever, Dick Republican Yea
Dwyer, Michael Republican Yea
Enget, Mark Republican Yea
Erbele, Robert Republican Yea
Gerhardt, Justin Republican Yea
Hogue, David Republican Yea
Kessel, Greg Republican Yea
Klein, Jerry Republican Yea
Larson, Diane Republican Yea
Lee, Judy Republican Yea
Lemm, Randy D. Republican Yea
Luick, Larry Republican Yea
Magrum, Jeffery J. Republican Yea
Meyer, Scott Republican Yea
Myrdal, Janne Republican Yea
Patten, Dale Republican Yea
Paulson, Bob Republican Yea
Powers, Michelle Republican Yea
Roers, Kristin Republican Yea
Rummel, Dean Republican Yea
Schaible, Donald Republican Yea
Sickler, Jonathan Republican Yea
Sorvaag, Ronald Republican Yea
Thomas, Paul J. Republican Yea
Walen, Chuck Republican Yea
Wanzek, Terry M. Republican Yea
Weber, Mark F. Republican Yea
Weston, Kent Republican Yea
Wobbema, Mike Republican Yea
van Oosting, Desiree Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Motion for Final Passage on HB 1564

Passed 90 Yea · 1 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 79102
Democratic 11000
Total 90102
% of votes cast 97%1%0%2%
How each member voted (93)
Member Party Vote
Brown, Collette Democratic Yea
Conmy, Liz Democratic Yea
Davis, Jayme Democratic Yea
Dobervich, Gretchen Democratic Yea
Finley-DeVille, Lisa Democratic Yea
Foss, Austin Democratic Yea
Hager, LaurieBeth Democratic Yea
Hanson, Karla Rose Democratic Yea
Ista, Zachary Democratic Yea
Mitskog, Alisa Democratic Yea
Schneider, Mary Democratic Yea
Anderson, Bert Republican Yea
Anderson, Dick Republican Yea
Anderson, Karen A. Republican Yea
Bahl, Landon Republican Yea
Beltz, Mike Republican Yea
Berg, Mike Republican Yea
Bolinske, Macy Republican Yea
Bosch, Glenn Republican Yea
Brandenburg, Mike Republican Not Voting
Christianson, Nels Republican Yea
Dockter, Jason Republican Yea
Dressler, Ty Republican Yea
Fegley, Clayton Republican Yea
Fisher, Jay Republican Yea
Frelich, Kathy Republican Yea
Grindberg, Karen Republican Yea
Grueneich, Jim Republican Yea
Hagert, Jared C. Republican Yea
Hatlestad, Patrick R. Republican Yea
Hauck, Dori Republican Yea
Headland, Craig Republican Yea
Heilman, Matthew Republican Yea
Heinert, Pat D. Republican Yea
Henderson, Donna Republican Yea
Hendrix, Jared Republican Yea
Holle, Dawson Republican Yea
Hoverson, Jeff Republican Yea
Johnson, Jorin Republican Yea
Johnston, Daniel Republican Yea
Jonas, Jim Republican Yea
Karls, Karen Republican Yea
Kasper, Jim Republican Yea
Kempenich, Keith Republican Not Voting
Kiefert, Dwight Republican Yea
Klemin, Lawrence R. Republican Yea
Koppelman, Ben Republican Yea
Lefor, Mike Republican Yea
Longmuir, Donald W. Republican Yea
Louser, Scott Republican Yea
Maki, Roger A. Republican Yea
Marschall, Andrew Republican Yea
Martinson, Bob Republican Yea
McLeod, Carrie Republican Yea
Meier, Lisa Republican Yea
Monson, David Republican Yea
Morton, Desiree Republican Yea
Motschenbacher, Mike Republican Yea
Murphy, Eric J. Republican Yea
Nathe, Mike Republican Yea
Nehring, Dennis Republican Nay
Nelson, Jon O. Republican Yea
Novak, Anna S. Republican Yea
O'Brien, Emily Republican Yea
Olson, Jeremy Republican Yea
Olson, Jeremy Republican Yea
Osowski, Doug Republican Yea
Ostlie, Mitch Republican Yea
Porter, Todd Republican Yea
Pyle, Brandy L. Republican Yea
Richter, David Republican Yea
Rios, Nico Republican Yea
Rohr, Karen M. Republican Yea
Ruby, Dan Republican Yea
Ruby, Matthew Republican Yea
Sanford, Mark Republican Yea
Satrom, Bernie Republican Yea
Schatz, Mike Republican Yea
Schauer, Austen Republican Yea
Schreiber-Beck, Cynthia Republican Yea
Steiner, Vicky Republican Yea
Stemen, Gregory Republican Yea
Swiontek, Steve Republican Yea
Toman, Nathan Republican Yea
Tveit, Bill Republican Yea
VanWinkle, Lori Republican Yea
Vetter, Steve Republican Yea
Vigesaa, Don Republican Yea
Vollmer, Daniel R. Republican Yea
Wagner, Scott Republican Yea
Warrey, Jonathan Republican Yea
Weisz, Robin Republican Yea
Wolff, Christina Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

civil-rights labor
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does HB 1564 do?
Relating to Indian child welfare.
Who sponsors HB 1564?
HB 1564 is sponsored by Weston, Kent (Republican), Lee, Judy (Republican), Holle, Dawson (Republican), Hogan, Kathy (Democratic), Finley-DeVille, Lisa (Democratic), Cory, Claire (Republican), Cleary, Sean (Republican), Brown, Collette (Democratic), Davis, Jayme (Democratic), and Beltz, Mike (Republican).
What is the current status of HB 1564?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 20, 2025. Enacted.
Where can I track HB 1564?
Track HB 1564 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 1564

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of HB 1564

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →