West Virginia 2026 Session Status: Introduced 9 R cosponsors

HB 5351 — Relating to modernization of fees generated from emergency communication service users

Last action — On 3rd reading, House Calendar

  1. 1
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House of Delegates
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2026 Session. It reached “Introduced” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Relating to modernization of fees generated from emergency communication service users

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

61 added · 49 removed

Plain-language change summary

The updated version of HB 5351 allows county commissions to set a fee on all types of 911 service user locations, including residential and commercial sites, regardless of the communication technology used, such as VoIP or landlines. This change is significant because it ensures that counties can collect necessary fees from a broader range of service users to enhance their emergency telephone systems and improve addressing, especially in rural areas. The revenue from these fees can only be used for specific purposes related to emergency services, ensuring that funds are allocated effectively to maintain safety and efficiency in emergency response.

→
Previous
Latest
WEST VIRGINIA LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION Introduced House Bill 5351 By Delegates Hornby, Akers, Clark, Mallow, Miller, Willis, Hott, Holstein, Green, and Hanshaw (Mr.
CS for HB 5351 WEST VIRGINIA LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION Committee Substitute for House Bill 5351 By Delegates Hornby, Akers, Clark, Mallow, Miller, Willis, Hott, Holstein, Green, and Hanshaw (Mr.
Speaker) [Introduced February 09, 2026;
Speaker) [Originating in the Committee on the Judiciary;
referred to the Committee on the Judiciary] Intr HB 2026R3966 A BILL to amend and reenact §7-1-3cc of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, relating to modernization of fees generated from emergency communication service users;
Reported on February 25, 2026] CS for HB 5351 A BILL to amend and reenact §7-1-3cc of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, relating to modernization of fees generated from emergency communication service users;
and allowing counties to amend the 911 fee process for use of communication devices beyond landlines.
and providing that county commissions may impose an enhanced emergency telephone system fee on 911 service user locations.
and Intr HB 2026R3966 (3) Minimum standards for education and training of all personnel in emergency communications centers.
and 1 CS for HB 5351 (3) Minimum standards for education and training of all personnel in emergency communications centers.
(b) A county commission may impose a fee upon consumers of local exchange service 911 service users within that county for an enhanced emergency telephone system and associated electronic equipment and for the conversion of all rural routes to city-type addressing as provided in section three of this article.
(b)(1) A county commission may impose a fee upon consumers of local exchange service each 911 service user location, defined as an occupied residential, commercial, or business premises assigned a physical address within that county, without regard to the type of communications technology utilized at that location, for an enhanced emergency telephone system and associated electronic equipment and for the conversion of all rural routes to city-type addressing as provided in section three of this article.
The fee may be placed on landline users, users of local exchange services, voice over internet protocol subscribers, or any other user whose use can be reasonably related to 911 services.
Effective on July 1, 2006, all county enhanced emergency telephone system fees that are in effect as of July 1, 2006, and as such may later be modified by action of a county commission, shall be imposed upon in-state subscribers to voice over Internet protocol (VoIP) service, as VoIP service is defined by the Federal Communications Commission of the United States A nonbusiness VoIP service subscriber shall be considered in-state if the primary residence of the subscriber is located within West Virginia.
Effective on July 1, 2006, all county enhanced emergency telephone system fees that are in effect as of July 1, 2006, and as such may later be modified by action of a county commission, shall be imposed upon in-state subscribers to voice over Internet protocol (VoIP) service, as VoIP service is defined by the Federal Communications Commission of the United States A nonbusiness voice over internet protocol (VoIP) service subscriber shall be considered in-state if the primary residence of the subscriber is located within West Virginia.
(c)(1) A county commission may collect a county-imposed 911 user fee or contract with the telephone company or companies providing local exchange service within the county for the telephone company or companies one or more third parties to act as the billing agent or agents of the county commission for the billing of the fee imposed pursuant to subsection (b) of this section.
(2) A county commission may not impose more than one enhanced emergency telephone system fee authorized by this section upon the same 911 service user location, and the fee shall not be separately imposed upon individual telecommunications, wireless, Voice over Internet Protocol, broadband, or similar service subscriptions associated with that location.
Intr HB 2026R3966 The cost for the billing agent services may be included as a recurring maintenance cost of the enhanced emergency telephone system.
2 CS for HB 5351 (3) A county commission may not levy a fee on commercial mobile service as defined at 47 U.S.C.
(2) Where a county commission has contracted with a telephone company to act as its billing agent for enhanced emergency telephone system fees, all competing local exchange telephone companies with customers in that county shall bill the enhanced emergency telephone system fees to its respective customers located in that county and shall remit the fee.
§332, private mobile service as defined at 47 U.S.C.
§332, or internet access as defined at 47 U.S.C.
§151 Note, §1105(5).
(c)(1) A county commission may collect the enhanced emergency telephone system fees described in subsection (b) of this section or contract with the telephone company or companies providing local exchange service within the county for the telephone company or companies a third party to act as the billing agent or agents of the county commission for the billing of the fee imposed pursuant to subsection (b) of this section.
The cost for the billing agent services may be included as a recurring maintenance cost of the enhanced emergency telephone system.
(2) Where a county commission has contracted with a telephone company to act as its billing agent for enhanced emergency telephone system fees, all competing local exchange telephone companies with customers in that county shall bill the enhanced emergency telephone system fees to its respective customers located in that county whose service addresses correspond to a 911 service user location and shall remit the fee.
3 CS for HB 5351 4
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Filed for introduction

  2. To Judiciary

  3. Introduced in House

  4. To House Judiciary

  5. To House Homeland Security

  6. Markup Discussion

  7. To House Judiciary

  8. Markup Discussion

  9. By substitute, do pass

  10. On 1st reading, Special Calendar

  11. Read 1st time

  12. On 2nd reading, Special Calendar

  13. Read 2nd time

  14. On 3rd reading with right to amend, Special Calendar

  15. Postponed on 3rd reading, Special Calendar, until 3/4/2026

  16. Placed on House Calendar

  17. On 3rd reading, House Calendar

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 9 co-sponsors · 142 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (9)

Not signed on (142)

142 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 142 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does HB 5351 do?
Relating to modernization of fees generated from emergency communication service users
Who sponsors HB 5351?
HB 5351 is sponsored by Clark, Michael Hornby (Republican), James Robert "JB" Akers II (Republican), Phil Mallow (Republican), George Miller (Republican), Jimmy Willis (Republican), John Paul Hott (Republican), Josh Holstein (Republican), David Green (Republican), and Roger Hanshaw (Republican).
What is the current status of HB 5351?
This bill died with 2026 Session. It reached “Introduced” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track HB 5351?
Track HB 5351 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 5351

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 5351

Last checked for changes about 1 month ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →