Delaware 151st General Assembly (2021-2022) Status: Enacted Bipartisan · 6 D · 1 R cosponsors

SB 116 — AN ACT TO AMEND CHAPTER 17, TITLE 6 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO THE CREATION, REGULATION, OPERATION AND DISSOLUTION OF DOMESTIC LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS AND THE REGISTRATION AND REGULATION OF FOREIGN LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS.

Last action — Signed by Governor

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed House
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced April 21, 2021. Enacted.

Odds of enactment

High chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 98% · high confidence
  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 11 sponsors

    3 primary, 8 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Bipartisan support

    Sponsored across 2 parties (6 D · 1 R) — cross-party backing.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 2 recorded votes so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Summary

This bill continues the practice of amending periodically the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act (the “Act”) to keep it current and to maintain its national preeminence. The following is a section-by-section review of the proposed amendments of the Act. Section 1. This section amends Section 17-106 of the Act to add subsection (e) to provide a safe harbor procedure for ratifying acts or transactions that may be taken by or in respect of a limited partnership under the Act or a limited partnership agreement that are void or voidable and waiving failures to comply with requirements of a partnership agreement that make such acts and transactions void or voidable. New subsection (e) is intended to provide a rule different from the rule applied in Composecure, L.L.C. v. Cardux, LLC, 206 A.3d 807 (Del. 2018), and Absalom Absalom Trust v. Saint Gervais LLC, 2019 WL 2655787 (Del. Ch. June 27, 2019), that acts or transactions determined to be void generally may not be ratified. The penultimate sentence of new subsection (e) confirms that void or voidable actions may be ratified or requirements may be waived by other means permitted by law, and accordingly, new subsection (e) is not intended to preempt or restrict other valid means of ratifying acts or transactions or waiving requirements or to impair the effectiveness of any valid ratification or waiver previously effected. Section 2. This section amends Section 17-220 of the Act to make a conforming change. Section 3. This section amends Section 17-305 of the Act to make certain clarifying and conforming changes, and to provide that when a limited partner is entitled to obtain information for a stated purpose (whether pursuant to Section 17-305 or a partnership agreement), the limited partner’s right shall be to obtain such information as is necessary and essential to achieving that purpose, unless such right has been expanded or restricted in the partnership agreement. The first sentence of subsection (f) is intended to (i) change current law, as set forth in Murfey v. WHC Ventures, LLC, 236 A.3d 337 (Del. 2020), that the “necessary and essential” test does not apply by default to a limited partner’s contractual right to obtain information from a limited partnership for a stated purpose, and (ii) clarify that the “necessary and essential” test applies to a limited partner’s right under Section 17-305(a) of the Act to obtain information from a limited partnership for a purpose reasonably related to the limited partner’s interest as a limited partner. Section 4. This section amends Section 17-403(c) of the Act to provide that a general partner may delegate any of its rights, powers or duties irrespective of whether it has a conflict of interest with respect to the matter as to which such rights, powers or duties are being delegated, and that the person or persons to whom any such rights, powers or duties are being delegated shall not be deemed conflicted solely by reason of the conflict of interest of the general partner. The amendments to Section 17-403(c) create a different rule than the rule applied in cases such as Wenske v. Bluebell Creameries, Inc., 214 A.3d 958 (Del. Ch. 2019), that a conflicted principal is legally disabled from delegating authority over the subject matter as to which the principal is conflicted even to an independent delegatee. Section 5. This section amends Section 17-1201 of the Act to clarify the effect of subchapter XII of the Act and to provide for the manner in which a limited partnership may become a statutory public benefit limited partnership. Section 6. This section amends Section 17-1202(a) of the Act to provide that a partnership agreement of a statutory public benefit limited partnership must state that the limited partnership is a statutory public benefit limited partnership and must set forth the specific public benefit or benefits to be promoted by the limited partnership, to provide that the partnership agreement shall control as among the partners and other persons who are party to or otherwise bound by the partnership agreement in the event of any inconsistency between the public benefit(s) as set forth in such agreement and the certificate of limited partnership, to require amendment of the certificate of limited partnership of a statutory public benefit limited partnership in specified circumstances, and to clarify the effect of subchapter XII of the Act. Section 7. This section repeals Section 17-1203 of the Act. Section 8. This section amends Section 17-1204 of the Act to make conforming changes. Section 9. This section amends Section 17-1205 of the Act to make a conforming change. Section 10. This section provides that the proposed amendments to the Act shall become effective August 1, 2021.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Signed by Governor

  2. Passed By House. Votes: 40 YES 1 ABSENT

  3. Suspension of Rules in House

  4. Reported Out of Committee (Judiciary) in House with 1 Favorable, 7 On Its Merits

  5. Assigned to Judiciary Committee in House

  6. Passed By Senate. Votes: 21 YES

  7. Reported Out of Committee (Judiciary) in Senate with 4 Favorable, 1 On Its Merits

  8. Introduced and Assigned to Judiciary Committee in Senate

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

3 sponsors · 8 co-sponsors · 51 not signed on

Sponsors (3)

Not signed on (51)

51 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 51 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

2/3

Passed 40 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 12001
Democratic 16000
Republican 12000
Total 40001
% of votes cast 98%0%0%2%
How each member voted (41)
Member Party Vote
Andria L. Bennett — Yea
David Bentz — Yea
Gerald L. Brady — Yea
John A. Kowalko — Yea
John L. Mitchell — Yea
Michael Ramone — Yea
Paul S. Baumbach — Yea
Peter C. Schwartzkopf — Yea
Ruth Briggs King — Yea
Sean Matthews — Yea
Sherry Dorsey Walker — Yea
Stephen Smyk — Not Voting
Valerie Longhurst — Yea
Debra Heffernan Democratic Yea
Edward S. Osienski Democratic Yea
Eric Morrison Democratic Yea
Franklin D. Cooke Democratic Yea
Kendra Johnson Democratic Yea
Kimberly Williams Democratic Yea
Krista Griffith Democratic Yea
Larry Lambert Democratic Yea
Madinah Wilson-Anton Democratic Yea
Melissa Minor-Brown Democratic Yea
Nnamdi O. Chukwuocha Democratic Yea
Sean M. Lynn Democratic Yea
Sherae'a Moore Democratic Yea
Stephanie T. Bolden Democratic Yea
William Bush Democratic Yea
William J. Carson Democratic Yea
Bryan W. Shupe Republican Yea
Charles S Postles Jr. Republican Yea
Daniel B. Short Republican Yea
Jeffrey N. Spiegelman Republican Yea
Jesse R. Vanderwende Republican Yea
Kevin S Hensley Republican Yea
Lyndon D. Yearick Republican Yea
Michael F. Smith Republican Yea
Richard G. Collins Republican Yea
Ronald E. Gray Republican Yea
Shannon Morris Republican Yea
Timothy D. Dukes Republican Yea

Official roll call →

SM

Passed 21 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 5000
Democratic 11000
Republican 5000
Total 21000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (21)
Member Party Vote
Bruce C. Ennis — Yea
Colin Bonini — Yea
Ernesto B Lopez — Yea
Kyle Evans Gay — Yea
Sarah McBride — Yea
Bryan Townsend Democratic Yea
Darius J. Brown Democratic Yea
David P. Sokola Democratic Yea
John "Jack" Walsh Democratic Yea
Laura V. Sturgeon Democratic Yea
Marie Pinkney Democratic Yea
Nicole Poore Democratic Yea
S. Elizabeth Lockman Democratic Yea
Spiros Mantzavinos Democratic Yea
Stephanie L. Hansen Democratic Yea
Trey Paradee Democratic Yea
Brian Pettyjohn Republican Yea
Bryant L. Richardson Republican Yea
Dave G. Lawson Republican Yea
David L. Wilson Republican Yea
Gerald W. Hocker Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 116 do?
This bill continues the practice of amending periodically the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act (the “Act”) to keep it current and to maintain its national preeminence. The following is a section-by-section review of the proposed amendments of the Act. Section 1. This section amends Section 17-106 of the Act to add subsection (e) to provide a safe harbor procedure for ratifying acts or transactions that may be taken by or in respect of a limited partnership under the Act or a limited partnership agreement that are void or voidable and waiving failures to comply with requirements of a partnership agreement that make such acts and transactions void or voidable. New subsection (e) is intended to provide a rule different from the rule applied in Composecure, L.L.C. v. Cardux, LLC, 206 A.3d 807 (Del. 2018), and Absalom Absalom Trust v. Saint Gervais LLC, 2019 WL 2655787 (Del. Ch. June 27, 2019), that acts or transactions determined to be void generally may not be ratified. The penultimate sentence of new subsection (e) confirms that void or voidable actions may be ratified or requirements may be waived by other means permitted by law, and accordingly, new subsection (e) is not intended to preempt or restrict other valid means of ratifying acts or transactions or waiving requirements or to impair the effectiveness of any valid ratification or waiver previously effected. Section 2. This section amends Section 17-220 of the Act to make a conforming change. Section 3. This section amends Section 17-305 of the Act to make certain clarifying and conforming changes, and to provide that when a limited partner is entitled to obtain information for a stated purpose (whether pursuant to Section 17-305 or a partnership agreement), the limited partner’s right shall be to obtain such information as is necessary and essential to achieving that purpose, unless such right has been expanded or restricted in the partnership agreement. The first sentence of subsection (f) is intended to (i) change current law, as set forth in Murfey v. WHC Ventures, LLC, 236 A.3d 337 (Del. 2020), that the “necessary and essential” test does not apply by default to a limited partner’s contractual right to obtain information from a limited partnership for a stated purpose, and (ii) clarify that the “necessary and essential” test applies to a limited partner’s right under Section 17-305(a) of the Act to obtain information from a limited partnership for a purpose reasonably related to the limited partner’s interest as a limited partner. Section 4. This section amends Section 17-403(c) of the Act to provide that a general partner may delegate any of its rights, powers or duties irrespective of whether it has a conflict of interest with respect to the matter as to which such rights, powers or duties are being delegated, and that the person or persons to whom any such rights, powers or duties are being delegated shall not be deemed conflicted solely by reason of the conflict of interest of the general partner. The amendments to Section 17-403(c) create a different rule than the rule applied in cases such as Wenske v. Bluebell Creameries, Inc., 214 A.3d 958 (Del. Ch. 2019), that a conflicted principal is legally disabled from delegating authority over the subject matter as to which the principal is conflicted even to an independent delegatee. Section 5. This section amends Section 17-1201 of the Act to clarify the effect of subchapter XII of the Act and to provide for the manner in which a limited partnership may become a statutory public benefit limited partnership. Section 6. This section amends Section 17-1202(a) of the Act to provide that a partnership agreement of a statutory public benefit limited partnership must state that the limited partnership is a statutory public benefit limited partnership and must set forth the specific public benefit or benefits to be promoted by the limited partnership, to provide that the partnership agreement shall control as among the partners and other persons who are party to or otherwise bound by the partnership agreement in the event of any inconsistency between the public benefit(s) as set forth in such agreement and the certificate of limited partnership, to require amendment of the certificate of limited partnership of a statutory public benefit limited partnership in specified circumstances, and to clarify the effect of subchapter XII of the Act. Section 7. This section repeals Section 17-1203 of the Act. Section 8. This section amends Section 17-1204 of the Act to make conforming changes. Section 9. This section amends Section 17-1205 of the Act to make a conforming change. Section 10. This section provides that the proposed amendments to the Act shall become effective August 1, 2021.
Who sponsors SB 116?
SB 116 is sponsored by Kyle Evans Gay, Darius J. Brown (Democratic), Bryan Townsend (Democratic), Sean M. Lynn (Democratic), Stephanie L. Hansen (Democratic), Brian Pettyjohn (Republican), William Bush (Democratic), Krista Griffith (Democratic), John L. Mitchell, Gerald L. Brady, and Sarah McBride.
What is the current status of SB 116?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced April 21, 2021. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 116?
Track SB 116 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 116

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 116

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →