SB475 — (New Title) relative to pet vendor foster homes, defining pet vendor foster facility, and relative to cruelty to livestock.
Last action — CONFERENCE REPORT ADOPTED
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced November 21, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
Vetoed by Governor Kelly Ayotte (Republican) on August 19, 2026.
Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the House.
Odds of enactment
Moderate chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a moderate chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Passed Senate
Current position in the legislative process.
-
9 sponsors
1 primary, 8 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (6 R · 2 D) — cross-party backing.
-
Failed a recorded vote
Failed 2 recorded votes so far — a real headwind.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Summary
(New Title) relative to pet vendor foster homes, defining pet vendor foster facility, and relative to cruelty to livestock.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
187 added · 17 removedPlain-language change summary
The bill SB 475 has been amended to introduce specific definitions for "pet vendor foster home" and "pet vendor foster facility." This change clarifies what these terms mean within the context of animal care, ensuring that temporary homes for pets are properly regulated and overseen by licensed vendors. Defining these terms helps promote better treatment of animals by ensuring their safety and well-being, particularly for those needing special care, such as pregnant or sick animals. This amendment is important as it strengthens the framework for responsible pet care and supports animal welfare standards in the state.
SB 475 - ASVERSION AMENDEDADOPTED BY THEBOTH SENATEBODIES 03/12/2026 1005s SESSION14May2026... 26-2034 08/09 SENATE BILL 475 AN ACT including a determination of the best interest of the animal in the definition of foster home.
1838h 06/04/2026 2092CofC 06/04/2026 2181EBA SESSION 26-2034 08/09 SENATE BILL 475 AN ACT relative to pet vendor foster homes, defining pet vendor foster facility, and relative to cruelty to livestock.
Energy and Natural Resources ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── AMENDED ANALYSIS This bill includes a determination of the best interest of the animal in the definition of foster home.home and provides procedures for the potential confiscation of livestock involved in cruelty to animal cases.
SB 475 - ASVERSION AMENDEDADOPTED BY THEBOTH SENATEBODIES 03/12/2026 1005s 26-203414May2026... 08/09 STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE In the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand Twenty-Six AN ACT including a determination of the best interest of the animal in the definition of foster home.
1838h 06/04/2026 2092CofC 06/04/2026 2181EBA 26-2034 08/09 STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE In the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand Twenty-Six AN ACT relative to pet vendor foster homes, defining pet vendor foster facility, and relative to cruelty to livestock.
1 New Paragraph;Paragraphs;
Pet Vendor Foster Home;
Amend RSA 437:1 by inserting after paragraph V the following new paragraph:paragraphs:
“Foster“Pet vendor foster home” means a private residence in New Hampshire associated with and inspected by a pet vendor licensed under RSA 437:3 that is used to provide temporary physical custody and care at such private residence for the pet vendor’s animals, includingincluding, but not limited to, pregnant or lactating animals, when it is deemed to be in the best interests of that animal’s health, safety,safety and wellbeing as determined by a New Hampshire licensed veterinarian.
2VII. Effective Date.
This“Pet actvendor shallfoster takefacility” effectmeans 60a daysfacility afterin itsNew passage.Hampshire that may house animals owned and inspected by a pet vendor licensed under RSA 437:1 that is used to provide temporary physical custody and care at such facility for medical or behavioral rehabilitation when it is deemed to be in the best interest of the animal’s health, safety, and wellbeing as determined by a New Hampshire licensed veterinarian.
2 New Paragraphs;
Sale Of Pets And Disposition Of Unclaimed Animals;
Transfer of Animals and Birds;
Requirements.
Amend RSA 437:3 by inserting after paragraph V the following new paragraphs:
VI.
A pet vendor shall report, at least annually and updated as necessary, on all pet vendor foster homes associated with the pet vendor to the department of agriculture, markets, and food to ensure compliance with licensure, animal inventory, and applicable pet limit requirements, as established by department rules pursuant to RSA 541-A.
VII.
Information contained in such pet vendor foster home listings shall be confidential and shall not be subject to public disclosure in accordance with RSA 436:6-a and RSA 91-A.
3 Cruelty to Animals.
Amend RSA 644:8, IV(a)(1) to read as follows:
IV.(a)(1) Any person charged with animal cruelty under paragraphs III or III-a may have his or her animals, except for livestock, confiscated by the arresting officer.
The confiscation of livestock shall be governed by paragraph IV-b.
4 Cruelty to Animals.
Amend RSA 644:8, IV-a(a) to read as follows:
IV-a.(a) Except as provided in subparagraphs (b) and (c) any appropriate law enforcement officer, animal control officer, or officer of a duly licensed humane society may take into temporary SB 475 - VERSION ADOPTED BY BOTH BODIES - Page 2 - protective custody any animal, except for livestock, which shall be governed by paragraph IV- b, when there is probable cause to believe that it has been or is being abused or neglected in violation of paragraphs III or III-a when there is a clear and imminent danger to the animal's health or life and there is not sufficient time to obtain a court order.
Such officer shall leave a written notice indicating the type and number of animals taken into protective custody, the name of the officer, the time and date taken, the reason it was taken, the procedure to have the animal returned and any other relevant information.
Such notice shall be left at the location where the animal was taken into custody.
The officer shall provide for proper care and housing of any animal taken into protective custody under this paragraph.
If, after 7 days, the animal has not been returned or claimed, the officer shall petition the municipal or district court seeking either permanent custody or a one-week extension of custody or shall file charges under this section.
If a week's extension is granted by the court and after a period of 14 days the animal remains unclaimed, the title and custody of the animal shall rest with the officer on behalf of the officer's department or society.
The department or society may dispose of the animal in any lawful and humane manner as if it were the rightful owner.
If after 14 days the officer or the officer's department determines that charges should be filed under this section, the officer shall petition the court.
5 New Paragraphs;
Cruelty to Animals;
Livestock.
Amend RSA 644:8 by inserting after paragraph IV-a the following new paragraphs:
IV-b.(a) Any person charged with cruelty to animals under paragraph III or III-a concerning livestock may have his or her livestock confiscated by the arresting officer.
No animal shall be confiscated unless a person is charged under this section, except when there is probable cause to believe the livestock's life is in imminent danger.
Show all 96 changed lines (56 more)
The investigating officer for a case involving livestock as defined in RSA 427:38, III shall be accompanied by the state veterinarian or designee, to include New Hampshire department of agriculture, markets, and food staff, or a licensed veterinarian, or other qualified staff from an animal shelter facility approved by the state veterinarian, in person or by video who shall determine whether there is probable cause to believe that the livestock should be confiscated.
Livestock confiscated without a warrant where a charge has not been filed shall be returned within 10 days.
(b) The department of justice shall develop a form to be distributed to any person charged with cruelty to animals under paragraph III or III-a, concerning livestock.
The form shall inform the person of their right to have the confiscated livestock examined by a veterinarian licensed under RSA 332-B, chosen by the person charged, at the person's expense.
(c) Courts shall give cases in which livestock have been confiscated by an arresting officer priority on the court calendar, as outlined in RSA 644:8, IV(a)(3).
(d) Any person with proof of sole ownership or co-ownership of the livestock confiscated by an arresting officer in a livestock cruelty case and who is not a defendant or party of interest in the criminal case may petition the court for temporary custody of the livestock.
The court shall give SB 475 - VERSION ADOPTED BY BOTH BODIES - Page 3 - such person priority for temporary custody of the livestock if the court determines it is in the best interest of the livestock's health, safety, and wellbeing.
(e) No custodian of the livestock confiscated under this section shall spay or neuter or otherwise permanently alter the confiscated livestock in his or her custody pending final disposition of the court case unless a treating veterinarian deems such procedure necessary to save the life of the livestock or the owner of the livestock agrees in writing to the procedure or treatment.
If the treating veterinarian believes that livestock which has been confiscated is in a state of suffering and that the cost to alleviate the suffering will exceed the amount of allowable reimbursement as set by Agr 3504.01(c)(8), unless the owner pays for the care, the animal shall be euthanized.
(f) Upon a person's conviction of cruelty to animals regarding livestock, the court shall dispose of the confiscated livestock in any manner it decides except in a case in which the confiscated livestock is owned or co-owned by persons other than the defendant.
If the defendant does not have an ownership interest in the confiscated livestock, the court shall give priority to restoring full ownership rights to any person with proof of ownership if the court determines that such is in the best interest of the livestock's health, safety, and wellbeing.
If the confiscated livestock is co-owned by the defendant, the court shall give priority to transferring the defendant's interest in the property to the remaining owner or co-owners equitably if the court determines that such is in the best interest of the livestock's health, safety, and wellbeing.
(g) The costs to provide the confiscated livestock with humane care and adequate and necessary veterinary services, if any, incurred in boarding and treating the livestock, pending disposition of the case, and in disposing of the livestock upon a conviction of said person for cruelty to animals regarding livestock, shall be borne by the person so convicted in accordance with rules adopted by the department of agriculture, markets, and food.
(h) Any donations raised using the stories or likenesses of the animals in protective custody shall be used to offset the cost of care of such animals.
IV-c.(a) Except as provided in RSA 644:8, IV(b), any appropriate law enforcement officer or municipal animal control officer may take into temporary protective custody any livestock when the owner or caretaker is not present and there is probable cause to believe that it has been or is being abused or neglected in violation of paragraphs III or III-a when there is a clear and imminent danger to the livestock's health or life and there is not sufficient time to obtain a court order.
Such officer shall leave a written notice indicating the type and number of livestock taken into protective custody, the name of the officer, the time and date taken, the reason it was taken, the procedure to have the livestock returned and any other relevant information.
Such notice shall be left at the location where the livestock was taken into custody.
The officer shall provide for proper care and housing of any livestock taken into protective custody under this paragraph.
For any livestock confiscated without a warrant where a charge has not been filed, the confiscated livestock shall be returned within 10 days.
If, after 10 days, the livestock has not been returned or claimed, the officer SB 475 - VERSION ADOPTED BY BOTH BODIES - Page 4 - shall petition the municipal or district court seeking either permanent custody or a one-week extension of custody or shall file charges under this section.
If a week's extension is granted by the court and after a period of 14 days the livestock remains unclaimed, the title and custody of the livestock shall rest with the officer on behalf of the officer's department.
The department may dispose of the livestock in any lawful and humane manner as if it were the rightful owner.
If after 14 days the officer or the officer's department determines that charges should be filed under this section, the officer shall petition the court.
An owner of livestock taken into protective custody shall have the right as referenced in subparagraph IV(b).
(b) For purposes of subparagraph (a), the investigating officer for livestock, as defined in RSA 427:38, III, shall be accompanied by the state veterinarian or their designee in person or by video who shall set the probable cause criteria for taking the livestock.
(c) In cases where one or more lactating livestock is confiscated, proof shall be provided by the confiscating party to the attending veterinarian and the owner or caretaker that proper care and facilities shall be provided for adults and offspring.
No lactating livestock shall be separated from its non-weaned offspring unless such separation is authorized by a licensed veterinarian.
(d) No person, other than the state veterinarian or their designee, or an employee of a government agency with jurisdiction to investigate violations of this section, and who is conducting an investigation under this section, may take part during any investigation into a complaint conducted pursuant to this section.
No person who may be called upon to take custody of any livestock seized as a result of a complaint under this section may participate in the decision to seize any livestock.
The act of making or forwarding a complaint does not make a person part of an investigation and does not render that person ineligible to take animals into custody.
(e) In order to protect the integrity of complaint investigations an appropriate law enforcement officer shall require any person or their designated agent called upon to take custody of any livestock seized or to assist during any complaint investigation, to sign a binding nondisclosure agreement intended to protect any shared or confidential information against unauthorized use pending final adjudication or dismissal of such complaint;
provided that information may be disclosed only to officials with a need to know who are subject to confidentiality obligations.
(f) No custodian of livestock in temporary protective custody under this section shall spay or neuter or otherwise permanently alter the confiscated livestock in his or her custody pending final disposition of the court case unless a treating veterinarian deems such procedure necessary to save the life of the livestock or the owner of the livestock agrees in writing to the procedure or treatment.
If the treating veterinarian believes that livestock which has been confiscated is in a state of suffering and that the cost to alleviate the suffering will exceed the amount of allowable reimbursement as set by Agr 3504.01(c)(8), unless the owner pays for the care or surrenders the animal outright or for care by an animal shelter facility, the animal shall be euthanized.
6 Veterinarian Assistant.
Amend RSA 644:8, V to read as follows:
SB 475 - VERSION ADOPTED BY BOTH BODIES - Page 5 - V.
A veterinarian licensed to practice in the state and the state veterinarian or their designee shall be held harmless from either criminal or civil liability for any decisions made for services rendered under the provisions of this section or RSA 435:11-16.
Such a veterinarian or designee is, therefore, under this paragraph, protected from a lawsuit for his or her part in an investigation of cruelty to animals.
7 State Veterinarian;
Powers.
Amend RSA 436:8 to read as follows:
436:8 Powers.
The state veterinarian, under the direction of the commissioner, shall have all of the powers of the commissioner and shall have general charge of the enforcement of this chapter.
Complaints under RSA 644:8, 644:8-a, 644:8-aa and any other law pertaining to the abuse of domestic animals, as defined under RSA 436:1, shall initially be filed with the local law enforcement agency, animal control officer, state police, or sheriff which has jurisdiction over where the animal is located or kept.
At the request of the local law enforcement agency, animal control officer, state police, or sheriff, the state veterinarian shall assist in a secondary capacity in enforcing the provisions of and investigating said complaints.
[In the event the commissioner becomes incapacitated or a vacancy occurs in the office, the state veterinarian shall perform all the duties of that office during any such incapacity or until any such vacancy is filled.
The commissioner may direct the state veterinarian to act for him or her in an official capacity whenever he or she may be absent from his or her duties.] 8 Repeal.
RSA 644:8, IV-a(b), relative to livestock confiscation, is repealed.
9 Renumbering Contingency.
If SB 535 of the 2026 regular legislative session becomes law, RSA 437:1, VI and VII as inserted by section 1 of this act shall be renumbered as RSA 437:1, VIII and IX.
10 Effective Date.
I.
Sections 3-8 of this act shall take effect January 1, 2027.
II.
The remainder of this act shall take effect upon its passage.
Show all 96 changed rows (56 more)
View plain text versions (4)
- Version adopted by both bodies View text Current pdf
- Amended As Amended by the Senate pdf
- Amended As Amended by the House pdf
- Introduced View text pdf
Action History
-
Notwithstanding the Governor's Veto, Shall SB 475 Become Law: RC 8Y-16N, Veto Sustained, lacking the necessary two-thirds vote; 08/19/2026; SJ 15
-
Vetoed by Governor 07/15/2026
-
Enrolled Adopted, VV, (In recess 06/04/2026); SJ 15
-
Enrolled (in recess of) 06/04/2026 HJ 15
-
Enrolled Bill Amendment # 2026-2181e Adopted, VV, (In recess of 06/04/2026); SJ 14
-
Enrolled Bill Amendment # 2026-2181e: AA VV 06/04/2026 HJ 15 P. 48
-
Conference Committee Report # 2026-2092c, Adopted, VV; 06/04/2026; SJ 14
-
Conference Committee Report 2026-2092c: Adopted, VV 06/04/2026 HJ 15 P. 2
-
Conference Committee Report # 2026-2092c Filed 05/28/2026; As Amended by the House
-
Conferee Change; Senator Lang Replaces Senator Altschiller; SJ 14
-
Conferee Change: Rep. Alexander Jr. Replaces Rep. Freeman 05/26/2026 HJ 14 P. 35
-
Conferee Change: Rep. Freeman Replaces Rep. Bixby 05/22/2026 HJ 14 P. 34
-
Committee of Conference Meeting: 05/26/2026, 01:00 pm, Room 159, GP
-
Speaker Appoints: Reps. J. Aron, Comtois, Bixby, N. Germana 05/21/2026 HJ 14 P. 11
-
House Accedes to Senate Request for CofC (Rep. J. Aron): MA VV 05/21/2026 HJ 14 P. 11
-
President Appoints: Senators Birdsell, Pearl, Altschiller; (In Recess 05/14/2026); SJ 13
-
Sen. Avard Moved Nonconcur with the House Amendment; Requests C of C, MA, VV; (In Recess 05/14/2026); SJ 13
-
Ought to Pass with Amendment 2026-1838h: MA VV 05/14/2026 HJ 13 P. 21
-
Amendment # 2026-1838h: AA VV 05/14/2026 HJ 13 P. 21
-
Committee Report: Ought to Pass with Amendment # 2026-1838h (NT) 05/05/2026 (Vote 15-0; CC) HC 19 P. 13
-
Executive Session: 05/05/2026 10:00 am GP 153
-
Full Committee Work Session: 05/05/2026 10:00 am GP 153
-
Full Committee Work Session: 04/28/2026 10:00 am GP 153
-
Full Committee Work Session: 04/14/2026 01:30 pm GP 153
-
Full Committee Work Session: 04/07/2026 01:00 pm GP 153
-
Public Hearing: 03/31/2026 10:00 am GP 153
-
Introduced (in recess of) 03/12/2026 and referred to Environment and Agriculture HJ 8 P. 114
-
Ought to Pass with Amendment #2026-1005s, MA, VV; OT3rdg; 03/12/2026; SJ 6
-
Committee Amendment # 2026-1005s, AA, VV; 03/12/2026; SJ 6
-
Committee Report: Ought to Pass with Amendment # 2026-1005s, 03/12/2026; Vote 5-0; CC; SC 9
-
Hearing: 02/17/2026, Room 103, SH, 09:30 am; SC 5
-
Introduced 01/07/2026 and Referred to Energy and Natural Resources; SJ 1
Sponsors
- Nicholas Germana · Cosponsor
- Daryl Abbas · Cosponsor
- Wayne MacDonald · Cosponsor
- Daniel Innis · Cosponsor
- Ruth Ward · Cosponsor
- Kevin Avard · Cosponsor
- Regina Birdsell · Primary
- David Watters · Cosponsor
- Suzanne Harvey · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 8 co-sponsors · 406 not signed on · 11 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Regina Birdsell Republican Voted No
Co-sponsors (8)
- Nicholas Germana Democrat
- Daryl Abbas Republican Voted No
- Wayne MacDonald Republican
- Daniel Innis Republican Voted No
- Ruth Ward Republican Voted No
- Kevin Avard Republican
- David Watters Democrat Voted No
- Suzanne Harvey
Not signed on (406)
406 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 406 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 8 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 15 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 35% | 65% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (23)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cindy Rosenwald | Democrat | Nay |
| David Watters | Democrat | Nay |
| Debra Altschiller | Democrat | Nay |
| Donovan Fenton | Democrat | Nay |
| Pat Long | Democrat | Nay |
| Rebecca Perkins Kwoka | Democrat | Nay |
| Suzanne Prentiss | Democrat | Nay |
| Tara Reardon | Democrat | Nay |
| Bill Gannon | Republican | Nay |
| Daniel Innis | Republican | Nay |
| Daryl Abbas | Republican | Nay |
| David Rochefort | Republican | Yea |
| Denise Ricciardi | Republican | Nay |
| Howard Pearl | Republican | Yea |
| James Gray | Republican | Yea |
| Keith Murphy | Republican | Yea |
| Kevin Avard | Republican | Yea |
| Mark McConkey | Republican | Yea |
| Ruth Ward | Republican | Nay |
| Sharon Carson | Republican | Nay |
| Tim McGough | Republican | Yea |
| Timothy Lang | Republican | Nay |
| Victoria Sullivan | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 16 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 33% | 67% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (24)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cindy Rosenwald | Democrat | Nay |
| David Watters | Democrat | Nay |
| Debra Altschiller | Democrat | Nay |
| Donovan Fenton | Democrat | Nay |
| Pat Long | Democrat | Nay |
| Rebecca Perkins Kwoka | Democrat | Nay |
| Suzanne Prentiss | Democrat | Nay |
| Tara Reardon | Democrat | Nay |
| Bill Gannon | Republican | Nay |
| Daniel Innis | Republican | Nay |
| Daryl Abbas | Republican | Nay |
| David Rochefort | Republican | Yea |
| Denise Ricciardi | Republican | Nay |
| Howard Pearl | Republican | Yea |
| James Gray | Republican | Yea |
| Keith Murphy | Republican | Yea |
| Kevin Avard | Republican | Yea |
| Mark McConkey | Republican | Yea |
| Regina Birdsell | Republican | Nay |
| Ruth Ward | Republican | Nay |
| Sharon Carson | Republican | Nay |
| Tim McGough | Republican | Yea |
| Timothy Lang | Republican | Nay |
| Victoria Sullivan | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB475 do?
- (New Title) relative to pet vendor foster homes, defining pet vendor foster facility, and relative to cruelty to livestock.
- Who sponsors SB475?
- SB475 is sponsored by Nicholas Germana (Democrat), Daryl Abbas (Republican), Wayne MacDonald (Republican), Daniel Innis (Republican), Ruth Ward (Republican), Kevin Avard (Republican), Regina Birdsell (Republican), David Watters (Democrat), and Suzanne Harvey.
- What is the current status of SB475?
- This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced November 21, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
- Where can I track SB475?
- Track SB475 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB475
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB475
Last checked for changes about 1 month ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →