AN ACT TO AMEND TITLES 10 AND 11 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO EXPUNGEMENT.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 447 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 447.
You're tracking HB 447
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 447 — AN ACT TO AMEND TITLES 10 AND 11 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO EXPUNGEMENT.
Last action — Signed by Governor
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced June 02, 2022. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
11 sponsors
4 primary, 7 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (7 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
This Act implements some of the recommendations of the African American Task Force's Safety and Justice Subcommittee. Specifically, it requires that cases or charges that are more than 7 years old be treated as “resolved in favor of” a child or adult if there is no disposition available for the case and no outstanding warrants. This clarification will prevent errors in record-keeping in the criminal justice system from stopping an otherwise qualified petitioner from obtaining an expungement that may otherwise be available. It will also require old cases for which no outcome is listed to be removed from a person's record if they are more than 7 years old. In addition, this Act allow an individual with multiple violations or misdemeanors in different cases that would be eligible for a mandatory expungement if they had occurred in a single case, and the individual has no other convictions on their record, to apply directly for a discretionary expungement after 5 years have passed from the most recent conviction. The court would then consider the application under its usual “interest of justice” rubric in determining whether to grant the expungement. This saves applications to the pardon board for multiple minor misdemeanors and increases parity between applicants with similar records.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
63 added · 60 removed63 line(s) added, 60 removed.
Chukwuocha HOUSE& OFRep. REPRESENTATIVES 151st GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE AMENDMENT NO.
2Lynn TO& HOUSERep. BILL NO.
447Dorsey AMENDWalker House& BillSen. No.
447Brown byReps. deleting lines 3 through 23 and inserting in lieu thereof the following:
“§Baumbach, 4372.Bolden, Cooke, Griffith, Kowalko;
Sens.
Gay, Sokola HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 151st GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE BILL NO.
447 AN ACT TO AMEND TITLES 10 AND 11 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO EXPUNGEMENT.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE:
Section 1.
Amend Chapter 43, Title 11 of the Delaware Code by making deletions as shown by strike through and insertions as shown by underline as follows:
§ 4372.
(7) WhereA acharge or case is 7 or more years old and containsthere ais chargeno or charges without a disposition indicated or the disposition is listed as unknown, unobtainable, or pending.
This paragraph doesapplies notonly apply if there isare anno active warrantwarrants in the case,case. if there is documented case activity within the last 12 months, or if there are other charges in the case that were not terminated in favor of the accused.
(a)(f) Eligibility.[Repealed].
— (3) For purposes of determining eligibility fordeterminations expungement under this subsection,section, anySBI shall treat a charge thator case as though it was terminated in favor of the accused if the charge or case is 7 or more years old and for which there is no disposition indicated or the disposition is listed as unknown, unobtainable, or pendingpending. shall be considered dismissed and shall not negatively affect expungement eligibility.
This subsection does not apply if there is an active warrant in the casecase. or if there is documented case activity within the last 12 months.
(k) For purposes of eligibility determinations under this paragraph,section, the entireCourt shall treat a charge or case as though it was terminated in whichfavor eachof convictionthe appearsaccused mustif bethe eligiblecharge foror expungement.case is 7 or more years old and there is no disposition indicated or HD :
(k) For purposes of determining eligibility for expungement under this section, any charge that is 7 or more years old and for which there is no disposition indicated or the disposition is listed as unknown, unobtainable, or pending shall be HD :
06/21/202206/02/2022 03:2610:06 PMAM consideredthe dismisseddisposition andis shalllisted notas negativelyunknown, affectunobtainable, expungementor eligibilitypending. in any case.
This subsection does not apply if there is an active warrant in the casecase. or if there is documented case activity within the last 12 months.”.
FURTHERSection AMEND2. House Bill No.
447Amend Chapter 9, Title 10 of the Delaware Code by deletingmaking linesdeletions 26as throughshown 41by strike through and insertinginsertions inas lieushown thereofby theunderline following:as follows:
This paragraph doesapplies notonly apply if there isare anno active warrantwarrants in the case,case. if there is documented case activity within the last 12 months, or if there are other charges in the case that were not terminated in favor of the child.
(d) For purposes of determining eligibility for expungement under this section, anythe Court shall treat a charge thator case as though it was terminated in favor of the child if the charge or case is 7 or more years old and for which there is no disposition indicated or the disposition is listed as unknown, unobtainable, or pendingpending. shall be considered dismissed and shall not negatively affect expungement eligibility.
This subsection does not apply if there is an active warrant in the casecase. or if there is documented case activity within the last 12 months.
(g) For purposes of determining eligibility for expungement under this section, anythe Court shall treat a charge thator case as though it was terminated in favor of the child if the charge or case is 7 or more years old and for which there is no disposition indicated or the disposition is listed as unknown, unobtainable, or pendingpending. shall be considered dismissed and shall not negatively affect expungement eligibility.
This subsection does not apply if there is an active warrant in the casecase. or if there is documented case activity within the last 12 months.”.
SYNOPSIS This amendmentAct isimplements some of the samerecommendations asof HA1the toAfrican HB447American exceptTask forForce's theSafety following:and Justice Subcommittee.
ItSpecifically, replacesit atrequires linethat 5cases the phrase “A charge or casecharges isthat 7are or more yearsthan old and there is no disposition indicated” with “Where a case is 7 or more years old andbe containstreated aas charge“resolved orin chargesfavor withoutof” a disposition”child Itor clarifiesadult atif linethere 10is thatno thisdisposition languageavailable willfor be placed in 4373(a) Adds the phrasecase “inand anyno case”outstanding atwarrants. line 5.
ReplacesThis clarification will prevent errors in record-keeping in the wordcriminal “accused”justice withsystem “child”from onstopping linean 35.otherwise qualified petitioner from obtaining an expungement that may otherwise be available.
TheIt intentwill ofalso therequire amendmentold remainscases for which no outcome is listed to clarifybe thatremoved onlyfrom entirea casesperson's arerecord eligibleif forthey expungementare andmore tothan correct7 technicalyears errors.old.
In addition, this Act allow an individual with multiple violations or misdemeanors in different cases that would be eligible for a mandatory expungement if they had occurred in a single case, and the individual has no other convictions on their record, to apply directly for a discretionary expungement after 5 years have passed from the most recent conviction.
The court would then consider the application under its usual “interest of justice” rubric in determining whether to grant the expungement.
This saves applications to the pardon board for multiple minor misdemeanors and increases parity between applicants with similar records.
06/21/202206/02/2022 03:2610:06 PMAM 21415107772141510640
Action History
-
Signed by Governor
-
Passed By Senate. Votes: 21 YES
-
Reported Out of Committee (Finance) in Senate with 4 On Its Merits
-
Assigned to Finance Committee in Senate
-
Reported Out of Committee (Judiciary) in Senate with 4 On Its Merits
-
Assigned to Judiciary Committee in Senate
-
Passed By House. Votes: 41 YES
-
Amendment HA 2 to HB 447 - Passed In House by Voice Vote
-
Amendment HA 1 to HB 447 - Stricken in House
-
Amendment HA 1 to HB 447 - Introduced and Placed With Bill
-
Reported Out of Committee (Judiciary) in House with 4 Favorable, 4 On Its Merits
-
Introduced and Assigned to Judiciary Committee in House
Sponsors
- Kyle Evans Gay · Cosponsor
- Nnamdi O. Chukwuocha · Primary
- Darius J. Brown · Primary
- Sean M. Lynn · Primary
- David P. Sokola · Cosponsor
- Franklin D. Cooke · Cosponsor
- Krista Griffith · Cosponsor
- Sherry Dorsey Walker · Primary
- Stephanie T. Bolden · Cosponsor
- John A. Kowalko · Cosponsor
- Paul S. Baumbach · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →4 sponsors · 7 co-sponsors · 51 not signed on
Sponsors (4)
- Nnamdi O. Chukwuocha Democratic
- Darius J. Brown Democratic
- Sean M. Lynn Democratic
- Sherry Dorsey Walker
Co-sponsors (7)
- Kyle Evans Gay
- David P. Sokola Democratic
- Franklin D. Cooke Democratic
- Krista Griffith Democratic
- Stephanie T. Bolden Democratic
- John A. Kowalko
- Paul S. Baumbach
Not signed on (51)
51 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 51 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (21)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bruce C. Ennis | — | Yea |
| Colin Bonini | — | Yea |
| Ernesto B Lopez | — | Yea |
| Kyle Evans Gay | — | Yea |
| Sarah McBride | — | Yea |
| Bryan Townsend | Democratic | Yea |
| Darius J. Brown | Democratic | Yea |
| David P. Sokola | Democratic | Yea |
| John "Jack" Walsh | Democratic | Yea |
| Laura V. Sturgeon | Democratic | Yea |
| Marie Pinkney | Democratic | Yea |
| Nicole Poore | Democratic | Yea |
| S. Elizabeth Lockman | Democratic | Yea |
| Spiros Mantzavinos | Democratic | Yea |
| Stephanie L. Hansen | Democratic | Yea |
| Trey Paradee | Democratic | Yea |
| Brian Pettyjohn | Republican | Yea |
| Bryant L. Richardson | Republican | Yea |
| Dave G. Lawson | Republican | Yea |
| David L. Wilson | Republican | Yea |
| Gerald W. Hocker | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 41 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (41)
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 447 do?
- This Act implements some of the recommendations of the African American Task Force's Safety and Justice Subcommittee. Specifically, it requires that cases or charges that are more than 7 years old be treated as “resolved in favor of” a child or adult if there is no disposition available for the case and no outstanding warrants. This clarification will prevent errors in record-keeping in the criminal justice system from stopping an otherwise qualified petitioner from obtaining an expungement that may otherwise be available. It will also require old cases for which no outcome is listed to be removed from a person's record if they are more than 7 years old. In addition, this Act allow an individual with multiple violations or misdemeanors in different cases that would be eligible for a mandatory expungement if they had occurred in a single case, and the individual has no other convictions on their record, to apply directly for a discretionary expungement after 5 years have passed from the most recent conviction. The court would then consider the application under its usual “interest of justice” rubric in determining whether to grant the expungement. This saves applications to the pardon board for multiple minor misdemeanors and increases parity between applicants with similar records.
- Who sponsors HB 447?
- HB 447 is sponsored by Kyle Evans Gay, Nnamdi O. Chukwuocha (Democratic), Darius J. Brown (Democratic), Sean M. Lynn (Democratic), David P. Sokola (Democratic), Franklin D. Cooke (Democratic), Krista Griffith (Democratic), Sherry Dorsey Walker, Stephanie T. Bolden (Democratic), John A. Kowalko, and Paul S. Baumbach.
- What is the current status of HB 447?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced June 02, 2022. Enacted.
- Where can I track HB 447?
- Track HB 447 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 447
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 447
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →