Delaware 151st General Assembly (2021-2022) Status: Enacted 7 D cosponsors

HB 447 — AN ACT TO AMEND TITLES 10 AND 11 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO EXPUNGEMENT.

Last action — Signed by Governor

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed House
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced June 02, 2022. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 82% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 11 sponsors

    4 primary, 7 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (7 D).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 2 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

This Act implements some of the recommendations of the African American Task Force's Safety and Justice Subcommittee. Specifically, it requires that cases or charges that are more than 7 years old be treated as “resolved in favor of” a child or adult if there is no disposition available for the case and no outstanding warrants. This clarification will prevent errors in record-keeping in the criminal justice system from stopping an otherwise qualified petitioner from obtaining an expungement that may otherwise be available. It will also require old cases for which no outcome is listed to be removed from a person's record if they are more than 7 years old. In addition, this Act allow an individual with multiple violations or misdemeanors in different cases that would be eligible for a mandatory expungement if they had occurred in a single case, and the individual has no other convictions on their record, to apply directly for a discretionary expungement after 5 years have passed from the most recent conviction. The court would then consider the application under its usual “interest of justice” rubric in determining whether to grant the expungement. This saves applications to the pardon board for multiple minor misdemeanors and increases parity between applicants with similar records.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

63 added · 60 removed

63 line(s) added, 60 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
Chukwuocha HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 151st GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE AMENDMENT NO.
Chukwuocha & Rep.
2 TO HOUSE BILL NO.
Lynn & Rep.
447 AMEND House Bill No.
Dorsey Walker & Sen.
447 by deleting lines 3 through 23 and inserting in lieu thereof the following:
Brown Reps.
“§ 4372.
Baumbach, Bolden, Cooke, Griffith, Kowalko;
Sens.
Gay, Sokola HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 151st GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE BILL NO.
447 AN ACT TO AMEND TITLES 10 AND 11 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO EXPUNGEMENT.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE:
Section 1.
Amend Chapter 43, Title 11 of the Delaware Code by making deletions as shown by strike through and insertions as shown by underline as follows:
§ 4372.
(7) Where a case is 7 or more years old and contains a charge or charges without a disposition or the disposition is listed as unknown, unobtainable, or pending.
(7) A charge or case is 7 or more years old and there is no disposition indicated or the disposition is listed as unknown, unobtainable, or pending.
This paragraph does not apply if there is an active warrant in the case, if there is documented case activity within the last 12 months, or if there are other charges in the case that were not terminated in favor of the accused.
This paragraph applies only if there are no active warrants in the case.
(a) Eligibility.
(f) [Repealed].
— (3) For purposes of determining eligibility for expungement under this subsection, any charge that is 7 or more years old and for which there is no disposition indicated or the disposition is listed as unknown, unobtainable, or pending shall be considered dismissed and shall not negatively affect expungement eligibility.
For purposes of eligibility determinations under this section, SBI shall treat a charge or case as though it was terminated in favor of the accused if the charge or case is 7 or more years old and there is no disposition indicated or the disposition is listed as unknown, unobtainable, or pending.
This subsection does not apply if there is an active warrant in the case or if there is documented case activity within the last 12 months.
This subsection does not apply if there is an active warrant in the case.
For eligibility under this paragraph, the entire case in which each conviction appears must be eligible for expungement.
(k) For purposes of eligibility determinations under this section, the Court shall treat a charge or case as though it was terminated in favor of the accused if the charge or case is 7 or more years old and there is no disposition indicated or HD :
(k) For purposes of determining eligibility for expungement under this section, any charge that is 7 or more years old and for which there is no disposition indicated or the disposition is listed as unknown, unobtainable, or pending shall be HD :
06/21/2022 03:26 PM considered dismissed and shall not negatively affect expungement eligibility in any case.
06/02/2022 10:06 AM the disposition is listed as unknown, unobtainable, or pending.
This subsection does not apply if there is an active warrant in the case or if there is documented case activity within the last 12 months.”.
This subsection does not apply if there is an active warrant in the case.
FURTHER AMEND House Bill No.
Section 2.
447 by deleting lines 26 through 41 and inserting in lieu thereof the following:
Amend Chapter 9, Title 10 of the Delaware Code by making deletions as shown by strike through and insertions as shown by underline as follows:
This paragraph does not apply if there is an active warrant in the case, if there is documented case activity within the last 12 months, or if there are other charges in the case that were not terminated in favor of the child.
This paragraph applies only if there are no active warrants in the case.
(d) For purposes of determining eligibility for expungement under this section, any charge that is 7 or more years old and for which there is no disposition indicated or the disposition is listed as unknown, unobtainable, or pending shall be considered dismissed and shall not negatively affect expungement eligibility.
(d) For purposes of determining eligibility for expungement under this section, the Court shall treat a charge or case as though it was terminated in favor of the child if the charge or case is 7 or more years old and there is no disposition indicated or the disposition is listed as unknown, unobtainable, or pending.
This subsection does not apply if there is an active warrant in the case or if there is documented case activity within the last 12 months.
This subsection does not apply if there is an active warrant in the case.
(g) For purposes of determining eligibility for expungement under this section, any charge that is 7 or more years old and for which there is no disposition indicated or the disposition is listed as unknown, unobtainable, or pending shall be considered dismissed and shall not negatively affect expungement eligibility.
(g) For purposes of determining eligibility for expungement under this section, the Court shall treat a charge or case as though it was terminated in favor of the child if the charge or case is 7 or more years old and there is no disposition indicated or the disposition is listed as unknown, unobtainable, or pending.
This subsection does not apply if there is an active warrant in the case or if there is documented case activity within the last 12 months.”.
This subsection does not apply if there is an active warrant in the case.
SYNOPSIS This amendment is the same as HA1 to HB447 except for the following:
SYNOPSIS This Act implements some of the recommendations of the African American Task Force's Safety and Justice Subcommittee.
It replaces at line 5 the phrase “A charge or case is 7 or more years old and there is no disposition indicated” with “Where a case is 7 or more years old and contains a charge or charges without a disposition” It clarifies at line 10 that this language will be placed in 4373(a) Adds the phrase “in any case” at line 5.
Specifically, it requires that cases or charges that are more than 7 years old be treated as “resolved in favor of” a child or adult if there is no disposition available for the case and no outstanding warrants.
Replaces the word “accused” with “child” on line 35.
This clarification will prevent errors in record-keeping in the criminal justice system from stopping an otherwise qualified petitioner from obtaining an expungement that may otherwise be available.
The intent of the amendment remains to clarify that only entire cases are eligible for expungement and to correct technical errors.
It will also require old cases for which no outcome is listed to be removed from a person's record if they are more than 7 years old.
In addition, this Act allow an individual with multiple violations or misdemeanors in different cases that would be eligible for a mandatory expungement if they had occurred in a single case, and the individual has no other convictions on their record, to apply directly for a discretionary expungement after 5 years have passed from the most recent conviction.
The court would then consider the application under its usual “interest of justice” rubric in determining whether to grant the expungement.
This saves applications to the pardon board for multiple minor misdemeanors and increases parity between applicants with similar records.
06/21/2022 03:26 PM 2141510777
06/02/2022 10:06 AM 2141510640
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Signed by Governor

  2. Passed By Senate. Votes: 21 YES

  3. Reported Out of Committee (Finance) in Senate with 4 On Its Merits

  4. Assigned to Finance Committee in Senate

  5. Reported Out of Committee (Judiciary) in Senate with 4 On Its Merits

  6. Assigned to Judiciary Committee in Senate

  7. Passed By House. Votes: 41 YES

  8. Amendment HA 2 to HB 447 - Passed In House by Voice Vote

  9. Amendment HA 1 to HB 447 - Stricken in House

  10. Amendment HA 1 to HB 447 - Introduced and Placed With Bill

  11. Reported Out of Committee (Judiciary) in House with 4 Favorable, 4 On Its Merits

  12. Introduced and Assigned to Judiciary Committee in House

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

4 sponsors · 7 co-sponsors · 51 not signed on

Sponsors (4)

Not signed on (51)

51 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 51 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

SM

Passed 21 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 5000
Democratic 11000
Republican 5000
Total 21000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (21)
Member Party Vote
Bruce C. Ennis — Yea
Colin Bonini — Yea
Ernesto B Lopez — Yea
Kyle Evans Gay — Yea
Sarah McBride — Yea
Bryan Townsend Democratic Yea
Darius J. Brown Democratic Yea
David P. Sokola Democratic Yea
John "Jack" Walsh Democratic Yea
Laura V. Sturgeon Democratic Yea
Marie Pinkney Democratic Yea
Nicole Poore Democratic Yea
S. Elizabeth Lockman Democratic Yea
Spiros Mantzavinos Democratic Yea
Stephanie L. Hansen Democratic Yea
Trey Paradee Democratic Yea
Brian Pettyjohn Republican Yea
Bryant L. Richardson Republican Yea
Dave G. Lawson Republican Yea
David L. Wilson Republican Yea
Gerald W. Hocker Republican Yea

Official roll call →

SM

Passed 41 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 13000
Democratic 16000
Republican 12000
Total 41000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (41)
Member Party Vote
Andria L. Bennett — Yea
Charles "Bud" M. Freel — Yea
David Bentz — Yea
John A. Kowalko — Yea
John L. Mitchell — Yea
Michael Ramone — Yea
Paul S. Baumbach — Yea
Peter C. Schwartzkopf — Yea
Ruth Briggs King — Yea
Sean Matthews — Yea
Sherry Dorsey Walker — Yea
Stephen Smyk — Yea
Valerie Longhurst — Yea
Debra Heffernan Democratic Yea
Edward S. Osienski Democratic Yea
Eric Morrison Democratic Yea
Franklin D. Cooke Democratic Yea
Kendra Johnson Democratic Yea
Kimberly Williams Democratic Yea
Krista Griffith Democratic Yea
Larry Lambert Democratic Yea
Madinah Wilson-Anton Democratic Yea
Melissa Minor-Brown Democratic Yea
Nnamdi O. Chukwuocha Democratic Yea
Sean M. Lynn Democratic Yea
Sherae'a Moore Democratic Yea
Stephanie T. Bolden Democratic Yea
William Bush Democratic Yea
William J. Carson Democratic Yea
Bryan W. Shupe Republican Yea
Charles S Postles Jr. Republican Yea
Daniel B. Short Republican Yea
Jeffrey N. Spiegelman Republican Yea
Jesse R. Vanderwende Republican Yea
Kevin S Hensley Republican Yea
Lyndon D. Yearick Republican Yea
Michael F. Smith Republican Yea
Richard G. Collins Republican Yea
Ronald E. Gray Republican Yea
Shannon Morris Republican Yea
Timothy D. Dukes Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does HB 447 do?
This Act implements some of the recommendations of the African American Task Force's Safety and Justice Subcommittee. Specifically, it requires that cases or charges that are more than 7 years old be treated as “resolved in favor of” a child or adult if there is no disposition available for the case and no outstanding warrants. This clarification will prevent errors in record-keeping in the criminal justice system from stopping an otherwise qualified petitioner from obtaining an expungement that may otherwise be available. It will also require old cases for which no outcome is listed to be removed from a person's record if they are more than 7 years old. In addition, this Act allow an individual with multiple violations or misdemeanors in different cases that would be eligible for a mandatory expungement if they had occurred in a single case, and the individual has no other convictions on their record, to apply directly for a discretionary expungement after 5 years have passed from the most recent conviction. The court would then consider the application under its usual “interest of justice” rubric in determining whether to grant the expungement. This saves applications to the pardon board for multiple minor misdemeanors and increases parity between applicants with similar records.
Who sponsors HB 447?
HB 447 is sponsored by Kyle Evans Gay, Nnamdi O. Chukwuocha (Democratic), Darius J. Brown (Democratic), Sean M. Lynn (Democratic), David P. Sokola (Democratic), Franklin D. Cooke (Democratic), Krista Griffith (Democratic), Sherry Dorsey Walker, Stephanie T. Bolden (Democratic), John A. Kowalko, and Paul S. Baumbach.
What is the current status of HB 447?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced June 02, 2022. Enacted.
Where can I track HB 447?
Track HB 447 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 447

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 447

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →