HB 2505 — Provides that a grandparent shall be given priority if it is in the best interest of the child to be placed in the custody of a third party
Last action — Placed on Informal Calendar - SA 1 adopted, SA 2 pending
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has passed the House. Introduced December 17, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the Senate.
Odds of enactment
Moderate chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a moderate chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Passed House
Current position in the legislative process.
-
5 sponsors
1 primary, 4 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (3 R · 2 D) — cross-party backing.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 3 recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
In plain language
Grandparents are prioritized for custody if it serves the child's best interest.
This bill amends custody laws to give priority to grandparents when determining custody arrangements if it benefits the child. The court must always decide custody based on the best interests of the child.
What this means for you
- Families: This bill may affect family dynamics by prioritizing grandparents in custody cases.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
2 added · 1 removedPlain-language change summary
The bill HB 2505 has been updated to reflect changes in its official classification, shifting from version "C" to version "P." This change indicates that the bill has gone through additional revisions and is now considered a perfected version. This matters because a perfected version typically means it has been refined and is closer to being finalized for approval, potentially increasing its chances of becoming law.
SECOND REGULAR SESSION [PERFECTED] HOUSE COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR HOUSE BILL NOS.
2505 & 2044 103RD GENERAL ASSEMBLY 6301H.02C6301H.02P JOSEPH ENGLER, Chief Clerk AN ACT To repeal section 452.375, RSMo, and to enact in lieu thereof one new section relating to the custody of children.
Such presumption is rebuttable only by a preponderance of the evidence in accordance with all relevant factors, EXPLANATION — Matter enclosed in bold-faced brackets [thus] in the above bill is not enacted and is intended to be omitted from the law.
HCS HBs 2505 & 2044 2 rebuttable only by a preponderance of the evidence in accordance with all relevant factors, including, but not limited to, the factors contained in subdivisions (1) to (8) of this subsection.
HCS HBs 2505 & 2044 3 (a) A felony violation of section 566.030, 566.031, 566.032, 566.060, 566.061, 566.062, 566.064, 566.067, 566.068, 566.083, 566.100, 566.101, 566.111, 566.151, 566.203, 566.206, 566.209, 566.211, or 566.215;
HCS HBs 2505 & 2044 3 (b) A violation of section 568.020;
HCS HBs 2505 & 2044 4 (4) Sole custody to either parent;
HCS HBs 2505 & 2044 4 (a) When the court finds that each parent is unfit, unsuitable, or unable to be a custodian, or the welfare of the child requires, and it is in the best interests of the child, then custody, temporary custody or visitation may be awarded to a person related by consanguinity or affinity to the child with priority given to the grandparent or grandparents of the child.
Such plan may be a parenting plan submitted by the parties pursuant to section 452.310 or, in the absence thereof, a plan determined by the court, but in all cases, the HCS HBs 2505 & 2044 5 custody plan approved and ordered by the court shall be in the court's discretion and shall be in the best interest of the child.
HCS HBs 2505 & 2044 5 10.
Except as otherwise precluded by state or federal law, if any individual, professional, public or private institution or organization denies access or fails to provide or disclose any and all records and information, including, but not limited to, past and present dental, medical and school records pertaining to a minor child, to either parent upon the written request of such parent, the court shall, upon its finding that the individual, professional, public or private institution or organization denied such request without good HCS HBs 2505 & 2044 6 cause, order that party to comply immediately with such request and to pay to the prevailing HCS HBs 2505 & 2044 6 party all costs incurred, including, but not limited to, attorney's fees and court costs associated with obtaining the requested information.
View plain text versions (4)
- Perfected View text Current pdf
- Committee Substitute House Committee Substitute pdf
- Committee Substitute Senate Committee Substitute pdf
- Introduced View text pdf
Action History
-
Placed on Informal Calendar - SA 1 adopted, SA 2 pending
-
SS Offered
-
Taken Up for Third Reading (S)
-
Placed on Informal Calendar
-
SCS Reported Do Pass (S)
-
SCS Voted Do Pass (S)
-
Executive Session Held (S)
-
Public Hearing Held (S)
-
Public Hearing Scheduled (S) - Wednesday, April 8, 2026, 8:15 a.m., Senate Lounge - 3rd Floor
-
Public Hearing Scheduled (S) - CANCELLED: Wednesday, April 1, 2020, 8:15 a.m., Senate Lounge-3rd Floor
-
Second read and referred: Judiciary and Civil and Criminal Jurisprudence(S)
-
Reported to the Senate and First Read (S)
-
Third Read and Passed (H) - AYES: 144 NOES: 0 PRESENT: 0
-
Taken Up for Third Reading (H)
-
Perfected (H)
-
HCS Adopted (H)
-
Title of Bill - Agreed To
-
Taken Up for Perfection (H)
-
Placed on the Informal Perfection Calendar (H)
-
Reported Do Pass (H) - AYES: 11 NOES: 0 PRESENT: 0
-
Voted Do Pass (H)
-
Executive Session Completed (H)
-
Referred: Rules - Legislative(H)
-
HCS Reported Do Pass (H) - AYES: 14 NOES: 0 PRESENT: 0
-
HCS Voted Do Pass (H)
-
Executive Session Completed (H)
-
Public Hearing Completed (H)
-
Referred: Children and Families(H)
-
Read Second Time (H)
-
Read First Time (H)
-
Prefiled (H)
Sponsors
- John Hewkin · Cosponsor
- Deanna Self · Cosponsor
- Marty Joe Murray · Cosponsor
- Marla Smith · Cosponsor
- David Dolan · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 4 co-sponsors · 194 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- David Dolan Republican
Co-sponsors (4)
- John Hewkin Republican
- Deanna Self Republican
- Marty Joe Murray Democratic
- Marla Smith Democratic
Not signed on (194)
194 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 194 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 2505?
- HB 2505 is sponsored by John Hewkin (Republican), Deanna Self (Republican), Marty Joe Murray (Democratic), Marla Smith (Democratic), and David Dolan (Republican).
- What is the current status of HB 2505?
- This bill has passed the House. Introduced December 17, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
- Where can I track HB 2505?
- Track HB 2505 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 2505
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 2505
Last checked for changes about 1 month ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →