California 2011-2012, 1st Special Session Status: Enacted

AB 27 — Voluntary Alternative Redevelopment Program.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 6, Statutes of 2011-12 First Extraordinary Session.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced May 19, 2011. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 3 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

The Community Redevelopment Law authorizes the establishment of redevelopment agencies in communities to address the effects of blight, as defined, in those communities and requires agencies to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and to approve a redevelopment plan for each project area. This bill would, notwithstanding specified law, upon the enactment of specified legislation concerning redevelopment, establish a voluntary alternative redevelopment program whereby a redevelopment agency would be authorized to continue to exist upon the enactment of an ordinance by the community to comply with the bill's provisions. The bill would require the city or county that created a redevelopment agency to notify the county auditor-controller, the Controller, and the Department of Finance on or before November 1, 2011, that the community will comply with the bill's provisions. The bill would require a participating city or county to make specified remittances to the county auditor-controller, who shall allocate the remittances for deposit into a Special District Allocation Fund, for specified allocation to certain special districts, and into the county Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund, as prescribed. The bill would authorize the city or county to enter into an agreement with the redevelopment agency in that jurisdiction, whereby the redevelopment agency would transfer a portion of its tax increment to the city or county for the purpose of financing certain activities within the redevelopment area, as specified. The bill would impose specified sanctions on a city or county that fails to make the required remittances, as determined by the Director of Finance. This bill would authorize the county auditor-controller to charge a fee that does not exceed the reasonable costs to the county auditor-controller to implement the provisions of this bill. This bill would authorize a community to establish a new redevelopment agency only after the debt obligations of the former redevelopment agency have been retired and the community satisfies the provisions of this bill, as specified. The bill would appropriate $500,000 from the General Fund to the Department of Finance for the costs to comply with the bill. The California Constitution authorizes the Governor to declare a fiscal emergency and to call the Legislature into special session for that purpose. Governor Schwarzenegger issued a proclamation declaring a fiscal emergency, and calling a special session for this purpose, on December 6, 2010. Governor Brown issued a proclamation on January 20, 2011, declaring and reaffirming that a fiscal emergency exists and stating that his proclamation supersedes the earlier proclamation for purposes of that constitutional provision. This bill would state that it addresses the fiscal emergency declared and reaffirmed by the Governor by proclamation issued on January 20, 2011, pursuant to the California Constitution. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 6, Statutes of 2011-12 First Extraordinary Session.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4:15 p.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 47. Noes 31. Page 214.).

  5. Assembly Rule 77 suspended. (Page 214.)

  6. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after June 17 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  7. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 21. Noes 16. Page 150.).

  8. Senate Rule 29.3 suspended. (Ayes 24. Noes 14. Page 147.)

  9. Read third time and amended.

  10. Ordered to third reading.

  11. Withdrawn from committee.

  12. Joint Rule 10.5 suspended. (Page 146.)

  13. Pursuant to Joint Rule 33.1,

  14. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on B. & F.R.

  15. Referred to Com. on B. & F.R.

  16. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  17. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 49. Noes 21. Page 181.)

  18. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  19. (Page 171.)

  20. Ordered to second reading.

  21. Without reference to committee.

  22. From printer.

  23. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Blumenfield · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 7 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Blumenfield

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

3rd Supp 1 AB27 Blumenfield By Leno

Passed 21 Yea · 16 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 201502
Democratic 1001
Republican 0100
Total 211603
% of votes cast 53%40%0%8%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Emmerson — Nay
Fuller — Nay
Yee — Nay
Hancock — Yea
Wyland — Nay
Cannella — Nay
Lowenthal — Yea
De León — Yea
Evans — Yea
Negrete McLeod — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Correa — Nay
Rubio — Not Voting
Runner — Not Voting
Harman — Nay
DeSaulnier — Yea
Dutton — Nay
Anderson — Nay
Hernandez — Yea
Huff — Nay
Leno — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Price — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Nay
Wolk — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Blakeslee — Nay
Kehoe — Yea
Liu — Yea
Vargas — Yea
Wright — Nay
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Nay
La Malfa — Nay
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Not Voting
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

AB 27 BLUMENFIELD Concurrence in Senate Amendments

Passed 47 Yea · 31 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 442902
Democratic 3000
Republican 0200
Total 473102
% of votes cast 59%39%0%3%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Eng — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Garrick — Nay
Hagman — Nay
Feuer — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Butler — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Hill — Yea
Huber — Yea
Campos — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Carter — Yea
Jeffries — Nay
Cedillo — Yea
Lara — Yea
Portantino — Nay
Fletcher — Nay
Alejo — Nay
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Conway — Nay
Cook — Nay
Davis — Yea
Logue — Nay
Miller — Nay
Monning — Yea
Nestande — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Olsen — Nay
Pan — Yea
Silva — Nay
Skinner — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Swanson — Nay
Valadao — Nay
Wagner — Nay
Williams — Yea
Gorell — Not Voting
Halderman — Not Voting
Donnelly — Nay
Mendoza — Nay
Morrell — Nay
Achadjian — Nay
Ammiano — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Knight — Nay
Ma — Yea
Mansoor — Nay
Norby — Nay
Perea — Yea
Smyth — Nay
Torres — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Bonnie Lowenthal — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Nay
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

AB 27 BLUMENFIELD Assembly Third Reading

Passed 49 Yea · 21 Nay · 10 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 4619010
Republican 0200
Democratic 3000
Total 4921010
% of votes cast 61%26%0%13%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Eng — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Hall — Yea
Butler — Yea
Williams — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Campos — Yea
Portantino — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Garrick — Not Voting
Gordon — Yea
Gorell — Not Voting
Carter — Not Voting
Hagman — Nay
Bonilla — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Halderman — Nay
Harkey — Nay
Cedillo — Not Voting
Hayashi — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Fletcher — Not Voting
Knight — Nay
Ammiano — Yea
Block — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Conway — Nay
Cook — Nay
Davis — Yea
Donnelly — Nay
Lara — Yea
Logue — Nay
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Not Voting
Monning — Yea
Morrell — Nay
Nestande — Not Voting
Norby — Nay
Olsen — Nay
Perea — Yea
Silva — Nay
Smyth — Not Voting
Solorio — Yea
Torres — Yea
Valadao — Nay
Wieckowski — Yea
Achadjian — Nay
Alejo — Yea
Beall — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huber — Yea
Jeffries — Nay
Ma — Yea
Mansoor — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Pan — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Beth Gaines — Not Voting
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Bonnie Lowenthal — Yea
Roger Hernández — Not Voting
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

finance housing
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 27 do?
The Community Redevelopment Law authorizes the establishment of redevelopment agencies in communities to address the effects of blight, as defined, in those communities and requires agencies to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and to approve a redevelopment plan for each project area. This bill would, notwithstanding specified law, upon the enactment of specified legislation concerning redevelopment, establish a voluntary alternative redevelopment program whereby a redevelopment agency would be authorized to continue to exist upon the enactment of an ordinance by the community to comply with the bill's provisions. The bill would require the city or county that created a redevelopment agency to notify the county auditor-controller, the Controller, and the Department of Finance on or before November 1, 2011, that the community will comply with the bill's provisions. The bill would require a participating city or county to make specified remittances to the county auditor-controller, who shall allocate the remittances for deposit into a Special District Allocation Fund, for specified allocation to certain special districts, and into the county Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund, as prescribed. The bill would authorize the city or county to enter into an agreement with the redevelopment agency in that jurisdiction, whereby the redevelopment agency would transfer a portion of its tax increment to the city or county for the purpose of financing certain activities within the redevelopment area, as specified. The bill would impose specified sanctions on a city or county that fails to make the required remittances, as determined by the Director of Finance. This bill would authorize the county auditor-controller to charge a fee that does not exceed the reasonable costs to the county auditor-controller to implement the provisions of this bill. This bill would authorize a community to establish a new redevelopment agency only after the debt obligations of the former redevelopment agency have been retired and the community satisfies the provisions of this bill, as specified. The bill would appropriate $500,000 from the General Fund to the Department of Finance for the costs to comply with the bill. The California Constitution authorizes the Governor to declare a fiscal emergency and to call the Legislature into special session for that purpose. Governor Schwarzenegger issued a proclamation declaring a fiscal emergency, and calling a special session for this purpose, on December 6, 2010. Governor Brown issued a proclamation on January 20, 2011, declaring and reaffirming that a fiscal emergency exists and stating that his proclamation supersedes the earlier proclamation for purposes of that constitutional provision. This bill would state that it addresses the fiscal emergency declared and reaffirmed by the Governor by proclamation issued on January 20, 2011, pursuant to the California Constitution. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.
Who sponsors AB 27?
AB 27 is sponsored by Blumenfield.
What is the current status of AB 27?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced May 19, 2011. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 27?
Track AB 27 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 27

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 27

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →