Redevelopment.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 8 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 8.
You're tracking SB 8
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 8 — Redevelopment.
Last action — Vetoed by the Governor.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2011-2012, 1st Special Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law requires a redevelopment agency, for the 2009–10 and 2010–11 fiscal years, to deposit revenue payments in its county's Supplemental Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund for allocation to school entities. Existing law authorizes an agency, in order to make these payments, to borrow the amount required to be allocated to that agency's Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund and requires the agency to repay the borrowed funds by a specified date. This bill would authorize an agency to extend the date of repayment for the borrowed funds by 5 years. Existing law suspends various activities of redevelopment agencies and prohibits the agencies from incurring indebtedness for a specified period. Existing law also dissolves redevelopment agencies and community development agencies, as of October 1, 2011, and designates successor agencies, as defined. Existing law exempts from dissolution a redevelopment agency of a community where the city or county that created the agency participates in a voluntary alternative redevelopment program, as prescribed. Existing law requires a participating city or county to make specified remittances for deposit in the Special District Allocation Fund and authorizes that city or county to enter into an agreement with an agency whereby the agency would transfer a portion of its tax increment to the city or county for the purpose of financing specified activities. This bill would make technical, clarifying, and conforming changes to these provisions. The bill would modify provisions relating to agency indebtedness and the transfer of housing funds and responsibilities associated with dissolved redevelopment agencies. The bill would also provide, for the 2012–13 and 2013–14 fiscal years only, that an agreement to transfer tax increment between a city or county and an agency may include an additional amount to reimburse the city for a specified shortfall. The bill would make certain provisions operative only if a specified provision of law is operative. The bill would appropriate $1,000 from the General Fund to the Department of Finance for the costs to comply with the bill. The California Constitution authorizes the Governor to declare a fiscal emergency and to call the Legislature into special session for that purpose. Governor Schwarzenegger issued a proclamation declaring a fiscal emergency, and calling a special session for this purpose, on December 6, 2010. Governor Brown issued a proclamation on January 20, 2011, declaring and reaffirming that a fiscal emergency exists and stating that his proclamation supersedes the earlier proclamation for purposes of that constitutional provision. This bill would state that it addresses the fiscal emergency declared and reaffirmed by the Governor by proclamation issued on January 20, 2011, pursuant to the California Constitution. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.
Bill Text
- Enrolled 09/12/11 - Enrolled Current pdf September 12, 2011
- Amended 09/02/11 - Amended Assembly pdf September 02, 2011
- Introduced 05/18/11 - Introduced pdf May 18, 2011
- SB8 View text html
Action History
-
Vetoed by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 1 p.m.
-
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 30. Noes 8. Page 242.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
-
In Senate.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 47. Noes 27. Page 318.) Ordered to the Senate.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 4.) (September 7).
-
Hearing postponed by committee.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on BUDGET.
-
Re-referred to Com. on BUDGET.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Consent granted to take up without reference to committee or file. (Ayes 47. Noes 22. Page 189.)
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 24. Noes 5. Page 108.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Ordered to second reading.
-
Withdrawn from committee.
-
Introduced. Read first time. Referred to Com. on RLS.
Sponsors
- Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 6 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 28 | 7 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 30 | 8 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 75% | 20% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Nay |
| DeSaulnier | — | Nay |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Nay |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Not Voting |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Not Voting |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wright | — | Nay |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| La Malfa | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 44 | 25 | 0 | 6 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 47 | 27 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 59% | 34% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Not Voting |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Halderman | — | Nay |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Not Voting |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Not Voting |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Nay |
| Portantino | — | Not Voting |
| Cook | — | Nay |
| Harkey | — | Not Voting |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Mendoza | — | Nay |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Nay |
| Torres | — | Not Voting |
| Valadao | — | Nay |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Achadjian | — | Nay |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Nay |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Allen, Benjamin | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 14 | 3 | 0 | 8 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 15 | 4 | 0 | 8 |
| % of votes cast | 56% | 15% | 0% | 30% |
How each member voted (27)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Not Voting |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Not Voting |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Not Voting |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Not Voting |
| Nestande | — | Not Voting |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Swanson | — | Nay |
| Valadao | — | Not Voting |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Not Voting |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| Allen, Benjamin | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 22 | 4 | 0 | 11 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 24 | 5 | 0 | 11 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 13% | 0% | 28% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cannella | — | Not Voting |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Emmerson | — | Not Voting |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Not Voting |
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Gaines | — | Nay |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Dutton | — | Not Voting |
| Huff | — | Not Voting |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Not Voting |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Not Voting |
| Harman | — | Not Voting |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| La Malfa | — | Nay |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 8 do?
- Existing law requires a redevelopment agency, for the 2009–10 and 2010–11 fiscal years, to deposit revenue payments in its county's Supplemental Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund for allocation to school entities. Existing law authorizes an agency, in order to make these payments, to borrow the amount required to be allocated to that agency's Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund and requires the agency to repay the borrowed funds by a specified date. This bill would authorize an agency to extend the date of repayment for the borrowed funds by 5 years. Existing law suspends various activities of redevelopment agencies and prohibits the agencies from incurring indebtedness for a specified period. Existing law also dissolves redevelopment agencies and community development agencies, as of October 1, 2011, and designates successor agencies, as defined. Existing law exempts from dissolution a redevelopment agency of a community where the city or county that created the agency participates in a voluntary alternative redevelopment program, as prescribed. Existing law requires a participating city or county to make specified remittances for deposit in the Special District Allocation Fund and authorizes that city or county to enter into an agreement with an agency whereby the agency would transfer a portion of its tax increment to the city or county for the purpose of financing specified activities. This bill would make technical, clarifying, and conforming changes to these provisions. The bill would modify provisions relating to agency indebtedness and the transfer of housing funds and responsibilities associated with dissolved redevelopment agencies. The bill would also provide, for the 2012–13 and 2013–14 fiscal years only, that an agreement to transfer tax increment between a city or county and an agency may include an additional amount to reimburse the city for a specified shortfall. The bill would make certain provisions operative only if a specified provision of law is operative. The bill would appropriate $1,000 from the General Fund to the Department of Finance for the costs to comply with the bill. The California Constitution authorizes the Governor to declare a fiscal emergency and to call the Legislature into special session for that purpose. Governor Schwarzenegger issued a proclamation declaring a fiscal emergency, and calling a special session for this purpose, on December 6, 2010. Governor Brown issued a proclamation on January 20, 2011, declaring and reaffirming that a fiscal emergency exists and stating that his proclamation supersedes the earlier proclamation for purposes of that constitutional provision. This bill would state that it addresses the fiscal emergency declared and reaffirmed by the Governor by proclamation issued on January 20, 2011, pursuant to the California Constitution. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.
- Who sponsors SB 8?
- SB 8 is sponsored by Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review.
- What is the current status of SB 8?
- This bill died with 2011-2012, 1st Special Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 8?
- Track SB 8 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 8
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 8
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →