HB 1355 — relative to eliminating the default budget from the official ballot referenda.
Last action — Refer to Interim Study, MA, VV; 05/07/2026; SJ 11
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has passed the House. Introduced December 02, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the Senate.
Odds of enactment
Moderate chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a moderate chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Passed House
Current position in the legislative process.
-
9 sponsors
1 primary, 8 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (9 R).
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Summary
relative to eliminating the default budget from the official ballot referenda.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
84 added · 74 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendments to HB 1355 clarify the process for handling local operating budgets when an article isn’t adopted. Now, if there isn’t an approved budget, the governing body is required to hold a special meeting to discuss a revised budget. Additionally, there are new requirements for disclosing how the default budget is calculated, ensuring that residents can understand the changes made. These updates aim to improve transparency and accountability in local budgeting processes.
HB 1355 - AS INTRODUCEDAMENDED SESSIONBY 26-3060THE 09/08 HOUSE BILL12Mar2026... 1355 AN ACT relative to eliminating the default budget from the official ballot referenda.
0695h SESSION 26-3060 09/08 HOUSE BILL 1355 AN ACT relative to eliminating the default budget from the official ballot referenda.
HB 1355 - AS INTRODUCEDAMENDED 26-3060BY 09/08THE STATEHOUSE OF12Mar2026... NEW HAMPSHIRE In the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand Twenty-Six AN ACT relative to eliminating the default budget from the official ballot referenda.
0695h 26-3060 09/08 STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE In the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand Twenty-Six AN ACT relative to eliminating the default budget from the official ballot referenda.
(c) No warrant article shall be amended to eliminate the subject matter of the article or to change the purpose of thea petitioned warrant article.
HB 1355 - AS INTRODUCEDAMENDED BY THE HOUSE - Page 2 - (c) "Contracts" as used in this subdivision means contracts previously approved, in the amount so approved, by the legislative body in either the operating budget authorized for the previous year or in a separate warrant article for a previous year.] X.
If no operating budget article is adopted, [thethe local political subdivision either shall be deemed to have approved the[the default budget] an operating budget or]equal to the previous year’s approved operating budget or the governing body [may]may shall hold a special meeting pursuant to paragraph XVI to take up the issue of a revised operating budget only;
"Shall the (local political subdivision) raise and appropriate as an operating budget, not including appropriations by special warrant articles and other appropriations voted separately, the amounts set forth on the budget posted with the warrant or as amended by vote of the first session, for the purposes set forth therein, totaling $ ____________? Should this article be defeated, [thethe default[default] adopted operating budget shall be $ __________, which is the same as last[last year, with certain adjustments required by previous action of the (local political subdivision) or by law;law] the previous year's adopted budget;
or]or the governing body [may]may shall hold one special meeting, in accordance with RSA 40:13, X and XVI, to take up the issue of a revised operating budget only." HB 1355 - AS INTRODUCEDAMENDED BY THE HOUSE - Page 3 - XI-a.
Special meetings shall be subject to RSA 31:5, 39:3, 195:13, 197:2, and 197:3, provided that no more than one special meeting may be held to raise and appropriate money for the same question or issue in any one calendar year or fiscal year, whichever applies, and further provided that any special meeting held pursuant to [paragraphs]paragraphs paragraph X [andand XI]XI shall not[not be subject to RSA 31:5 and RSA 197:3 and shall not be counted toward the number of special meetings which may be held in a given calendar or fiscal year.year.] comply with the following:
(a) ForThe the special meeting firstshall sessionnot underbe thissubject paragraph,to neitherRSA the31:5 governingand bodyRSA nor197:3 budgetand committee shall propose,not norbe shallcounted thetoward legislative body make an amendment, such that the operatingnumber budgetof isspecial highermeetings thanwhich themay operatingbe budgetheld whichin faileda duringgiven thecalendar annualor meetingfiscal secondyear. session balloting.
(b) IfThe nofirst operatingsession budgetof article is adopted via the special meeting secondwarned sessionfor ballota questiondate undernot thisfewer paragraph,than the20 adopteddays budgetnor shallmore bethan the30 previousdays year’sfollowing adoptedthe budgetsecond reducedsession byof 10the percent.annual meeting.
(c) The wordingsecond session of the secondspecial sessionmeeting ballotwarned questionfor ofa thedate specialnot meetingfewer underthan this15 paragraphdays concerningnor more than 30 days following the operatingfirst budgetsession shallof bethe asspecial follows:meeting.
"Shall(d) At the (localfirst politicalsession subdivision)of raisethe and appropriate as an operating budget, not including appropriations by special warrantmeeting articlesunder andthis otherparagraph, appropriationsneither voted separately, the amountsgoverning setbody forthnor on the budget postedcommittee withshall thepropose, warrantnor orshall as amended by vote of the firstlegislative sessionbody ofmake thean specialamendment, meeting,such forthat the purposesoperating setbudget forthis therein,higher totalingthan $ HB 1355 - AS INTRODUCED - Page 4 - ____________? Should this article be defeated, the adoptedoperating budget shall be $ __________, which isfailed 10at percent lower than the previoussecond year’ssession adoptedof operatingthe budget."annual 4meeting. Municipal Budget Law;
(e) If no operating budget article is adopted at the special meeting, the local political subdivision shall be deemed to have approved an operating budget equal to the previous year’s approved operating budget.
HB 1355 - AS AMENDED BY THE HOUSE - Page 4 - (f) The ballot question for the operating budget at the second session of the special meeting shall read as follows:
"Shall the (local political subdivision) raise and appropriate as an operating budget, not including appropriations by special warrant articles and other appropriations voted separately, the amounts set forth on the budget posted with the warrant or as amended by vote of the first session of the special meeting, for the purposes set forth therein, totaling $ ____________? Should this article be defeated, the adopted operating budget shall be $ __________, which is the same as the previous year’s adopted budget.” 4 Municipal Budget Law;
View plain text versions (2)
- Amended As Amended by the House Current pdf
- Introduced View text pdf
Action History
-
Refer to Interim Study, MA, VV; 05/07/2026; SJ 11
-
Committee Report: Referred to Interim Study, 05/07/2026; Vote 4-0; CC; SC 17
-
Hearing: 04/28/2026, Room 122-123, SH, 10:15 am; SC 16
-
Introduced 03/12/2026 and Referred to Election Law and Municipal Affairs; SJ 7
-
Ought to Pass with Amendment 2026-0695h: MA DV 176-160 03/12/2026 HJ 8 P. 42
-
Amendment # 2026-0695h: AA VV 03/12/2026 HJ 8 P. 42
-
Minority Committee Report: Inexpedient to Legislate
-
Majority Committee Report: Ought to Pass with Amendment # 2026-0695h 03/03/2026 (Vote 10-8; RC) HC 10 P. 68
-
==CONTINUED== Executive Session: 03/03/2026 10:30 am GP 154
-
==RECESSED== Executive Session: 02/17/2026 09:00 am GP 154
-
Public Hearing: 01/23/2026 11:15 am GP 154
-
Introduced 01/07/2026 and referred to Municipal and County Government HJ 1 P. 16
Sponsors
- Erica Layon · Cosponsor
- Mike Drago · Cosponsor
- Cyril Aures · Cosponsor
- Kristin Noble · Primary
- Ross Berry · Cosponsor
- Diane Pauer · Cosponsor
- Keith Ammon · Cosponsor
- Tom Mannion · Cosponsor
- Brian Labrie · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 8 co-sponsors · 406 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Kristin Noble Republican
Co-sponsors (8)
- Erica Layon Republican
- Mike Drago Republican
- Cyril Aures Republican
- Ross Berry Republican
- Diane Pauer Republican
- Keith Ammon Republican
- Tom Mannion Republican
- Brian Labrie Republican
Not signed on (406)
406 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 406 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 1355 do?
- relative to eliminating the default budget from the official ballot referenda.
- Who sponsors HB 1355?
- HB 1355 is sponsored by Erica Layon (Republican), Mike Drago (Republican), Cyril Aures (Republican), Kristin Noble (Republican), Ross Berry (Republican), Diane Pauer (Republican), Keith Ammon (Republican), Tom Mannion (Republican), and Brian Labrie (Republican).
- What is the current status of HB 1355?
- This bill has passed the House. Introduced December 02, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
- Where can I track HB 1355?
- Track HB 1355 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 1355
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 1355
Last checked for changes about 1 month ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →