New Hampshire 2026 Session Status: Passed House 3 R cosponsors

CACR 9 — relating to the retirement age for judges. Providing that the mandatory judicial retirement age shall be increased from 70 to 75.

Last action — Ought to Pass: MF DV 136-185 Lacking Necessary Three-Fifths Vote 03/11/2026 HJ 7 P. 228

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has passed the House. Introduced November 07, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.

Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the Senate.

Odds of enactment

Moderate chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a moderate chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Stalled 32% · moderate confidence

  • Passed House

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 3 sponsors

    1 primary, 2 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (3 R).

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Summary

relating to the retirement age for judges. Providing that the mandatory judicial retirement age shall be increased from 70 to 75.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Ought to Pass: MF DV 136-185 Lacking Necessary Three-Fifths Vote 03/11/2026 HJ 7 P. 228

  2. Minority Committee Report: Inexpedient to Legislate

  3. Majority Committee Report: Ought to Pass 01/28/2026 (Vote 10-8; RC) HC 10 P. 55

  4. Executive Session: 01/28/2026 01:30 pm GP 230

  5. Public Hearing: 01/28/2026 01:30 pm GP 230

  6. ==RESCHEDULED== Public Hearing: 01/28/2026 02:00 pm GP 230

  7. Introduced 01/07/2026 and referred to Judiciary HJ 1 P. 40

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 412 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (2)

Not signed on (412)

412 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 412 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

civil-rights labor
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does CACR 9 do?
relating to the retirement age for judges. Providing that the mandatory judicial retirement age shall be increased from 70 to 75.
Who sponsors CACR 9?
CACR 9 is sponsored by Bob Lynn (Republican), Kevin Avard (Republican), and Jack Flanagan (Republican).
What is the current status of CACR 9?
This bill has passed the House. Introduced November 07, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
Where can I track CACR 9?
Track CACR 9 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on CACR 9

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of CACR 9

Last checked for changes about 1 month ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →