SB439 — relative to municipal data center zoning.
Last action — DIED ON THE TABLE
-
1Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced November 21, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee referral and hearing.
Odds of enactment
Low chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Introduced
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 4 recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Summary
relative to municipal data center zoning.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
11 added · 37 removedPlain-language change summary
The updated version of Bill SB 439 has significantly increased the allowable size of data centers from a maximum of 10% to 25% of the total building area on a site. It also simplifies the approval process by allowing local legislative bodies to permit these centers with fewer restrictions, such as the previous distance requirement from transit facilities and noise regulations. These changes are important because they may encourage more data center development, potentially boosting local economies and technological infrastructure, but they could raise concerns about noise and environmental impacts in residential areas.
SB 439 - AS INTRODUCEDAMENDED BY THE SENATE 01/29/2026 0176s SESSION 26-2236 06/09 SENATE BILL 439 AN ACT relative to municipal data center zoning.
SB 439 - AS INTRODUCEDAMENDED BY THE SENATE 01/29/2026 0176s 26-2236 06/09 STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE In the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand Twenty-Six AN ACT relative to municipal data center zoning.
“Data center” does not include a facility that does not exceed 1025 percent of the gross floor area of all on-site buildings, is used to serve the enterprise functions of the on-site property owner, and is not used to lease data services to third parties.
AData localcenters legislativeare bodyallowed may permit the establishment of data centers within zoning districts designated for commercial or industrial use,use and subject to the provisions of this subdivision and local land use regulationsregulations. adopted pursuant to this title.
II.674:83 Rulemaking.
DataThe centersplanning shallboard, notwith bethe permittedapproval within 2,640 feet of athe passengerlocal raillegislative stationbody, ormay otheradopt high-capacityregulations transitas facilitynecessary. approved by the municipality or the department of transportation.
III.
No data center shall be approved until the applicant has provided written confirmation from the serving electric utility that adequate electrical capacity shall be available to meet the facility’s projected energy demand within 2 years of construction.
IV.
Noise levels generated by a data center located within 300 feet of a residential district shall not exceed the ambient noise level at the property line of the nearest residentially zoned parcel by more than 5 percent.
The applicant shall submit a noise study performed by a qualified acoustical engineer to the planning board prior to site plan approval.
674:83 Design and Siting Standards.
I.
All mechanical and electrical equipment, including but not limited to transformers and generators, shall be set back a minimum of 150 feet from any public right-of-way or residentially zoned property and shall be fully screened by an architecturally integrated structure or decorative wall.
II.
A minimum 30-foot-wide perimeter landscape buffer shall be provided, including at least 2 staggered rows of large canopy trees spaced 20 feet on center and sufficient underplanting to achieve 75 percent live vegetative coverage.
III.
Building facades exceeding 100 feet in length shall include architectural variations in color, material, pattern, texture, height, or fenestration to avoid large, monolithic surfaces.
SB 439 - AS INTRODUCED - Page 2 - IV.
All street frontages shall include a detached sidewalk at least 6 feet in width, separated from the curb by a landscaped strip at least 8 feet in width planted with large canopy street trees at 20-foot spacing or equivalent groupings.
V.
On-site pedestrian pathways shall be shaded by structures, plantings, or both to provide a minimum of 75 percent shade coverage at maturity.
674:84 Rulemaking.
The planning board, with the approval of the local legislative body, may adopt regulations necessary to implement this subdivision, including additional performance, screening, or design standards, consistent with the purpose of this subdivision.
View plain text versions (2)
- Amended As Amended by the Senate Current pdf
- Introduced View text pdf
Action History
-
Died on Table, Session ended 08/19/2026 HJ 16
-
Lay SB439 on Table (Rep. Ammon): MA DV 304-11 05/14/2026 HJ 13 P. 110
-
Minority Committee Report: Inexpedient to Legislate
-
Majority Committee Report: Ought to Pass with Amendment # 2026-1807h 05/05/2026 (Vote 11-9; RC) HC 19 P. 26
-
Executive Session: 05/05/2026 10:30 am GP 154
-
Public Hearing: 04/07/2026 10:00 am GP 154
-
Introduced (in recess of) 02/19/2026 and referred to Municipal and County Government HJ 5 P. 124
-
Ought to Pass with Amendment #2026-0176s, RC 16Y-8N, MA; OT3rdg; 01/29/2026; SJ 2
-
Sen. Perkins Kwoka Floor Amendment # 2026-0352s, AF, VV; 01/29/2026; SJ 2
-
Committee Amendment # 2026-0176s, RC 16Y-8N, AA; 01/29/2026; SJ 2
-
SB 439 was Removed from the Consent Calendar; 01/29/2026; SJ 2
-
Committee Report: Ought to Pass with Amendment # 2026-0176s, 01/29/2026; Vote 5-0; CC; SC 3
-
Hearing: 01/13/2026, Room 122-123, SH, 09:45 am; SC 46
-
Introduced 01/07/2026 and Referred to Election Law and Municipal Affairs; SJ 1
Sponsors
- Hope E Damon · Cosponsor
- Debra Altschiller · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 413 not signed on · 7 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Debra Altschiller Democrat Voted No
Co-sponsors (1)
- Hope E Damon
Not signed on (413)
413 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 413 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 15 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 65% | 35% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (23)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cindy Rosenwald | Democrat | Nay |
| David Watters | Democrat | Nay |
| Debra Altschiller | Democrat | Nay |
| Donovan Fenton | Democrat | Nay |
| Pat Long | Democrat | Nay |
| Rebecca Perkins Kwoka | Democrat | Nay |
| Suzanne Prentiss | Democrat | Nay |
| Tara Reardon | Democrat | Nay |
| Bill Gannon | Republican | Yea |
| Daniel Innis | Republican | Yea |
| Daryl Abbas | Republican | Yea |
| David Rochefort | Republican | Yea |
| Denise Ricciardi | Republican | Yea |
| Howard Pearl | Republican | Yea |
| James Gray | Republican | Yea |
| Keith Murphy | Republican | Yea |
| Kevin Avard | Republican | Yea |
| Mark McConkey | Republican | Yea |
| Ruth Ward | Republican | Yea |
| Sharon Carson | Republican | Yea |
| Tim McGough | Republican | Yea |
| Timothy Lang | Republican | Yea |
| Victoria Sullivan | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 15 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 65% | 35% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (23)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cindy Rosenwald | Democrat | Nay |
| David Watters | Democrat | Nay |
| Debra Altschiller | Democrat | Nay |
| Donovan Fenton | Democrat | Nay |
| Pat Long | Democrat | Nay |
| Rebecca Perkins Kwoka | Democrat | Nay |
| Suzanne Prentiss | Democrat | Nay |
| Tara Reardon | Democrat | Nay |
| Bill Gannon | Republican | Yea |
| Daniel Innis | Republican | Yea |
| Daryl Abbas | Republican | Yea |
| David Rochefort | Republican | Yea |
| Denise Ricciardi | Republican | Yea |
| Howard Pearl | Republican | Yea |
| James Gray | Republican | Yea |
| Keith Murphy | Republican | Yea |
| Kevin Avard | Republican | Yea |
| Mark McConkey | Republican | Yea |
| Ruth Ward | Republican | Yea |
| Sharon Carson | Republican | Yea |
| Tim McGough | Republican | Yea |
| Timothy Lang | Republican | Yea |
| Victoria Sullivan | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 16 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (24)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cindy Rosenwald | Democrat | Nay |
| David Watters | Democrat | Nay |
| Debra Altschiller | Democrat | Nay |
| Donovan Fenton | Democrat | Nay |
| Pat Long | Democrat | Nay |
| Rebecca Perkins Kwoka | Democrat | Nay |
| Suzanne Prentiss | Democrat | Nay |
| Tara Reardon | Democrat | Nay |
| Bill Gannon | Republican | Yea |
| Daniel Innis | Republican | Yea |
| Daryl Abbas | Republican | Yea |
| David Rochefort | Republican | Yea |
| Denise Ricciardi | Republican | Yea |
| Howard Pearl | Republican | Yea |
| James Gray | Republican | Yea |
| Keith Murphy | Republican | Yea |
| Kevin Avard | Republican | Yea |
| Mark McConkey | Republican | Yea |
| Regina Birdsell | Republican | Yea |
| Ruth Ward | Republican | Yea |
| Sharon Carson | Republican | Yea |
| Tim McGough | Republican | Yea |
| Timothy Lang | Republican | Yea |
| Victoria Sullivan | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 16 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (24)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cindy Rosenwald | Democrat | Nay |
| David Watters | Democrat | Nay |
| Debra Altschiller | Democrat | Nay |
| Donovan Fenton | Democrat | Nay |
| Pat Long | Democrat | Nay |
| Rebecca Perkins Kwoka | Democrat | Nay |
| Suzanne Prentiss | Democrat | Nay |
| Tara Reardon | Democrat | Nay |
| Bill Gannon | Republican | Yea |
| Daniel Innis | Republican | Yea |
| Daryl Abbas | Republican | Yea |
| David Rochefort | Republican | Yea |
| Denise Ricciardi | Republican | Yea |
| Howard Pearl | Republican | Yea |
| James Gray | Republican | Yea |
| Keith Murphy | Republican | Yea |
| Kevin Avard | Republican | Yea |
| Mark McConkey | Republican | Yea |
| Regina Birdsell | Republican | Yea |
| Ruth Ward | Republican | Yea |
| Sharon Carson | Republican | Yea |
| Tim McGough | Republican | Yea |
| Timothy Lang | Republican | Yea |
| Victoria Sullivan | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB439 do?
- relative to municipal data center zoning.
- Who sponsors SB439?
- SB439 is sponsored by Hope E Damon and Debra Altschiller (Democrat).
- What is the current status of SB439?
- This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced November 21, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track SB439?
- Track SB439 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB439
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB439
Last checked for changes about 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →