New Hampshire 2026 Session Status: Introduced 1 D cosponsors

SB439 — relative to municipal data center zoning.

Last action — DIED ON THE TABLE

  1. 1
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced November 21, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.

Next likely step: a committee referral and hearing.

Odds of enactment

Low chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Stalled 30% · moderate confidence
  • Introduced

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 2 sponsors

    1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 4 recorded votes so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Summary

relative to municipal data center zoning.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

11 added · 37 removed

Plain-language change summary

The updated version of Bill SB 439 has significantly increased the allowable size of data centers from a maximum of 10% to 25% of the total building area on a site. It also simplifies the approval process by allowing local legislative bodies to permit these centers with fewer restrictions, such as the previous distance requirement from transit facilities and noise regulations. These changes are important because they may encourage more data center development, potentially boosting local economies and technological infrastructure, but they could raise concerns about noise and environmental impacts in residential areas.

→
Previous
Latest
SB 439 - AS INTRODUCED SESSION 26-2236 06/09 SENATE BILL 439 AN ACT relative to municipal data center zoning.
SB 439 - AS AMENDED BY THE SENATE 01/29/2026 0176s SESSION 26-2236 06/09 SENATE BILL 439 AN ACT relative to municipal data center zoning.
SB 439 - AS INTRODUCED 26-2236 06/09 STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE In the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand Twenty-Six AN ACT relative to municipal data center zoning.
SB 439 - AS AMENDED BY THE SENATE 01/29/2026 0176s 26-2236 06/09 STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE In the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand Twenty-Six AN ACT relative to municipal data center zoning.
“Data center” does not include a facility that does not exceed 10 percent of the gross floor area of all on-site buildings, is used to serve the enterprise functions of the on-site property owner, and is not used to lease data services to third parties.
“Data center” does not include a facility that does not exceed 25 percent of the gross floor area of all on-site buildings, is used to serve the enterprise functions of the on-site property owner, and is not used to lease data services to third parties.
A local legislative body may permit the establishment of data centers within zoning districts designated for commercial or industrial use, subject to the provisions of this subdivision and local land use regulations adopted pursuant to this title.
Data centers are allowed within zoning districts designated for commercial or industrial use and subject to the provisions of local land use regulations.
II.
674:83 Rulemaking.
Data centers shall not be permitted within 2,640 feet of a passenger rail station or other high-capacity transit facility approved by the municipality or the department of transportation.
The planning board, with the approval of the local legislative body, may adopt regulations as necessary.
III.
No data center shall be approved until the applicant has provided written confirmation from the serving electric utility that adequate electrical capacity shall be available to meet the facility’s projected energy demand within 2 years of construction.
IV.
Noise levels generated by a data center located within 300 feet of a residential district shall not exceed the ambient noise level at the property line of the nearest residentially zoned parcel by more than 5 percent.
The applicant shall submit a noise study performed by a qualified acoustical engineer to the planning board prior to site plan approval.
674:83 Design and Siting Standards.
I.
All mechanical and electrical equipment, including but not limited to transformers and generators, shall be set back a minimum of 150 feet from any public right-of-way or residentially zoned property and shall be fully screened by an architecturally integrated structure or decorative wall.
II.
A minimum 30-foot-wide perimeter landscape buffer shall be provided, including at least 2 staggered rows of large canopy trees spaced 20 feet on center and sufficient underplanting to achieve 75 percent live vegetative coverage.
III.
Building facades exceeding 100 feet in length shall include architectural variations in color, material, pattern, texture, height, or fenestration to avoid large, monolithic surfaces.
SB 439 - AS INTRODUCED - Page 2 - IV.
All street frontages shall include a detached sidewalk at least 6 feet in width, separated from the curb by a landscaped strip at least 8 feet in width planted with large canopy street trees at 20-foot spacing or equivalent groupings.
V.
On-site pedestrian pathways shall be shaded by structures, plantings, or both to provide a minimum of 75 percent shade coverage at maturity.
674:84 Rulemaking.
The planning board, with the approval of the local legislative body, may adopt regulations necessary to implement this subdivision, including additional performance, screening, or design standards, consistent with the purpose of this subdivision.
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Died on Table, Session ended 08/19/2026 HJ 16

  2. Lay SB439 on Table (Rep. Ammon): MA DV 304-11 05/14/2026 HJ 13 P. 110

  3. Minority Committee Report: Inexpedient to Legislate

  4. Majority Committee Report: Ought to Pass with Amendment # 2026-1807h 05/05/2026 (Vote 11-9; RC) HC 19 P. 26

  5. Executive Session: 05/05/2026 10:30 am GP 154

  6. Public Hearing: 04/07/2026 10:00 am GP 154

  7. Introduced (in recess of) 02/19/2026 and referred to Municipal and County Government HJ 5 P. 124

  8. Ought to Pass with Amendment #2026-0176s, RC 16Y-8N, MA; OT3rdg; 01/29/2026; SJ 2

  9. Sen. Perkins Kwoka Floor Amendment # 2026-0352s, AF, VV; 01/29/2026; SJ 2

  10. Committee Amendment # 2026-0176s, RC 16Y-8N, AA; 01/29/2026; SJ 2

  11. SB 439 was Removed from the Consent Calendar; 01/29/2026; SJ 2

  12. Committee Report: Ought to Pass with Amendment # 2026-0176s, 01/29/2026; Vote 5-0; CC; SC 3

  13. Hearing: 01/13/2026, Room 122-123, SH, 09:45 am; SC 46

  14. Introduced 01/07/2026 and Referred to Election Law and Municipal Affairs; SJ 1

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 413 not signed on · 7 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (1)

  • Hope E Damon

Not signed on (413)

413 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 413 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 16 Yea · 8 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 15000
Democrat 0800
Total 15800
% of votes cast 65%35%0%0%
How each member voted (23)
Member Party Vote
Cindy Rosenwald Democrat Nay
David Watters Democrat Nay
Debra Altschiller Democrat Nay
Donovan Fenton Democrat Nay
Pat Long Democrat Nay
Rebecca Perkins Kwoka Democrat Nay
Suzanne Prentiss Democrat Nay
Tara Reardon Democrat Nay
Bill Gannon Republican Yea
Daniel Innis Republican Yea
Daryl Abbas Republican Yea
David Rochefort Republican Yea
Denise Ricciardi Republican Yea
Howard Pearl Republican Yea
James Gray Republican Yea
Keith Murphy Republican Yea
Kevin Avard Republican Yea
Mark McConkey Republican Yea
Ruth Ward Republican Yea
Sharon Carson Republican Yea
Tim McGough Republican Yea
Timothy Lang Republican Yea
Victoria Sullivan Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 16 Yea · 8 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 15000
Democrat 0800
Total 15800
% of votes cast 65%35%0%0%
How each member voted (23)
Member Party Vote
Cindy Rosenwald Democrat Nay
David Watters Democrat Nay
Debra Altschiller Democrat Nay
Donovan Fenton Democrat Nay
Pat Long Democrat Nay
Rebecca Perkins Kwoka Democrat Nay
Suzanne Prentiss Democrat Nay
Tara Reardon Democrat Nay
Bill Gannon Republican Yea
Daniel Innis Republican Yea
Daryl Abbas Republican Yea
David Rochefort Republican Yea
Denise Ricciardi Republican Yea
Howard Pearl Republican Yea
James Gray Republican Yea
Keith Murphy Republican Yea
Kevin Avard Republican Yea
Mark McConkey Republican Yea
Ruth Ward Republican Yea
Sharon Carson Republican Yea
Tim McGough Republican Yea
Timothy Lang Republican Yea
Victoria Sullivan Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Ought to Pass w/Amendment

Passed 16 Yea · 8 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 16000
Democrat 0800
Total 16800
% of votes cast 67%33%0%0%
How each member voted (24)
Member Party Vote
Cindy Rosenwald Democrat Nay
David Watters Democrat Nay
Debra Altschiller Democrat Nay
Donovan Fenton Democrat Nay
Pat Long Democrat Nay
Rebecca Perkins Kwoka Democrat Nay
Suzanne Prentiss Democrat Nay
Tara Reardon Democrat Nay
Bill Gannon Republican Yea
Daniel Innis Republican Yea
Daryl Abbas Republican Yea
David Rochefort Republican Yea
Denise Ricciardi Republican Yea
Howard Pearl Republican Yea
James Gray Republican Yea
Keith Murphy Republican Yea
Kevin Avard Republican Yea
Mark McConkey Republican Yea
Regina Birdsell Republican Yea
Ruth Ward Republican Yea
Sharon Carson Republican Yea
Tim McGough Republican Yea
Timothy Lang Republican Yea
Victoria Sullivan Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Committee Amendment

Passed 16 Yea · 8 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 16000
Democrat 0800
Total 16800
% of votes cast 67%33%0%0%
How each member voted (24)
Member Party Vote
Cindy Rosenwald Democrat Nay
David Watters Democrat Nay
Debra Altschiller Democrat Nay
Donovan Fenton Democrat Nay
Pat Long Democrat Nay
Rebecca Perkins Kwoka Democrat Nay
Suzanne Prentiss Democrat Nay
Tara Reardon Democrat Nay
Bill Gannon Republican Yea
Daniel Innis Republican Yea
Daryl Abbas Republican Yea
David Rochefort Republican Yea
Denise Ricciardi Republican Yea
Howard Pearl Republican Yea
James Gray Republican Yea
Keith Murphy Republican Yea
Kevin Avard Republican Yea
Mark McConkey Republican Yea
Regina Birdsell Republican Yea
Ruth Ward Republican Yea
Sharon Carson Republican Yea
Tim McGough Republican Yea
Timothy Lang Republican Yea
Victoria Sullivan Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB439 do?
relative to municipal data center zoning.
Who sponsors SB439?
SB439 is sponsored by Hope E Damon and Debra Altschiller (Democrat).
What is the current status of SB439?
This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced November 21, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Where can I track SB439?
Track SB439 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB439

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB439

Last checked for changes about 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →