Budget Act of 2011: Director of Finance: reductions.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 6 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 6.
You're tracking SB 6
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 6 — Budget Act of 2011: Director of Finance: reductions.
Last action — Vetoed by the Governor.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2011-2012, 1st Special Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
(1) Existing law requires the Legislature to pass a Budget Bill making appropriations for the support of state government for the ensuing fiscal year. The Budget Act of 2011 requires the Director of Finance to forecast General Fund revenues for the 2011–12 fiscal year by December 15, 2011, and to determine whether that revenue forecast or the Legislative Analyst's November 2011 General Fund revenue forecast is higher. The Director of Finance is required to make reductions to specified items of appropriation if the higher revenue forecast is less than $87,452,500,000 and to make additional reductions to specified items of appropriation if the higher revenue forecast is less than $86,452,500,000. This bill would require the director to meet specified requirements if the director proposes to reduce an item of appropriation pursuant to these provisions. (2) Existing law requires the governing board of each community college district to charge each student a fee, and sets that fee at $36 per unit per semester, effective with the fall term of the 2011–12 academic year. Existing law repeals these provisions January 1, 2012, as specified. This bill instead would repeal these provisions May 1, 2012, as specified. (3) Existing law requires this fee to be raised to $46 per unit per semester, effective with the winter term of the 2011–12 academic year, if the Director of Finance reduces specified appropriations as described above. These provisions become operative January 1, 2012, as specified. This bill would specify that the raising of this fee to $46 per unit per semester would occur effective with the summer term of the 2012 calendar year. This bill would make this provision operative May 1, 2012, as specified. The bill would provide a statement of legislative intent relating to this delay in the fee increase. (4) The bill would appropriate $1,000 from the General Fund to the Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges for general operation costs of the board. (5) The California Constitution authorizes the Governor to declare a fiscal emergency and to call the Legislature into special session for that purpose. Governor Schwarzenegger issued a proclamation declaring a fiscal emergency, and calling a special session for this purpose, on December 6, 2010. Governor Brown issued a proclamation on January 20, 2011, declaring and reaffirming that a fiscal emergency exists and stating that his proclamation supersedes the earlier proclamation for purposes of that constitutional provision. This bill would state that it addresses the fiscal emergency declared and reaffirmed by the Governor by proclamation issued on January 20, 2011, pursuant to the California Constitution. (6) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.
Bill Text
- Enrolled 09/12/11 - Enrolled Current pdf September 12, 2011
- Amended 09/06/11 - Amended Assembly pdf September 06, 2011
- Amended 09/01/11 - Amended Assembly pdf September 01, 2011
- Introduced 05/18/11 - Introduced pdf May 18, 2011
- SB6 View text html
Action History
-
Vetoed by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3:30 p.m.
-
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 23. Noes 16. Page 243.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
-
In Senate.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 48. Noes 27. Page 317.) Ordered to the Senate.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 16. Noes 11.) (September 7).
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on BUDGET.
-
Hearing postponed by committee.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on BUDGET.
-
Re-referred to Com. on BUDGET.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Consent granted to take up without reference to committee or file. (Ayes 47. Noes 22. Page 189.)
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 24. Noes 5. Page 107.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Ordered to second reading.
-
Withdrawn from committee.
-
Introduced. Read first time. Referred to Com. on RLS.
Sponsors
- Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 6 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 21 | 15 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 23 | 16 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 58% | 40% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Correa | — | Not Voting |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Cannella | — | Nay |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Nay |
| Blakeslee | — | Nay |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Nay |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Nay |
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| La Malfa | — | Nay |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 45 | 25 | 0 | 5 |
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 48 | 27 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 34% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Cook | — | Nay |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Valadao | — | Nay |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Nay |
| Portantino | — | Not Voting |
| Galgiani | — | Not Voting |
| Gorell | — | Not Voting |
| Halderman | — | Nay |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Perea | — | Not Voting |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Solorio | — | Not Voting |
| Achadjian | — | Nay |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Nay |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Allen, Benjamin | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 15 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 16 | 11 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 59% | 41% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (27)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Nay |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Valadao | — | Nay |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Allen, Benjamin | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 22 | 4 | 0 | 11 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 24 | 5 | 0 | 11 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 13% | 0% | 28% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Emmerson | — | Not Voting |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Not Voting |
| Cannella | — | Not Voting |
| Gaines | — | Nay |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Harman | — | Not Voting |
| Huff | — | Not Voting |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Dutton | — | Not Voting |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Not Voting |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Not Voting |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| La Malfa | — | Nay |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 6 do?
- (1) Existing law requires the Legislature to pass a Budget Bill making appropriations for the support of state government for the ensuing fiscal year. The Budget Act of 2011 requires the Director of Finance to forecast General Fund revenues for the 2011–12 fiscal year by December 15, 2011, and to determine whether that revenue forecast or the Legislative Analyst's November 2011 General Fund revenue forecast is higher. The Director of Finance is required to make reductions to specified items of appropriation if the higher revenue forecast is less than $87,452,500,000 and to make additional reductions to specified items of appropriation if the higher revenue forecast is less than $86,452,500,000. This bill would require the director to meet specified requirements if the director proposes to reduce an item of appropriation pursuant to these provisions. (2) Existing law requires the governing board of each community college district to charge each student a fee, and sets that fee at $36 per unit per semester, effective with the fall term of the 2011–12 academic year. Existing law repeals these provisions January 1, 2012, as specified. This bill instead would repeal these provisions May 1, 2012, as specified. (3) Existing law requires this fee to be raised to $46 per unit per semester, effective with the winter term of the 2011–12 academic year, if the Director of Finance reduces specified appropriations as described above. These provisions become operative January 1, 2012, as specified. This bill would specify that the raising of this fee to $46 per unit per semester would occur effective with the summer term of the 2012 calendar year. This bill would make this provision operative May 1, 2012, as specified. The bill would provide a statement of legislative intent relating to this delay in the fee increase. (4) The bill would appropriate $1,000 from the General Fund to the Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges for general operation costs of the board. (5) The California Constitution authorizes the Governor to declare a fiscal emergency and to call the Legislature into special session for that purpose. Governor Schwarzenegger issued a proclamation declaring a fiscal emergency, and calling a special session for this purpose, on December 6, 2010. Governor Brown issued a proclamation on January 20, 2011, declaring and reaffirming that a fiscal emergency exists and stating that his proclamation supersedes the earlier proclamation for purposes of that constitutional provision. This bill would state that it addresses the fiscal emergency declared and reaffirmed by the Governor by proclamation issued on January 20, 2011, pursuant to the California Constitution. (6) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.
- Who sponsors SB 6?
- SB 6 is sponsored by Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review.
- What is the current status of SB 6?
- This bill died with 2011-2012, 1st Special Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 6?
- Track SB 6 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 6
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 6
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →