New Hampshire 2026 Session Status: Introduced Bipartisan · 1 R · 1 D cosponsors

SB444 — prohibiting the use of animal testing when other comparable methods are available.

Last action — INTERIM STUDY

  1. 1
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced November 21, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.

Next likely step: a committee referral and hearing.

Odds of enactment

Low chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Stalled 28% · moderate confidence
  • Introduced

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 3 sponsors

    1 primary, 2 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Bipartisan support

    Sponsored across 2 parties (1 R · 1 D) — cross-party backing.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Summary

prohibiting the use of animal testing when other comparable methods are available.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

51 added · 129 removed

Plain-language change summary

The recent amendments to Bill SB 444 focus on the use of animals in product testing, particularly eliminating references to cosmetic testing. The revised language prohibits testing facilities from using traditional animal test methods if alternatives have been approved or waivers granted. This is significant because it strengthens the conditions under which animal testing can be performed, promoting more humane practices and supporting the use of alternative testing methods that do not involve animals. Overall, the changes reflect a shift towards better ethical standards in product testing.

→
Previous
Latest
SB 444-FN - AS INTRODUCED SESSION 26-2010 08/06 SENATE BILL 444-FN AN ACT prohibiting the use of animal testing when other comparable methods are available.
SB 444-FN - AS AMENDED BY THE SENATE 03/05/2026 0877s SESSION 26-2010 08/06 SENATE BILL 444-FN AN ACT prohibiting the use of animal testing when other comparable methods are available.
SB 444-FN - AS INTRODUCED 26-2010 08/06 STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE In the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand Twenty-Six AN ACT prohibiting the use of animal testing when other comparable methods are available.
SB 444-FN - AS AMENDED BY THE SENATE 03/05/2026 0877s 26-2010 08/06 STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE In the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand Twenty-Six AN ACT prohibiting the use of animal testing when other comparable methods are available.
1 New Chapter;
 1 New Chapter;
“Cosmetic animal testing” means the internal or external application or exposure of any cosmetic product, or any cosmetic ingredient or nonfunctional constituent, to the skin, eyes, or any other body part, organ, or extremity of an animal for the purpose of evaluating the safety or efficacy of a cosmetic product or a cosmetic ingredient or nonfunctional constituent for use in a cosmetic product.
V.
"Cosmetic” means articles intended to be rubbed, poured, sprinkled, or sprayed on, introduced into, or otherwise applied to the human body or any part thereof for cleansing, beautifying, promoting attractiveness, or altering the appearance, and articles intended for use as a component of any such articles, except that such term shall not include soap.
VI.
“Cosmetic ingredient” means a chemical or mixture used as a component in the manufacture of a cosmetic product, described in 21 C.F.R.
section 700.3(e).
SB 444-FN - AS INTRODUCED - Page 2 - VII.
“Cosmetic manufacturer” means any entity required to specify conspicuously its name and place of business on the label of a cosmetic in package form pursuant to 21 C.F.R.
section 701.12.
VIII.
“Cosmetic product” means a finished cosmetic, the manufacture of which has been completed.
IX.
“Non-functional constituent” means any incidental ingredient as defined in 21 C.F.R.
section 701.3(l).
X.
“Supplier” means any entity that provides, whether directly or through a third party, any cosmetic ingredient used by a manufacturer in the formulation of a cosmetic product.
XI.
XII.
Testing facility does not include an institution of higher education as defined in RSA 188-H:1.
V.
I.(a) No testing facility in the state shall use a traditional animal test method in this state if an agency responsible for regulating the specific product or activity for which the test method is being used has either:
SB 444-FN - AS AMENDED BY THE SENATE - Page 2 - I.(a) No testing facility in the state shall use a traditional animal test method in this state if an agency responsible for regulating the specific product or activity for which the test method is being used has either:
SB 444-FN - AS INTRODUCED - Page 3 - II.
II.
III.
359-V:3 Severability.
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, or any rule or regulation adopted pursuant thereto, to the contrary, the exclusive remedy for enforcing this section shall be the attorney general bringing a civil action in a court of competent jurisdiction to restrain the violation and for other further relief as the court shall determine is proper.
If any provision of this chapter is held invalid, or if its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity does not affect other provisions or applications of this chapter which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.
359-V:3 Prohibition on the Sale or Offer for Sale of Cosmetics.
2 Effective Date.
I.
No cosmetic manufacturer shall knowingly sell or offer for sale in this state any cosmetic if such cosmetic was developed or manufactured using cosmetic animal testing that was conducted or contracted for by the cosmetic manufacturer, or any supplier of the cosmetic manufacturer.
  II.
Paragraph I shall not apply to any of the following:
(a)  Animal testing conducted outside of the United States and in order to comply with a requirement of a foreign regulatory authority;
provided that no evidence derived from the testing was relied upon to substantiate the safety of the cosmetic ingredient or cosmetic product being sold by the manufacturer in the state.
(b)  Animal testing conducted for any cosmetic or cosmetic ingredient subject to regulation under the Chapter V of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C.
section 351 et seq.
(c) Animal testing conducted for an ingredient intended to be used in a product that is not a cosmetic product and conducted pursuant to a requirement of a federal, state, or foreign regulatory authority;
provided that no evidence derived from such testing was relied upon to substantiate the safety of a cosmetic sold in New Hampshire by a cosmetics manufacturer, unless all of the following apply:
(1) There is no alternative test method or strategy to test the safety of the cosmetic ingredient or non-functional constituent;
and (2) There is documented evidence that animal testing was conducted with the intent to use the ingredients in a product other than a cosmetic;
and SB 444-FN - AS INTRODUCED - Page 4 - (3) The ingredient has been used in a product other than cosmetics at least 12 months before the cosmetics manufacturer or cosmetic supplier relied on the results of animal testing.
Show all 57 changed rows (17 more)
Previous
Latest
(d) Animal testing is requested, required, or conducted by a federal or state regulatory authority and all of the following apply:
(1)  There is no alternative test method or strategy to test the safety of the cosmetic ingredient or non-functional constituent;
and (2)  There is a reasonable probability that the ingredient or nonfunctional constituent poses a specific and serious adverse human health risk and the need to conduct animal testing is justified and supported by a detailed research protocol that is proposed as the basis for the evaluation of the cosmetic ingredient or nonfunctional constituent;
and   (3) The cosmetic ingredient or non-functional constituent is in wide use and, in the case of a cosmetic ingredient, cannot be replaced by another cosmetic ingredient capable of performing a similar function.
III.
 This section shall not apply to the following:
  (a)  A cosmetic product, if the cosmetic product in its final form was tested on animals before the effective date of this chapter, even if the cosmetic is manufactured on or after that date, provided that no new animal testing in violation of this chapter occurs after its effective date.
(b)  A cosmetic ingredient if the cosmetic ingredient was tested on animals before the effective date of this chapter, even if the ingredient is manufactured on or after that date, provided that no new animal testing in violation of this chapter occurs after its effective date.
  (c)  A cosmetic manufacturer or cosmetic supplier reviewing, assessing, or retaining evidence from a cosmetic animal test.
(d)  A retailer in the state of New Hampshire who sells but does not manufacture cosmetics.
IV.
 No political subdivision of the state shall establish or continue any prohibition on or relating to cosmetic animal testing, as defined in this section, that is not identical to the prohibitions set forth in this section.
359-V:4  Penalties.
 Notwithstanding RSA 651:2, a cosmetic manufacturer that sells or offers for sale a cosmetic in violation of this chapter shall be guilty of a violation punishable by a fine of not more than $5,000 for the first day of such violation, and an additional fine of $1,000 for each day that the violation continues.
  359-V:5 Severability.
If any provision of this chapter is held invalid, or if its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity does not affect other provisions or applications of this chapter which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.  2 Effective Date.
LBA 26-2010 11/18/25 SB 444-FN- FISCAL NOTE AS INTRODUCED AN ACT prohibiting the use of animal testing when other comparable methods are available.
LBA 26-2010 3/10/26 SB 444-FN- FISCAL NOTE AS AMENDED BY THE SENATE (AMENDMENT #2026-0877s) AN ACT prohibiting the use of animal testing when other comparable methods are available.
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Executive Session: 10/14/2026 10:00 am GP 229

  2. Subcommittee Work Session: 09/30/2026 10:10 am GP 229

  3. Refer for Interim Study: MA VV 05/14/2026 HJ 13 P. 2

  4. Committee Report: Refer for Interim Study 04/29/2026 (Vote 13-2; CC) HC 19 P. 6

  5. Subcommittee Work Session: 04/28/2026 10:00 am GP 229

  6. Executive Session: 04/29/2026 10:00 am GP 229

  7. Subcommittee Work Session: 04/21/2026 01:15 pm GP 229

  8. Public Hearing: 04/08/2026 01:15 pm GP 229

  9. Introduced (in recess of) 03/12/2026 and referred to Commerce and Consumer Affairs HJ 8 P. 114

  10. Ought to Pass with Amendment #2026-0877s, MA, VV; OT3rdg; 03/05/2026; SJ 5

  11. Sen. Innis Floor Amendment # 2026-0877s, AA, VV; 03/05/2026; SJ 5

  12. Committee Amendment # 2026-0778s, AF, VV; 03/05/2026; SJ 5

  13. SB 444 was Removed from the Consent Calendar; 03/05/2026; SJ 5

  14. Committee Report: Ought to Pass with Amendment # 2026-0778s, 03/05/2026; Vote 5-0; CC; SC 8

  15. Hearing: 01/20/2026, Room 100, SH, 11:00 am; SC 1

  16. Introduced 01/07/2026 and Referred to Commerce; SJ 1

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 412 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (2)

Not signed on (412)

412 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 412 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB444 do?
prohibiting the use of animal testing when other comparable methods are available.
Who sponsors SB444?
SB444 is sponsored by Daniel Innis (Republican), Pat Long (Democrat), and Suzanne Harvey.
What is the current status of SB444?
This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced November 21, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Where can I track SB444?
Track SB444 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB444

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB444

Last checked for changes 7 days ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →