California 2011-2012, 1st Special Session Status: Enacted

AB 32 — Education finance.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 15, Statutes of 2011-12 First Extraordinary Session.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced May 19, 2011. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 4 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

(1) Pursuant to existing law, the amount of General Fund revenues appropriated for school districts and community college districts is a component of calculations required for purposes of the provisions of the California Constitution requiring minimum funding for the public schools. Existing law states that specified sales and use tax revenues transferred pursuant to certain provisions of the Revenue and Taxation Code are not General Fund revenues for these purposes. This bill would make a technical change in this provision to correct a cross-reference. (2) Existing law establishes an education funding system under which the Superintendent of Public Instruction apportions to each qualifying school district state aid funds in an amount not to exceed its revenue limit, an amount that is largely based on the district's average daily attendance, which is computed as specified. Existing law authorizes specified school districts to calculate their revenue limits in a different manner if the school district includes a necessary small high school, which is defined as a high school with an average daily attendance of less than 301 that meets prescribed conditions. This bill would, for the purpose of calculating apportionments for school districts with necessary small high schools, authorize a school district to include average daily attendance in grades 7 and 8 and the instructors of grade 7 and 8 pupils in the calculation of average daily attendance and number of certificated employees employed in the 2011–12 fiscal year if the school district included average daily attendance in grades 7 and 8 and the instructors of grade 7 and 8 pupils in the calculation of average daily attendance and certificated employees employed in the 2010–11 fiscal year. (3) Existing law requires the governing board of each community college district to charge each student a fee, and sets that fee at $36 per unit per semester, effective with the fall term of 2011–12 academic year. Existing law repeals these provisions January 1, 2012, as specified. This bill instead would repeal these provisions May 1, 2011, as specified. (4) Existing law requires the governing board of each community college district to charge each student a fee, and sets that fee at $36 per unit per semester. Existing law requires this fee to be raised to $46 per unit per semester, effective with the winter term of the 2011–12 academic year, if the Director of Finance reduces specified appropriations as described above. Existing law makes these provisions operative January 1, 2012, as specified. This bill would specify that the raising of this fee to $46 per unit per semester would occur effective with the summer term of the 2012 calendar year. The bill would provide a statement of legislative intent relating to this delay in the fee increase. This bill instead would make these provisions operative May 1, 2011, as specified. (5) Existing law requires the Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges to adopt regulations for the payment of apportionments to community college districts. Existing law, notwithstanding the authority of the board of governors in this respect, makes various adjustments to the payment of these apportionments. This bill would specify that these adjustments would be operative commencing with the 2011–12 fiscal year. The bill would also specify certain apportionments that would be delayed from the months of January to June, inclusive, 2011, until July 2011. The bill would appropriate $832,000,000 from the General Fund to the Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges for apportionment to community college districts, for expenditure during the 2011–12 fiscal year, to be expended in accordance with a specified item of the Budget Act of 2010. (6) An existing item of the Budget Act of 2011 reappropriates 19 balances from various General Fund budget items to the State Department of Education for specified purposes. This bill would amend this item to delete one of these balances and to add 12 more of these balances, thereby making an appropriation. (7) The funds appropriated by this bill would be applied toward the minimum funding requirements for school districts and community college districts imposed by Section 8 of Article XVI of the California Constitution. (8) The California Constitution authorizes the Governor to declare a fiscal emergency and to call the Legislature into special session for that purpose. Governor Schwarzenegger issued a proclamation declaring a fiscal emergency, and calling a special session for this purpose, on December 6, 2010. Governor Brown issued a proclamation on January 20, 2011, declaring and reaffirming that a fiscal emergency exists and stating that his proclamation supersedes the earlier proclamation for purposes of that constitutional provision. This bill would state that it addresses the fiscal emergency declared and reaffirmed by the Governor by proclamation issued on January 20, 2011, pursuant to the California Constitution. (9) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 15, Statutes of 2011-12 First Extraordinary Session.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 11 a.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 49. Noes 27. Page 316.).

  5. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.

  6. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 22. Noes 13. Page 233.).

  7. Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.

  8. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 9. Noes 4.) (September 6).

  9. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on B. & F.R.

  10. Referred to Com. on B. & F.R.

  11. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  12. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 49. Noes 21. Page 184.)

  13. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  14. (Page 171.)

  15. Ordered to second reading.

  16. Without reference to committee.

  17. From printer.

  18. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Blumenfield · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 6 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Blumenfield

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 49 Yea · 27 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 462504
Republican 0200
Democratic 3000
Total 492704
% of votes cast 61%34%0%5%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Chesbro — Yea
Davis — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Hagman — Nay
Eng — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Butler — Yea
Carter — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Perea — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Swanson — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Garrick — Nay
Campos — Yea
Gorell — Not Voting
Bonilla — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Fletcher — Nay
Halderman — Nay
Portantino — Not Voting
Hall — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Jeffries — Nay
Knight — Nay
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Conway — Nay
Cook — Nay
Donnelly — Nay
Lara — Yea
Logue — Nay
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Nay
Monning — Yea
Nestande — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Olsen — Nay
Pan — Yea
Smyth — Nay
Solorio — Not Voting
Valadao — Nay
Wagner — Nay
Achadjian — Nay
Alejo — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Huber — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Ma — Yea
Mansoor — Nay
Morrell — Nay
Norby — Nay
Silva — Nay
Torres — Not Voting
Wieckowski — Yea
Williams — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Bonnie Lowenthal — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 22 Yea · 13 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 201205
Democratic 2000
Republican 0100
Total 221305
% of votes cast 55%33%0%13%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Cannella — Nay
Wyland — Nay
Corbett — Yea
Emmerson — Nay
Evans — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Yee — Yea
Dutton — Nay
Lowenthal — Yea
De León — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Negrete McLeod — Yea
Huff — Nay
Liu — Yea
Price — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Runner — Nay
Rubio — Not Voting
Fuller — Not Voting
Correa — Not Voting
Anderson — Nay
Blakeslee — Nay
Walters — Not Voting
Alquist — Yea
Harman — Nay
Hernandez — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Leno — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Vargas — Yea
Wright — Not Voting
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
La Malfa — Nay
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 9 Yea · 4 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 9403
Total 9403
% of votes cast 56%25%0%19%
How each member voted (16)
Member Party Vote
Emmerson — Nay
DeSaulnier — Yea
Evans — Yea
Fuller — Not Voting
Lowenthal — Yea
Rubio — Not Voting
Anderson — Nay
Hancock — Yea
Huff — Nay
Leno — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Alquist — Not Voting
Liu — Yea
Wright — Yea
La Malfa — Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 49 Yea · 21 Nay · 10 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 4619010
Democratic 3000
Republican 0200
Total 4921010
% of votes cast 61%26%0%13%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Campos — Yea
Cook — Nay
Eng — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Hagman — Nay
Halderman — Nay
Butler — Yea
Hill — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Ma — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Portantino — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Conway — Nay
Achadjian — Nay
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Davis — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Hueso — Yea
Jeffries — Nay
Bonilla — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Lara — Yea
Logue — Nay
Mendoza — Yea
Monning — Yea
Olsen — Nay
Silva — Nay
Solorio — Yea
Valadao — Nay
Wagner — Nay
Fletcher — Not Voting
Garrick — Not Voting
Gorell — Not Voting
Carter — Not Voting
Cedillo — Not Voting
Donnelly — Nay
Miller — Not Voting
Morrell — Nay
Nestande — Not Voting
Nielsen — Nay
Alejo — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Huber — Yea
Knight — Nay
Mansoor — Nay
Norby — Nay
Pan — Yea
Perea — Yea
Smyth — Not Voting
Torres — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Williams — Yea
Beth Gaines — Not Voting
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Bonnie Lowenthal — Yea
Roger Hernández — Not Voting
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 32 do?
(1) Pursuant to existing law, the amount of General Fund revenues appropriated for school districts and community college districts is a component of calculations required for purposes of the provisions of the California Constitution requiring minimum funding for the public schools. Existing law states that specified sales and use tax revenues transferred pursuant to certain provisions of the Revenue and Taxation Code are not General Fund revenues for these purposes. This bill would make a technical change in this provision to correct a cross-reference. (2) Existing law establishes an education funding system under which the Superintendent of Public Instruction apportions to each qualifying school district state aid funds in an amount not to exceed its revenue limit, an amount that is largely based on the district's average daily attendance, which is computed as specified. Existing law authorizes specified school districts to calculate their revenue limits in a different manner if the school district includes a necessary small high school, which is defined as a high school with an average daily attendance of less than 301 that meets prescribed conditions. This bill would, for the purpose of calculating apportionments for school districts with necessary small high schools, authorize a school district to include average daily attendance in grades 7 and 8 and the instructors of grade 7 and 8 pupils in the calculation of average daily attendance and number of certificated employees employed in the 2011–12 fiscal year if the school district included average daily attendance in grades 7 and 8 and the instructors of grade 7 and 8 pupils in the calculation of average daily attendance and certificated employees employed in the 2010–11 fiscal year. (3) Existing law requires the governing board of each community college district to charge each student a fee, and sets that fee at $36 per unit per semester, effective with the fall term of 2011–12 academic year. Existing law repeals these provisions January 1, 2012, as specified. This bill instead would repeal these provisions May 1, 2011, as specified. (4) Existing law requires the governing board of each community college district to charge each student a fee, and sets that fee at $36 per unit per semester. Existing law requires this fee to be raised to $46 per unit per semester, effective with the winter term of the 2011–12 academic year, if the Director of Finance reduces specified appropriations as described above. Existing law makes these provisions operative January 1, 2012, as specified. This bill would specify that the raising of this fee to $46 per unit per semester would occur effective with the summer term of the 2012 calendar year. The bill would provide a statement of legislative intent relating to this delay in the fee increase. This bill instead would make these provisions operative May 1, 2011, as specified. (5) Existing law requires the Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges to adopt regulations for the payment of apportionments to community college districts. Existing law, notwithstanding the authority of the board of governors in this respect, makes various adjustments to the payment of these apportionments. This bill would specify that these adjustments would be operative commencing with the 2011–12 fiscal year. The bill would also specify certain apportionments that would be delayed from the months of January to June, inclusive, 2011, until July 2011. The bill would appropriate $832,000,000 from the General Fund to the Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges for apportionment to community college districts, for expenditure during the 2011–12 fiscal year, to be expended in accordance with a specified item of the Budget Act of 2010. (6) An existing item of the Budget Act of 2011 reappropriates 19 balances from various General Fund budget items to the State Department of Education for specified purposes. This bill would amend this item to delete one of these balances and to add 12 more of these balances, thereby making an appropriation. (7) The funds appropriated by this bill would be applied toward the minimum funding requirements for school districts and community college districts imposed by Section 8 of Article XVI of the California Constitution. (8) The California Constitution authorizes the Governor to declare a fiscal emergency and to call the Legislature into special session for that purpose. Governor Schwarzenegger issued a proclamation declaring a fiscal emergency, and calling a special session for this purpose, on December 6, 2010. Governor Brown issued a proclamation on January 20, 2011, declaring and reaffirming that a fiscal emergency exists and stating that his proclamation supersedes the earlier proclamation for purposes of that constitutional provision. This bill would state that it addresses the fiscal emergency declared and reaffirmed by the Governor by proclamation issued on January 20, 2011, pursuant to the California Constitution. (9) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.
Who sponsors AB 32?
AB 32 is sponsored by Blumenfield.
What is the current status of AB 32?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced May 19, 2011. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 32?
Track AB 32 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 32

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 32

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →