New Hampshire 2026 Session Status: Enacted 9 R cosponsors

HB 1563 — relative to the special education aid formula and the administration and monitoring of state special education aid.

Last action — Signed by Governor Ayotte 07/02/2026; Chapter 232; eff. 7/1/2028

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed House
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced December 10, 2025. Enacted.

Signed by Governor Kelly Ayotte (Republican) on July 10, 2026.

Odds of enactment

High chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 62% · moderate confidence
  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 9 sponsors

    1 primary, 8 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (9 R).

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

In plain language

This bill modifies the special education aid formula and its administration.

The bill updates the formula used to allocate special education aid. It also addresses how this aid is managed and monitored at the state level.

Summary

(New Title) relative to the special education aid formula and the administration and monitoring of state special education aid.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

147 added · 245 removed

Plain-language change summary

The amendments to Bill HB 1563 clarify how financial aid for special education will be distributed to school districts. Specifically, the threshold for receiving aid has been lowered from three times the average state expenditure per pupil to two and a half times. This change is significant because it potentially allows more districts to receive aid for students with high special education costs, which could help address funding inequities and support those students more effectively.

→
Previous
Latest
HB 1563-FN-LOCAL - VERSION ADOPTED BY BOTH BODIES 19Feb2026...
CHAPTER 232 HB 1563-FN-LOCAL - FINAL VERSION 19Feb2026...
HB 1563-FN-LOCAL - VERSION ADOPTED BY BOTH BODIES 19Feb2026...
CHAPTER 232 HB 1563-FN-LOCAL - FINAL VERSION 19Feb2026...
1 Legislative Intent.
232:1 Legislative Intent.
2 Education;
232:2 Education;
III.(a) For the fiscal year ending June 30, 2029, based upon school year 2027-2028 costs, and for each fiscal year thereafter, [The] the department of education shall distribute aid available under this paragraph as entitlement to such school districts as have a special education pupil for whose costs they are responsible, for whom the costs of special education in the fiscal year exceed [3] 2 and 1/2 times the most current state average expenditure per pupil for the school year preceding the year of distribution.If in any year, the amount appropriated for distribution as special education aid in accordance with this section is insufficient therefor, the appropriation shall be prorated proportionally based on entitlement among the districts entitled to a grant, provided that the department of education shall distribute to the school district not less than 80 percent of the district's entitlement in the fiscal year.
III.(a) For the fiscal year ending June 30, 2029, based upon school year 2027-2028 costs, and for each fiscal year thereafter, [The] the department of education shall distribute aid available under this paragraph as entitlement to such school districts as have a special education pupil for whose costs they are responsible, for whom the costs of special education in the fiscal year exceed [3] 2 and 1/2 times the most current state average expenditure per pupil for the school year preceding the year of distribution.
If in any year, the amount appropriated for distribution as special education aid in accordance with this section is insufficient therefor, the appropriation shall be prorated proportionally based on entitlement among the districts entitled to a grant, provided that the department of education shall distribute to the school district not less than 80 percent of the district's entitlement in the fiscal year.
HB 1563-FN-LOCAL - VERSION ADOPTED BY BOTH BODIES - Page 2 - [(b) The school district shall be liable for 3 and 1/2 times the estimated state average expenditure per pupil for the school year preceding the year of distribution, plus 20 percent of the additional cost, up to 10 times the estimated state average expenditure per pupil for the school year preceding the year of distribution.] (b) The school district shall be liable for the following amounts, calculated using the most current state average expenditure per pupil for the school year preceding the year of distribution:
[(b) The school district shall be liable for 3 and 1/2 times the estimated state average expenditure per pupil for the school year preceding the year of distribution, plus 20 percent of the additional cost, up to 10 times the estimated state average expenditure per pupil for the school year preceding the year of distribution.] CHAPTER 232 HB 1563-FN-LOCAL - FINAL VERSION - Page 2 - (b) The school district shall be liable for the following amounts, calculated using the most current state average expenditure per pupil for the school year preceding the year of distribution:
3 New Paragraph;
232:3 New Paragraph;
HB 1563-FN-LOCAL - VERSION ADOPTED BY BOTH BODIES - Page 3 - (a) In calculating costs associated with an individual student, the costs shall be incurred solely as a result of the provision of special education and related services to the student’s individual education program pursuant to RSA 186-C:7.
(a) In calculating costs associated with an individual student, the costs shall be incurred solely as a result of the provision of special education and related services to the student’s individual education program pursuant to RSA 186-C:7.
(c) The district shall demonstrate and document that it has fully accessed, to the maximum extent possible, other available revenue sources, including Medicaid and private insurance, or provide documentation as to why other revenue sources were unavailable to the district for special education aid.
CHAPTER 232 HB 1563-FN-LOCAL - FINAL VERSION - Page 3 - (c) The district shall demonstrate and document that it has fully accessed, to the maximum extent possible, other available revenue sources, including Medicaid and private insurance, or provide documentation as to why other revenue sources were unavailable to the district for special education aid.
(e) A pupil's local education agency (LEA) shall provide documentation on the specific costs being claimed for each student.
(e) A pupil's local education agency (LEA) shall provide documentation on the specific costs being claimed for each studentIf there are questions about an LEA's claim and its costs are not documented, the claim may be disqualified.
If there are questions about an LEA's claim and its costs are not documented, the claim may be disqualified.
All services included in the claim shall be specified in the IEP, and tied to the child's disability-related needs and programs.
All services included in the claim shall be specified in the IEP, and tied to the child's disability- related needs and programs.
4 New Section;
232:4 New Section;
HB 1563-FN-LOCAL - VERSION ADOPTED BY BOTH BODIES - Page 4 - III.
III.
(c) If systemic errors are identified, the department may take additional measures, including:
CHAPTER 232 HB 1563-FN-LOCAL - FINAL VERSION - Page 4 - (c) If systemic errors are identified, the department may take additional measures, including:
5 Effective Date.
232:5 Effective Date.
LBA 26-2408 04/10/2026 HB 1563-FN-LOCAL- FISCAL NOTE AS AMENDED BY THE HOUSE (AMENDMENT #2026-1086h) AN ACT relative to the special education aid formula and the administration and monitoring of state special education aid.
Approved:
FISCAL IMPACT:
July 02, 2026 Effective Date:
This bill does not provide funding, nor does it authorize new positions.
July 01, 2028
Estimated State Impact FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 Revenue $0 $0 $0 $0 Revenue Fund(s) None Indeterminable Expenditures* $0 $0 $0 Increase ($5M+) Funding Source(s) General Fund and Education Trust Fund Statutory Open Warrant Exists Appropriations* $0 $0 $0 to Make Required Special Education Aid Payments Funding Source(s) Education Trust Fund *Expenditure = Cost of bill *Appropriation = Authorized funding to cover cost of bill Estimated Political Subdivision Impact FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 Indeterminable Local Revenue $0 $0 $0 Increase ($5M+) Local Expenditures $0 $0 $0 $0 METHODOLOGY:
The bill, effective July 1, 2028 (FY 2029 payment based upon 2027-2028 school year costs), revises the aid formula for higher cost special education students by lowering the eligibility threshold and restructuring cost sharing between the state and school districts.
This bill also establishes a new certified reporting and risk-based monitoring system to improve oversight of reimbursements.
Below is a summary of the cost sharing changes proposed by this bill:
  Current Law Proposed Local State Local State Share Share Share Share Less than 2.5X 100% 0% 100% 0% 2.5X - 3.5X 100% 0% 85% 15% 3.5X - 10X 20% 80% 20% 80% More Than 10X 0% 100% 10% 90% X = Times the most current state average expenditure per pupil for the school year preceding the year of distribution Under current law, and unchanged by this bill, if annual appropriations for this aid program are insufficient, funds shall be prorated among eligible districts, with each district receiving no less than 80 percent of its entitlement.
In FY 2026, there were $54.769M in eligible costs, with a $49.917M state appropriation, resulting in a proration of 91.14%.
Ultimately, this bill’s impact on state expenditures and local school district revenue in FY 2029 and beyond is indeterminable, as district reimbursable costs and future state appropriation amounts are not yet known.
However, the Department of Education has provided the following information in estimating this bill’s potential impact:
 Recent special education aid submissions can be used to estimate changes at both the state and district levels.
Under current law, only students with costs exceeding 3.5 times the average cost per pupil (ACPP) qualify for aid ($75,320 in 2024–2025, paid in FY 2026).
The proposal lowers this threshold to 2.5 times ACPP ($53,800).
 As Department does not collect data on students below the current 3.5X threshold, this analysis is limited to currently eligible students and excludes any additional students who would qualify under the lower threshold.
 Under this bill, costs between 2.5x and 3.5x ACPP would be reimbursed at 15 percent (currently unreimbursed).
Applying this to recent data, 798 students would receive additional aid, increasing total district entitlement by $2,575,933 (about $3,228 per student).
 For students above 10x ACPP, reimbursement would decrease from 100 percent to 90 percent.
As a result, some districts would see reduced aid, and once costs exceed $247,479, districts would begin absorbing costs currently fully covered by the state.
In 2024–2025 data, 64 students across 45 districts fall into this category, resulting in estimated state savings of $708,528 and increased district costs ranging from $459 to $49,000 per student.
 The number and cost of additional students who would qualify under the 2.5x threshold remain unknown.
To estimate this, statistical modeling was applied using district-level data on special education populations, aid eligibility, and high-cost thresholds.
Since data below 3.5x ACPP is not currently available, the Department validated the model through back-testing against known high-cost student counts/expenditures and compared with a Pareto-based estimation approach.
Show all 50 changed rows (10 more)
Previous
Latest
Both methods produced broadly consistent projections of additional eligible students:
School Students Students Between 2.5x and 3.5x Year ACPP over 3.5x Pareto Modeling Linear ML Modeling - 2022 $17,986 760 973 2,738 - 2023 $19,034 762 898 2,784 - 2024 $19,914 857 865 2,990 - 2025 $21,520 907 962 2,960 Overall, based only on currently eligible students, the proposal results in a net increase in district entitlement of $1,934,153 statewide.
In addition, for illustrative purposes, using the range of 1,000 to 3,000 students between 2.5x to 3.5x, there could be additional district entitlement under this program of between $3,288,000 ($3,288 x 1,000 students) and $9,864,000 ($3,288 x 3,000 students) per year.
Using these assumptions, this bill could increase state aid to districts by approximately $5 million to $12 million per year, beginning in FY 2029.
Lastly, the Department states it is unclear if it would be responsible for ensuring that districts applied for Medicaid to Schools or personal insurance and if it would need to collect documentation of this.
If this is a requirement this would add additional work to the staff implementing this risk-based monitoring system.
The estimated cost for staffing for two (2) additional positions (miscellaneous business operations specialist, SOC 13-05, starting step 4) would be $208,000 in total beginning in FY 2029.
This bill provides neither appropriation nor authorization for new personnel.
AGENCIES CONTACTED:
Department of Education
View plain text versions (5)

Action History

  1. Signed by Governor Ayotte 07/02/2026; Chapter 232; eff. 7/1/2028

  2. Enrolled (in recess of) 06/04/2026 HJ 15

  3. Enrolled Adopted, VV, (In recess 06/04/2026); SJ 14

  4. Enrolled Bill Amendment # 2026-2140e: AA VV (in recess of) 06/04/2026 HJ 15

  5. Enrolled Bill Amendment # 2026-2140e Adopted, VV, (In recess of 06/04/2026); SJ 14

  6. Ought to Pass: MA, VV; OT3rdg; 05/14/2026; SJ 12

  7. Committee Report: Ought to Pass, 05/14/2026; Vote 7-0; CC; SC 18

  8. Ought to Pass: MA, VV; Refer to Finance Rule 4-5; 04/23/2026; SJ 10

  9. Committee Report: Ought to Pass, 04/23/2026; Vote 4-0; CC; SC 15

  10. Hearing: 04/13/2026, Room 100, SH, 09:00 am; SC 14

  11. Introduced 03/26/2026 and Referred to Education Finance; SJ 7

  12. Ought to Pass with Amendment 2026-1086h: MA VV 03/26/2026 HJ 9 P. 23

  13. Amendment # 2026-1086h (NT): AA VV 03/26/2026 HJ 9 P. 21

  14. Committee Report: Ought to Pass with Amendment # 2026-1086h (NT) 03/17/2026 (Vote 25-0; RC)

  15. Executive Session: 03/17/2026 10:00 am GP 230

  16. Division II Work Session: 03/09/2026 10:00 am GP 234

  17. Referred to Finance 02/19/2026 HJ 5 P. 43

  18. Ought to Pass with Amendment 2026-0546h: MA VV 02/19/2026 HJ 5 P. 43

  19. Amendment # 2026-0546h: AA VV 02/19/2026 HJ 5 P. 42

  20. Committee Report: Ought to Pass with Amendment # 2026-0546h 02/10/2026 (Vote 18-0; RC) HC 7 P. 26

  21. Executive Session: 02/10/2026 10:00 am GP 234

  22. Full Committee Work Session: 01/28/2026 10:00 am GP 234

  23. Public Hearing: 01/15/2026 01:00 pm GP 232

  24. Introduced 01/07/2026 and referred to Education Funding HJ 1 P. 26

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 8 co-sponsors · 406 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (8)

Not signed on (406)

406 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 406 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does HB 1563 do?
(New Title) relative to the special education aid formula and the administration and monitoring of state special education aid.
Who sponsors HB 1563?
HB 1563 is sponsored by Victoria Sullivan (Republican), Keith Murphy (Republican), Daniel Popovici-Muller (Republican), Keith Erf (Republican), Daniel Innis (Republican), Dan McGuire (Republican), Rick Ladd (Republican), Steven Smith (Republican), and Raymond Peeples (Republican).
What is the current status of HB 1563?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced December 10, 2025. Enacted.
Where can I track HB 1563?
Track HB 1563 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 1563

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 1563

Last checked for changes about 1 month ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →