California 2017-2018 Regular Session Status: In Committee 1 D cosponsors

AB 962 — State infrastructure financing for seaports.

Last action — From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law authorizes the formation of a seaport infrastructure financing district to finance port or harbor infrastructure projects. Existing law requires that a harbor agency, as defined, prepare an infrastructure financing plan as part of a proposal to form a seaport infrastructure financing district, and requires that the plan meet specified requirements. Existing law authorizes a seaport infrastructure financing district to fund infrastructure projects through tax increment financing, consistent with the infrastructure financing plan and with the agreement of the new seaport infrastructure financing district's affected taxing entities. Existing law, the Bergeson-Peace Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank Act, establishes the Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank within the Governor's Office of Business and Economic Development, and requires the bank to establish criteria, priorities, and guidelines for the selection of projects to receive financial assistance from the bank, including, but not limited to, any combination of grants, loans, and the proceeds of bonds issued by the bank. This bill would require the bank, after consulting with appropriate state and local agencies, to establish criteria, priorities, and guidelines for the selection of infrastructure development and equipment purchase projects submitted by harbor agencies, as defined, for assistance from the bank, as specified. The bill would require the harbor agency to adopt a resolution that includes specified information, including, among other information, the state fiscal and economic impacts estimated to result from the proposed infrastructure development or equipment purchase project. The bill would require the bank to approve the infrastructure development and equipment purchase project if the bank finds that the project is more likely than not to result in the harbor agency's estimated state fiscal and economic impacts and would require the bank to adopt a resolution approving funding, as specified. The bill would authorize the bank to require the harbor agency to meet a specified condition prior to providing the moneys appropriated by the Legislature for the infrastructure development and equipment purchase project.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

  2. Died pursuant to Art. IV, Sec. 10(c) of the Constitution.

  3. In committee: Held under submission.

  4. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  5. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  6. Read second time and amended.

  7. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (January 10).

  8. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (January 9). Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.

  9. (pending re-refer to Com. on L. GOV.)

  10. Assembly Rule 56 suspended. (Page 3677.)

  11. Re-referred to Coms. on J., E.D., & E. and L. GOV. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.

  12. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.

  13. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. Read second time and amended.

  14. Referred to Coms. on L. GOV. and J., E.D., & E.

  15. From printer. May be heard in committee March 19.

  16. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (1)

Not signed on (120)

120 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 120 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

finance transportation
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 962 do?
Existing law authorizes the formation of a seaport infrastructure financing district to finance port or harbor infrastructure projects. Existing law requires that a harbor agency, as defined, prepare an infrastructure financing plan as part of a proposal to form a seaport infrastructure financing district, and requires that the plan meet specified requirements. Existing law authorizes a seaport infrastructure financing district to fund infrastructure projects through tax increment financing, consistent with the infrastructure financing plan and with the agreement of the new seaport infrastructure financing district's affected taxing entities. Existing law, the Bergeson-Peace Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank Act, establishes the Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank within the Governor's Office of Business and Economic Development, and requires the bank to establish criteria, priorities, and guidelines for the selection of projects to receive financial assistance from the bank, including, but not limited to, any combination of grants, loans, and the proceeds of bonds issued by the bank. This bill would require the bank, after consulting with appropriate state and local agencies, to establish criteria, priorities, and guidelines for the selection of infrastructure development and equipment purchase projects submitted by harbor agencies, as defined, for assistance from the bank, as specified. The bill would require the harbor agency to adopt a resolution that includes specified information, including, among other information, the state fiscal and economic impacts estimated to result from the proposed infrastructure development or equipment purchase project. The bill would require the bank to approve the infrastructure development and equipment purchase project if the bank finds that the project is more likely than not to result in the harbor agency's estimated state fiscal and economic impacts and would require the bank to adopt a resolution approving funding, as specified. The bill would authorize the bank to require the harbor agency to meet a specified condition prior to providing the moneys appropriated by the Legislature for the infrastructure development and equipment purchase project.
Who sponsors AB 962?
AB 962 is sponsored by Quirk-Silva, Sharon (Democratic) and Travis Allen.
What is the current status of AB 962?
This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 962?
Track AB 962 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 962

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 962

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →