California 2011-2012, 1st Special Session Status: To Executive

SB 6 — Budget Act of 2011: Director of Finance: reductions.

Last action — Vetoed by the Governor.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2011-2012, 1st Special Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

(1) Existing law requires the Legislature to pass a Budget Bill making appropriations for the support of state government for the ensuing fiscal year. The Budget Act of 2011 requires the Director of Finance to forecast General Fund revenues for the 2011–12 fiscal year by December 15, 2011, and to determine whether that revenue forecast or the Legislative Analyst's November 2011 General Fund revenue forecast is higher. The Director of Finance is required to make reductions to specified items of appropriation if the higher revenue forecast is less than $87,452,500,000 and to make additional reductions to specified items of appropriation if the higher revenue forecast is less than $86,452,500,000. This bill would require the director to meet specified requirements if the director proposes to reduce an item of appropriation pursuant to these provisions. (2) Existing law requires the governing board of each community college district to charge each student a fee, and sets that fee at $36 per unit per semester, effective with the fall term of the 2011–12 academic year. Existing law repeals these provisions January 1, 2012, as specified. This bill instead would repeal these provisions May 1, 2012, as specified. (3) Existing law requires this fee to be raised to $46 per unit per semester, effective with the winter term of the 2011–12 academic year, if the Director of Finance reduces specified appropriations as described above. These provisions become operative January 1, 2012, as specified. This bill would specify that the raising of this fee to $46 per unit per semester would occur effective with the summer term of the 2012 calendar year. This bill would make this provision operative May 1, 2012, as specified. The bill would provide a statement of legislative intent relating to this delay in the fee increase. (4) The bill would appropriate $1,000 from the General Fund to the Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges for general operation costs of the board. (5) The California Constitution authorizes the Governor to declare a fiscal emergency and to call the Legislature into special session for that purpose. Governor Schwarzenegger issued a proclamation declaring a fiscal emergency, and calling a special session for this purpose, on December 6, 2010. Governor Brown issued a proclamation on January 20, 2011, declaring and reaffirming that a fiscal emergency exists and stating that his proclamation supersedes the earlier proclamation for purposes of that constitutional provision. This bill would state that it addresses the fiscal emergency declared and reaffirmed by the Governor by proclamation issued on January 20, 2011, pursuant to the California Constitution. (6) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Vetoed by the Governor.

  2. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3:30 p.m.

  3. Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 23. Noes 16. Page 243.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.

  4. In Senate.

  5. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 48. Noes 27. Page 317.) Ordered to the Senate.

  6. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  7. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 16. Noes 11.) (September 7).

  8. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on BUDGET.

  9. Hearing postponed by committee.

  10. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on BUDGET.

  11. Re-referred to Com. on BUDGET.

  12. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  13. Consent granted to take up without reference to committee or file. (Ayes 47. Noes 22. Page 189.)

  14. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  15. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 24. Noes 5. Page 107.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  16. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  17. Ordered to second reading.

  18. Withdrawn from committee.

  19. Introduced. Read first time. Referred to Com. on RLS.

Sponsors

  • Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 6 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 23 Yea · 16 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 211501
Democratic 2000
Republican 0100
Total 231601
% of votes cast 58%40%0%3%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Emmerson — Nay
Correa — Not Voting
Fuller — Nay
Yee — Yea
Wyland — Nay
Cannella — Nay
Lowenthal — Yea
De León — Yea
Negrete McLeod — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Evans — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Harman — Nay
Blakeslee — Nay
DeSaulnier — Yea
Dutton — Nay
Huff — Nay
Kehoe — Yea
Leno — Yea
Liu — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Vargas — Yea
Wolk — Nay
Runner — Nay
Anderson — Nay
Alquist — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Price — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Nay
Wright — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
La Malfa — Nay
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 48 Yea · 27 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 452505
Republican 0200
Democratic 3000
Total 482705
% of votes cast 60%34%0%6%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Eng — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Hagman — Nay
Yamada — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Garrick — Nay
Gatto — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Hayashi — Yea
Butler — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Huber — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Campos — Yea
Lara — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Monning — Yea
Olsen — Nay
Ammiano — Yea
Beall — Yea
Carter — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Conway — Nay
Cook — Nay
Davis — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Pan — Yea
Smyth — Nay
Swanson — Yea
Valadao — Nay
Wagner — Nay
Williams — Yea
Fletcher — Nay
Portantino — Not Voting
Galgiani — Not Voting
Gorell — Not Voting
Halderman — Nay
Jeffries — Nay
Donnelly — Nay
Knight — Nay
Miller — Nay
Morrell — Nay
Nestande — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Perea — Not Voting
Silva — Nay
Solorio — Not Voting
Achadjian — Nay
Alejo — Yea
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Logue — Nay
Ma — Yea
Mansoor — Nay
Norby — Nay
Skinner — Yea
Torres — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Bonnie Lowenthal — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 16 Yea · 11 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 151000
Democratic 1000
Republican 0100
Total 161100
% of votes cast 59%41%0%0%
How each member voted (27)
Member Party Vote
Dickinson — Yea
Butler — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Huffman — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Jeffries — Nay
Mitchell — Yea
Logue — Nay
Monning — Yea
Morrell — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Swanson — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Mansoor — Nay
Nestande — Nay
Valadao — Nay
Wagner — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 24 Yea · 5 Nay · 11 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 224011
Democratic 2000
Republican 0100
Total 245011
% of votes cast 60%13%0%28%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Emmerson — Not Voting
Correa — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Yee — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Wyland — Nay
Lowenthal — Yea
De León — Yea
Negrete McLeod — Yea
Evans — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Fuller — Not Voting
Cannella — Not Voting
Gaines — Nay
Runner — Not Voting
Harman — Not Voting
Huff — Not Voting
Kehoe — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Liu — Yea
Anderson — Nay
Dutton — Not Voting
Pavley — Yea
Price — Yea
Simitian — Not Voting
Vargas — Yea
Walters — Not Voting
Wright — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Blakeslee — Not Voting
Hernandez — Yea
Leno — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
La Malfa — Nay
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 6 do?
(1) Existing law requires the Legislature to pass a Budget Bill making appropriations for the support of state government for the ensuing fiscal year. The Budget Act of 2011 requires the Director of Finance to forecast General Fund revenues for the 2011–12 fiscal year by December 15, 2011, and to determine whether that revenue forecast or the Legislative Analyst's November 2011 General Fund revenue forecast is higher. The Director of Finance is required to make reductions to specified items of appropriation if the higher revenue forecast is less than $87,452,500,000 and to make additional reductions to specified items of appropriation if the higher revenue forecast is less than $86,452,500,000. This bill would require the director to meet specified requirements if the director proposes to reduce an item of appropriation pursuant to these provisions. (2) Existing law requires the governing board of each community college district to charge each student a fee, and sets that fee at $36 per unit per semester, effective with the fall term of the 2011–12 academic year. Existing law repeals these provisions January 1, 2012, as specified. This bill instead would repeal these provisions May 1, 2012, as specified. (3) Existing law requires this fee to be raised to $46 per unit per semester, effective with the winter term of the 2011–12 academic year, if the Director of Finance reduces specified appropriations as described above. These provisions become operative January 1, 2012, as specified. This bill would specify that the raising of this fee to $46 per unit per semester would occur effective with the summer term of the 2012 calendar year. This bill would make this provision operative May 1, 2012, as specified. The bill would provide a statement of legislative intent relating to this delay in the fee increase. (4) The bill would appropriate $1,000 from the General Fund to the Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges for general operation costs of the board. (5) The California Constitution authorizes the Governor to declare a fiscal emergency and to call the Legislature into special session for that purpose. Governor Schwarzenegger issued a proclamation declaring a fiscal emergency, and calling a special session for this purpose, on December 6, 2010. Governor Brown issued a proclamation on January 20, 2011, declaring and reaffirming that a fiscal emergency exists and stating that his proclamation supersedes the earlier proclamation for purposes of that constitutional provision. This bill would state that it addresses the fiscal emergency declared and reaffirmed by the Governor by proclamation issued on January 20, 2011, pursuant to the California Constitution. (6) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.
Who sponsors SB 6?
SB 6 is sponsored by Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review.
What is the current status of SB 6?
This bill died with 2011-2012, 1st Special Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 6?
Track SB 6 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 6

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 6

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →