HB 219 — Counties/Franchise Ambulance Service.
Last action — Withdrawn From Com
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced February 25, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the House.
Odds of enactment
Low chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
In Committee
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
0 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 R).
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
23 added · 27 removedPlain-language change summary
The updates to House Bill 219 include changes to the bill's introduction section, specifically the removal of a code designation and a revised date for its introduction. This creates a clearer and more straightforward presentation of the bill, making it easier for legislators and the public to understand its current status. These types of amendments are important as they help ensure transparency and clarity in the legislative process.
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2025 H 21 HOUSE BILL 219 Committee Substitute Favorable 4/9/25 Short Title:
Representative Pless.
For a complete list of sponsors, refer to the North Carolina General Assembly web site.
Emergency Management and Disaster Recovery, if favorable, State and Local Government, if favorable, Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House February 27, 2025 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT REPEALING THE LAW THAT AUTHORIZES COUNTIES AND CITIES TO FRANCHISE OR OPERATE AMBULANCE SERVICES AND PROVIDING THAT COUNTY OFFICIALS SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED TO APPROVE MODIFICATIONS INTHELEVELOFCAREPROVIDEDBYEMSPROVIDERSTHATARENOTOWNEDIN THE LEVEL OF CARE PROVIDED BY EMS PROVIDERS THAT ARE NOT OWNED OR OPERATED BY A CITY IN THE COUNTY OR THE COUNTY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM.
ArticleNotwithstanding 13any ofprovision Chapter 153A of theor Generalany Statutesrule isor amendedregulation byadopted addingpursuant ato newthe sectionauthority togranted read:in G.S.
"§143-508(b), 153A-251.Article 7 of Chapter 131E of the General Statutes, or any other provision of law, a county manager or EMS administrator delegated the authority to act on behalf of the county shall not be required to sign a document or otherwise approve of a modification in the level of care being provided by a provider within the county's emergency management system.
Level of care modifications.
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a county manager or EMS administrator delegated the authority to act on behalf of the county shall not be required to sign a document or otherwise approve of a modification in the level of care being provided by a provider within the county's emergency management system.
The provisions of this section do not apply if the provider is a city located within the county or the county responsible for the emergency management system."system. SECTION 3.
SECTION 3.
Section 1 of this act applies to any franchise agreements or contracts for ambulance service initiated or renewed on or after that date.
A cityor county with an existingfranchise agreement or contract for ambulance service in effect on the date this act becomes law shall not renew that agreement or contract.
*H219-v-2**H219-v-1*
Action History
-
Withdrawn From Com
-
Re-ref Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House
-
Reptd Fav Com Substitute
-
Re-ref Com On State and Local Government
-
Passed 1st Reading
-
Ref to the Com on Emergency Management and Disaster Recovery, if favorable, State and Local Government, if favorable, Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House
-
Filed
Sponsors
- Mark Pless · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →0 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 178 not signed on
Sponsors (0)
None.
Co-sponsors (1)
- Mark Pless Republican
Not signed on (178)
178 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 178 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 219?
- HB 219 is sponsored by Mark Pless (Republican).
- What is the current status of HB 219?
- This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced February 25, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track HB 219?
- Track HB 219 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 219
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 219
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →